MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Newsdreams on October 13, 2016, 09:37:43 PM

Title: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Newsdreams on October 13, 2016, 09:37:43 PM
https://twitter.com/matt_velazquez/status/786755637871075329
Very worried about turnovers  :-\
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: naginiF on October 13, 2016, 10:11:57 PM
In this weeks episode of "Teal Thoughts":
- 2016-17 season's gimmick turns out to be balloons?  If Wojo was a seasoned and respected coach he wouldn't have to resort to kids birthday party tricks.
- No Sacre mention.........SMH
- Great!  Duane is emerging as the leader.  We can't have a transfer being the team leader.
- Big Fishy shouldn't be practicing 15 footers...he'll be fouled out before he can attempt any shots.
- The whole article needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt.  Newspapers are a dying business and we should hate everything about them.
- It looks like Sam really does have tremendous upside


(honestly - everything in Matt's notes, except the TO's, makes me feel better about the season's opportunities)
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: wadesworld on October 13, 2016, 10:32:37 PM
Matty V is the man.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Marcus92 on October 13, 2016, 11:09:36 PM
Great article. I'd love to see this kind of in-depth, behind-the-scenes coverage throughout the season.

So we've got the balloons. Where are the seashells?
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: wadesworld on October 13, 2016, 11:13:03 PM
Great article. I'd love to see this kind of in-depth, behind-the-scenes coverage throughout the season.

So we've got the balloons. Where are the seashells?

In the sand filled water bottles.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Newsdreams on October 14, 2016, 12:05:17 AM
Great article. I'd love to see this kind of in-depth, behind-the-scenes coverage throughout the season.

So we've got the balloons. Where are the seashells?
We are not worthy!!!
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on October 14, 2016, 05:12:48 AM
I hear the ice-cream truck shows up if there are balloons left at the end of practice.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Dawson Rental on October 14, 2016, 07:51:07 AM
In this weeks episode of "Teal Thoughts":
- 2016-17 season's gimmick turns out to be balloons?  If Wojo was a seasoned and respected coach he wouldn't have to resort to kids birthday party tricks.
- No Sacre mention.........SMH
- Great!  Duane is emerging as the leader.  We can't have a transfer being the team leader.
- Big Fishy shouldn't be practicing 15 footers...he'll be fouled out before he can attempt any shots.
- The whole article needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt.  Newspapers are a dying business and we should hate everything about them.
- It looks like Sam really does have tremendous upside


(honestly - everything in Matt's notes, except the TO's, makes me feel better about the season's opportunities)

Why would he be? 

Not on the team.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mubb3434 on October 14, 2016, 08:05:35 AM
In crunch time I think you will see Rowsey, Duane, JJJ, Reinhardt, and Fish closing out games (with a mix of Haanif).
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: GGGG on October 14, 2016, 08:28:05 AM
In crunch time I think you will see Rowsey, Duane, JJJ, Reinhardt, and Fish closing out games (with a mix of Haanif).


You better sub on the defensive end.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: rocky_warrior on October 14, 2016, 09:04:26 AM
In an "oh crap" moment, I realize the new JS website (ownership) means the auto feeds are no longer working.  If someone finds an RSS feed for his articles (or blog?  does that still exist), shoot me a PM with the link.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: The Lens on October 14, 2016, 09:27:50 AM
In an "oh crap" moment, I realize the new JS website (ownership) means the auto feeds are no longer working.  If someone finds an RSS feed for his articles (or blog?  does that still exist), shoot me a PM with the link.

I found the old MJS interface much more user friendly than the Gannett platform.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 14, 2016, 10:13:58 AM
I found the old MJS interface much more user friendly than the Gannett platform.

Not to sound like an old man, but it's a pretty terrible web GUI and I refuse to read anything on MJS that isn't Marquette related. I don't mind the survey pop-up(gotta make money) but everything else is pretty terrible to use.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: warriorchick on October 14, 2016, 10:16:58 AM
Not to sound like an old man, but it's a pretty terrible web GUI and I refuse to read anything on MJS that isn't Marquette related. I don't mind the survey pop-up(gotta make money) but everything else is pretty terrible to use.

