MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 11:12:55 AM

Title: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 11:12:55 AM
Has anyone done a welfare check on:

TAMU
MU82
Wadesworld
Tower912


The board could use some of your positivity in this currently grim time.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: The Lens on January 12, 2020, 11:15:18 AM
I think you’re being a little rough on TAMU and maybe even 82. Their eyes have been wide open for awhile.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Silent Verbal on January 12, 2020, 11:20:21 AM
Projos often rag on posters who only show up after losses, but there are also some high volume Wojo guys who stay away when we’re not winning.  And when we do win, the first thing they’ll say is, “Where are all the Wojo haters now?”  Sometimes I think people like Wojo more than they like the program, or at least that their desire to be right about him trumps any happiness over the actual success of a win.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: wadesworld on January 12, 2020, 11:20:58 AM
https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=899

Maybe look harder?

Glad the posters who find glee in Marquette basketball losing are able to do so though. Happy for you that your 2020 is going so well.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 11:21:56 AM
I think you’re being a little rough on TAMU and maybe even 82. Their eyes have been wide open for awhile.

Not being rough on them. Legitimately wondering where they are as they are among Scoop’s most prolific and longstanding contributors.  I wouldn’t mind getting their takes and sales pitch as it relates to having a more positive outlook on the state of the program.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 12, 2020, 11:22:26 AM
Has anyone done a welfare check on:

TAMU
MU82
Wadesworld
Tower912


The board could use some of your positivity in this currently grim time.

Sometimes things in life are more fulfilling or important than coming here to rehash the same old with a lot of typed words in an internet pissing sword fight, especially with posters with the multiple handles. 82 and Wades were on yesterday. Wades has a name change.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: The Sultan of Semantics on January 12, 2020, 11:24:32 AM
Furthermore, calling TAMU and tower "high volume Wojo guys" is laughable.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu_hilltopper on January 12, 2020, 11:25:23 AM
/Filed under, hard-to-put-lipstick-on-pig
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 11:27:46 AM
https://www.muscoop.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=899

Maybe look harder?

Glad the posters who find glee in Marquette basketball losing are able to do so though. Happy for you that your 2020 is going so well.

My bad. Didn’t realize you changed your name, and I don’t visit SuperBar topics often. Feel free to weigh back in on actual games, rotations, etc.

Good idea on the name change. We need Mane quite badly!  As Cheeks has told us, it’s a guards game, and would be very helpful to add a stud like Mane to help offset loss of Markus.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 11:28:23 AM
Has anyone done a welfare check on:

TAMU
MU82
Wadesworld
Tower912


The board could use some of your positivity in this currently grim time.

I'm in Houston end of February....we getting together or what? 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 11:36:59 AM
Furthermore, calling TAMU and tower "high volume Wojo guys" is laughable.

I didn’t call them that. They don’t usually have strong opinions one way or another. They along with 82 generally choose to take an optimistic outlook. Just wondering where their current mindset is at this time.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: pbiflyer on January 12, 2020, 11:50:23 AM
Tower's absence was noticeable.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Johnny B on January 12, 2020, 11:52:09 AM
I PMd tower wondering where his post game thoughts were as I needed a little optimism. No reply  ?-(
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 12, 2020, 11:53:46 AM
TAMU is a good poster and realistic. He has given Wojo a lot of rope, but he is a good fan.

MU82 is optimistic in a good way. Again, 90% of the time no problem with Mike, in regards to ball opinion.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 🏀 on January 12, 2020, 11:57:11 AM
What’s worse? Posting less after a loss or posting more?

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on January 12, 2020, 11:57:19 AM
I miss Tower's recap and WC's GIFs.

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/73907166a062390d3ff8971fceb768cb/tenor.gif?itemid=5477426)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: muguru on January 12, 2020, 12:02:06 PM
It does seem like some of the more projo posters have gone more silent recently. Maybe...just maybe, they are starting to see things for what they are and what some of us saw years ago. Reality sucks, but this is where we are unfortunately.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 🏀 on January 12, 2020, 12:04:17 PM
guru

Regardless of what Pro/No Jo, he will be the coach next year. Accept it and move on. No one is letting Dawson, Lewis and Osa and potentially Mane get away.

I would assume the Projos are avoiding the cesspool.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: sailwi on January 12, 2020, 12:19:41 PM
Dr. Lovell was one of the Eucharistic Ministers at mass this morning.  I thought a fire WOJO during a lull in the signing was appropriate but the wife said no.  Opportunity lost I think.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 12, 2020, 12:47:47 PM
PTM

I would take a wager that he is not the coach next season. New jobs are job security, losing in year seven is not. If he ever got fired from MU he is an assistant for rest of career.
He has a chance to set his family up for life if he can hack another 6-8 years as a HC and should be on his mind.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 12:53:28 PM
What’s worse? Posting less after a loss or posting more?

One of the main points I try to make.

People who post after a win to discuss the game, and critique the good and the bad are not equivalent to those who post after a loss and do nothing but trash the coach and players( many of whom are playing through injury no less ).
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 01:18:30 PM
PTM

I would take a wager that he is not the coach next season. New jobs are job security, losing in year seven is not. If he ever got fired from MU he is an assistant for rest of career.
He has a chance to set his family up for life if he can hack another 6-8 years as a HC and should be on his mind.

If he lands Mane, highly doubt he would leave on his own, even if we miss NCAA tournament, and no way I see MU letting him go.  Ultimately, Wojo isn't a quick study, but he is a grinder, and the hope would that after 6 years and seeing how letting one player be ball dominant is a formula for disaster - he'll become a better coach.  This is the best we can hope for..and it is possible.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GoldenWarrior11 on January 12, 2020, 01:29:53 PM
Does every response on Scoop now need to be categorized as either a pro-Wojo or anti-Wojo? 

Other than the Providence result, every game has gone the way it was projected to (I would have thought we would have lost to Nova and beat Providence).
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 01:36:02 PM
I PMd tower wondering where his post game thoughts were as I needed a little optimism. No reply  ?-(

Haven't you guys figured it out ??

iI AM TOWER!!!!!!!!  ROFLMFAO
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Vander Blue Man Group on January 12, 2020, 01:43:48 PM
PTM

I would take a wager that he is not the coach next season. New jobs are job security, losing in year seven is not. If he ever got fired from MU he is an assistant for rest of career.
He has a chance to set his family up for life if he can hack another 6-8 years as a HC and should be on his mind.

I’m not a betting man but I’d take that action.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 01:53:26 PM
Does every response on Scoop now need to be categorized as either a pro-Wojo or anti-Wojo? 

Other than the Providence result, every game has gone the way it was projected to (I would have thought we would have lost to Nova and beat Providence).

When there's a concerted effort after every loss to campaign for Wojos ouster? Then yes, people that disagree with the wisdom of canning Wojo will challenge the rationale used to support the argument that Wojo need to go, and point to the potential negative consequences of his departure, such as losing recruits and the prospect of another rebuild. It's a critical debate, and one worth having.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Miss Katie’s on January 12, 2020, 02:09:24 PM
Tower's absence was noticeable.

This.  No recap :(
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Pakuni on January 12, 2020, 02:10:35 PM
I was out last night, but ... Scoop is a miserable dumpster fire after a loss. Why would anyone who doesn't self-identify as a masochist want to come here?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: muguru on January 12, 2020, 03:09:56 PM
If he lands Mane, highly doubt he would leave on his own, even if we miss NCAA tournament, and no way I see MU letting him go.  Ultimately, Wojo isn't a quick study, but he is a grinder, and the hope would that after 6 years and seeing how letting one player be ball dominant is a formula for disaster - he'll become a better coach.  This is the best we can hope for..and it is possible.

I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with this, but I do feel it needs to be pointed out that this is not necessarily true. I would have to research it more in depth to go back some years, but one recent example of where it worked just fine is Purdue with Carson Edwards..he had a usage rate higher than Markus(or very similarly) and they damn near made a Final Four. I'm certain there has to be other examples in years past where it has worked just fine...It comes down to the Coach making it work. Matt Painter seemed to, right??
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 12, 2020, 03:12:00 PM
I was out last night, but ... Scoop is a miserable dumpster fire after a loss. Why would anyone who doesn't self-identify as a masochist want to come here?

Agree, and it seems as if there is one guy  posting under multiple names which makes it even worse.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: real chili 83 on January 12, 2020, 03:26:26 PM
TAMU,

Congrats to the new papa. 🍾
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 03:36:11 PM
TAMU,

Congrats to the new papa. 🍾

Absolutely!!!  +1
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TallTitan34 on January 12, 2020, 04:15:33 PM
PTM

I would take a wager that he is not the coach next season. New jobs are job security, losing in year seven is not. If he ever got fired from MU he is an assistant for rest of career.
He has a chance to set his family up for life if he can hack another 6-8 years as a HC and should be on his mind.

I’ll bet that he is the coach next year.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 12, 2020, 04:18:03 PM
Congrats, TAMU!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: rocket surgeon on January 12, 2020, 04:29:34 PM
TAMU,

Congrats to the new papa. 🍾

what?  no internet connection in the baby wing?

congrats to the tam'ster!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 04:42:46 PM

Grats!!!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 12, 2020, 04:45:20 PM
guru

Regardless of what Pro/No Jo, he will be the coach next year. Accept it and move on. No one is letting Dawson, Lewis and Osa and potentially Mane get away.

I would assume the Projos are avoiding the cesspool.

I hate that the biggest argument for keeping Wojo has turned into this.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 12, 2020, 04:46:33 PM
Does every response on Scoop now need to be categorized as either a pro-Wojo or anti-Wojo? 

Other than the Providence result, every game has gone the way it was projected to (I would have thought we would have lost to Nova and beat Providence).

Pink text for projo red for nojo
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 04:46:46 PM
I hate that the biggest argument for keeping Wojo has turned into this.

It isn’t the biggest argument, just by some people who ignore the progress of the last five years.  But carry on.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 12, 2020, 05:12:59 PM
It isn’t the biggest argument, just by some people who ignore the progress of the last five years.  But carry on.

That's a funny way to say stagnation
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 🏀 on January 12, 2020, 05:16:49 PM
PTM

I would take a wager that he is not the coach next season. New jobs are job security, losing in year seven is not. If he ever got fired from MU he is an assistant for rest of career.
He has a chance to set his family up for life if he can hack another 6-8 years as a HC and should be on his mind.

$100. Al’s Run.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 12, 2020, 05:20:14 PM
I PMd tower wondering where his post game thoughts were as I needed a little optimism. No reply  ?-(
Probably just means that he is developing his thesis on why MU is still in the hunt.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mileskishnish72 on January 12, 2020, 05:23:05 PM
I have long enjoyed Tower’s “thoughts.” He usually hits the main points well such that it’s hard to disagree with him often or significantly. Maybe this week pushed him into a dark corner.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 12, 2020, 05:24:11 PM
PTM

Done deal!!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 🏀 on January 12, 2020, 05:26:56 PM
PTM

Done deal!!

I have to add a twist, when I win you have to start using the quote function on here. I’ll even come show you how it works!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Shooter McGavin on January 12, 2020, 05:27:54 PM
I’m still holding out hope this thing turns around.  But the talent level on this team does not appear to be good enough for Wojo to be able to get them to the tournament.  If he cannot do it, Goose’s theory of him leaving because it is his best option before the posse gets him is as good as any. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 06:49:43 PM
I hate that the biggest argument for keeping Wojo has turned into this.

It isn't the biggest argument,  but it is one of the deciding factors, along with starting from square one with a new coach and a new system.

Wojos tenure has been a mixed bag on many fronts,  so there's arguments to be made both ways. Unfortunately, some people are promoting the narrative that the team has epically underperformed due to Wojos leadership. Their claims are not supported by the evidence in the historical record. He hasn't been great and he hasn't been terrible.
If some people would simply acknowledge that fact, maybe it wouldn't be so hard for them to understand why some other people reasonably believe this incoming recruiting class has earned Wojo more time.

Therefore, in my honest opinion,  the potential costs of firing Wojo outweigh the potential benefits.
What's so hard to believe?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 06:52:42 PM
It isn't the biggest argument,  but it is one of the deciding factors, along with starting from square one with a new coach and a new system.

Wojos tenure has been a mixed bag on many fronts,  so there's arguments to be made both ways. Unfortunately, some people are promoting the narrative that the team has epically underperformed due to Wojos leadership. Their claims are not supported by the evidence in the historical record. He hasn't been great and he hasn't been terrible.
If some people would simply acknowledge that fact, maybe it wouldn't be so hard for them to understand why some other people reasonably believe this incoming recruiting class has earned Wojo more time.

Therefore, in my honest opinion,  the potential costs of firing Wojo outweigh the potential benefits.
What's so hard to believe?

Painfully mediocre. Never greater than the sum of his parts. If you’re ok with that, fine. But many of us believe this program deserves better than .500 in conference.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 06:56:23 PM
Painfully mediocre. Never greater than the sum of his parts. If you’re ok with that, fine. But many of us believe this program deserves better than .500 in conference.

