MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: real chili 83 on March 17, 2017, 11:19:14 PM

Title: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: real chili 83 on March 17, 2017, 11:19:14 PM
Mayfair, sand knit, who else?

Go Rocky!!!
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 17, 2017, 11:21:09 PM
Itll only make it worse right now because they will make a ton of accounts. Wait a couple days, ban them, and then they wont notice until the start of next season.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Goose on March 17, 2017, 11:22:20 PM
Two of the biggest idiots Scoop has seen during my time here.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Ardmore Mug on March 17, 2017, 11:24:32 PM
Can someone  please tell me how to put a poster on IGNORE ???   Its not very easy on this site
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Mr. Sand-Knit on March 17, 2017, 11:26:12 PM

This team is horrible defensively, we have no 4 and no 5 and no Pg.  wojo coached the hell out of this team to get us where we are.
He needs to get on the recruiting trail tomoro.  Our talent is not good in the junior n senior class, relative to the ncaa tourney n top of the BE.  As webber says tho future is bright.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: drewm88 on March 17, 2017, 11:27:29 PM
Can someone  please tell me how to put a poster on IGNORE ???   Its not very easy on this site

Click on profile.

Hover over Modify Profile. Buddies/Ignore List is an option there.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mayfairskatingrink on March 17, 2017, 11:27:53 PM
Mayfair, sand knit, who else?

Go Rocky!!!

Yeah, ban people because they think Wojo is a bad coach.

I look forward to the excuses when Wojo brings in some good, but not great, players and the same defensive problems occur. 

Talk to someone close to the program who watches the practices.  This is a coaching/teaching/schematic problem.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 17, 2017, 11:30:07 PM
Yeah, ban people because they think Wojo is a bad coach.

I look forward to the excuses when Wojo brings in some good, but not great, players and the same defensive problems occur. 

Talk to someone close to the program who watches the practices.  This is a coaching/teaching/schematic problem.

Name a better replacement that is available and will come right now. Cmon, times ticking.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: skianth16 on March 17, 2017, 11:30:35 PM
Scoop isn't just a forum to compliment the team. It's a forum to talk basketball. As a fan of our team, it's normal to criticize poor performance. That's what happens when you get embarrassed in a big game. Opinions are valid when they're negative too.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Hards Alumni on March 17, 2017, 11:31:08 PM
Banning trolls is fine, but if there are legitimate questions about the game then why ban?  If you guys are interested in an echo chamber or a safe space I do not recommend Internet forums.

Toughen up.  True fans stick around, even when it's rough, but dissent is part of free speech.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Vander Blue Man Group on March 17, 2017, 11:32:24 PM
The lack of an athletic 4 that can rebound and defend killed the team all year.  It's too soon to put that on someone like Theo but hopefully he can be that guy eventually.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: real chili 83 on March 17, 2017, 11:32:38 PM
Got em corralled for you
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: TallTitan34 on March 17, 2017, 11:32:52 PM
Scoop isn't just a forum to compliment the team. It's a forum to talk basketball. As a fan of our team, it's normal to criticize poor performance. That's what happens when you get embarrassed in a big game. Opinions are valid when they're negative too.

There is a difference in voicing valid concerns (see the Will Wojo Adjust theead) and simply being a troll. The posters listed above are simply trolls.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Vander Blue Man Group on March 17, 2017, 11:33:26 PM
Banning trolls is fine, but if there are legitimate questions about the game then why ban?  If you guys are interested in an echo chamber or a safe space I do not recommend Internet forums.

Toughen up.  True fans stick around, even when it's rough, but dissent is part of free speech.

Dissent is fine. However, it's rarely logical here.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mayfairskatingrink on March 17, 2017, 11:37:30 PM
Name a better replacement that is available and will come right now. Cmon, times ticking.

It wouldn't matter who was available.  Wojo's job is the safest in America.  MU is so glad to have no "issues" with the players that wins and losses are at the bottom of priorities.

