collapse

Resources

2024-2025 SOTG Tally


2024-25 Season SoG Tally
Jones, K.10
Mitchell6
Joplin4
Ross2
Gold1

'23-24 '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Recruiting as of 7/15/25 by JTJ3
[Today at 03:31:05 PM]


Nash Walker commits to MU by Nukem2
[Today at 01:21:14 PM]


More conference realignment talk by WhiteTrash
[Today at 12:16:36 PM]


2025-26 Schedule by Shaka Shart
[Today at 01:36:32 AM]


Marquette freshmen at Goolsby's 7/12 by BCHoopster
[July 09, 2025, 10:13:46 PM]


Kam update by MuggsyB
[July 09, 2025, 02:51:24 PM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: A long offseason

Marquette
66
Marquette
Scrimmage
Date/Time: Oct 4, 2025
TV: NA
Schedule for 2024-25
New Mexico
75

CrackedSidewalksSays

Hold on to your ass....the first domino has fallen...conference realignment begins

Written by: noreply@blogger.com (muwarrior92)




Well, we've all known it's coming and the first domino dropped today.  Nebraska is going to the Big Ten, which is perfect since the "N" stands for knowledge and the Big Ten already had 11 schools in the fold.  A marriage in heaven.  One of the most boring brands of football played (at Nebraska) now goes to easily the most boring football conference in America, the Big Ten.

Most likely the destruction of the Big 12 is all but assured, with 4 to 6 schools likely to go to the Pac Ten (soon to be Pac 14 or Pac 16).   But that's only where the initial fun begins, and more importantly where Marquette is is impacted greatly.

Without football, Marquette is a bystander while all the girls get invited to the dance, even the really ugly ones with bad breath and hairy arm pits.  The reason is simple, no football means not wanted in conference realignment, at least from a BCS perspective.

Now, it's possible (perhaps even likely) that my view point is skewed and in Debbie Downer overdrive, but let's just play along and say it isn't.   Here's what could be happening and fast.

Nebraska to the Big Ten.  Are they done? Maybe, but could add 2 to 4 more (Missouri, Rutgers, Pittsburgh, Syracuse, etc)
6 Big 12 schools to the Pac Ten  Pac 16

What does the SEC do?  They sure as hell aren't going to sit on 12 schools and give up that revenue.  Look for them to add 4 schools either from the Big East or the ACC (Florida State, South Florida, West Virginia, Louisville, are all candidates)

How about the ACC?  Will they try to cut the SEC off at the pass and grab Syracuse, Rutgers and maybe Pitt and some other school?

Which leaves us with the Big East, the weakest of the BCS football conferences to begin with.  In my eyes, this conference is dead, at least in football.  It's going to lose prominent members, not gain them for football.  Sure, Central Florida or Memphis might want to join, or Houston and even a Kansas or Kansas State, but that's a patch work situation.

Marquette, Villanova, St. John's, DePaul, Georgetown?  What becomes of these schools?  Could there be some kind of conference alliances that allow members to be in football for one conference but basketball for another?  Unlikely, but wilder things have happened.

It is entirely possible if enough of the Big East football members find other homes that the Big East is relegated to a basketball only conference.  At that point, you embrace that legacy and history and make it the best basketball only league you can.  You add Xavier, UMass, maybe Saint Louis and Temple.  Let's face it, good programs (some even very good) but not the Big East.

At the end of the day, if all this happens, then MU is going to be in a BCS-less conference which is not a good thing.  As Bill Self of Kansas put it bluntly, "I'm not in panic mode yet, but I'm very concerned," Self said. "I believe that Kansas will be OK no matter what, but for us to continue to compete at the level where we've been competing, and recruit at that level, I really believe that we need to be aligned with a BCS conference."

Bill Self is right and you don't have to be in Kansas anymore to share that same line of thinking.

So grab you asses folks, because the next month plus is going to be a wild ride that could have a profound affect on Marquette University athletics and the Big East for decades to come.

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2010/06/hold-on-to-your-assthe-first-domino-has.html

4everwarriors

"Give 'Em Hell, Al"

chapman

It's all about BCS status.  The Big East has it right now.  Fight to keep it.  There's going to be one less conference around initially to steal it away.  Staying the same for any length of time as every BE football school talks with the Big Ten and ACC is not the way to go.  Expand to 12 football schools now for a championship game, work on the television situation, replace any schools that leave immediately, and worry about the excessive size for basketball later.  Try to make sure that if and when the Big East loses its BCS bid it's got 12 football schools and 16-plus members that fought for BCS status, not two screwed-over football schools and 8 basketball schools.  Kansas, K-State, and Iowa State need to be invited now, along with at least one other football school.  Two or three more should be on the list.

willie warrior

I thought you were dead. Willie lives rent free in Reekers mind. Rick Pitino: "You can either complain or adapt."

Ready2Fly


Nukem2

When the dust settles over time, will there be any new TV/Cable/whatever viewers of college football / basketball.  I seriously doubt it.  All that would be happening is the re-distribution of teams across conferences.  So with no new viewers across the media spectrum, why (over the long haul) would the media outlets collectively give the collective BCS schools any more money?  I don't see any synergistic energies going on here.  In the end, I guess we all pay for the additonal costs of all of this.  Sure, it will probably benefit some conferences; but, there have to be economic losers in all of this?   

RJax55


Previous topic - Next topic