Who we hiring Panda bear?  Who is clamoring to come to MU since for decades all we get are assistants or retreads....cannot wait to hear who is knocking down the door to get us where we are entitled to be and will stay a long time....are we getting Billy Donovan?  How about Brad Stevens?  I hear Thad Matta wants the gig.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 07:20:48 PM
Who we hiring Panda bear?  Who is clamoring to come to MU since for decades all we get are assistants or retreads....cannot wait to hear who is knocking down the door to get us where we are entitled to be and will stay a long time....are we getting Billy Donovan?  How about Brad Stevens?  I hear Thad Matta wants the gig.

Cuonzo Martin, Ben Howlund and Shaka Smart

Top paying job, national recruiting base, NBA arena? Gee I don’t know? I’m not sure who would be interested this time, but last go around, all of the head coaches on the carousel made themselves available for Marquette.

Not moving on from mediocrity because, it’s too hard to find someone or if they’re really good they’ll leave is a pretty lame reason, even for you.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 07:30:50 PM
Cuonzo Martin, Ben Howlund and Shaka Smart

Top paying job, national recruiting base, NBA arena? Gee I don’t know? I’m not sure who would be interested this time, but last go around, all of the head coaches on the carousel made themselves available for Marquette.

Not moving on from mediocrity because, it’s too hard to find someone or if they’re really good they’ll leave is a pretty lame reason, even for you.

Retread. Retread. Retread.

We ended up with an assistant....AGAIN.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 07:35:34 PM
Retread. Retread. Retread.

We ended up with an assistant....AGAIN.
How could Shaka Smart be a retread if Texas was his second job? Do you know what retread means?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 🏀 on January 12, 2020, 08:04:14 PM
How could Shaka Smart be a retread if Texas was his second job? Do you know what retread means?

None of those guys are better than Wojo and you’re lying to yourself otherwise.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 12, 2020, 08:28:51 PM
Ners, appreciate the concern. Happy to report that I am doing great. My first daughter was born early Monday morning. Past week has been lots of joy  and not a lot of sleep. Wasn't able to watch the Providence game (sounds like I was lucky) but did see the Seton Hall game. Daughter is doing great but apparently not a good luck charm for Marquette!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Johnny B on January 12, 2020, 08:30:28 PM
Ners, appreciate the concern. Happy to report that I am doing great. My first daughter was born early Monday morning. Past week has been lots of joy  and not a lot of sleep. Wasn't able to watch the Providence game (sounds like I was lucky) but did see the Seton Hall game. Daughter is doing great but apparently not a good luck charm for Marquette!
What's the little ones name.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 08:33:55 PM
Painfully mediocre. Never greater than the sum of his parts. If you’re ok with that, fine. But many of us believe this program deserves better than .500 in conference.

Do you hear me saying I'm OK with mediocrity??  Do you think this incoming class is mediocre?? Especially if we get Mane??  I already conceded that Wojos tenure has been a mixed bag, and that it took this top ten recruiting class to put me solidly in favor of retaining him. This season was FUBAR once the Hausers left and the injuries started stacking up. If Wojo salvages an NCAA appearance that would be another point in the plus column. I won't give him extra credit if he wins one game in the tournament then loses. It's just one game. BFD. If they win two or three, sure.
If they don't make the tournament it's another point in the minus column but that's all it is. The Hausers leaving made that outcome highly likely.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 08:39:11 PM
None of those guys are better than Wojo and you’re lying to yourself otherwise.

We’ll never know for sure, but it’s really been a horse a piece given the results of each coach at their new gigs.

My main point is that Chicos said no head coach would be interested. That is patently false. He then called Shaka Smart a retread. That is patently false.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 12, 2020, 08:41:15 PM
What's the little ones name.

TAMU Jr, obvisouly.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 08:41:42 PM
Do you hear me saying I'm OK with mediocrity??  Do you think this incoming class is mediocre?? Especially if we get Mane??  I already conceded that Wojos tenure has been a mixed bag, and that it took this top ten recruiting class to put me solidly in favor of retaining him. This season was FUBAR once the Hausers left and the injuries started stacking up. If Wojo salvages an NCAA appearance that would be another point in the plus column. I won't give him extra credit if he wins one game in the tournament then loses. It's just one game. BFD. If they win two or three, sure.
If they don't make the tournament it's another point in the minus column but that's all it is. The Hausers leaving made that outcome highly likely.

He totally mismanaged the Hauser situation so he’s not getting any sympathy from me on that one.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 08:47:09 PM
How could Shaka Smart be a retread if Texas was his second job? Do you know what retread means?

I’m talking about now.


But ok, last I checked Smart said NO.  So what was left were retreads.  And once again we ended up with an assistant...AGAIN.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 08:49:07 PM
We’ll never know for sure, but it’s really been a horse a piece given the results of each coach at their new gigs.

My main point is that Chicos said no head coach would be interested. That is patently false. He then called Shaka Smart a retread. That is patently false.

I did not say no head coach would be interested.  I said a head coach that is worth something won’t...as has been the case for years now.  No doubt lots of mid major coaches who have proven nothing will be interested.  Yay. Yay. Yay.  So awesome.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: PuertoRicanNightmare on January 12, 2020, 08:49:43 PM
None of those guys are better than Wojo and you’re lying to yourself otherwise.
Are we now claiming we couldn’t possibly get a better coach than Wojo? I’m lost.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 08:49:58 PM
He totally mismanaged the Hauser situation so he’s not getting any sympathy from me on that one.

LOL.  You have no idea.  If Hausers back, other guys gone but you refuse to accept this. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 08:52:43 PM
I did not say no head coach would be interested.  I said a head coach that is worth something won’t...as has been the case for years now.  No doubt lots of mid major coaches who have proven nothing will be interested.  Yay. Yay. Yay.  So awesome.

Nope you said Brad Stevens or Billy Donovan implying we can’t get a premier head coaching target. Duh.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 08:53:59 PM
LOL.  You have no idea.  If Hausers back, other guys gone but you refuse to accept this.

Yikes. I don’t know how we’d manage....

The situation never should have reached the point of players leaving. The situation was completely botched.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Small Orange Soda on January 12, 2020, 08:54:49 PM
LOL.  You have no idea.  If Hausers back, other guys gone but you refuse to accept this.

Which would mean he mismanaged the situation, just in a different way.  I'm interested in who everyone assumes would've left though.  I absolutely would've wished Jamal Cain the best at a more appropriate school for his talent.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 08:57:54 PM
Nope you said Brad Stevens or Billy Donovan implying we can’t get a premier head coaching target. Duh.

Correct, Stevens and Donovan are not coming nor are any other high major premier coaches.

You said I said NO HEAD COACHES....you are absolutely dead wrong.  Premier head coaches = no.  Avg head coaches, mid major head coaches...sure.  Big difference.

Read what you wrote...you are flat out wrong.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 08:58:43 PM
Yikes. I don’t know how we’d manage....

The situation never should have reached the point of players leaving. The situation was completely botched.

You know nothing of the situation the same way you know nothing of a black hole.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 08:59:51 PM
Which would mean he mismanaged the situation, just in a different way.  I'm interested in who everyone assumes would've left though.  I absolutely would've wished Jamal Cain the best at a more appropriate school for his talent.

No, it means some relationships no matter what you do cannot remain.  Period.  As much as you pretend the coach has all the power and reasoning to keep everyone together, you are wrong on that front.  Just more agenda nonsense. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Small Orange Soda on January 12, 2020, 09:01:31 PM
No, it means some relationships no matter what you do cannot remain.  Period.  As much as you pretend the coach has all the power and reasoning to keep everyone together, you are wrong on that front.  Just more agenda nonsense.

Nope, just laying the blame where it belongs. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 09:01:43 PM
You know nothing of the situation the same way you know nothing of a black hole.

What do you know then?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 09:02:22 PM
LOL.  You have no idea.  If Hausers back, other guys gone but you refuse to accept this.
[/quote ]

nm
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 09:03:21 PM
Nope, just laying the blame where it belongs.

Oh, you mean with everyone...got it.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Small Orange Soda on January 12, 2020, 09:05:41 PM
Oh, you mean with everyone...got it.

Sure.  The guy who's 20 years their senior is gonna look worse though.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 09:06:44 PM
Markus stayed, Hausers go.  Period.  Markus goes, Hausers might stay (one).

Hausers stay, two guys go....not hard who they are.  Both playing now and giving solid minutes and scoring punch. 

Either way, net subtraction of players. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Small Orange Soda on January 12, 2020, 09:07:42 PM
Markus stayed, Hausers go.  Period.  Markus goes, Hausers might stay (one).

Hausers stay, two guys go....not hard who they are.  Both playing now and giving solid minutes and scoring punch. 

Either way, net subtraction of players.

Agreed.  Wojo let it get so bad that there was no way to salvage it.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 09:08:18 PM
LOL.  You have no idea.  If Hausers back, other guys gone but you refuse to accept this.

Is there a reference article that supports your statement? Who specifically was going to leave?
I don't doubt one or two guys might have transferred, but who?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 09:09:59 PM
Agreed.  Wojo let it get so bad that there was no way to salvage it.

Yep. Completely botched. It went from a grievance early in the season which should’ve been fixed to a bust up in the locker room during the Murray State game.

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 12, 2020, 09:11:54 PM
Is there a reference article that supports your statement? Who specifically was going to leave?
I don't doubt one or two guys might have transferred, but who?

There are no articles, letters, Nada on any of this.  All innuendo by all sides.  One side wants to believe a letter.  One side believes only a coach involved.  One wants to believe only the Hausers.

Lots of blame to go around, to suggest any one side was guilty of it all it absurd and those people have agendas.  A lot of people have some blame in this situation.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: panda on January 12, 2020, 09:15:25 PM
There are no articles, letters, Nada on any of this.  All innuendo by all sides.  One side wants to believe a letter.  One side believes only a coach involved.  One wants to believe only the Hausers.

Lots of blame to go around, to suggest any one side was guilty of it all it absurd and those people have agendas.  A lot of people have some blame in this situation.

No one knows anything. Except of course you. Lol
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 12, 2020, 09:25:11 PM
Yep. Completely botched. It went from a grievance early in the season which should’ve been fixed to a bust up in the locker room during the Murray State game.

Seton hall***

Which is understandable with a 1/16 player shooting with a wide open Sam
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Babybluejeans on January 12, 2020, 09:35:10 PM
There are no articles, letters, Nada on any of this.  All innuendo by all sides.  One side wants to believe a letter.  One side believes only a coach involved.  One wants to believe only the Hausers.

Lots of blame to go around, to suggest any one side was guilty of it all it absurd and those people have agendas.  A lot of people have some blame in this situation.

There are some very fine people on both sides.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 12, 2020, 09:41:20 PM
I guess the way it turned out everybody wins except this years team.

Sam gets a year to rehab his hip and play at Virginia.

Joey gets a year to grow up and play at Michigan State.

Markus gets another year to showcase himself.

Wojo gets to use Markus as a recruiting tool for another year.

I Hope the other guys on this years team get something more than a consolation prize.

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 12, 2020, 09:49:24 PM
Ners, appreciate the concern. Happy to report that I am doing great. My first daughter was born early Monday morning. Past week has been lots of joy  and not a lot of sleep. Wasn't able to watch the Providence game (sounds like I was lucky) but did see the Seton Hall game. Daughter is doing great but apparently not a good luck charm for Marquette!

Congrats TAMU!  Happy for you. Get some rest and enjoy this special time in your life.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 12, 2020, 10:40:45 PM
Also appreciate the concern, Ners. I've been around, even commented a little in a few threads that had nothing to do with the game.

Going into the season, I expected us to be 12-4 overall and 2-2 in the conference at this point. We are all of one game worse than that due to the OT loss to Providence -- apparently the only upset all season in all of college basketball, and the worst defeat any of the 350 D1 programs have suffered in several decades.

So I feel no differently about Wojo or the team today than I did 2 weeks ago or 2 months ago. And it gets exhausting discussing this same subject over and over and over (and over) again with those whose minds were made up long ago.

I come to Hangin' at the Al for recruiting news, injury news and the like, and I also come here to have a little MU hoops related fun. For me, it's not a very fun place after we lose, so I focus my time and energy elsewhere. I haven't even clicked on most Hangin' threads since Providence.

I hope you and all other Scoopers join me in rooting for a more fun environment on this site after Wednesday's game vs. Xavier.

Oh, and a huge congrats to TAMU and Mrs. TAMU!!!!

We Are Marquette.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: tower912 on January 13, 2020, 06:13:17 AM
I was winning an argument with my wife.    Her facebook time vs my Scoop time.    She has now admitted she is far more addicted to facebook.   

Or, just for you, willie, I was staking out a Wal Mart in Texas waiting for martial law to be declared.


Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: dgies9156 on January 13, 2020, 07:42:32 AM
Also appreciate the concern, Ners. I've been around, even commented a little in a few threads that had nothing to do with the game.

