deleted

[The Lens]

deleted.

Sometimes it's good to read context.

[Daniel]

I kind of read this as him not being convinced we really need a big guy.  But that what we just need is really good players.

But for me, I think we need a quality big guy

[TJ]

Even without a "Big Guy" it would be nice to have the average height of the starting 5 be greater than 6'2".

[MUCrew]

I kind of read this as him not being convinced we really need a big guy.  But that what we just need is really good players.

I think it was more Buzz telling the media what he's been hearing from other people.  He understands that big men are needed, but not necessarily required.  I also think that, without reading TOO much into his 3 sentences, that a really good player would trump a 'big-man-for-the-sake-of-having-a-big-man' type of player any day for Buzz.

[VegasWarrior77]

I think it was more Buzz telling the media what he's been hearing from other people.  He understands that big men are needed, but not necessarily required.  I also think that, without reading TOO much into his 3 sentences, that a really good player would trump a 'big-man-for-the-sake-of-having-a-big-man' type of player any day for Buzz.

+1

[RawdogDX]

Even without a "Big Guy" it will be nice to have the average height of the starting 5 be greater than 6'2".

fixed

[Dawson Rental]

Even without a "Big Guy" it would be nice to have the average height of the starting 5 be greater than 6'2".

But then how would we know which team is ours?

[muball]

Agree need good atheletes but without height you put yourself in a position that you have lesss alternatives and less room for error.