I don't agree with that philosophy but it's not changing.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 17, 2017, 11:38:28 PM
It wouldn't matter who was available.  Wojo's job is the safest in America.  MU is so glad to have no "issues" with the players that wins and losses are at the bottom of priorities.

I don't agree with that philosophy but it's not changing.

Exactly, you have no answers.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: B. McBannerson on March 17, 2017, 11:42:25 PM
Banning trolls is fine, but if there are legitimate questions about the game then why ban?  If you guys are interested in an echo chamber or a safe space I do not recommend Internet forums.

Toughen up.  True fans stick around, even when it's rough, but dissent is part of free speech.

You do not find it odd that one of them has not had a single positive post in the history of his posting. Not one. ever?

The other one, ripping on players to a degree that is unhealthy and without class.  Based on his first 20 posts, this isn't his first rodeo either.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Hards Alumni on March 17, 2017, 11:47:35 PM
You do not find it odd that one of them has not had a single positive post in the history of his posting. Not one. ever?

The other one, ripping on players to a degree that is unhealthy and without class.  Based on his first 20 posts, this isn't his first rodeo either.

Not what I said at all, and I'm not taking sides or speaking about specific posters.

I got called a whiner for voicing valid criticism, and that's what my post was in reference to... understanding the difference.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: skianth16 on March 18, 2017, 12:00:45 AM
Exactly, you have no answers.

But it's a valid point. It does seem like the powers that be would prefer a clean program over a consistently successful program. Ironically, the rough around the edges mindset that made MU nationally relevant is now frowned upon by the suits.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 18, 2017, 12:08:43 AM
But it's a valid point. It does seem like the powers that be would prefer a clean program over a consistently successful program. Ironically, the rough around the edges mindset that made MU nationally relevant is now frowned upon by the suits.

Here's the kicker of the crap you and Goose bring up.  You seem to claim that MU's desire to be "clean" is keeping them from being great.  Well, that's BS.  MU would accept any player that UNC, Duke, Kansas, and UCLA would.  They'd even accept a few isolated transgressions from those players.

But it's not MU's "restrictions" keeping those players from coming to MU.  It's the fact that they'd rather attend the 4 aforementioned programs.  Wojo is recruiting plenty of talent.  You just don't think the talent is good enough.  Tough crap...it is.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: skianth16 on March 18, 2017, 12:44:24 AM
Here's the kicker of the crap you and Goose bring up.  You seem to claim that MU's desire to be "clean" is keeping them from being great.  Well, that's BS.  MU would accept any player that UNC, Duke, Kansas, and UCLA would.  They'd even accept a few isolated transgressions from those players.

But it's not MU's "restrictions" keeping those players from coming to MU.  It's the fact that they'd rather attend the 4 aforementioned programs.  Wojo is recruiting plenty of talent.  You just don't think the talent is good enough.  Tough crap...it is.

Marquette wouldn't tolerate the academic fraud that UNC has committed year after year. And that impacts recruiting. We also wouldn't tolerate Josh Jackson's abuses, both verbal and vehicular. Our BOT would run as far away from LaVar Ball as this nation's borders would permit. Because that kind of publicity ruffles feathers.

So, you know, there are those things to consider.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 18, 2017, 01:11:14 AM
Marquette wouldn't tolerate the academic fraud that UNC has committed year after year.

True, MU has never been accused of that.  But on the heels of decades of success, they've proven the *might* turn a blind eye.

We also wouldn't tolerate Josh Jackson's abuses, both verbal and vehicular.

On an individual basis (!), I'd argue again that Marquette has shown it's willing to support a student athlete that has strayed for a brief moment from being a model citizen.  In fact, they've supported worse than Jackson.

Our BOT would run as far away from LaVar Ball as this nation's borders would permit.

