collapse

Resources

Stud of Xavier Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross5
James Jr3
Parham1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Really Good Day for the Future of Marquette Basketball by rocky_warrior
[Today at 11:08:22 PM]


Shaka cost us the game tonite by MarquetteMike1977
[Today at 10:36:03 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by MuggsyB
[Today at 09:15:02 PM]


2026 Coaching Carousel by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 09:01:12 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by K1 Lover
[Today at 07:17:06 PM]


Marquette Team Rankings by Newsdreams
[Today at 07:16:49 PM]


MU/XU Game Thread by willie warrior
[Today at 11:36:52 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up:  St. John's

Marquette
88
Marquette vs
St. John's
Date/Time: Feb 18, 2026, 8:00pm
TV: TNT
Schedule for 2025-26
Xavier
96

CrackedSidewalksSays

9 Quintillion to 1 for a perfect bracket.  By the second game of the second round, no one was left.

DePaul University mathematics professor Jeff Bergen figured out the odds for a perfect NCAA bracket. A mind boggling 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 1. That's 9 quintillion, basically a digit with 18 zeros after it....click link for more

Source: 9 Quintillion to 1 for a perfect bracket.  By the second game of the second round, no one was left.

Dr. Blackheart

Interesting view on the random effects of game theory where each game is 50/50 like a flip of a coin. Of course, a NCAA game is not 50/50 crapshoot of random effects as talent, skill, athleticism, officiating, coaching (and in Dayton's case, home court advantage) come into play.  I prefer Pomeroy, who has a predictive system based on many of these factors, and weights them appropriately, including looking at Luck, based on the past.

For example, under Pomeroy, Kentucky has a 33.8% chance of winning it all. Or, one in three. Georgetown had a 33.9% of making the S16 while Utah had a 51.7% chance.  Nova, on the other hand, had a 81.6% chance of making the Sweet 16.

A crapshoot, like featured on in the article, assumes equal odds. Your most important point has to do with sample size--the one game where some of these other factors away from a team's tendency, come into play for a game--and would go back to the norm in a 4 or 7 game playoff.  Like in the Nova game where they had their worst eFG% game of the season (Nova's far and away strength), while not being able to rebound better than their average (which has been middling all year anyway)...and the match up with NCST who controlled those boards by 13 (and possessions in a one possession game). One game out of their norm killed them.

Is it pure luck (crapshoot with equal odds) or a team (NCST) controlling the strengths of their opponent (eFG%) while exploiting their match-up advantage (rebounding)?  I credit NCST vs. George Washington like you.

BTW, I am winning my bracket following Pomeroy.

Previous topic - Next topic