Going into the season, I expected us to be 12-4 overall and 2-2 in the conference at this point. We are all of one game worse than that due to the OT loss to Providence -- apparently the only upset all season in all of college basketball, and the worst defeat any of the 350 D1 programs have suffered in several decades.

So I feel no differently about Wojo or the team today than I did 2 weeks ago or 2 months ago. And it gets exhausting discussing this same subject over and over and over (and over) again with those whose minds were made up long ago.

I come to Hangin' at the Al for recruiting news, injury news and the like, and I also come here to have a little MU hoops related fun. For me, it's not a very fun place after we lose, so I focus my time and energy elsewhere. I haven't even clicked on most Hangin' threads since Providence.

I hope you and all other Scoopers join me in rooting for a more fun environment on this site after Wednesday's game vs. Xavier.

Oh, and a huge congrats to TAMU and Mrs. TAMU!!!!

We Are Marquette.

Well said Brother MU, well said.

I have tended to stay distant in recent days due to the flood of Wojo criticism. While I share some of the concern, at this point we have to wait until season's end to see where we are. In the meantime, I do wish we could tone down the rhetoric and hope for the best this year.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 🏀 on January 13, 2020, 09:03:15 AM
Are we now claiming we couldn’t possibly get a better coach than Wojo? I’m lost.

Shaka, Howland & Martin specifically.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 13, 2020, 09:25:00 AM
I was winning an argument with my wife.    Her facebook time vs my Scoop time.    She has now admitted she is far more addicted to facebook.   

Or, just for you, willie, I was staking out a Wal Mart in Texas waiting for martial law to be declared.

That's great.  Congrats on the victory!  Welcome back.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 13, 2020, 09:27:58 AM
Also appreciate the concern, Ners. I've been around, even commented a little in a few threads that had nothing to do with the game.

Going into the season, I expected us to be 12-4 overall and 2-2 in the conference at this point. We are all of one game worse than that due to the OT loss to Providence -- apparently the only upset all season in all of college basketball, and the worst defeat any of the 350 D1 programs have suffered in several decades.

So I feel no differently about Wojo or the team today than I did 2 weeks ago or 2 months ago. And it gets exhausting discussing this same subject over and over and over (and over) again with those whose minds were made up long ago.

I come to Hangin' at the Al for recruiting news, injury news and the like, and I also come here to have a little MU hoops related fun. For me, it's not a very fun place after we lose, so I focus my time and energy elsewhere. I haven't even clicked on most Hangin' threads since Providence.

I hope you and all other Scoopers join me in rooting for a more fun environment on this site after Wednesday's game vs. Xavier.

Oh, and a huge congrats to TAMU and Mrs. TAMU!!!!

We Are Marquette.

Sounds good to me.  Looking forward to a win Wednesday night.  Big game for us!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Marcus92 on January 13, 2020, 11:33:34 AM
My preseason expectation was 10-11 conference wins, with the potential to win 12+ games and contend for a Big East title if:

• Last season's returning core (Markus, Sacar, Theo, Ed, Jamal, Brendan) stepped up
• The newcomers (Koby, Jayce, Greg, Symir) added athleticism and depth
• Three-point shooting didn't drop significantly (from 38.8% to around 36%)
• The team took better care of the ball (reducing TO% from 239th nationally last season)
• Free-throw rate increased, leading to more open looks inside and on the perimeter
• Defensive efficiency improved

Right now, Marquette looks more like a NCAA bubble team than anything else. Inconsistency rules. Impressive wins like Purdue and Villanova have been followed by disappointing losses. Encouraging signs (team 3PT% currently ranked #5 by KenPom, free throw rate ranked #18) have been tempered by struggles in other areas (2-point FG%, turnovers, rebounding).

The next few games should be telling. All three -- home against Xavier, at Georgetown, then home again against St. John's -- are winnable. If MU can get some momentum and confidence on its side, there's still a chance at a top 3 Big East finish. If not, 8 or 9 wins looks a lot more likely.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 13, 2020, 12:32:56 PM
My preseason expectation was 10-11 conference wins, with the potential to win 12+ games and contend for a Big East title if:

• Last season's returning core (Markus, Sacar, Theo, Ed, Jamal, Brendan) stepped up
• The newcomers (Koby, Jayce, Greg, Symir) added athleticism and depth
• Three-point shooting didn't drop significantly (from 38.8% to around 36%)
• The team took better care of the ball (reducing TO% from 239th nationally last season)
• Free-throw rate increased, leading to more open looks inside and on the perimeter
• Defensive efficiency improved

Right now, Marquette looks more like a NCAA bubble team than anything else. Inconsistency rules. Impressive wins like Purdue and Villanova have been followed by disappointing losses. Encouraging signs (team 3PT% currently ranked #5 by KenPom, free throw rate ranked #18) have been tempered by struggles in other areas (2-point FG%, turnovers, rebounding).

The next few games should be telling. All three -- home against Xavier, at Georgetown, then home again against St. John's -- are winnable. If MU can get some momentum and confidence on its side, there's still a chance at a top 3 Big East finish. If not, 8 or 9 wins looks a lot more likely.

All reasonable, M92.

I agree this next 3-game stretch is important. 3-0, we're in business ... 2-1, still waiting to see what we really can put together ... 1-2, extremely disappointing. (I won't even mention 0-3 as a possibility.)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 13, 2020, 03:21:19 PM
The next three MU games should be W's. Really no excuse if they do not go 3-0.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 13, 2020, 04:18:04 PM
The next three MU games should be W's. Really no excuse if they do not go 3-0.
oh but Goose, we know that there will be plenty of excuses.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 13, 2020, 04:41:47 PM
oh but Goose, we know that there will be plenty of excuses.
And whining from wee willie
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 13, 2020, 08:51:32 PM
The next three MU games should be W's. Really no excuse if they do not go 3-0.

What were Tony Bennett's "excuses" for losing to BC, South Carolina, Syracuse and by 1000 points to Purdue? Why didn't he go 4-0?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 13, 2020, 08:56:48 PM
The next three MU games should be W's. Really no excuse if they do not go 3-0.

Interesting.  Well, it's sports and games have to be played.  MU will be favored in two, and an underdog in the other. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Lennys Tap on January 13, 2020, 09:35:01 PM
What were Tony Bennett's "excuses" for losing to BC, South Carolina, Syracuse and by 1000 points to Purdue? Why didn't he go 4-0?

Funny thing about winning a national championship. Or even a FF or elite 8 - buys some goodwill, a little leeway and gives a coach capital to spend if he needs it. Three “no NCAAs” and 2 first round blow outs don’t do that.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 13, 2020, 09:51:49 PM
Funny thing about winning a national championship. Or even a FF or elite 8 - buys some goodwill, a little leeway and gives a coach capital to spend if he needs it. Three “no NCAAs” and 2 first round blow outs don’t do that.

That's nice that you are emotional out of it....it's a simple question he asked.  How does a championship coach lose those games?  Hmmm.  But but but he won last year so it doesn't matter what he does this year. 

And now year one is a no NCAA...love it....yes, he didn't get to walk into a tailor made scenario like Buzz did, instead he walked into a crap situation that Buzz made.  So yeah, some of those No NCAAs have a lot to do with the roster left behind.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 13, 2020, 10:38:14 PM
Funny thing about winning a national championship. Or even a FF or elite 8 - buys some goodwill, a little leeway and gives a coach capital to spend if he needs it. Three “no NCAAs” and 2 first round blow outs don’t do that.

I totally understand that, Lenny, and I would take Bennett over Wojo in a nanosecond.

But if we can look at a 3-game stretch for MU and say losing any of them suggests horrible coaching, why doesn't losing by 29 points to Purdue suggest something, especially when coupled with losses to 3 other mediocre teams?

I'm not comparing Wojo to Bennett. I'm just comparing the mindsets. I guess you've already answered the question, though. It's all good!

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: warriorchick on January 14, 2020, 08:37:04 AM
I don't know if y'all have noticed that I haven't visited the basketball threads recently, but here's why: even though I have put many of the more egregious posters on Ignore, it is simply not worth wading through all the vitriol, mean-spiritedness, and outright stupidity to get to anything that I would want to read.

FFS, we soundly beat a top-ten team, and some of you still found reasons to post harshly negative crap during and after the game. Every single thread, even if it starts out as reasonable discourse (like this one), devolves into a name-calling, dick-swinging argument about the same topics over and over again. This isn't a Marquette fan site any more.  It's a Marquette bashing site.  Fans of our opponents who visit this site must laugh their asses off, and I don't blame them.

I don't need to waste my time reading the posts of armchair coaches, failed athletes, and straight up idiots who have nothing constructive or insightful to say. It is possible to criticize without being hateful, but most of the recent posters on Scoop have chosen to forgo that route.  I know several other folks who used to be very active on Scoop who don't even log in anymore, and they were some of the most incisive, entertaining posters.

I am forever grateful to the mods for creating this site, as I have derived a lot of pleasure from participating in it.  But they have allowed it to be taken over by its most despicable posters.   Perhaps they don't mind, or may even agree with those "fans".  But if they want to return Scoop to the days when fans could have reasonable conversations, may I humbly suggest that they put the worst offenders (and we all know who they are) on a very long break and allow the site to mend itself.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 4everwarriors on January 14, 2020, 08:46:06 AM
Didn't notice butt would've figured ewe, Pa, Lovell, and Woj were all on a conference call trying ta find street parkin' closer dan 6th and Brown, hey?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GOO on January 14, 2020, 08:46:44 AM
Missing Scoopers:  There is a reason some of us don't bother showing up and posting multiple times on the same topic where two or three posters over and over and over start threads of some sort of Wojo being fired, replaced, etc. 

Not worth our time, especially where the posters don't understand their own illogical "bias confirmation" mindset. The confirmation bias on here by some is off the charts. Acknowledging it is the first step to a more reasoned analysis.  MU82's post is but one example of trying to point this out to a poster.

Not worth the time since it is not going to happen, as the program is doing well.  I understand there are those that only care about winning and that is fine.  But a lot of us are not going to debate the same issues over and over and over.  Hence, why this poster doesn't show up in each of these threads that get started after a loss. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: UWW2MU on January 14, 2020, 09:13:46 AM
Thank you for voicing this Chick.   

I come here mainly to learn and gain insight from the Hangin’ at the Al boards since I feel most posters have far more to give than I do.  Thus, it goes unnoticed when I leave many discussion topics unread these days.  But I assure you, there are far more people like me who are going unnoticed that simply stopped reading because of all the nastiness that goes on here. 

While we all want the team to win, there are far more important things in life than college basketball and the wins/losses.  It seems people have lost sight of that and let the losses control them too much and don’t appreciate the wins.  It’s probably a metaphor on life… or something like that.  Who knows, maybe many of these “troublesome” posters aren’t like this in other areas of their lives.

I hope the team continues an upward trend, but more so I hope we all find real satisfaction in what makes us happy (as long as it’s not the team bombing just to be right/get your way!  ;) ) and we share that joy with others.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: PuertoRicanNightmare on January 14, 2020, 09:18:52 AM
I don't know if y'all have noticed that I haven't visited the basketball threads recently, but here's why: even though I have put many of the more egregious posters on Ignore, it is simply not worth wading through all the vitriol, mean-spiritedness, and outright stupidity to get to anything that I would want to read.

FFS, we soundly beat a top-ten team, and some of you still found reasons to post harshly negative crap during and after the game. Every single thread, even if it starts out as reasonable discourse (like this one), devolves into a name-calling, dick-swinging argument about the same topics over and over again. This isn't a Marquette fan site any more.  It's a Marquette bashing site.  Fans of our opponents who visit this site must laugh their asses off, and I don't blame them.

I don't need to waste my time reading the posts of armchair coaches, failed athletes, and straight up idiots who have nothing constructive or insightful to say. It is possible to criticize without being hateful, but most of the recent posters on Scoop have chosen to forgo that route.  I know several other folks who used to be very active on Scoop who don't even log in anymore, and they were some of the most incisive, entertaining posters.

I am forever grateful to the mods for creating this site, as I have derived a lot of pleasure from participating in it.  But they have allowed it to be taken over by its most despicable posters.   Perhaps they don't mind, or may even agree with those "fans".  But if they want to return Scoop to the days when fans could have reasonable conversations, may I humbly suggest that they put the worst offenders (and we all know who they are) on a very long break and allow the site to mend itself.
I read all your posts aloud in a shrill, screeching voice.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MomofMUltiples on January 14, 2020, 10:31:05 AM
I read all your posts aloud in a shrill, screeching voice.

It's truly a shame that you would think that of an intelligent, articulate woman.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: skianth16 on January 14, 2020, 10:33:39 AM
Missing Scoopers:  There is a reason some of us don't bother showing up and posting multiple times on the same topic where two or three posters over and over and over start threads of some sort of Wojo being fired, replaced, etc. 

Not worth our time, especially where the posters don't understand their own illogical "bias confirmation" mindset. The confirmation bias on here by some is off the charts. Acknowledging it is the first step to a more reasoned analysis.  MU82's post is but one example of trying to point this out to a poster.