Again, Marquette has proven they will deal with overbearing parents.  It might not be their preferred MO, but there's no restriction there.  At least not for a year of athletic service....
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on March 18, 2017, 01:15:06 AM
There is a difference in voicing valid concerns (see the Will Wojo Adjust theead) and simply being a troll. The posters listed above are simply trolls.
^This
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 18, 2017, 03:29:29 AM
Two of the biggest idiots Scoop has seen during my time here.

There have been many idiots on this site and Goose has seen them all. This is saying something.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Goose on March 18, 2017, 07:00:24 AM
Rocky

I would expect better from you. Please do not put words in my mouth. I have not said MU's desire to be clean is keeping them from being great. Plenty of other factors, but nothing to do with being clean or not. Time to ban myself.

Good luck moving forward,Rocky!!
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: tower912 on March 18, 2017, 07:22:05 AM
Let them troll.    It reveals more about them than it does about the team.  Everybody knew this was not a championship team.    Everyone could see the flaws.     They have been discussed more rationally and objectively.   Sometimes more, sometimes less.    To only appear when things are going wrong and never have anything positive to say?     Character revealed.     
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 18, 2017, 08:47:10 AM
Let them troll.    It reveals more about them than it does about the team. .. Character revealed.     

Admittedly, this is my perspective as a moderator for 10 years. 

There will never be a troll-free BB forum.   And you wouldn't want that anyhow, everyone sitting around a circle agreeing with eachother.   

When people write incendiary things and get strong responses, I'm more inclined to lock (versus delete) the thread, as if to leave it as a monument to their character.

Now, no doubt, when someone is constantly running their mouth off making the place an unhappy zone, that's when you bounce them from the bar for a while.

Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Hards Alumni on March 18, 2017, 08:49:17 AM
Admittedly, this is my perspective as a moderator for 10 years. 

There will never be a troll-free BB forum.   And you wouldn't want that anyhow, everyone sitting around a circle agreeing with eachother.   

When people write incendiary things and get strong responses, I'm more inclined to lock (versus delete) the thread, as if to leave it as a monument to their character.

Now, no doubt, when someone is constantly running their mouth off making the place an unhappy zone, that's when you bounce them from the bar for a while.

Thanks.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: muwarrior69 on March 18, 2017, 09:08:51 AM
Admittedly, this is my perspective as a moderator for 10 years. 

There will never be a troll-free BB forum.   And you wouldn't want that anyhow, everyone sitting around a circle agreeing with eachother.   

When people write incendiary things and get strong responses, I'm more inclined to lock (versus delete) the thread, as if to leave it as a monument to their character.

Now, no doubt, when someone is constantly running their mouth off making the place an unhappy zone, that's when you bounce them from the bar for a while.

Is there a way to lock a user from posting in a particular thread without locking  out the rest of us who want to have a "civil" discourse?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 18, 2017, 09:35:03 AM
I would expect better from you. Please do not put words in my mouth. I have not said MU's desire to be clean is keeping them from being great. Plenty of other factors, but nothing to do with being clean or not. Time to ban myself.

Goose.  Apologies if I misinterpreted.  I guess I don't understand what you meant when you posted the bit quoted below.

In my heart and in my head, I do not think brass has a plan to be elite for much of four decades. They have the hope and dream and not the plan. Honestly, maybe MU brass is too good of a group of people to pull the trigger to be elite. If the case, I accept that and spend the ball money on making it better academic environment.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: manny31 on March 18, 2017, 10:17:54 AM
I would suggest everyone find the ignore function on Scoop. The forum needs to be self regulating, can't expect moderators to be the thought police. I generally don't put folks on ignore but it can give you a nice break from MDDG, Myfair, etc.. onward Warriors....
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Ardmore Mug on March 18, 2017, 10:34:49 AM
If you IGNORE these trolls and don't engage them, they will go away..  As long as you "feed" them, they will return... 8-)
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: #UnleashSean on March 18, 2017, 11:36:18 AM
When the ban waves come, please dont sweep me into it again because I made a post asking about a game update  ;) ;)
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Mr. Sand-Knit on March 18, 2017, 11:42:57 AM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: MU82 on March 18, 2017, 12:15:06 PM
But it's a valid point. It does seem like the powers that be would prefer a clean program over a consistently successful program. Ironically, the rough around the edges mindset that made MU nationally relevant is now frowned upon by the suits.