No one who uses the term "GUI" is not an old man.   :)
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Jay Bee on October 14, 2016, 10:28:23 AM
No one who uses the term "GUI" is not an old man.   :)

4never is exceedingly aged & says "gooey" quite often

Let's pretend we believed Sandy's def & dreb'ing were a cut above the rest... crazy?:

Markus, Haanif, JjJ, Sandy, Luke to start
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: #UnleashSean on October 14, 2016, 10:50:44 AM
In crunch time I think you will see Rowsey, Duane, JJJ, Reinhardt, and Fish closing out games (with a mix of Haanif).

That'll probably be the starting roster, maybe -duane +Cheatham
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 14, 2016, 11:04:45 AM
4never is exceedingly aged & says "gooey" quite often

Let's pretend we believed Sandy's def & dreb'ing were a cut above the rest... crazy?:

Markus, Haanif, JjJ, Sandy, Luke to start

Carter, Haanif, JjJ, Sandy, Luke to start in at least non-conference
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: #UnleashSean on October 14, 2016, 11:05:52 AM
Carter, Haanif, JjJ, Sandy, Luke to start in at least non-conference

People keep saying this but... Katin and Rowsey did not transfer to ride the bench. Much like Trent Lockett.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 14, 2016, 11:15:25 AM
People keep saying this but... Katin and Rowsey did not transfer to ride the bench. Much like Trent Lockett.

Actually, I forgot about Katin

Carter, Haanif, JjJ, Katin, Luke
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: GGGG on October 14, 2016, 11:18:14 AM
People keep saying this but... Katin and Rowsey did not transfer to ride the bench. Much like Trent Lockett.

I don't believe Lockett started at the beginning of the season either.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MuMark on October 14, 2016, 11:22:04 AM
People keep saying this but... Katin and Rowsey did not transfer to ride the bench. Much like Trent Lockett.

None of them were promised a starting job. Minutes are what matters and they will have to be earned. Rowsey and Reinhardt are no different from any other player on the team.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Benny B on October 14, 2016, 11:41:19 AM
55 on the 5x10?  Holy sh#tsnacks... that's Novak-esque right there.  And Markus is at 58?  Good lord... if any semblance of that can translate to the court, start clearing your schedule in March.

Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on October 14, 2016, 11:48:39 AM
Actually, I forgot about Katin

Carter, Haanif, JjJ, Katin, Luke

Yup, that's my guess as well
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on October 14, 2016, 11:53:58 AM
55 on the 5x10?  Holy sh#tsnacks... that's Novak-esque right there.  And Markus is at 58?  Good lord... if any semblance of that can translate to the court, start clearing your schedule in March.

I've learned to always keep my March schedule open.  The last few years its been too open.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: jsglow on October 14, 2016, 12:02:42 PM
Actually, I forgot about Katin

Carter, Haanif, JjJ, Katin, Luke

Correct.  Write it down.  The interesting thing will be the rotation and minutes distribution 6-9.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: jsglow on October 14, 2016, 12:11:45 PM
55 on the 5x10?  Holy sh#tsnacks... that's Novak-esque right there.  And Markus is at 58?  Good lord... if any semblance of that can translate to the court, start clearing your schedule in March.

I watched all those guys shoot with keen interest at Madness.  Katin and Rowsey have flawless form.  Sammy has a very nice shot too. Markus has 'good' form that he repeats with precision.  We're going to truly threaten teams from deep. 

And guess what?  That opens things up heading inside for our already accomplished slashers. 

And guess what else?  We won't have two big bodies down there that sometimes got in the way last year.

I sincerely believe our offense takes a big step forward in efficiency this year.  Just have to avoid popping those turnover balloons and hold our own on the defensive glass.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MerrittsMustache on October 14, 2016, 12:15:35 PM
55 on the 5x10?  Holy sh#tsnacks... that's Novak-esque right there.  And Markus is at 58?  Good lord... if any semblance of that can translate to the court, start clearing your schedule in March.

True...but Novak is literally a foot taller than Rowsey.

Rowsey could be the next Mo Acker or he could be the next...well, any sub-6 footer who can shoot the lights out as long as no one is within 6 feet of him.

I'm not trying to knock Rowsey, I hope he ends up being great, but I think that some on here are setting themselves up to be disappointed.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Galway Eagle on October 14, 2016, 12:20:26 PM
True...but Novak is literally a foot taller than Rowsey.

