collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

The Altercation by MuggsyB
[Today at 02:12:06 PM]


What would make you show Shaka the door in March? by MuggsyB
[Today at 02:06:51 PM]


NM by MU82
[Today at 01:01:04 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by Jay Bee
[Today at 12:41:54 PM]


Zaide Didn’t Travel With Team by ATL MU Warrior
[Today at 11:51:30 AM]


[Paint Touches] Marquette Minutes Projections for 2026 by Jay Bee
[Today at 09:25:42 AM]


2026 Transfer Portal Wishlist by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 01:19:26 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

PaintTouchesSays

Post-game thoughts: Cincinnati blows out Marquette
      


Written by: Mark Strotman
            


Well, the Golden Eagles have played better, but this certainly isn't any cause for concern. It's never good to lose the way Marquette did tonight, but the combination of Cincinnati's stifling zone and ability to beat the Golden Eagles at ... Continue reading →


         

http://painttouches.com/2012/02/29/post-game-thoughts-cincinnati-blows-out-marquette/
      

JTBMU7

Agree with most of this, but not on the 2-3 being the way to stop us.

MU has shredded zones the past 4 weeks - consistently getting the ball in the paint. This was the comment in our first few games and it's not true. The fact is we were slow, out played and out hustled all night on both ends. Just facing a 2-3 is not the main reason.

strotty

Playing against a 2-3 zone while in a half court offense (without Gardner) has killed Marquette. Even if they start the possession in transition and then set up the half court it works wonders. But in a true half court offense, they're lost against a team with a big man.

JTBMU7

i'm not saying the zone doesnt slow things down, it does. but playing against the zone is nothing new, and we have beaten it consistently this season. it certainly has not killed us...

the root of our problems last night stem from defense and off rebounding. if we dont get stops, we can't push the ball, whether they are playing zone, man, whatever, when you go against a set D after a make it's tough. theoretically off rebounds should be easier against a 2-3, but that wasnt the case in the first 20 minutes.

Cincy is not a great offensive team and we gave up 70 points. just played really poorly on that side of the floor.

Henry Sugar

I don't think it was either Cincy's zone or Marquette's defense.  MU has played plenty of zones, and Cincy only scored 1.03 ppp last night.  That's not a good defensive effort, but Marquette wins most nights if they allow that.

It's all about the turnovers.  Marquette had their third sloppiest night protecting the ball all season (1/4 possessions), and their worst night of forcing turnovers all season long (1/10 possessions).  Ballgame.

Let's also give some credit to Cincy, which is the #10 team at protecting the ball and the #96 at forcing turnovers.

I doubt most opponents are going to be able to replicate Cincy's approach against MU.  Not unless they are bringing turnover differential, shot-blocking, home court advantage, and a second game against Marquette.
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

Previous topic - Next topic