I don't see how running a clean program and being successful are mutually exclusive. How "dirty" are Izzo, Self, Wright, Few, Mack, Brey, K and Bennett, to name a few?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 18, 2017, 12:20:46 PM
Rocky

I would expect better from you. Please do not put words in my mouth. I have not said MU's desire to be clean is keeping them from being great. Plenty of other factors, but nothing to do with being clean or not. Time to ban myself.

Good luck moving forward,Rocky!!

Peace
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 18, 2017, 12:23:56 PM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad

No one can accuse you of not trying.



My comment, of course, has nothing to do with you ignoring WC.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: naginiF on March 18, 2017, 12:28:39 PM
No one can accuse you of not trying.
"really? you know i'm tired and you're picking now to press my buttons.  have you really thought the consequences all the way through?"

- me to my 10 year old right now AND Chick to Sand-Knit right now
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 18, 2017, 12:35:42 PM
"really? you know i'm tired and you're picking now to press my buttons.  have you really thought the consequences all the way through?"

- me to my 10 year old right now AND Chick to Sand-Knit right now

Exactly, no one can accuse Mr. Sand-knit of not going for the ban.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: naginiF on March 18, 2017, 12:39:56 PM
Exactly, no one can accuse Mr. Sand-knit of not going for the ban.
To be fair to Sand what got my 10 yr old that warning was him smugly saying "Who are you rooting for dad? i'm rooting for Notre Dame".  Sand has a ways to go before hitting that level.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 18, 2017, 01:27:20 PM
Goose.  Apologies if I misinterpreted.  I guess I don't understand what you meant when you posted the bit quoted below.

Rocky, I jumped to the same conclusion. Further down in that thread Goose explains himself a little more. It's not that their too ethically good to pull the trigger, its that they are too good to recognize their own shortcomings and bring in some more basketball people.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 18, 2017, 01:29:22 PM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad

C'mon dude. Its 2017, show some class.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: real chili 83 on March 18, 2017, 01:36:43 PM
C'mon dude. Its 2017, show some class.

Why would he break character?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: tower912 on March 18, 2017, 01:39:22 PM
Pathetic and sadly predictable.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 18, 2017, 01:57:21 PM
Rocky, I jumped to the same conclusion. Further down in that thread Goose explains himself a little more. It's not that their too ethically good to pull the trigger, its that they are too good to recognize their own shortcomings and bring in some more basketball people.

Ah.  OK.  I generally read everything here (skim depending on how busy it is/how much time I have) and that one just jumped out to me.   So Goose, if you're still reading, again apologize for misinterpretation of your words. 
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: brewcity77 on March 18, 2017, 02:04:52 PM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad

Just stop logging on to MUScoop. That'll save your all her comments  ;)
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: keefe on March 19, 2017, 12:32:31 AM
Rocky

I would expect better from you. Please do not put words in my mouth. I have not said MU's desire to be clean is keeping them from being great. Plenty of other factors, but nothing to do with being clean or not. Time to ban myself.

Good luck moving forward,Rocky!!

Joe

Well said.

Beers in Lan Kwai Fong or Seattle?

LMK

Crash
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Mr. Sand-Knit on March 19, 2017, 01:53:45 PM
I appreciate and respect all comments and viewpoints from within the muscoop community.  Disagreeing with them is american as apple pie.  Banning them is unamerican
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: jsglow on March 19, 2017, 04:18:57 PM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad

Excuse me?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: warriorchick on March 19, 2017, 04:56:39 PM
Excuse me?

Like you haven't wondered the same thing once or twice.....
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: VegasWarrior77 on March 19, 2017, 10:43:25 PM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad
(https://margosmiddlefinger.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/ass-sphincter.png?w=300&h=201)
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: wildbillsb on March 19, 2017, 10:54:22 PM
Like you haven't wondered the same thing once or twice.....