Rowsey could be the next Mo Acker or he could be the next...well, any sub-6 footer who can shoot the lights out as long as no one is within 6 feet of him.

I'm not trying to knock Rowsey, I hope he ends up being great, but I think that some on here are setting themselves up to be disappointed.

or god forbid the next jake thomas who can shoot lights out in practice and warm ups but not in games
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: GGGG on October 14, 2016, 12:24:52 PM
or god forbid the next jake thomas who can shoot lights out in practice and warm ups but not in games


I know that makes people shudder, and the leap from South Dakota to the BE is bigger than the Big South to the BE, but I would be lying if I said that thought didn't cross my mind.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MerrittsMustache on October 14, 2016, 12:29:09 PM

I know that makes people shudder, and the leap from South Dakota to the BE is bigger than the Big South to the BE, but I would be lying if I said that thought didn't cross my mind.

If Rowsey put up "senior year Cubillan" type numbers (7 pts, 2-3 ast, 41% from 3), I'd be very pleased.


Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Marcus92 on October 14, 2016, 12:33:05 PM
Rowsey or Reinhardt don't have to be the second coming of Steve Novak to help this team.

Last season we shot 33.9% from 3-point range, behind more than 200 other teams in the country. And that was on just 572 attempts — fewer than 260+ other teams. Pretty pathetic.

In other words, if Andrew and Katin connect on 35% of their threes (not exactly a high standard), we'll be better than we were a year ago. If they manage to reach the 38-40% range, we'll be dramatically better. Anything above that could be pretty amazing.

Let's hold off a bit before comparing these guys to one of college basketball's all-time long-distance shooters.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: jsglow on October 14, 2016, 12:49:03 PM

I know that makes people shudder, and the leap from South Dakota to the BE is bigger than the Big South to the BE, but I would be lying if I said that thought didn't cross my mind.

All true, but nobody ever said Thomas was the best guard in the Kasten gym either.  Rowsey can play.  I think the big question is how he fares against bigger guys.  That's still to be seen, at least by us on the outside.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: GGGG on October 14, 2016, 12:52:51 PM
I don't really put a lot of stock in the "best guy in the practice gym" type statements until I see it on the court versus real competition.  I have heard that too many times and the only one to ever exceed those statements was Wade.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Babybluejeans on October 14, 2016, 12:55:07 PM
Rowsey or Reinhardt don't have to be the second coming of Steve Novak to help this team.

Last season we shot 33.9% from 3-point range, behind more than 200 other teams in the country. And that was on just 572 attempts — fewer than 260+ other teams. Pretty pathetic.

In other words, if Andrew and Katin connect on 35% of their threes (not exactly a high standard), we'll be better than we were a year ago. If they manage to reach the 38-40% range, we'll be dramatically better. Anything above that could be pretty amazing.

Let's hold off a bit before comparing these guys to one of college basketball's all-time long-distance shooters.

Exactly. Our historical reference points tend to be the stars but getting Maurice Acker (9 ppg, 49% 3-pt) or Cooby (as poster above pointed out) numbers could well make all the difference in whether we dance.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 14, 2016, 01:04:13 PM
Correct.  Write it down.  The interesting thing will be the rotation and minutes distribution 6-9.

I will say, I don't think Carter gets more 20 minutes a game even though he starts. Will be too difficult to keep Rowsey and Markus from getting 20 minutes combined at the 1.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Babybluejeans on October 14, 2016, 01:07:11 PM
I don't really put a lot of stock in the "best guy in the practice gym" type statements until I see it on the court versus real competition.  I have heard that too many times and the only one to ever exceed those statements was Wade.

On the nose. It's akin to "he's looked great in training camp" in the NFL. Been burned in fantasy drafts by that old saw enough to know that almost everyone looks great in training camp (or the practice gym).
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on October 14, 2016, 01:13:14 PM
I will say, I don't think Carter gets more 20 minutes a game even though he starts. Will be too difficult to keep Rowsey and Markus from getting 20 minutes combined at the 1.