Not worth the time since it is not going to happen, as the program is doing well.  I understand there are those that only care about winning and that is fine.  But a lot of us are not going to debate the same issues over and over and over.  Hence, why this poster doesn't show up in each of these threads that get started after a loss.

The highest volume posters are pro Wojo. The posters who start the most threads are pro Wojo. What I think you're seeing is that more and more people seem to be getting frustrated with Wojo, not that one or two disgruntled fans are taking over the board.

As far as the confirmation  bias, you're 100% right, but it's a two-way street. We all do it, regardless of our views on a particular coach, player, opponent, etc. People always find what they're looking for.

Maybe Scoop should only allow 10 posts per thread or per day. That would definitely cut back on all the redundant conversations, and we might actually see a thread or two stay on topic. Sadly, a few here might lose out on their primary hobby.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 14, 2020, 10:37:01 AM
I read all your posts aloud in a shrill, screeching voice.

Completely unnecessary. No need to make sexist comments
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: warriorchick on January 14, 2020, 10:45:39 AM
It's truly a shame that you would think that of an intelligent, articulate woman.

hmm...I did not see PRN's post before this because I had him on Ignore.

But thank you, PRN, for unequivocally proving my point.   :)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 14, 2020, 10:57:00 AM
The highest volume posters are pro Wojo. The posters who start the most threads are pro Wojo. What I think you're seeing is that more and more people seem to be getting frustrated with Wojo, not that one or two disgruntled fans are taking over the board.

As far as the confirmation  bias, you're 100% right, but it's a two-way street. We all do it, regardless of our views on a particular coach, player, opponent, etc. People always find what they're looking for.

Maybe Scoop should only allow 10 posts per thread or per day. That would definitely cut back on all the redundant conversations, and we might actually see a thread or two stay on topic. Sadly, a few here might lose out on their primary hobby.

Theres probably 5 people on here who just need a 90 day ban. Ironically, these are the same 5 people who ruined the superbar.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 14, 2020, 11:01:10 AM
skianth

I agree. Many of the pro Wojo camp love to attack non Wojo supporters. While I take my jabs at folks, it is usually after being jabbed multiple times in advance.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: PuertoRicanNightmare on January 14, 2020, 11:11:33 AM
hmm...I did not see PRN's post before this because I had him on Ignore.

But thank you, PRN, for unequivocally proving my point.   :)
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/ABgNxvbk95V3W/giphy.gif?cid=19f5b51ac882f598bc1b1a8e3f0ff43a5a0cc29e7390b3bd&rid=giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WarriorDad on January 14, 2020, 11:43:10 AM
I don't know if y'all have noticed that I haven't visited the basketball threads recently, but here's why: even though I have put many of the more egregious posters on Ignore, it is simply not worth wading through all the vitriol, mean-spiritedness, and outright stupidity to get to anything that I would want to read.

FFS, we soundly beat a top-ten team, and some of you still found reasons to post harshly negative crap during and after the game. Every single thread, even if it starts out as reasonable discourse (like this one), devolves into a name-calling, dick-swinging argument about the same topics over and over again. This isn't a Marquette fan site any more.  It's a Marquette bashing site.  Fans of our opponents who visit this site must laugh their asses off, and I don't blame them.

I don't need to waste my time reading the posts of armchair coaches, failed athletes, and straight up idiots who have nothing constructive or insightful to say. It is possible to criticize without being hateful, but most of the recent posters on Scoop have chosen to forgo that route.  I know several other folks who used to be very active on Scoop who don't even log in anymore, and they were some of the most incisive, entertaining posters.

I am forever grateful to the mods for creating this site, as I have derived a lot of pleasure from participating in it.  But they have allowed it to be taken over by its most despicable posters.   Perhaps they don't mind, or may even agree with those "fans".  But if they want to return Scoop to the days when fans could have reasonable conversations, may I humbly suggest that they put the worst offenders (and we all know who they are) on a very long break and allow the site to mend itself.

I used to visit daily, but now come weekly for the most part.  Got into it with a few members last year about the Bulls and Lebron.  The anti Wojo bashing. The constant claims of being a different person.  Not worth the energy.

The other Marquette message board is no different.   Where does one go?  It is the nature of the digital space I am afraid.  Cardinals NFL forum is the same.  Cubs sites are the same.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: real chili 83 on January 14, 2020, 12:03:43 PM
Some of us have retreated to the safety, civility, and sanity of the Underboard.

Chick, you are dead on.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: LloydsLegs on January 14, 2020, 12:08:01 PM
I read all your posts aloud in a shrill, screeching voice.

reprehensible and sexist

but expected
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WarriorDad on January 14, 2020, 12:18:51 PM
I read all your posts aloud in a shrill, screeching voice.

Uncalled for
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GooooMarquette on January 14, 2020, 12:31:52 PM
Well said, Chick. Very well said.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Silent Verbal on January 14, 2020, 12:44:48 PM
“Mods, please ban those posters whose views I don’t agree with!”

But seriously, this is the worst five year stretch MU ball has had since Scoop started in 2006.  Things were bound to get increasingly negative, especially since that stretch came on the heels of our best run since Al.  No real surprise there.  Things will get more positive when MU has more success.  Until then, there will be those who complain, and those who complain about the complainers.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: dinger on January 14, 2020, 12:48:35 PM
“Mods, please ban those posters whose views I don’t agree with!”


Maybe instead of banning anyone, we could just limit all individual posters to like 5 or 10 posts a day. I can't think of anything about MUBB so important to say that I need to say it more than 5 times in a day, or something that hasn't already been said in the other 120,000 posts in the last year. Or maybe relax that in just the gameday threads or something. Just a thought?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 14, 2020, 12:55:54 PM
That's it. If you criticize Eojo or the direction the program is heading, ban speed ahead.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Pakuni on January 14, 2020, 01:03:36 PM
Until then, there will be those who complain, and those who complain about the complainers.

And those who complain about being complained about.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GB Warrior on January 14, 2020, 01:07:08 PM
Maybe instead of banning anyone, we could just limit all individual posters to like 5 or 10 posts a day. I can't think of anything about MUBB so important to say that I need to say it more than 5 times in a day, or something that hasn't already been said in the other 120,000 posts in the last year. Or maybe relax that in just the gameday threads or something. Just a thought?

I disapprove, as it conflicts with my plans to introduce a series of Pro-jo and No-jo bots to stir up discord.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Skatastrophy on January 14, 2020, 01:21:15 PM
I like Marquette basketball.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 14, 2020, 01:40:40 PM
real 83

You are a member of a lot of secret MU ball clubs. Well deserved, you are one of the good ones!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 14, 2020, 01:54:08 PM
Warriorchick, while I agree with the good intent of your post, and the part about extremely negative posters, I don't believe in bans or stifling of debate regarding Wojo. If people can start from a point of agreed upon facts, and not exaggerate those facts or cherry pick from them, a civil, appropriate, serious and necessary discussion can occur. This is a Marquette fan site, and the head coach in a pivotal year is a worthy topic for discussion , as are the players. If people would constructively critique Wojo and the team, rather than constantly criticize, they might even find their arguments being received more openly. Many already do this.

There are a few though, or maybe more than a few who go into full trash mode, with caustic and vitriolic attacks directed at Wojo, the players, and any poster who attempts to counter their borderline hate speech.

Name calling and insulting people for their views is where the mods could and IMHO should exercise their ban hammer muscles.

I appreciate your call for the board to be better and I fully support the sentiment.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Jockey on January 14, 2020, 01:58:06 PM
Chick, Goo, Warriordad - well said.

I am an MU basketball fan. Technology has given voice to any idiot who wants to be the guy who screams the loudest. I am tired of it, but I accept that is the way it is. The result? I come here way less often that I used to. It is why Twitter and Facebook are not a part of my life.


I have reservations about Wojo's coaching skills and hope they improve. If not, eventually "OK" will not be good enough and he will be gone. In the meantime, I will not be one of the Scoopers who will happily destroy MU basketball to satisfy their feelings.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 14, 2020, 02:01:26 PM
real 83

You are a member of a lot of secret MU ball clubs. Well deserved, you are one of the good ones!

(https://drink314.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/72710784_1379808602168421_6645988726897901568_o-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 14, 2020, 02:06:46 PM
“Mods, please ban those posters whose views I don’t agree with!”

But seriously, this is the worst five year stretch MU ball has had since Scoop started in 2006.  Things were bound to get increasingly negative, especially since that stretch came on the heels of our best run since Al.  No real surprise there.  Things will get more positive when MU has more success.  Until then, there will be those who complain, and those who complain about the complainers.

This right here. Not sure why people get so bent about disagreements and differing opinions. Maybe everyone should just respond to every post with:  “I agree.”  Sure would be a vibrant and dynamic board.

P.S.  Those of you who are staunch Wojo backers, you aren’t any bigger or better fans than those of us who are frustrated. Your side just has lower expectations from the MU program and seems content with a 30-50ish type of team. If that weren’t the case you’d stop trying to rationalize why we can’t crack the Top 25 or haven’t won an NCAA game under Wojo.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MUfan12 on January 14, 2020, 02:13:31 PM
It's not the negativity that gets to me, it's every f*cking thread devolving into re-litigating some issue in the past, even going back to the Crean era.

If that went away and we could focus on this year's squad, it'd be a much more readable board.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on January 14, 2020, 02:22:28 PM
Maybe instead of banning anyone, we could just limit all individual posters to like 5 or 10 posts a day. I can't think of anything about MUBB so important to say that I need to say it more than 5 times in a day, or something that hasn't already been said in the other 120,000 posts in the last year. Or maybe relax that in just the gameday threads or something. Just a thought?

2 written posts per day but unlimited ability to post gifs or haikus
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: BM1090 on January 14, 2020, 02:22:41 PM
It's not the negativity that gets to me, it's every f*cking thread devolving into re-litigating some issue in the past, even going back to the Crean era.

If that went away and we could focus on this year's squad, it'd be a much more readable board.

This. 100%.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Lighthouse 84 on January 14, 2020, 02:39:20 PM
I don't care if there's a topic I don't agree with or a Scooper's viewpoint I disagree with, but maybe the mods could implement a rule stating that the posting of multiple threads on the same topic by the same Scooper mandates a 30 day ban.  The other day I counted 3 (and maybe a fourth, if MikeDeanesDarkGlasses and Mike Deanes Seat Belt are the same poster), all on the same topic. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GOO on January 14, 2020, 03:04:18 PM
I don't care if there's a topic I don't agree with or a Scooper's viewpoint I disagree with, but maybe the mods could implement a rule stating that the posting of multiple threads on the same topic by the same Scooper mandates a 30 day ban.  The other day I counted 3 (and maybe a fourth, if MikeDeanesDarkGlasses and Mike Deanes Seat Belt are the same poster), all on the same topic.

This. +1
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Marcus92 on January 14, 2020, 03:12:49 PM
Those of you who are staunch Wojo backers, you aren’t any bigger or better fans than those of us who are frustrated. Your side just has lower expectations from the MU program and seems content with a 30-50ish type of team. If that weren’t the case you’d stop trying to rationalize why we can’t crack the Top 25 or haven’t won an NCAA game under Wojo.

I find posts like this frustrating.

With just 4 Big East games under our belt, it's waaayyy too soon to draw any definitive conclusions on the season. There are still 14 conference games left to play -- more than 3/4 of the schedule. I think this team still has the potential to make a run at a league title, a Top 20 ranking and a 4 or 5 NCAA seed.

I supported Wojo's contract extension -- but I wouldn't call myself a staunch Wojo backer. I'm a staunch backer of Marquette basketball. The way last season ended was gut-wrenching. I'm very concerned about the inconsistency from game to game this season. I don't have lower expectations for the program. And I'm not content with a 30-50ish type of team. (I'd be surprised if anyone who posts on this site is; I can't stand unfounded statements like this.)

To be clear, I expect Marquette to rise to the level of a Top 20-25 program -- year in, year out. National titles should be the goal, rather than just making the tournament. If a private Catholic university like Villanova can do it, I see no reason why MU can't.

I simply disagree that it's 100% clear, without a doubt, we've already seen the best Wojo has to offer. That's an opinion, not a fact. I disagree the program has shown zero signs of progress under Wojo. I disagree there's no chance this team will raise its level of play. And I disagree that any of the constant comparisons between Wojo and past coaches (Deane, Crean, Williams) are at all relevant.

It doesn't make me right. It doesn't mean my mind is forever made up about Wojo or the future of the program. It doesn't make me a better fan. They're my own opinions, based on what I've seen and learned in my 30+ years of rooting for Marquette basketball.

The next few games, and the rest of the season, will tell us a lot.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 14, 2020, 04:17:27 PM
I read all your posts aloud in a shrill, screeching voice.
Not cool, PRN. Not cool.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 21Jumpstreet on January 14, 2020, 04:18:19 PM
This. 100%.