Now settle down you two.  Remember, the children read this, too.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocket surgeon on March 20, 2017, 05:59:35 PM
How do i ignore warriorchick, really annoying broad

Really?  I don't get why people have to announce when they want to "ignore" someone.  Just do it and move on.

Speaking to respecting all viewpoints???  Then what's this ignore thingy about?  That's like your own personal ban-hammer right there...Disagreeing can be healthy and instructive.  Banning?  Where the H-E-double hockey sticks were you when we lost a good one 4-5 months ago


Free the bailbondsman eh eh ein'er  hey?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: tower912 on March 20, 2017, 06:17:54 PM
He's had his chances.   He's wasted them all.   
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 21, 2017, 09:32:44 AM
Note well ..

Over our decade, Chicos has been banned multiple times, meaning, he's come back multiple times.  Even this last time, the super duper perma ban, he left for months then came back under a different account .. which hasn't been banned, yet he is staying away. 

Ners is the 2nd poster child of second chances.  After months of absence, he's back too. 

Scoop is the second, third, and tenth chances capital of the world.   

In reality, we don't ban .. we just give people vacations. 

Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Loose Cannon on March 21, 2017, 12:40:13 PM
In reality, we don't ban .. we just give people vacations.

 Well Scoop's must really be good if they all want to return.  Err is that a paid vacation?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 21, 2017, 01:18:06 PM
Scoop is somewhere between good, necessary evil, and a room full of monkeys on typewriters.

.. Not to mention, the number of users who say "THIS PLACE SUCKS, I'M LEAVING AND NEVER COMING BACK" then back their prodigal butts come  .. are in the double digits.

Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: real chili 83 on March 21, 2017, 06:44:24 PM
You charge too much. 
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: naginiF on March 21, 2017, 08:15:18 PM
Scoop is somewhere between good, necessary evil, and a room full of monkeys on typewriters.

.. Not to mention, the number of users who say "THIS PLACE SUCKS, I'M LEAVING AND NEVER COMING BACK" then back their prodigal butts come  .. are in the double digits.
The fact that you overtly insult those that come here simply to talk MU hoops in a civil manner speaks volumes to the environment here......it's really not worth sticking around for.

Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 21, 2017, 08:34:12 PM
The fact that you overtly insult those that come here simply to talk MU hoops in a civil manner speaks volumes to the environment here......it's really not worth sticking around for.

Lol
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu03eng on March 21, 2017, 09:11:34 PM
The fact that you overtly insult those that come here simply to talk MU hoops in a civil manner speaks volumes to the environment here......it's really not worth sticking around for.

Back up the irony truck, we got a lot to unload here
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 21, 2017, 09:45:54 PM
The fact that you overtly insult those that come here simply to talk MU hoops in a civil manner speaks volumes to the environment here......it's really not worth sticking around for.

(https://media4.giphy.com/media/5gw0VWGbgNm8w/200_s.gif)
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: muwarrior69 on March 22, 2017, 11:00:47 AM
Scoop is somewhere between good, necessary evil, and a room full of monkeys on typewriters.

.. Not to mention, the number of users who say "THIS PLACE SUCKS, I'M LEAVING AND NEVER COMING BACK" then back their prodigal butts come  .. are in the double digits.

You just insulted all the simians on the planet.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: MU82 on March 22, 2017, 12:13:14 PM
Where the H-E-double hockey sticks were you when we lost a good one 4-5 months ago


When Ralph Branca died, I think I was just chillin' at home. Thanks for asking, though.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Dawson Rental on March 22, 2017, 01:41:27 PM
Note well ..

Over our decade, Chicos has been banned multiple times, meaning, he's come back multiple times.  Even this last time, the super duper perma ban, he left for months then came back under a different account .. which hasn't been banned, yet he is staying away. 

Ners is the 2nd poster child of second chances.  After months of absence, he's back too. 