It will because they can both play off ball, plus I see Markus getting more time at the 2 anyways. I know Jay bee has the biggest hard on for Markus but lets not forget he is only 17. Lets not give him the Vander and JJJ freshman year treatment.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: wadesworld on October 14, 2016, 01:25:43 PM
Rowsey will be in double digits.  While he won't be anywhere close to a Novak type shooter, he'll be closer to Novak than he is to Thomas.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: jsglow on October 14, 2016, 01:31:00 PM
I don't really put a lot of stock in the "best guy in the practice gym" type statements until I see it on the court versus real competition.  I have heard that too many times and the only one to ever exceed those statements was Wade.

Fair enough.  Understand that I'm not suggesting that Rowsey is 'great', just that I don't think he's walk on Thomas.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Badgerhater on October 14, 2016, 01:42:15 PM
Asking those who may know.

How much quickness is out there with these shooters?  Is the release smooth and quick?

If they can't get open looks and take awhile to launch a shot, MU will be in for some long nights at the mason convention.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: BM1090 on October 14, 2016, 01:47:59 PM
Asking those who may know.

How much quickness is out there with these shooters?  Is the release smooth and quick?

If they can't get open looks and take awhile to launch a shot, MU will be in for some long nights at the mason convention.

Reinhardt and Rowsey have quick releases. Howard has a pretty quick release, but a bit slower. Hauser's is slower but he's taller so he doesn't need it to be as quick.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: wadesworld on October 14, 2016, 01:49:29 PM
Reinhardt and Rowsey have quick releases. Howard has a pretty quick release, but a bit slower. Hauser's is slower but he's taller so he doesn't need it to be as quick.

I agree with this analysis.

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong here, but to me Hauser reminds me of a 6'7" version of the 6' Riley LaChance.  Does everything pretty well, best asset is the ability to shoot the ball, but doesn't have a huge weakness.  Very high IQ, doesn't force things (too much), great footwork, but isn't some freak athlete who will blow by someone off the dribble.  Just tough players who won't beat themselves.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Benny B on October 14, 2016, 01:56:14 PM

Rowsey could be the next Mo Acker or he could be the next...well, any sub-6 footer who can shoot the lights out as long as no one is within 6 feet of him.


Incidentally, Hicks was about 6 feet away from Jenkins.

https://www.youtube.com/e/wO15bt0UP1g
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: dgies9156 on October 14, 2016, 02:04:39 PM
Rowsey could be the next Mo Acker or he could be the next...well,

Gary Rosenberger?
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on October 14, 2016, 02:26:49 PM
Gary Rosenberger?

I'm thinking white Aaron Hutchins.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Jay Bee on October 14, 2016, 02:39:58 PM

the leap from South Dakota to the BE is bigger than the Big South to the BE

Wat?
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: GGGG on October 14, 2016, 02:40:54 PM
Wat?


Maybe I'm overrating the Big South???
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on October 14, 2016, 03:14:59 PM
If Rowsey put up "senior year Cubillan" type numbers (7 pts, 2-3 ast, 41% from 3), I'd be very pleased.

Same
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: BobWildLoyalist on October 14, 2016, 03:15:18 PM
What are the chances Dominic James is supplying the balloons for practice?
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MerrittsMustache on October 14, 2016, 03:18:39 PM
What are the chances Dominic James is supplying the balloons for practice?


(http://i.imgur.com/0PoqQMo.gif)
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: esotericmindguy on October 14, 2016, 03:47:37 PM
Traci Carter will not be consistently finishing important games. Rowsey can handle the ball and shoots free throws in the 90% range. His turnover rate at asheville was half that of Carter. I don't see what some on this board see in him, he's a backup PG at best.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: GGGG on October 14, 2016, 03:54:45 PM
I don't think you can write off a freshman point guard who was basically forced to start because they had no other alternative.  He may not end up being all that, but I think he will grow into a solid player.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mubb3434 on October 14, 2016, 03:55:07 PM
I see Rowsey as playing 25+ minutes everyday. Reliable player with experience. I think he will avg. around 15 ppg throughout the season with at least 2 games at 25 points +.

Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MuMark on October 14, 2016, 04:04:30 PM
Offense this year..... draw and kick.....space floor......Sam swish....

https://twitter.com/marquettembb/status/787035354364796928
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: BM1090 on October 14, 2016, 04:12:37 PM
Offense this year..... draw and kick.....space floor......Sam swish....

https://twitter.com/marquettembb/status/787035354364796928

Interesting pairings there. Traci, HC, Luke, Katin all are likely to be starters and are on the same team with.....Sam.

