collapse

Resources

Stud of Oklahoma Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

James vs Jones by GoldenEagles03
[Today at 04:52:45 PM]


Front court starters by Jay Bee
[Today at 03:58:42 PM]


Hard to maintain interest by Mu8891
[Today at 03:53:58 PM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by BM1090
[Today at 03:16:13 PM]


2025-26 Big East Thread by panda
[Today at 02:42:45 PM]


Shaka’s game management by Big Papi
[Today at 01:29:12 PM]


FIB City RGL by MU Fan in Connecticut
[Today at 10:50:49 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Valparaiso

Marquette
74
Marquette vs.
Valparaiso
Date/Time: Dec 2, 2025, 7:00pm
TV: ESPN+
Schedule for 2025-26
Oklahoma
75

CrackedSidewalksSays

9 Quintillion to 1 for a perfect bracket.  By the second game of the second round, no one was left.

DePaul University mathematics professor Jeff Bergen figured out the odds for a perfect NCAA bracket. A mind boggling 9,223,372,036,854,775,808 to 1. That's 9 quintillion, basically a digit with 18 zeros after it....click link for more

Source: 9 Quintillion to 1 for a perfect bracket.  By the second game of the second round, no one was left.

Dr. Blackheart

Interesting view on the random effects of game theory where each game is 50/50 like a flip of a coin. Of course, a NCAA game is not 50/50 crapshoot of random effects as talent, skill, athleticism, officiating, coaching (and in Dayton's case, home court advantage) come into play.  I prefer Pomeroy, who has a predictive system based on many of these factors, and weights them appropriately, including looking at Luck, based on the past.

For example, under Pomeroy, Kentucky has a 33.8% chance of winning it all. Or, one in three. Georgetown had a 33.9% of making the S16 while Utah had a 51.7% chance.  Nova, on the other hand, had a 81.6% chance of making the Sweet 16.

A crapshoot, like featured on in the article, assumes equal odds. Your most important point has to do with sample size--the one game where some of these other factors away from a team's tendency, come into play for a game--and would go back to the norm in a 4 or 7 game playoff.  Like in the Nova game where they had their worst eFG% game of the season (Nova's far and away strength), while not being able to rebound better than their average (which has been middling all year anyway)...and the match up with NCST who controlled those boards by 13 (and possessions in a one possession game). One game out of their norm killed them.

Is it pure luck (crapshoot with equal odds) or a team (NCST) controlling the strengths of their opponent (eFG%) while exploiting their match-up advantage (rebounding)?  I credit NCST vs. George Washington like you.

BTW, I am winning my bracket following Pomeroy.

Previous topic - Next topic