For me, it’s the personal nature of the “discussions.” We can disagree, even get heated, but the personal attacks are tough to read. I would think this is one of those places where we all have one thing in common and would respect each other a bit more because of it. It bugs me that what could be a rational discussion ends up an angry, selfish, unnecessary questioning of sanity, mental stability, fandom, politics, and on and on.

We all want Marquette to be great, we are average amongst the top tier schools, well above average as a whole. We all want each other to be great, we are average. We could be great.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 14, 2020, 04:21:30 PM
Maybe instead of banning anyone, we could just limit all individual posters to like 5 or 10 posts a day. I can't think of anything about MUBB so important to say that I need to say it more than 5 times in a day, or something that hasn't already been said in the other 120,000 posts in the last year. Or maybe relax that in just the gameday threads or something. Just a thought?
I like the thought but Sybil will just create even more sock puppets to get around the posting limit.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Pakuni on January 14, 2020, 04:37:27 PM
I find posts like this frustrating.

With just 4 Big East games under our belt, it's waaayyy too soon to draw any definitive conclusions on the season. There are still 14 conference games left to play -- more than 3/4 of the schedule. I think this team still has the potential to make a run at a league title, a Top 20 ranking and a 4 or 5 NCAA seed.

I supported Wojo's contract extension -- but I wouldn't call myself a staunch Wojo backer. I'm a staunch backer of Marquette basketball. The way last season ended was gut-wrenching. I'm very concerned about the inconsistency from game to game this season. I don't have lower expectations for the program. And I'm not content with a 30-50ish type of team. (I'd be surprised if anyone who posts on this site is; I can't stand unfounded statements like this.)

To be clear, I expect Marquette to rise to the level of a Top 20-25 program -- year in, year out. National titles should be the goal, rather than just making the tournament. If a private Catholic university like Villanova can do it, I see no reason why MU can't.

I simply disagree that it's 100% clear, without a doubt, we've already seen the best Wojo has to offer. That's an opinion, not a fact. I disagree the program has shown zero signs of progress under Wojo. I disagree there's no chance this team will raise its level of play. And I disagree that any of the constant comparisons between Wojo and past coaches (Deane, Crean, Williams) are at all relevant.

It doesn't make me right. It doesn't mean my mind is forever made up about Wojo or the future of the program. It doesn't make me a better fan. They're my own opinions, based on what I've seen and learned in my 30+ years of rooting for Marquette basketball.

The next few games, and the rest of the season, will tell us a lot.

I agree.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 14, 2020, 05:06:55 PM
I like the thought but Sybil will just create even more sock puppets to get around the posting limit.

Statements like this are not helpful.

I am totally new to the board and just because I happened to agree with Cheeks or Chicos or whatever people call him, people on the other side of the argument accused me of being him.
I hope the NoJos are starting to see that there is a large section of the fan base who disagree with their take on Wojo.

I made this point in another post but I'll try to make it again here.

If Wojos record, (wins and losses, tournament appearances, recruiting, coaching, player development, leadership, character, etc), was as bad as the NoJos portray it, wouldn't it be obvious to everyone( recruits, the BoD, ALL the fans)??
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: real chili 83 on January 14, 2020, 05:13:03 PM
real 83

You are a member of a lot of secret MU ball clubs. Well deserved, you are one of the good ones!

You too.  Hugs and kisses brother.  ;)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: real chili 83 on January 14, 2020, 05:13:23 PM
Nd sucks.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: hairy worthen on January 14, 2020, 05:20:38 PM
You too.  Hugs and kisses brother.  ;)
Squirmy
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 14, 2020, 05:33:08 PM
This right here. Not sure why people get so bent about disagreements and differing opinions. Maybe everyone should just respond to every post with:  “I agree.”  Sure would be a vibrant and dynamic board.

P.S.  Those of you who are staunch Wojo backers, you aren’t any bigger or better fans than those of us who are frustrated. Your side just has lower expectations from the MU program and seems content with a 30-50ish type of team. If that weren’t the case you’d stop trying to rationalize why we can’t crack the Top 25 or haven’t won an NCAA game under Wojo.
No, you are wrong. We need more thought police rules on posting.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: hairy worthen on January 14, 2020, 05:40:30 PM
I don't know if y'all have noticed that I haven't visited the basketball threads recently, but here's why: even though I have put many of the more egregious posters on Ignore, it is simply not worth wading through all the vitriol, mean-spiritedness, and outright stupidity to get to anything that I would want to read.

FFS, we soundly beat a top-ten team, and some of you still found reasons to post harshly negative crap during and after the game. Every single thread, even if it starts out as reasonable discourse (like this one), devolves into a name-calling, dick-swinging argument about the same topics over and over again. This isn't a Marquette fan site any more.  It's a Marquette bashing site.  Fans of our opponents who visit this site must laugh their asses off, and I don't blame them.

I don't need to waste my time reading the posts of armchair coaches, failed athletes, and straight up idiots who have nothing constructive or insightful to say. It is possible to criticize without being hateful, but most of the recent posters on Scoop have chosen to forgo that route.  I know several other folks who used to be very active on Scoop who don't even log in anymore, and they were some of the most incisive, entertaining posters.

I am forever grateful to the mods for creating this site, as I have derived a lot of pleasure from participating in it.  But they have allowed it to be taken over by its most despicable posters.   Perhaps they don't mind, or may even agree with those "fans".  But if they want to return Scoop to the days when fans could have reasonable conversations, may I humbly suggest that they put the worst offenders (and we all know who they are) on a very long break and allow the site to mend itself.
Different points of view are good. This would be a pretty boring board if everyone agreed and was always rah rah.

 I agree with you that the name calling and disrespect should be kept to a minimum, but you are being hypocritical criticizing others while calling them stupid and idiots among other things. I do think some of the posts are out of line, but I also think there are some snowflakes that are offended by anything. It's not offensive for someone to have a different point of view.

At the end of the day the mods do a great job of not being overbearing while still laying the wood when needed
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 14, 2020, 06:02:40 PM
Different points of view are good. This would be a pretty boring board if everyone agreed and was always rah rah.

 I agree with you that the name calling and disrespect should be kept to a minimum, but you are being hypocritical criticizing others while calling them stupid and idiots among other things. I do think some of the posts are out of line, but I also think there are some snowflakes that are offended by anything. It's not offensive for someone to have a different point of view.

At the end of the day the mods do a great job of not being overbearing while still laying the wood when needed

In fairness, she didn't call anyone out by name, or in a direct posted response. She spoke in generalities and directed them at the entire community. There is a huge difference. One is personal, the other impersonal.. If a person feels that a general comment is specifically referring to them, well........
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GooooMarquette on January 14, 2020, 06:12:10 PM
Nd sucks.



This sentiment is good anywhere, but it most belongs in the NM thread. As a service to you, my friend, I have added such a post in your honor.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: hairy worthen on January 14, 2020, 06:25:23 PM
In fairness, she didn't call anyone out by name, or in a direct posted response. She spoke in generalities and directed them at the entire community. There is a huge difference. One is personal, the other impersonal.. If a person feels that a general comment is specifically referring to them, well........
Ok if you say so. She is still using language that she is criticizing others for using. She is also specifically calling out those posters who criticize the team which are specific posters. Believe me I have had my share of posters call me names or my posts "dumb" etc. And I have done so on occasion as well. I do try to keep the name calling out of it and at least make a credible argument.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 14, 2020, 06:56:21 PM
Ok if you say so. She is still using language that she is criticizing others for using. She is also specifically calling out those posters who criticize the team which are specific posters. Believe me I have had my share of posters call me names or my posts "dumb" etc. And I have done so on occasion as well. I do try to keep the name calling out of it and at least make a credible argument.

I explained the major difference in the post you responded to. I don't know what else to say. If people called you names, or insulted you directly, then her comments would also apply to them. Her comments about people spamming the board with Nega-bombs should only bother those who engage in the behavior. I also support what she said about them.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: hairy worthen on January 14, 2020, 07:06:07 PM
I explained the major difference in the post you responded to. I don't know what else to say. If people called you names, or insulted you directly, then her comments would also apply to them. Her comments about people spamming the board with Nega-bombs should only bother those who engage in the behavior. I also support what she said about them.
And I gave you a response. I don't know what else to say. I understand what you are attempting to say. Sounds like a rationalization to me. What she says does not bother me in the least it's hypocritical that's all.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: warriorchick on January 14, 2020, 08:31:39 PM
And I gave you a response. I don't know what else to say. I understand what you are attempting to say. Sounds like a rationalization to me. What she says does not bother me in the least it's hypocritical that's all.

 ::)  Aaaaand another conversation devolving into a dumb argument.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 15, 2020, 04:41:11 AM
::)  Aaaaand another conversation devolving into a dumb argument.
Asaand another opinion devolving into calling other opinions dumb, which makes the point that we need to ban all those whose opinions differ from the elite  educated illuminati
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu_hilltopper on January 15, 2020, 07:48:52 AM
::)  Aaaaand another conversation devolving into a dumb argument.


MUScoop's slogan.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 15, 2020, 08:43:18 AM
::)  Aaaaand another conversation devolving into a dumb argument.

This is scoop where people will latch onto a single tiny detail in a post and fight about it for 15 pages
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 15, 2020, 08:50:21 AM
This is scoop where people will latch onto a single tiny detail in a post and fight about it for 15 pages

And just about everyone is guilty of it
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 15, 2020, 08:56:05 AM
And just about everyone is guilty of it

Ehhhhh there's the select few who make it an artform. Sometimes even starting 6 more topics on the same thing.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 15, 2020, 09:01:58 AM
Ehhhhh there's the select few who make it an artform. Sometimes even starting 6 more topics on the same thing.

Seek help, you are unstable for lack of self awareness of your own contributions for which you complain
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 15, 2020, 09:03:09 AM
Seek help, you are unstable for lack of self awareness of your own contributions for which you complain

You should go through my posts more throughly
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 15, 2020, 10:05:51 AM
This is scoop where people will latch onto a single tiny detail in a post and fight about it for 15 pages

And 15 years!

(Honestly don't know if Scoop has been around that long ... but it made for good symmetry!)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 15, 2020, 10:17:04 AM
And 15 years!

(Honestly don't know if Scoop has been around that long ... but it made for good symmetry!)

Dang I should have done 13.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: vogue65 on January 15, 2020, 11:04:48 AM
For my $0.02 worth, I'm happy to see the most angry, agressive, obnoxious deviants gone.
I can pass over the tedious repetitive members, no problem.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Mr. Sand-Knit on January 15, 2020, 11:13:28 AM
If he lands Mane, highly doubt he would leave on his own, even if we miss NCAA tournament, and no way I see MU letting him go.  Ultimately, Wojo isn't a quick study, but he is a grinder, and the hope would that after 6 years and seeing how letting one player be ball dominant is a formula for disaster - he'll become a better coach.  This is the best we can hope for..and it is possible.

Really an ignorant opinion,  the problem is not Markus its that the rest of our junior and senior players are not very good.  Ya blame Markus for trying to drag the reat of the stumble bums to victory.  So so very stupid
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 15, 2020, 11:54:15 AM
Really an ignorant opinion,  the problem is not Markus its that the rest of our junior and senior players are not very good.  Ya blame Markus for trying to drag the reat of the stumble bums to victory.  So so very stupid

Rarely bother to even dignify you with a response, but I’ll indulge:  I do t give AF what you think - you are the guy who heralded Matters Heldt over Luke Fischer and have had numerous other epicly failed takes.

I like Markus, but there would be another senior and another Redshirt sophomore on the roster who aren’t “stumble bums” had Wojo been able to manage things better last year.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: tower912 on January 15, 2020, 01:27:08 PM
Their dissatisfaction and physical limitations were integral to the closing stretch last year.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 15, 2020, 01:39:43 PM
Completely unnecessary. No need to make sexist comments
Not understanding the sexist bit. Did you ever listen to the dear departed Sam Kinnison?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: lawdog77 on January 15, 2020, 01:46:22 PM
Rarely bother to even dignify you with a response, but I’ll indulge:  I do t give AF what you think - you are the guy who heralded Matters Heldt over Luke Fischer and have had numerous other epicly failed takes.

I like Markus, but there would be another senior and another Redshirt sophomore on the roster who aren’t “stumble bums” had Wojo been able to manage things better differentlylast year.
Fixed it for you. It may have been an unmanageable situation, nobody really knows.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: tower912 on January 15, 2020, 01:52:08 PM
Not understanding the sexist bit. Did you ever listen to the dear departed Sam Kinnison?
Yes, because the late Sam should have been everyone's moral touchstone when it came to defining sexism.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Herman Cain on January 15, 2020, 02:18:15 PM
I don't know if y'all have noticed that I haven't visited the basketball threads recently, but here's why: even though I have put many of the more egregious posters on Ignore, it is simply not worth wading through all the vitriol, mean-spiritedness, and outright stupidity to get to anything that I would want to read.

FFS, we soundly beat a top-ten team, and some of you still found reasons to post harshly negative crap during and after the game. Every single thread, even if it starts out as reasonable discourse (like this one), devolves into a name-calling, dick-swinging argument about the same topics over and over again. This isn't a Marquette fan site any more.  It's a Marquette bashing site.  Fans of our opponents who visit this site must laugh their asses off, and I don't blame them.