Actually, upon further review it seems they are playing 4v4, no Luke on the floor. Never mind.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on October 14, 2016, 04:19:25 PM
Traci Carter will not be consistently finishing important games. Rowsey can handle the ball and shoots free throws in the 90% range. His turnover rate at asheville was half that of Carter. I don't see what some on this board see in him, he's a backup PG at best.

Carter has a point brain and great attacking instincts. He has good form on his shot too, which I expect to get more consistent over time. He will be a very valuable upperclassman, of that I am certain.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: muwarrior69 on October 14, 2016, 04:27:42 PM
In this weeks episode of "Teal Thoughts":
- 2016-17 season's gimmick turns out to be balloons?  If Wojo was a seasoned and respected coach he wouldn't have to resort to kids birthday party tricks.
- No Sacre mention.........SMH
- Great!  Duane is emerging as the leader.  We can't have a transfer being the team leader.
- Big Fishy shouldn't be practicing 15 footers...he'll be fouled out before he can attempt any shots.
- The whole article needs to be taken with a huge grain of salt.  Newspapers are a dying business and we should hate everything about them.
- It looks like Sam really does have tremendous upside


(honestly - everything in Matt's notes, except the TO's, makes me feel better about the season's opportunities)

Or Matt.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: muwarrior69 on October 14, 2016, 04:31:44 PM
Incidentally, Hicks was about 6 feet away from Jenkins.

https://www.youtube.com/e/wO15bt0UP1g

Best Championship game finish this century or perhaps the last.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: barfolomew on October 14, 2016, 05:05:43 PM
Offense this year..... draw and kick.....space floor......Sam swish....

https://twitter.com/marquettembb/status/787035354364796928

As long as Sam is guarded by a slow-rotating 5.
And they are playing 4 on 4 following coincidental minor penalties.

But I agree; I think Sam is one of the several options we will have on offense this year.
As regards the defense, I fall somewhere between cautiously pessimistic and full-on nauseous.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: brewcity77 on October 14, 2016, 06:45:31 PM
Of course Rowsey had a better turnover rate, just look at his percent of shots taken. When you're putting up around 30% of the shots, you won't have the ball long enough to turn it over. Silly comparison to make.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: We R Final Four on October 14, 2016, 07:04:46 PM
Offense this year..... draw and kick.....space floor......Sam swish....

https://twitter.com/marquettembb/status/787035354364796928

Defense this year....they scored?......that's alright....we will just draw and kick....space floor......attempted 3. 
They scored? .....that's alright...repeat.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: forgetful on October 14, 2016, 08:58:55 PM
Rowsey or Reinhardt don't have to be the second coming of Steve Novak to help this team.

Last season we shot 33.9% from 3-point range, behind more than 200 other teams in the country. And that was on just 572 attempts — fewer than 260+ other teams. Pretty pathetic.

In other words, if Andrew and Katin connect on 35% of their threes (not exactly a high standard), we'll be better than we were a year ago. If they manage to reach the 38-40% range, we'll be dramatically better. Anything above that could be pretty amazing.

Let's hold off a bit before comparing these guys to one of college basketball's all-time long-distance shooters.

Early prediction, we shoot almost 5% higher this year than last.  Predicting 38.5%.

Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Brewtown Andy on October 15, 2016, 05:55:11 AM
or god forbid the next jake thomas who can shoot lights out in practice and warm ups but not in games

Jake Thomas shot 39% on 172 attempts his senior year.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: rocket surgeon on October 15, 2016, 06:11:11 AM
The only thing missing from this picture is Paul westhead, Eyn'a?

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaab/2015/03/05/loyola-marymount-hank-gathers-death-25-years-bo-kimble-paul-westhead/24447175/
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on October 15, 2016, 07:17:46 AM
Jake Thomas shot 39% on 172 attempts his senior year.

And was a walk-on who earned a scholarship, hustled and hit some key shots for MU (Syracuse, Butler Maui) or spread the floor effectively (Davidson).  It wasn't Jake's fault that the two guard slotted to start couldn't perform off the court.

