[Cracked Sidewalks] Losing by double digits is worse; Otule's defensive dominance only bright spot

[CrackedSidewalksSays]

Losing by double digits is worse; Otule's defensive dominance only bright spot

Written by: jpudner@concentricgrasstops.com (bamamarquettefan1)

The best shot blocker in the Big East, Chris Otule, once again rejected more than 10% of all 2-point shots while he was on the court to hold St. John’s to 47.8% on two-pointers.

That’s the end of the good news.  A loss is not a loss.

From the Vanderbilt to Villanova games, win or lose, MU was one of the most consistently good teams in the country, playing like a Top 20 team (Sagarin score of 88 or higher) in nine of 10 big games.  The 3-game skid since then culminated last night with MU playing like 247th place Elon.

88+ Sagarin score â€" 9 of 10 games thru Nova
81 Sagarin score vs. USF
84 Sagarin score vs. Georgetown
67 Sagarin score vs. St. John’s

A score of 67 for the 12-point home loss to St. John’s means MU was as good as the 247th best team in the country, Elon, last night, or equal to Auburn and Wake Forest, by far the worst teams in any BCS conference.

MUs first double digit loss (only Ohio State, Pitt, BYU, Belmont and, uggghhhh, Wisconsin still don’t have one as St. John’s also knocked out Duke and Arkansas knocked out Vandy since my first post) hurts because this is the first game in two years in which MU just failed the eyeball test â€" not looking like a tournament team to evaluators who watched the game or simply saw the score.

If this turns out to be a 3-game dip and MU returns to its “top 20-level play,” we still make the tournament, but if we continue to play at the “skid” level of the last three games we don’t.  The fact is MU probably gets one of the four needed wins even if it plays at the “skid-level” against Providence and probably falls short even if it plays at its “top 20-level” at UConn, so that leaves MU needing to win 3 of 4 games for a bid:

Win 3 of 4 to make tourney

Seton Hall twice.  As noted in an earlier post, since Hazell’s return Seton Hall has played at a Sagarin level of 84, and they continued that since my column with a win at Rutgers and narrow loss vs. Nova.  At the “skid-level” MU probably loses both games to Seton Hall starting Saturday at home and goes to the NIT, but a return to the “Top-20” level play for both matchups and MU sweeps Seton Hall and needs just one other win.

Cincinnati.  This is by far the biggest game remaining.  The Bearcats, St. John’s and MU were considered to be fighting for the 9th, 10th and 11th Big East bids and with St. John’s going into the other two gyms to win, they are in.  Cincy at MU will determine if MU would be the 10th bid or the 11th bid, and the former is much more likely.  Cincy has played at an 84-level, the same level as Seton Hall since Hazell’s return, so again if MU rebounds to the Top-20 level they handle Cincy in the Bradley Center.  At the skid level, probably not.

1st Round Big East.  An opening round game in the Big East might entail a rematch with South Florida, a game that MU might pull out again even playing at the “skid” level, but would certainly win easily at the “Top 20” level.

Otule’s defensive dominance

All year it appeared MUs only weaknesses were giving up offensive rebounds and the related fact of yielding a very high two-point field goal percentage.
Chris Otule has singled-handedly fixed those problems.

I noted that Otule had become the top shotblocker in the Big East, basically rejecting one in every 10 shots while he is on the court.  And let me add that they have been great blocks that give MU possession by batting the ball down on the court or into the backboard - not the swat into the 10th row that many players do to give the opposing team the ball back with no harm done.

Despite MU being on its heels on many SJU possessions due to an incredible 13 steals, Otule’s presence underneath made the half court defense so good that overall SJU hit the exact national average, 47.8%, of their two-pointers.

Otule also grabbed 8 rebounds to enable MU to win the rebounding battle and limit SJU to a below average 30.5% offensive rebounding.

I didn’t have time to break down the stats with Otule on the court, which are undoubtedly even better, but the fact is Otule has single-handedly taken care of MUs only two weaknesses.

Obviously Otule is an offensive liability due to weaknesses catching passes and passing back out of the post.  Let Davante Gardner play offense and Otule play defense and MU has a dominant center.  Even not being able to do that, MU is getting its best production at the center spot since Robert Jackson’s glorious one year.

While that has been solved for the moment, Georgetown and SJU have exploited the other potential weakness that was always there â€" the fact that MU really plays two shooting guards without a true point guard.  MU was number one in the Big East in turnover margin prior to the Georgetown game, but was only even with a Georgetown team that had to that point been terrible, and then lost last night due to the 18-9 margin in favor of SJU and the fact that 13 of those turnovers were actual steals.

Give Lavin credit, he had three players foul out by playing aggressively enough to get the turnovers, but it was worth it for him.

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2011/02/losing-by-double-digits-is-worse-otules.html

[Blackhat]

Props to Otule!

He has improved a ton since he has gotten here.  Still inconsistent but his occasional presence in the middle has been something we haven't seen in a long time.

Just needs consistency now.  keep up the hard work Chris!

[marquette99]

Agreed. Hate to have the big man not get rewarded with a win for a great outing, but he is doing his part.

[Dr. Blackheart]

This was a faster (70 possessions) paced game (Buzz's style and as reflected with our 2nd half lead), but our legs and minds were not in this.  MU is tired and this is a wake up call for the team which I am sure they will respond to. They are taking today off to rest and regroup, look in the mirror and get back in the saddle.  Some observations.

• SJU had 13 steals and MU had 18 TO's. MU's guard play has been the biggest surprise for me this year--and not in a good way. Our guard play simply killed us as this is a game MU should have won statistically (as they were in the 2nd half)
• MU is now 1-13 the past two seasons in "grinder" games against ranked or NCAA teams where we score 70 or fewer points.  When MU's high motion offense is taken away or we struggle in it, we then force play instead of feeding the low post (and we need our guards learn to how to feed the post).  And how many open looks did MU pass up last night?  Also, this is another reason MU needs a defensive scheme based on stops. SJU's finishing run was torture as MU folded.
• Thank you State of Wisconsin for completely shutting down I-94 East (South). The extra 50 minutes was one last kick in the nads after I was one of 12 fans who actually stayed till the final buzzer.  These 8:00PM starts are just not a good idea. Attendance was listed as 17K plus but I think there was 12K in the house.  The booing and lack of vibe reflected on our fans.
• MU's coaching staff was pantsed.  Dunlop and Keady are a very nice luxury.
• Chris and Jimmy were outstanding.  JFB had an All BE game despite the gloom of it...just needs to be more selfish.

Ok...the drip is all out....no doubt these guys will respond after some time for adjustments. As bad as it felt, BE basketball is just awesome to watch night in and out.  Give SJU credit.

[bilsu]

We had to win this game. Wheter it was a one point loss or 12 point loss does not matter.

[Henry Sugar]

Stats by the Half

1H (MU vs SJU)
Efficiency (0.97 vs 1.01)
eFG% (43% vs 52%)
TO% (20% vs 19%)
OR% (25% vs 21%)
FTR (54% vs 41%)

Tie game, but SJU was more efficient in the 1H and had an advantage on eFG%.  Slight advantages for TO's and OR's to SJU and MU, respectively.

2H (MU vs SJU)
Efficiency (0.94 vs 1.27)
eFG% (53% vs 47%)
TO% (31% vs 6%)
OR% (31% vs 41%)
FTR (70% vs 53%)

MU actually shot the ball more efficiently than SJU and won the FTR battle (BFD).  Too bad they turned the ball over almost one out of every three trips down the floor.  2H defense was terrible overall, okay on eFG%, terrible on forcing TO's and average at OR%.