I don't need to waste my time reading the posts of armchair coaches, failed athletes, and straight up idiots who have nothing constructive or insightful to say. It is possible to criticize without being hateful, but most of the recent posters on Scoop have chosen to forgo that route.  I know several other folks who used to be very active on Scoop who don't even log in anymore, and they were some of the most incisive, entertaining posters.

I am forever grateful to the mods for creating this site, as I have derived a lot of pleasure from participating in it.  But they have allowed it to be taken over by its most despicable posters.   Perhaps they don't mind, or may even agree with those "fans".  But if they want to return Scoop to the days when fans could have reasonable conversations, may I humbly suggest that they put the worst offenders (and we all know who they are) on a very long break and allow the site to mend itself.
MU has an engaged fan base which is an asset of the program.  I believe it is one of the essential requirements for success. Engaged Fans have strong opinions.

Scoop allows for all opinions.

Mr. Dodds only allows one opinion, his and those who agree with him  .

I prefer Scoop. 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 15, 2020, 02:34:11 PM
Honestly, a lot of the interesting conversations have moved onto twitter of all places. I don't post here nearly as much as I use to simply because the level of discourse has devolved to name calling and each "side" using it's own facts. Over the last three days I've gotten involved with at least 4 parallel debates about Wojo on twitter that were intelligent, insightful, and snarky....all things that Scoop use to be but have seemingly gone away. These conversations were outstanding despite me being largely on the pollyanna side of things and one of the few ones at that.

Plus selfishly I get tired of having to defend myself when I post things that I know to be true and people question it.

One note, this absolutely has nothing to do with the overlords of Scoop, they have provided an invaluable platform that I'm historically grateful for....it's not their fault that the majority of the posters these days are borderline trolls.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 79Warrior on January 15, 2020, 02:41:27 PM
MU has an engaged fan base which is an asset of the program.  I believe it is one of the essential requirements for success. Engaged Fans have strong opinions.

Scoop allows for all opinions.

Mr. Dodds only allows one opinion, his and those who agree with him  .

I prefer Scoop.

Agree HC. Dodds has no interest in differing opinions. That why his board does not get much traffic.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 4everwarriors on January 15, 2020, 03:11:46 PM
MU has an engaged fan base which is an asset of the program.  I believe it is one of the essential requirements for success. Engaged Fans have strong opinions.

Scoop allows for all opinions.

Mr. Dodds only allows one opinion, his and those who agree with him  .

I prefer Scoop.




Who, hey?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: jesmu84 on January 15, 2020, 04:00:36 PM
Honestly, a lot of the interesting conversations have moved onto twitter of all places. I don't post here nearly as much as I use to simply because the level of discourse has devolved to name calling and each "side" using it's own facts. Over the last three days I've gotten involved with at least 4 parallel debates about Wojo on twitter that were intelligent, insightful, and snarky....all things that Scoop use to be but have seemingly gone away. These conversations were outstanding despite me being largely on the pollyanna side of things and one of the few ones at that.

Plus selfishly I get tired of having to defend myself when I post things that I know to be true and people question it.

One note, this absolutely has nothing to do with the overlords of Scoop, they have provided an invaluable platform that I'm historically grateful for....it's not their fault that the majority of the posters these days are borderline trolls.

+1
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: LloydsLegs on January 15, 2020, 04:27:04 PM
Dang I should have done 13.

This could devolve into the Bernie/Warren 30 years or 29 years debate!! [NO POLITICS]
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 15, 2020, 05:15:12 PM
This could devolve into the Bernie/Warren 30 years or 29 years debate!! [NO POLITICS]

That was the weirdest argument I've ever seen in a debate
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: fjm on January 15, 2020, 05:26:32 PM
I’ve been around. But I’m not into reading anger and hate.

So why acknowledged angry people that only show up during losses.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 15, 2020, 05:47:46 PM
I’ve been around. But I’m not into reading anger and hate.

So why acknowledged angry people that only show up during losses.

I actively post I order to counter the more extreme takes on Wojo and the players.

Karin Mane or one of his peeps may browse Marquette fan sites and I think it's important that they see support for the players and coach, win or lose.
If no one spoke up in support of Wojo and the team, Karim could get the notion that he might be making a mistake by considering Marquette.

The same rationale applies to other recruits considering Marquette.

These borderline trolls could cause real harm to the program
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: PuertoRicanNightmare on January 15, 2020, 05:51:07 PM
For my $0.02 worth, I'm happy to see the most angry, agressive, obnoxious deviants gone.
I can pass over the tedious repetitive members, no problem.
How about a page just for the deviants.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: rocky_warrior on January 15, 2020, 05:52:27 PM
I actively post I order to counter the more extreme takes on Wojo and the players.

Have you ever considered that if everyone ignored the "more extreme" that their threads would fall to the bottom of the list, and wouldn't keep being bumped.  At the same time, if you only posted or replied to posts that were discussing (what you deem) interesting thoughts about Marquette Hoops, perhaps there would be less arguing.

Just some of my own thoughts.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 15, 2020, 06:11:11 PM
Have you ever considered that if everyone ignored the "more extreme" that their threads would fall to the bottom of the list, and wouldn't keep being bumped.  At the same time, if you only posted or replied to posts that were discussing (what you deem) interesting thoughts about Marquette Hoops, perhaps there would be less arguing.

Just some of my own thoughts.

I've considered it, but if lies or misrepresentations are left unchallenged they often become accepted as truth. I don't find much on this board worth fighting about but the trashing of Wojo and the players is where I draw the line.

In view of the mods reluctance to ban the borderline trolls who show up  only after losses and pollute the board with toxic, hyperbolic rhetoric, I see no other option. Silence is not an option for me in this instance.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 15, 2020, 09:19:21 PM
I've considered it, but if lies or misrepresentations are left unchallenged they often become accepted as truth. I don't find much on this board worth fighting about but the trashing of Wojo and the players is where I draw the line.

In view of the mods reluctance to ban the borderline trolls who show up  only after losses and pollute the board with toxic, hyperbolic rhetoric, I see no other option. Silence is not an option for me in this instance.

It’s not that serious... a message isn’t life. I am a fan but it’s college basketball, basically a hobby.  ::)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: JakeBarnes on January 15, 2020, 09:25:36 PM
Lots of missing scoopers tonight
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 15, 2020, 10:02:08 PM
Lots of missing scoopers tonight

Curious, Jake ... did you end up going to Kirkwood?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Markusquette on January 15, 2020, 10:11:58 PM
Lots of missing scoopers tonight

Of course. Nothing bad enough worth sharing.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Pakuni on January 15, 2020, 10:13:50 PM
Lots of missing scoopers tonight

Shhhhh ... no need to encourage them.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: skianth16 on January 15, 2020, 10:15:38 PM
Lots of missing scoopers tonight

I hate to state the obvious, but a lot of Scoopers were probably at the game tonight. That makes a difference in time spent on the internet.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Markusquette on January 15, 2020, 10:18:04 PM
I hate to state the obvious, but a lot of Scoopers were probably at the game tonight. That makes a difference in time spent on the internet.

Hmm. I have a harder time believing some of the expected missing scoopers would not be attending the game.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 15, 2020, 10:25:18 PM
It’s not that serious... a message isn’t life. I am a fan but it’s college basketball, basically a hobby.  ::)

How about people toning down the rhetoric in the middle of the season AND in the middle of a recruiting battle for Karim Mane. When the seasons over and Karim is signed to a NLI, then let's talk about how successful or unsuccessful Marquette was this season. Sometimes I think people are trying to sabotage his recruitment to make Wojo look bad.

Words matter. The trashing of Wojo and the players is not harmless. Those words could negatively impact this season and future recruiting.

Fans need to remember that they represent Marquette, just like the coach and the players do.

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: skianth16 on January 15, 2020, 10:28:11 PM
How about people toning down the rhetoric in the middle of the season AND in the middle of a recruiting battle for Karim Mane. When the seasons over and Karim is signed to a NLI, then let's talk about how successful or unsuccessful Marquette was this season. Sometimes I think people are trying to sabotage his recruitment to make Wojo look bad.

(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQmr4l0o2kzN8HJ9uA-Z20GsRjDED3tMWraegHPHpEHVQcbVqr5)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 15, 2020, 10:29:01 PM
How about people toning down the rhetoric in the middle of the season AND in the middle of a recruiting battle for Karim Mane. When the seasons over and Karim is signed to a NLI, then let's talk about how successful or unsuccessful Marquette was this season. Sometimes I think people are trying to sabotage his recruitment to make Wojo look bad.

Yea. Let’s shut down Scoop until after the season and the Karim Mane recruitment is over.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 15, 2020, 10:30:05 PM
How about people toning down the rhetoric in the middle of the season AND in the middle of a recruiting battle for Karim Mane. When the seasons over and Karim is signed to a NLI, then let's talk about how successful or unsuccessful Marquette was this season. Sometimes I think people are trying to sabotage his recruitment to make Wojo look bad.

Silliness.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 15, 2020, 10:36:24 PM
Silliness.

Is it?

There are people on this board who seem to still be angry over Buzz leaving and constantly hold him up as proof that Wojo is a failure.. There's another group, or maybe the same group that's angry about the Hausers leaving and places ALL the blame on
Wojo.

Angry people with a grudge are capable of almost anything.

Are there some people on this board rooting for Wojo to fail? You tell me.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 15, 2020, 10:44:15 PM
Yea. Let’s shut down Scoop until after the season and the Karim Mane recruitment is over.

No, let's shut down the extreme rhetoric until Karim is signed and Marquettes tournament fate is determined.

Constructive criticism is actually very helpful. I do it myself. Destructive, hyperbolic, negative rhetoric, not so much.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 15, 2020, 10:54:18 PM
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcQmr4l0o2kzN8HJ9uA-Z20GsRjDED3tMWraegHPHpEHVQcbVqr5)

When you're dealing with " fans " who only show up after a loss to spew caustic, vitriolic, negative rhetoric, but lack the courage to show up after a win, I wouldn't put anything past them.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 15, 2020, 11:04:30 PM
I've considered it, but if lies or misrepresentations are left unchallenged they often become accepted as truth. I don't find much on this board worth fighting about but the trashing of Wojo and the players is where I draw the line.

In view of the mods reluctance to ban the borderline trolls who show up  only after losses and pollute the board with toxic, hyperbolic rhetoric, I see no other option. Silence is not an option for me in this instance.

Thank you for coming out of your silent room after all these years lurking and carrying the mantle of all good things Scoop. Your 12 days of fighting for the life of the Scoop board against all things and posters unjust will be rewarded in heaven.

Arby's coupons for you, sir, for your newfound gallantry.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: JakeBarnes on January 15, 2020, 11:06:21 PM
Curious, Jake ... did you end up going to Kirkwood?

Nope. 0-3 there so went to Old Town Pub as the wife was coaching a running group down the street. Maybe this is my new place (albeit much further from home)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 16, 2020, 12:05:48 AM
Nope. 0-3 there so went to Old Town Pub as the wife was coaching a running group down the street. Maybe this is my new place (albeit much further from home)

I'm a refuse-to-give-in-to-superstition kind of guy, so I would have HAD to go to Kirkwood if I were you. But I totally understand.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 16, 2020, 12:17:22 AM
Thank you for coming out of your silent room after all these years lurking and carrying the mantle of all good things Scoop. Your 12 days of fighting for the life of the Scoop board against all things and posters unjust will be rewarded in heaven.

Arby's coupons for you, sir, for your newfound gallantry.

If you don't have a problem with " fans" who only show up after losses to trash the coach and players that's fine. You do you.

I did recently join the board to add another voice in opposition to these "fans" and their hyperbolic, negative comments. I can think of worse reasons.

As for your characterization of me as a self styled crusader for all things good on the board you should read the post you responded to a little closer. The only things I've been battling are the "fans" who constantly trash the coach and players while Marquette is in the midst of a tough conference schedule and a critical recruiting battle. If you have a problem with that we're not going to get along well.

You can keep your coupons

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Goose on January 16, 2020, 03:38:38 AM
Dr. B

It really is special that WhoaJoe took the time to dip his toe in the Scoop water. If we are lucky, possibly WhoaJoe’s instant Scoop success will encourage other long time lurkers to sneak in a post or fifty a day.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 16, 2020, 05:56:55 AM
How about people toning down the rhetoric in the middle of the season AND in the middle of a recruiting battle for Karim Mane. When the seasons over and Karim is signed to a NLI, then let's talk about how successful or unsuccessful Marquette was this season. Sometimes I think people are trying to sabotage his recruitment to make Wojo look bad.

Words matter. The trashing of Wojo and the players is not harmless. Those words could negatively impact this season and future recruiting.

