collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75


ringout

2 things

Ben Averkamp, wow!

How pathetic would the BADger offense be without Jordan Taylor?

bilsu

Quote from: ringout on May 26, 2011, 11:12:07 AM
2 things

Ben Averkamp, wow!

How pathetic would the BADger offense be without Jordan Taylor?
I think these numbers are interesting and make for good discussion. There is no doubt that Taylor ws the key player for the badgers. However, I do not think you can say the badgers would have average 7 points less agame without him. In fact the offense would have been less dominated by one person and could of actually scored more points. Taylor allowed them to run the possession clock down to the final seconds, because he could break the other team down one on one. Take Taylor out and they may have actually had to play faster on offense as UW had no other player like him to consistantly get off a good last second shot.

rocky_warrior

> There is a defensive component to this, but I'm saving that for another post. Check back!

So, next he's going to channel Henry Sugar?

marquette99

Just to clarify on how many fewer points wisconsin would have scored without him - the value add is based on points scored PER TRIP.  So hypothetically, if with taylor they had averaged 50 trips per game and scored 55 points a game, and. Without him they had been a slightly less boring 60 points in 60 trips, then the system would say the badgers scored 10 percent more points PER TRIP with him.  The system would be right at the same time that your prediction would be right, because they would have actually scored 5 more points without him.

However, his offense would have been valuable because there's a better chance of winning when scoring 55 boring points but only giving your opponemt 50 trips to match you, then of scoring 60 points at a faster clip that gave your opponents 60 return trips to top you 60.

Henry Sugar

You may be overstating the reputation of the Chicago Now blogs a bit.

That said, Pudner does a great job of getting the blog picked up by some of the national pundits. 
A warrior is an empowered and compassionate protector of others.

brewcity77

Really nice mention. Good to see someone else can appreciate Pudner's massive statgeek abilities ;D

bamamarquettefan

Quote from: Henry Sugar on May 26, 2011, 03:14:46 PM
You may be overstating the reputation of the Chicago Now blogs a bit.

That said, Pudner does a great job of getting the blog picked up by some of the national pundits. 

Thanks!  I can't pretend to know how big Chicago Now's following is, or Big Apple Buckets, which has run a few nice follow-ups, though I can't seem to pull them up now (http://nycbuckets.com.)

I guess at very least I've managed to go beyond annoying some of our MU fans to annoying at least a few people in the 1st and 2nd city :-)
The www.valueaddsports.com analysis of basketball, football and baseball players are intended to neither be too hot or too cold - hundreds immerse themselves in studies of stats not of interest to broader fan bases (too hot), while others still insist on pure observation (too cold).

Previous topic - Next topic