Same thing with Derrick.  Starting PG was supposed to be Duane.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on October 15, 2016, 08:44:14 AM
And was a walk-on who earned a scholarship, hustled and hit some key shots for MU (Syracuse, Butler Maui) or spread the floor effectively (Davidson).  It wasn't Jake's fault that the two guard slotted to start couldn't perform off the court.

Same thing with Derrick.  Starting PG was supposed to be Duane.

Yea, that team was a hot mess with Vander declaring early, Duane getting hurt, and Mayo being Mayo.

If Vander stays, that's a completely different team cause I still think he would have been the starting PG.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Nukem2 on October 15, 2016, 09:21:33 AM
Yea, that team was a hot mess with Vander declaring early, Duane getting hurt, and Mayo being Mayo.

If Vander stays, that's a completely different team cause I still think he would have been the starting PG.
Actually, Mayo was rather decent as a junior.  But the torn meniscus surgery and the broken nose delayed and disrupted his start to the season.  He was really a force on offense down the stretch.  People seem to forget that.  He  became the old Mayo again after Buzz left.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Dawson Rental on October 15, 2016, 12:17:55 PM
True...but Novak is literally a foot taller than Rowsey.

Rowsey could be the next Mo Acker or he could be the next...well, any sub-6 footer who can shoot the lights out as long as no one is within 6 feet of him.

I'm not trying to knock Rowsey, I hope he ends up being great, but I think that some on here are setting themselves up to be disappointed.

I guess that you're not very high on Markus Howard then.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: wadesworld on October 15, 2016, 12:25:20 PM
Actually, Mayo was rather decent as a junior.  But the torn meniscus surgery and the broken nose delayed and disrupted his start to the season.  He was really a force on offense down the stretch.  People seem to forget that.  He  became the old Mayo again after Buzz left.

He was always the "old Mayo."
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Nukem2 on October 15, 2016, 12:29:11 PM
He was always the "old Mayo."
Maybe, but he was on better behavior as a junior and was very productive once he got his minutes.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: esotericmindguy on October 15, 2016, 05:43:44 PM
Of course Rowsey had a better turnover rate, just look at his percent of shots taken. When you're putting up around 30% of the shots, you won't have the ball long enough to turn it over. Silly comparison to make.

Disagree, Rowsey was used on nearly 30% of the possessions and played 90% of the minutes. Usually guys that are relied upon to make plays and score the ball turn it over more. Not to mention fatigue. All Traci was supposed to do was bring the ball up and pass it. He couldn't even do that. If he starts this year then Howard and Rowsey aren't as good as I think they'll be and MU will struggle. He's a solid backup PG.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MuMark on October 15, 2016, 05:57:08 PM
Disagree, Rowsey was used on nearly 30% of the possessions and played 90% of the minutes. Usually guys that are relied upon to make plays and score the ball turn it over more. Not to mention fatigue. All Traci was supposed to do was bring the ball up and pass it. He couldn't even do that. If he starts this year then Howard and Rowsey aren't as good as I think they'll be and MU will struggle. He's a solid backup PG.

Or Traci has improved from his freshmen to his sophomore year as you know.......sometimes happens.

Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: brewcity77 on October 15, 2016, 06:06:48 PM
Disagree, Rowsey was used on nearly 30% of the possessions and played 90% of the minutes. Usually guys that are relied upon to make plays and score the ball turn it over more. Not to mention fatigue. All Traci was supposed to do was bring the ball up and pass it. He couldn't even do that. If he starts this year then Howard and Rowsey aren't as good as I think they'll be and MU will struggle. He's a solid backup PG.

I just don't think the numbers bear that out. Look at our point guard compared to our highest shot percentage players over the past few years:

So the past five years, our starting point guard has had a higher turnover rate than our leading playmakers/scorers every single year. Before that, Acker and James were better, but it's hard for a true point to have a low turnover rate because they do have the ball in their hands so much and their possessions are less likely to end in shots (which, even when missed, don't count as turnovers).

Traci was a pass-first point guard while Rowsey was primarily a shooter. Rowsey took more than twice as many shots on a percentage basis and had a significantly lower assist rate. Rowsey was focused on shooting, Carter was focused on passing. It's just not a very good comparison.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: esotericmindguy on October 15, 2016, 08:19:45 PM
Yeah but Rowsey played PG, he just happens to be a scoring PG. Plus All those players you compared to Junior and Derrick Wilson were much better players. Derrick Wilson might be the worst 2 year starting QB in recent MU history.

