[Cracked Sidewalks] Preseason Roundtable: Replacing Butler

[CrackedSidewalksSays]

Preseason Roundtable: Replacing Butler

Written by: noreply@blogger.com (Alan Bykowski)

We're only a few days away from the opening of Marquette's season, but  it still feels like there are plenty of questions that need to be  answered. To address these questions, we've brought the Cracked  Sidewalks crew together, including one of our regular guest  contributors, Dr. Blackheart. Here's the first query:

How will Marquette replace Jimmy Butler?

Alan:  You don't replace a guy like JFB, at least not with one player. I think  that you'll see Jamil take up a big part of his scoring and rebounding,  and hopefully Jae and DJO can also see an uptick to offset Jimmy's  loss. My real concern is on defense. I think Vander needs to step  forward as the guy who can guard anyone. He may not start, but he can  get 25 minutes off the bench as a stopper at multiple positions. If that  happens, we should move on without missing a beat.

Dr. Blackheart:  You cannot replace his "smarts", but Jamil Wilson is more athletic, and  more versatile offensively with his perimeter shooting, passing, and  dribbling. The combination of Wilson, Crowder, Otule, and Gardner will  have to deliver on the JFB intangibles.

James:  Likely cannot replace his versatility and leadership. He was a 1st  round draft choice and I don't see another one on the bench to take his  place. Wilson will be part of the answer. Crowder will be the other  part. I think Jae has a monster year.

John:  Jamil Wilson. Marquette was terrible on defense last year until Butler  started moving around the court to guard the likes of Kemba Walker and  Tu Holloway. At 6'7" with length, Jamil gives Buzz the same kind of  option to come up with a scheme to improve the defense. While on the  court as a FRESHMAN at Oregon, Jamil was actually a better rebounder  both offensively and defensively than Jimmy was as a SENIOR (grabbed  8.5% of Oregon's misses to Jimmy's 8.2% of Marquette's, and 15%-12%  advantage on defensive rebounds). Jamil was just as good a shot blocker  as Jae (3.3% of opponent's shots) which is three times as many blocks as  Jimmy and means MU will have two of the best shot-blocking forwards in  the country along with the best shot-blocking center in the Big East,  which makes it more likely MU can hold down opponents FG percentages  even with the guards going for steals. Obviously Marquette cannot  replace Jimmy's ability to get to the line, but Jamil could replace him  where MU needs it even more -- on defense. The fact that Jamil steps  into Jimmy's role is the reason that the improvement of all the  returning players should make MU a better team this year than last.

Kevin:  You don't replace guys, one for one, the other players on the team pick  up the slack. DJO and Jae add 2-3 ppg, Vander (please, please, please)  adds 3-4 ppg. Otule, Gardner, and Wilson chip in.

Rob:  I don't think they will. It's too difficult to replace one of the most  efficient players in MU history, who could also be dialed in  consistently every night. However, MU didn't exactly replace Hayward  either (Crowder was not the same), nor did they replace the Three  Amigos. To me, a more interesting question is how will MU look  differently this year and still be great offensively. Because you know  MU will still have a great offense this year.

Tim:  Logic says Jamil Wilson. Wilson was the best athlete in the program  last year, and a full year of acclimation should make him an immediate  impact player. That said, Butler won't be replaced -- the team will play  differently. With DJO and Crowder, MU already has two go-to scorers and  Wilson's flexibility will create fits for the opposition. Realizing  that last season MU had one of the least experienced rosters in the Big  East & now has one of the most veteran squads, replacing graduates  -- even one as talented as JFB -- is not a concern.

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2011/11/preseason-roundtable-replacing-butler.html