Fans need to remember that they represent Marquette, just like the coach and the players do.
The powers that be are certainly not basing hiring, firing or recruiting decisions based on what fans are saying online.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: tower912 on January 16, 2020, 06:37:32 AM
This is true.   However, recruits and their families do read message boards.    And it can negatively influence them.    Badger fans negatively influenced Blue, Matthews, the Hauser family.    Legend has it that message board chatter cost MU a recruit under Crean.   Certainly, the Diener family has no love for a certain poster on the Dodds board.     Now, some will argue that recruits and their families should not read message boards.   That it is just a message board and what anonymous fans post shouldn't be taken seriously or personally.     Balderdash.   

You are judged by what you say everywhere and by everyone.    Words do create impressions.   People do infer character of individuals and a fanbase as a whole.     It just is.   
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 16, 2020, 06:50:39 AM
Dr. B

It really is special that WhoaJoe took the time to dip his toe in the Scoop water. If we are lucky, possibly WhoaJoe’s instant Scoop success will encourage other long time lurkers to sneak in a post or fifty a day.
Does Chico's actually have a job?  Sure seems to be a lot of free time.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 16, 2020, 07:44:04 AM
This is true.   However, recruits and their families do read message boards.    And it can negatively influence them.    Badger fans negatively influenced Blue, Matthews, the Hauser family.    Legend has it that message board chatter cost MU a recruit under Crean.   Certainly, the Diener family has no love for a certain poster on the Dodds board.     Now, some will argue that recruits and their families should not read message boards.   That it is just a message board and what anonymous fans post shouldn't be taken seriously or personally.     Balderdash.   

You are judged by what you say everywhere and by everyone.    Words do create impressions.   People do infer character of individuals and a fanbase as a whole.     It just is.

I understand what you are saying, tower. I would argue that we shouldn't go after MU players and that we shouldn't launch scathing, repeated diatribes against the MU coach because being civil is simply the right thing to do.

That being said, I don't believe folks who articulate a genuine dissatisfaction with the direction of the program should have to think, "I better pretend to be happy, or to not care, because a recruit's uncle might see this." It's a fan site. We are allowed to have fan takes.

Are there really major college hoops programs whose fan sites NEVER criticize the coach and/or players out of fear that recruits might be logged on? If so, why aren't those programs getting all the great recruits? I have seen Kentucky, Duke, Carolina and Kansas fan sites; I wonder how those programs keep getting 5-star recruits.

I do believe there are ways to discuss a coach's shortcomings without saying, "So-and-so is a moron. I never liked him. All he does is de-motivate our players. He's a tool. Etc." And certainly, adults attacking the teenagers and early-20-somethings who have dedicated their lives to MU basketball are revealing their lack of character.

As with most things, there are degrees of "right" and "wrong," lots of nuance.

I thought Wojo looked weak when he was unable to do one of the biggest parts of any coach's job: manage his players' egos. I hated losing the Hausers, and even more, I worried that the situation might hurt future recruiting. I did not for one second say to myself, "Gee, if I voice those concerns on Scoop, I could cost us future recruits."

Others, obviously, are free to disagree. It's an interesting topic, in and of itself.

And, of course, I am delighted to have been shown I really shouldn't have worried that Hausershima would hurt Wojo's ability to land good recruits.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 07:44:43 AM
Does Chico's actually have a job?  Sure seems to be a lot of free time.

Keep lying...you have mastered it
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: GOO on January 16, 2020, 07:49:27 AM
This is true.   However, recruits and their families do read message boards.    And it can negatively influence them.    Badger fans negatively influenced Blue, Matthews, the Hauser family.    Legend has it that message board chatter cost MU a recruit under Crean.   Certainly, the Diener family has no love for a certain poster on the Dodds board.     Now, some will argue that recruits and their families should not read message boards.   That it is just a message board and what anonymous fans post shouldn't be taken seriously or personally.     Balderdash.   

You are judged by what you say everywhere and by everyone.    Words do create impressions.   People do infer character of individuals and a fanbase as a whole.     It just is.

I do think that one's character can come through on a board like this, as people tend not to hide their true self as much as they do in person.  True "character revealed" on these boards?  As far as the board itself or fan base itself, I do agree that families and others do get impressions and extrapolate a few comments and generalize to the whole - as that seems to be human nature - take one or two points and assume and extrapolate to the whole.  Bad logic, but it is part of what we do as humans, even though we should know better. 

One thing I have learned from this board is just how many people have egos (or is it fragile egos) that any slight must be responded to and how hurt people get at the slightest of slights.  Little ability to take a glancing jab or negative comment and move on to the important things in life that actually matter.   
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 08:07:44 AM
Lots of missing scoopers tonight

Didn’t see the game, was in meetings until late last night....plus a celebration with my family.  Will watch game tonight, sounds like we played well.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: NickelDimer on January 16, 2020, 08:12:06 AM
Sometimes I think people are trying to sabotage his recruitment to make Wojo look bad.

Wow that’s a bad (but hilarious) take

Thank you for coming out of your silent room after all these years lurking and carrying the mantle of all good things Scoop. Your 12 days of fighting for the life of the Scoop board against all things and posters unjust will be rewarded in heaven.

Arby's coupons for you, sir, for your newfound gallantry.
(https://media2.giphy.com/media/l4q8cJzGdR9J8w3hS/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 08:29:04 AM
Xavier board has a Fire Steele thread and it sounds just like some folks here.  Lots of experts out there.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 16, 2020, 09:40:29 AM
When you're dealing with " fans " who only show up after a loss to spew caustic, vitriolic, negative rhetoric, but lack the courage to show up after a win, I wouldn't put anything past them.

Ya know what Scoop doesn't need? A white knight to ride in a solve all of it's problems, cause you are actually just making it worse. General interneting says don't feed the trolls, stick to facts and debating valid opinions and the rest will take care of itself.

Scoop has been here long before you, and it will be here long after you're gone. Same with the trolls. MU has landed and lost lots of recruits none of whom did it matter that some keyboard tough guys were debating the merits of the programs coach in some hazy corner of the internet. I bring this up to you because unlike the trolls you might be redeemable. Just let it all go.

(https://i.imgur.com/2iaOGVW.gif)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 16, 2020, 10:00:56 AM
Ya know what Scoop doesn't need? A white knight to ride in a solve all of it's problems, cause you are actually just making it worse. General interneting says don't feed the trolls, stick to facts and debating valid opinions and the rest will take care of itself.

Scoop has been here long before you, and it will be here long after you're gone. Same with the trolls. MU has landed and lost lots of recruits none of whom did it matter that some keyboard tough guys were debating the merits of the programs coach in some hazy corner of the internet. I bring this up to you because unlike the trolls you might be redeemable. Just let it all go.

WhoaJoe: Highly recommend you heed mu03's advice. He is among the most reasonable posters on Scoop.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Spaniel with a Short Tail on January 16, 2020, 10:19:49 AM
(https://99percentinvisible.org/app/uploads/2018/06/40-seconds-left.jpg)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 16, 2020, 03:17:17 PM
Does Chico's actually have a job?  Sure seems to be a lot of free time.

That’s what I’ve saying. What does this person do that they have that much free time?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 04:35:35 PM
That’s what I’ve saying. What does this person do that they have that much free time?

I work for a university

You also incorrectly believe I am someone else posting here....that’s a Tsmith34 issue that you are falling for.  Blame yourself.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 16, 2020, 04:45:08 PM
WhoaJoe: Highly recommend you heed mu03's advice. He is among the most reasonable posters on Scoop.

I'm not sure what to make of mu03.
That posters take after a win is SO different from their take after a loss.
It's like they're two different people.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: NorthernDancerColt on January 16, 2020, 05:19:40 PM
(https://99percentinvisible.org/app/uploads/2018/06/40-seconds-left.jpg)

Behind WalMart?

Because you can’t spell “martial law” without it.   ;)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 16, 2020, 05:45:03 PM
I work for a university

You also incorrectly believe I am someone else posting here....that’s a Tsmith34 issue that you are falling for.  Blame yourself.

What do you for a living that you have free time during the day and can work at 2am if you want?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 06:20:31 PM
What do you for a living that you have free time during the day and can work at 2am if you want?

I don’t want to work at 2:00am, there are times I am compelled to because of partnerships around the world in different time zones, etc.  My “free time” during the day is usually during lunch, my morning drive or my evening. Or maybe something opens up and I need 10 minutes to get my brain off the grind...this is an outlet for me.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 16, 2020, 07:07:53 PM
I'm not sure what to make of mu03.
That posters take after a win is SO different from their take after a loss.
It's like they're two different people.

If by so different you mean that I post after wins but i don't after losses then yes I'm all over the place
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 16, 2020, 07:17:54 PM
I'm not sure what to make of mu03.
That posters take after a win is SO different from their take after a loss.
It's like they're two different people.

Some share one account others make multiple  ;)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 16, 2020, 07:19:12 PM
I don’t want to work at 2:00am, there are times I am compelled to because of partnerships around the world in different time zones, etc.  My “free time” during the day is usually during lunch, my morning drive or my evening. Or maybe something opens up and I need 10 minutes to get my brain off the grind...this is an outlet for me.

You shouldn't be scooping and driving
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 07:31:07 PM
You shouldn't be scooping and driving

I don’t....don’t text and drive.


Carpool
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 16, 2020, 07:34:29 PM
You shouldn't be scooping and driving

Don’t worry he’s not. He won’t tell anyone what he actually does because he does nothing. One post he says he has a job that affords him the flexibility  to work at 2am if he wants and now he is saying he doesn’t want to work at 2am he just has all these important global partners that need him at all hours. It sounds made up.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 16, 2020, 07:39:07 PM
I'm not sure what to make of mu03.
That posters take after a win is SO different from their take after a loss.
It's like they're two different people.

I think you are getting him confused with somebody else.

I told you what to make of mu03eng: He is a very intelligent Marquette fan who almost always offers well-thought-out and reasonable takes.

His advice to you was excellent. Not sure why you wouldn't accept in the kind, constructive and useful manner in which it was intended.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 16, 2020, 07:41:29 PM
Don’t worry he’s not. He won’t tell anyone what he actually does because he does nothing. One post he says he has a job that affords him the flexibility  to work at 2am if he wants and now he is saying he doesn’t want to work at 2am he just has all these important global partners that need him at all hours. It sounds made up.

Cheeks has been very public on who he is and what his job is. While he is often over the top on his arguments with the hyperbole, he is also a professional expert in sports and media, if not the top one here on Scoop. Why he chooses the hills he does to die on is one thing, but it can also be quite fun to poke that pig.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 08:50:06 PM
Cheeks has been very public on who he is and what his job is. While he is often over the top on his arguments with the hyperbole, he is also a professional expert in sports and media, if not the top one here on Scoop. Why he chooses the hills he does to die on is one thing, but it can also be quite fun to poke that pig.

If one is to die, need to pick a hill and own it.  Plant the flag.  I hear more NCAA reporting about to come out for the next school by end of January.  :D

Barfing Keith is on ignore...not worth the brain cells.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 16, 2020, 08:52:06 PM
If one is to die, need to pick a hill and own it.  Plant the flag.  I hear more NCAA reporting about to come out for the next school by end of January.  :D


Well, it is summer in Argentina.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 08:54:09 PM
Well, it is summer in Argentina.

I like the way you think
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 16, 2020, 09:07:16 PM
I think you are getting him confused with somebody else.

I told you what to make of mu03eng: He is a very intelligent Marquette fan who almost always offers well-thought-out and reasonable takes.

His advice to you was excellent. Not sure why you wouldn't accept in the kind, constructive and useful manner in which it was intended.

Re-read his post and have to disagree.

Casting me as a self styled crusader who thinks I'm going to save the board is condescending BS.

As was his comment suggesting I might be redeemable .

He was also completely dismissive about the potential damage EXTREME negative posters could inflict on the program, and basically compared me to them.

What he said about me being as bad as my nemeses doesn't really bother me because I do have an agenda, just like the EXTREME NoJos seem to have their agenda. My agenda is somewhat different and doesn't involve trashing the coach and players but that's just semantics.

People giving me unsolicited advice does raise my ire though. You can trust that I know exactly what I'm doing and will continue to do so regardless of others "well intentioned advice".

If you actually read my posts, you will find that I'm a fairly intelligent Marquette fan who tries to offer well thought out and reasonable takes as well. I'm sure I'm not as intelligent and reasonable as Mu03eng is but then again I don't go around giving advice to people who don't want it either.



Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: MU82 on January 16, 2020, 09:14:53 PM
Re-read his post and have to disagree.

Casting me as a self styled crusader who thinks I'm going to save the board is condescending BS.

As was his comment suggesting I might be redeemable .

He was also completely dismissive about the potential damage EXTREME negative posters could inflict on the program, and basically compared me to them.

What he said about me being as bad as my nemeses doesn't really bother me because I do have an agenda, just like the EXTREME NoJos seem to have their agenda. My agenda is somewhat different and doesn't involve trashing the coach and players but that's just semantics.

People giving me unsolicited advice does raise my ire though. You can trust that I know exactly what I'm doing and will continue to do so regardless of others "well intentioned advice".