Back to the point, carter won't be finishing games. He turns ball over, can't shoot and can't hit FTs. He's a nice energy player off the bench. if he's the PG for 25 minutes, look for another year of futility.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: MuMark on October 15, 2016, 08:36:38 PM
So again...you have already decided that Traci will be the same player this season that he was as a frosh?

That may prove to be true but many players make improvements as they get older. Skills get better......decision making improves...etc.

I think you are making a premature assumption.

Let's see how the season plays out.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on October 15, 2016, 08:40:42 PM
Also, where does the bad free throw shooter come from? He was 75% from the line last year which is serviceable. Can't wait until Traci plays close to 30 minutes a game next year. Our offense was at its best when he was in the game.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Jay Bee on October 15, 2016, 08:42:04 PM

Back to the point, carter....can't hit FTs.

Carter shot well from the line as a freshman. Unfortunately, that doesn't matter.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 17, 2016, 08:16:05 AM
Early prediction, we shoot almost 5% higher this year than last.  Predicting 38.5%.

Not saying you are wrong, but that would make us a top 25 3pt shooting team.

If you are correct and we can rebound a little bit....definitely dancing.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: NotAnAlum on October 17, 2016, 10:11:52 AM
Henry was a bad 3 pt shooter and yet he continued to throw them up with the second most attempts on the team.  Just swapping his attempts for Katin's will raise the team average by almost 2%.  Add a year of experience to the other guys plus Rowsey plus more maturity in point guard play and adding another 3% is within reason.
I don't think scoring will be the 2016-17 team's problem.  Much more concerned about being able to stop the other team.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 17, 2016, 10:16:54 AM
Henry was a bad 3 pt shooter and yet he continued to throw them up with the second most attempts on the team.  Just swapping his attempts for Katin's will raise the team average by almost 2%.  Add a year of experience to the other guys plus Rowsey plus more maturity in point guard play and adding another 3% is within reason.
I don't think scoring will be the 2016-17 team's problem.  Much more concerned about being able to stop the other team.

I don't think they'll have issues with defense in the sense that they can keep teams from getting really good looks....it'll be in rebounding shots after decent looks that is of concern. The stat to watch this season will be second chance points, that will tell the tale.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: Jay Bee on October 17, 2016, 11:07:45 AM
Not saying you are wrong, but that would make us a top 25 3pt shooting team.

Further, we may project at a higher 3FGA/FGA% than most of those top 25...

5% higher 3FG%? I'd take it (nh)
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: fjm on October 17, 2016, 11:55:10 AM
38.5% would tie us with duke for 24th best in the country last year.

Wojo to duke confirmed...
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: NotAnAlum on October 17, 2016, 01:52:30 PM
I don't think they'll have issues with defense in the sense that they can keep teams from getting really good looks....it'll be in rebounding shots after decent looks that is of concern. The stat to watch this season will be second chance points, that will tell the tale.
If teams are mostly shooting outside shots then a guard heavy lineup should be able to rebound in space, in fact we could be better off by being "quicker to the ball".  My concern is that our guys allow too much penetration (as they have in the past) and then even if the first try doesn't go in the other team gets 2nd and 3rd shots along with "and ones".  That and bigger teams just living in the post against us.  Thankfully there aren't a lot of teams these days built around low post offense.
Regardless I think we'll see a lot more high scoring games.
Title: Re: Very interesting might give clues to starting lineup
Post by: mu03eng on October 17, 2016, 02:58:21 PM
If teams are mostly shooting outside shots then a guard heavy lineup should be able to rebound in space, in fact we could be better off by being "quicker to the ball".  My concern is that our guys allow too much penetration (as they have in the past) and then even if the first try doesn't go in the other team gets 2nd and 3rd shots along with "and ones".  That and bigger teams just living in the post against us.  Thankfully there aren't a lot of teams these days built around low post offense.
Regardless I think we'll see a lot more high scoring games.

You aren't wrong, and I think there will be some very exciting games at the BC this year if offense is your thing.