Scoop is the second, third, and tenth chances capital of the world.   

In reality, we don't ban .. we just give people vacations.

Maybe it's time for double secret probation.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 22, 2017, 02:54:07 PM
I'd love some kind of view-ban, where the user can post what they want, but zero people see it, like a tree falling in the woods with no one around.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Benny B on March 22, 2017, 03:00:14 PM
Like you haven't wondered the same thing once or twice.....

https://www.youtube.com/v/AqeatUvRu68
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: warriorchick on March 22, 2017, 05:11:40 PM
https://www.youtube.com/v/AqeatUvRu68

Excellent.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: g0lden3agle on March 22, 2017, 06:11:22 PM
I'd love some kind of view-ban, where the user can post what they want, but zero people see it, like a tree falling in the woods with no one around.

Would you notify the user of their ban?  No notification would be hilarious.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 22, 2017, 07:18:41 PM
Exactly.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: manny31 on March 22, 2017, 07:45:39 PM
Would you notify the user of their ban?  No notification would be hilarious.
Scoop Purgatory?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: GGGG on March 22, 2017, 07:46:54 PM
Scoop Purgatory?


Mods could sell indulgences as a fundraiser. 
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: reinko on March 22, 2017, 08:36:21 PM
BRING BACK TO THE FEATURE TO SEE HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE BLOCKED YOU! 
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: MU B2002 on March 22, 2017, 10:12:36 PM
BRING BACK TO THE FEATURE TO SEE HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE BLOCKED YOU!

+1
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 23, 2017, 12:27:06 AM
BRING BACK TO THE FEATURE TO SEE HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE BLOCKED YOU!

I'm actually really curious about this. Bring it back! Make Scoop great again!
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocket surgeon on March 23, 2017, 05:00:19 PM
Note well ..

Over our decade, Chicos has been banned multiple times, meaning, he's come back multiple times.  Even this last time, the super duper perma ban, he left for months then came back under a different account .. which hasn't been banned, yet he is staying away. 

Ners is the 2nd poster child of second chances.  After months of absence, he's back too. 

Scoop is the second, third, and tenth chances capital of the world.   

In reality, we don't ban .. we just give people vacations.

oh i understand and know the whole history thing-some us just kinda tro the chicos/jams thing out there as a "scoop memorial".  please don't misunderstand my occasional, silly throw-back as an insult or begging for a 3rd...4th...umm, 5th? chance to come back.  even though he's snuck(sp?) in/out the back door a few times, he's in a good place.  loves the occasional "rent-free" comments
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Skitch on March 23, 2017, 10:23:49 PM
I feel like an idiot but can someone tell me how you go about ignoring someone on here?
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: rocket surgeon on March 23, 2017, 10:32:36 PM
I feel like an idiot but can someone tell me how you go about ignoring someone on here?

Google it
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: drewm88 on March 23, 2017, 10:46:22 PM
I feel like an idiot but can someone tell me how you go about ignoring someone on here?
http://www.muscoop.com/index.php?topic=54035.msg916113#msg916113
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: VegasWarrior77 on March 23, 2017, 10:50:05 PM
I feel like an idiot but can someone tell me how you go about ignoring someone on here?

You're not an idiot.  I wish some that you want to ignore would realize that they are...
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: naginiF on March 23, 2017, 11:08:34 PM
I feel like an idiot but can someone tell me how you go about ignoring someone on here?
i'm sure this has been answered but ...... profile>summary>modify profile>buddies/ignore list>edit ignore list>rocket surgeon

and you're good to go
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 24, 2017, 07:49:59 AM
Not an idiot .. I had to ask Rocky a couple weeks ago.  Couldn't find it either.
Title: Re: Predicting the ban hammer
Post by: Benny B on March 24, 2017, 09:20:09 AM
Not an idiot .. I had to ask Rocky a couple weeks ago.  Couldn't find it either.

Ask Rocky how to turn the "people ignoring you" stats back on, dammit.