If you actually read my posts, you will find that I'm a fairly intelligent Marquette fan who tries to offer well thought out and reasonable takes as well. I'm sure I'm not as intelligent and reasonable as Mu03eng is but then again I don't go around giving advice to people who don't want it either.

OK ... you choose "I'm the best and anybody who thinks otherwise can go to h-e-double-hockey-sticks."

Have a nice life.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 16, 2020, 09:24:31 PM
OK ... you choose "I'm the best and anybody who thinks otherwise can go to h-e-double-hockey-sticks."

Have a nice life.

If that's what you got from my post then I'm not surprised you thought Mu03engs post was "kind , constructive and useful".

You can save your well wishes and your advice for someone who wants it.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Mutaman on January 16, 2020, 09:34:06 PM
..this is an outlet for me.

his outlet is to post on a college basketball board and then read hundreds of replies calling him a psychotic a--h---. Quite an outlet.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 09:43:48 PM
his outlet is to post on a college basketball board and then read hundreds of replies calling him a psychotic a--h---. Quite an outlet.

Ahh, look who is back...the fraud that was exposed on multiple sites as a liar.  What’s wrong, no racist comments to make about posters on Dodds and other boards so you’re back here again?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Mutaman on January 16, 2020, 11:10:37 PM
the fraud that was exposed on multiple sites as a liar. 

They laughed at me and made jokes but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt and with... geometric logic...

kookoo for cocoa puffs
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 16, 2020, 11:17:03 PM
Re-read his post and have to disagree.

Casting me as a self styled crusader who thinks I'm going to save the board is condescending BS.

As was his comment suggesting I might be redeemable .

He was also completely dismissive about the potential damage EXTREME negative posters could inflict on the program, and basically compared me to them.

What he said about me being as bad as my nemeses doesn't really bother me because I do have an agenda, just like the EXTREME NoJos seem to have their agenda. My agenda is somewhat different and doesn't involve trashing the coach and players but that's just semantics.

People giving me unsolicited advice does raise my ire though. You can trust that I know exactly what I'm doing and will continue to do so regardless of others "well intentioned advice".

If you actually read my posts, you will find that I'm a fairly intelligent Marquette fan who tries to offer well thought out and reasonable takes as well. I'm sure I'm not as intelligent and reasonable as Mu03eng is but then again I don't go around giving advice to people who don't want it either.

How did you become THIS awesome?!  The Scoop community is lucky to have you. Please continue your crusade.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 16, 2020, 11:27:49 PM
How did you become THIS awesome?!  The Scoop community is lucky to have you. Please continue your crusade.

You and others are being played on this one, but it does make me laugh.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 17, 2020, 12:26:52 AM
How did you become THIS awesome?!  The Scoop community is lucky to have you. Please continue your crusade.

You seriously don't think anything you say will influence me in any way do you??  You're amusing and tedious at the same time.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 06:07:13 AM
Come on people this board is influencing recruiting and management decisions. We have a job to do to here- we must save MU’s basketball program with our posts on a fan message board that no one with any real influence reads. LMAO!

Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 06:15:27 AM
How did you become THIS awesome?!  The Scoop community is lucky to have you. Please continue your crusade.

Cheeks has to make sure all the recruits that read this board read positive posts about wojo so they will have a positive opinion of the MU program. That’s not crazy at all. It seems completely logical.   ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 17, 2020, 07:19:07 AM
Re-read his post and have to disagree.

Casting me as a self styled crusader who thinks I'm going to save the board is condescending BS.

As was his comment suggesting I might be redeemable .

He was also completely dismissive about the potential damage EXTREME negative posters could inflict on the program, and basically compared me to them.

What he said about me being as bad as my nemeses doesn't really bother me because I do have an agenda, just like the EXTREME NoJos seem to have their agenda. My agenda is somewhat different and doesn't involve trashing the coach and players but that's just semantics.

People giving me unsolicited advice does raise my ire though. You can trust that I know exactly what I'm doing and will continue to do so regardless of others "well intentioned advice".

If you actually read my posts, you will find that I'm a fairly intelligent Marquette fan who tries to offer well thought out and reasonable takes as well. I'm sure I'm not as intelligent and reasonable as Mu03eng is but then again I don't go around giving advice to people who don't want it either.

Its amazing that you "lurked" here for years before deciding to post. Now you have over 300 posts in a week. Only one other guy posts at such a volume... But you are totally a different person.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 17, 2020, 07:59:59 AM
Its amazing that you "lurked" here for years before deciding to post. Now you have over 300 posts in a week. Only one other guy posts at such a volume... But you are totally a different person.

You are being played and it is hilarious to watch
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: lawdog77 on January 17, 2020, 08:04:32 AM
You are being played and it is hilarious to watch
Keefe's attempt at satire?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 17, 2020, 08:15:12 AM
Keefe's attempt at satire?

Definitely not Crash
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 17, 2020, 08:21:04 AM
Keefe's attempt at satire?

Someone’s....I have my guesses....mods could say if they wanted.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: real chili 83 on January 17, 2020, 08:56:02 AM
In before the lock.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 17, 2020, 09:04:11 AM
In before the lock.

naw, this won't be locked, if anything it's a good thread for troll baiting to maybe keep some of the other threads a little less clogged.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 09:38:20 AM
Keefe's attempt at satire?

Whoajoe2020 and cheeks are the same person
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 09:41:08 AM
Someone’s....I have my guesses....mods could say if they wanted.


I’m sure you use multiple devices and multiple IPs
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 17, 2020, 09:52:58 AM
Whoajoe2020 and cheeks are the same person

Whoajoe, Cheeks, AND Keithtisbarf are Chicos

(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/848/Aliens.jpg)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: #UnleashSean on January 17, 2020, 09:58:48 AM
Keefe's attempt at satire?
Benny B in da house?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 17, 2020, 12:51:17 PM
Definitely not Crash

I have already identified who I am and why I am here. I may have been mistaken about who you were, but not the condescending nature of your response and advice. I apologize for the former. I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't repeat the latter.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 17, 2020, 01:12:23 PM
I have already identified who I am and why I am here.
Mrs. Wojo?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 17, 2020, 01:14:44 PM
Mrs. Wojo?

Your mama!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on January 17, 2020, 01:16:39 PM
You're mama!
I guess I have to go all pedantic Bee Jay and say, "Your mama" not "you're mama".
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: mu03eng on January 17, 2020, 01:17:54 PM
Mrs. Wojo?

Bryan Colangelo's burner account?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 17, 2020, 01:24:20 PM
I guess I have to go all pedantic Bee Jay and say, "Your mama" not "you're mama".

LOL fixed
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 04:10:16 PM
Whoajoe, Cheeks, AND Keithtisbarf are Chicos

(https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/848/Aliens.jpg)

I am cheeks....I post on here all day while my wife works 80 hours a week. I also can’t leave the house because I can’t fit through the door.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 17, 2020, 04:43:37 PM
I am cheeks....I post on here all day while my wife works 80 hours a week. I also can’t leave the house because I can’t fit through the door.

Keep trying
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 17, 2020, 08:22:41 PM
Whoajoe2020 and cheeks are the same person

Nope...which is why I am laughing at how much your simple mind is being played here.  I also tip my cap to Whoajoe for this great stunt this past week....epic.   As I said, Barf, the mods could clear this up in a heartbeat if they wish...unless one of them is in on it.   8-)   

Regardless, I hope Joe keeps going....and as I said, when I am under the knife a bit later and he / she is still posting then what is your excuse going to be? 
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: cheebs09 on January 17, 2020, 08:24:33 PM
Bryan Colangelo's burner account?

Carlos Beltran’s niece.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: rocky_warrior on January 17, 2020, 08:44:33 PM
the mods could clear this up in a heartbeat if they wish...

You keep saying this.  The only thing I'm clear on is this "Joe" is trying his(her?) best to remain  anonymous.  I have guesses, but that's all they are.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 17, 2020, 09:28:34 PM
You keep saying this.  The only thing I'm clear on is this "Joe" is trying his(her?) best to remain  anonymous.  I have guesses, but that's all they are.

OK, well that's a start.  I figured that wasn't the case which is why I asked, but that's one clue I suppose. 

I'm happy to offer Joe the same thing Billy was going to do and we can clear this up really quick.  Joe, wherever the hell he lives, can upload a photo of the front page of the paper where he lives with the date, I'll do the same with the LA Times or OC Register same time and day....cannot be in two places at one time.  Plenty of other creative ways to prove people wrong on this, but I again tip my hat to him (her)....pretty funny to watch.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: WhoaJoe2020 on January 17, 2020, 09:40:30 PM
You keep saying this.  The only thing I'm clear on is this "Joe" is trying his(her?) best to remain  anonymous.  I have guesses, but that's all they are.

You tell me how to verify I'm a unique account without giving out personal information and I would be glad to do it. I guess my word isn't good enough.

By the way, I find some of Cheeks comments fairly outrageous. Just because we agree on one or two issues does not make us the same.

I believe the people who accuse me of being him already know I'm not, but say it anyway to try and silence anyone who agrees with Cheeks. Especially when it comes to debates involving Wojo.

All I can say to them is........

It won't work.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on January 17, 2020, 09:43:21 PM
OK, well that's a start.  I figured that wasn't the case which is why I asked, but that's one clue I suppose. 

I'm happy to offer Joe the same thing Billy was going to do and we can clear this up really quick.  Joe, wherever the hell he lives, can upload a photo of the front page of the paper where he lives with the date, I'll do the same with the LA Times or OC Register same time and day....cannot be in two places at one time.  Plenty of other creative ways to prove people wrong on this, but I again tip my hat to him (her)....pretty funny to watch.

Whoajoe@directv.com just sent this to me to post. He was getting an error message about "too many users from this IP trying to access www.muscoop.com."

(https://dygtyjqp7pi0m.cloudfront.net/i/35680/30905125_1m.jpg?v=8D60AD3FC3AE800)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Cheeks on January 17, 2020, 09:48:07 PM
You tell me how to verify I'm a unique account without giving out personal information and I would be glad to do it. I guess my word isn't good enough.

By the way, I find some of Cheeks comments fairly outrageous. Just because we agree on one or two issues does not make us the same.

I believe the people who accuse me of being him already know I'm not, but say it anyway to try and silence anyone who agrees with Cheeks. Especially when it comes to debates involving Wojo.

All I can say to them is........

It won't work.

OUTRAGEOUS???

(https://media.giphy.com/media/JmxYC6ZUOe73gOi0kH/giphy.gif)   (https://media.giphy.com/media/QRiIOZmt6jTgs/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 10:30:58 PM
Keep trying

Exposed!
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Keithtisbarf on January 17, 2020, 10:33:38 PM
Nope...which is why I am laughing at how much your simple mind is being played here.  I also tip my cap to Whoajoe for this great stunt this past week....epic.   As I said, Barf, the mods could clear this up in a heartbeat if they wish...unless one of them is in on it.   8-)   

Regardless, I hope Joe keeps going....and as I said, when I am under the knife a bit later and he / she is still posting then what is your excuse going to be?

The fact that you can’t or won’t prove you are really under the knife. “Wing” surgery also doesn’t put someone out of commission for more than a day.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: lawdog77 on January 18, 2020, 07:34:29 AM
OK, well that's a start.  I figured that wasn't the case which is why I asked, but that's one clue I suppose. 

I'm happy to offer Joe the same thing Billy was going to do and we can clear this up really quick.  Joe, wherever the hell he lives, can upload a photo of the front page of the paper where he lives with the date, I'll do the same with the LA Times or OC Register same time and day....cannot be in two places at one time.  Plenty of other creative ways to prove people wrong on this, but I again tip my hat to him (her)....pretty funny to watch.
Who the heck buys newspapers anymore?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: willie warrior on January 18, 2020, 07:35:51 AM
Nope...which is why I am laughing at how much your simple mind is being played here.  I also tip my cap to Whoajoe for this great stunt this past week....epic.   As I said, Barf, the mods could clear this up in a heartbeat if they wish...unless one of them is in on it.   8-)   

Regardless, I hope Joe keeps going....and as I said, when I am under the knife a bit later and he / she is still posting then what is your excuse going to be?
C'mon Cheeks, even if you were under the knife, it would be a local anaesthetic and you would still be posting.
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: 4everwarriors on January 18, 2020, 07:36:59 AM
Eye don't cee y wee kant all bee friends, aina?
Title: Re: Missing Scoopers?
Post by: Elonsmusk on January 18, 2020, 07:39:21 AM
OK, well that's a start.  I figured that wasn't the case which is why I asked, but that's one clue I suppose. 

I'm happy to offer Joe the same thing Billy was going to do and we can clear this up really quick.  Joe, wherever the hell he lives, can upload a photo of the front page of the paper where he lives with the date, I'll do the same with the LA Times or OC Register same time and day....cannot be in two places at one time.  Plenty of other creative ways to prove people wrong on this, but I again tip my hat to him (her)....pretty funny to watch.

Any idea why Billy backed out of this “creative”  proof of life concept you’ve constructed?