collapse

Resources

Stud of Creighton Game

No Stud when we lose.
2025-26 Season SoG Tally
Ross4
James Jr1

'24-25 * '23-24 * '22-23
'21-22 * '20-21 * '19-20
'18-19 * '17-18 * '16-17
'15-16 * '14-15 * '13-14
'12-13 * '11-12 * '10-11

Big East Standings

Recent Posts

Who do you wish hadn't gone pro early? by #UnleashMalik
[Today at 03:18:59 PM]


The Altercation by MU82
[Today at 03:02:46 PM]


MU versus Seton Hall by Billy Hoyle
[Today at 02:37:21 PM]


How Shaka Can Save This Season by WhiteTrash
[Today at 12:05:55 PM]


We’re #1 … by Jay Bee
[Today at 11:11:55 AM]


2025-26 College Hoops Thread by wadesworld
[Today at 09:52:13 AM]


Recruiting as of 1/15/26 by MUEng92
[Today at 09:37:32 AM]

Please Register - It's FREE!

The absolute only thing required for this FREE registration is a valid e-mail address. We keep all your information confidential and will NEVER give or sell it to anyone else.
Login to get rid of this box (and ads) , or signup NOW!

Next up: Seton Hall

Marquette
63
Marquette vs
Seton Hall
Date/Time: Dec 30, 2025, 6:00pm
TV: FS1
Schedule for 2025-26
Creighton
84

Nukem2

Quote from: Murffieus on May 02, 2010, 02:50:07 PM
Maymon's best chance at the NBA would be as a poor man's Barkely. Like Barkely, Maymon is a tweener----as such like Barkely his best position will be to work wide of the lane (wide post). There, size isn't paramount----what is paramount is technique.
Barkely had a lot more boucne than Maymon has.  CB could rebound with anyone with his bounce and bulk.

LA

Quote from: MarquetteDano on May 02, 2010, 03:19:07 PM
I do believe the shot clock has been an improvement to the college game and the NBA can take credit for that.  However, I prefered the previous 45 second shot clock (probably in the minority on this issue).  By the way, the NCAA has discussed moving the shot clock to 30 seconds (I can only hope this does not get passed).

Alright I figured it out...being a fan of the 45 second shot clock must make you

A) A big 10 fan and probably badger troll
B) A women's college basketball fan (which probably means you are a former womens player or parent)
C) Adolph Rupp

MarquetteDano

Quote from: LA on May 03, 2010, 11:14:53 AM
Alright I figured it out...being a fan of the 45 second shot clock must make you

B) A women's college basketball fan (which probably means you are a former womens player or parent)

Isn't the women's shot clock 30 seconds in the NCAA?  Not sure... don't watch a lot of women's games.

I recognize I am in the minority at that one but I will say this:  a five second shot clock ensures every offense will basically be the same.  Every five seconds you add to it will make for more diverse offenses.  I like watching a team like the William & Mary (much slower pace than the Badgers) face Washington.  The contrasting styles makes it interesting.  The reason why the Big Ten seems boring is because too many teams have similar styles/paces not because a single team plays a slow pace.

JWags85

Quote from: MarquetteDano on May 03, 2010, 11:39:06 AM
Isn't the women's shot clock 30 seconds in the NCAA?  Not sure... don't watch a lot of women's games.

I recognize I am in the minority at that one but I will say this:  a five second shot clock ensures every offense will basically be the same.  Every five seconds you add to it will make for more diverse offenses.  I like watching a team like the William & Mary (much slower pace than the Badgers) face Washington.  The contrasting styles makes it interesting.  The reason why the Big Ten seems boring is because too many teams have similar styles/paces not because a single team plays a slow pace.

It is 30.  I notice that it speeds up their game a bit and makes women's teams, who are often more methodical and fundamental-based than men's teams, work a bit quicker.

Previous topic - Next topic