MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Herman Cain on August 01, 2016, 09:20:53 PM

Title: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Herman Cain on August 01, 2016, 09:20:53 PM
If a deep pocketed benefactor were willing to put up enough money to restore the Warrior name, how much would he/she be required to donate?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GoldenWarrior11 on August 01, 2016, 10:06:00 PM
How much is Valley Fields worth?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on August 01, 2016, 10:22:00 PM
The correct answer is nothing, because its not for sale.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Galway Eagle on August 01, 2016, 10:45:04 PM
I believe a deep pocketed benefactor tried this and we rejected the offer
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: MU82 on August 01, 2016, 10:56:41 PM
As Dr. Evil would say ...

"ONE BEELLION DOLLARS!"

I'm not saying who might pay that, but he would call it a huuuge, beautiful deal.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Dawson Rental on August 01, 2016, 11:43:26 PM
I believe a deep pocketed benefactor tried this and we rejected the offer

Of course, he offerred a hell of a lot less than the lowest amount allowed by Marquette Fan in New York as a poll answer.  Surprise!

Geez, I wonder if the purpose of the poll is so that Marquette Fan in New York can decide how much he's going to offer?  Don't be cheap due, just go to the 200 mil.  That way the athletic department will have more than enough moula to buy out Wojo as a consequence of him not pursuing Kostas.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: tower912 on August 02, 2016, 05:30:38 AM
So many here lament poor decisions by MU that make us look bad.    The blowback of changing the name back to Warriors, which at MU is deeply entangled in native American imagery, would be immense and well deserved.     The narrative would be... Marquette will do anything for money. 
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu72warrior on August 02, 2016, 07:27:30 AM
They did it before to get the valley fields
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: warriorchick on August 02, 2016, 08:02:21 AM
As Dr. Evil would say ...

"ONE BEELLION DOLLARS!"

I'm not saying who might pay that, but he would call it a huuuge, beautiful deal.

Um, that's not what he said.

(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/1m.gif)
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: rocky_warrior on August 02, 2016, 08:20:20 AM
11 years ago I thought there could be a chance for Warriors again.  Then "Gold" happened (and the ensuing vote), and I realized it was never gonna' happen.  So, I just still call them Warriors.  That's about as good as it's gonna' get.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 02, 2016, 08:24:15 AM
At least give me Hilltoppers.  Or Jumping Jez's.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 02, 2016, 08:26:20 AM
11 years ago I thought there could be a chance for Warriors again.  Then "Gold" happened (and the ensuing vote), and I realized it was never gonna' happen.  So, I just still call them Warriors.  That's about as good as it's gonna' get.

Dwyane Wade single handedly got rid of that nickname...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcrEl_r8xEE

Oops!
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GooooMarquette on August 02, 2016, 08:32:40 AM
11 years ago I thought there could be a chance for Warriors again.  Then "Gold" happened (and the ensuing vote), and I realized it was never gonna' happen.  So, I just still call them Warriors.  That's about as good as it's gonna' get.

Same here.  I once thought it may be possible, but that ship sailed years ago.  Now, it's gonna have to do to know that other fans (and even some hoops announcers) still think of the team as Warriors.

Let's go Warriors!
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: jsglow on August 02, 2016, 08:55:38 AM
Heck, this same thread happened years ago.  Been there, done that.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu03eng on August 02, 2016, 09:36:13 AM
So many here lament poor decisions by MU that make us look bad.    The blowback of changing the name back to Warriors, which at MU is deeply entangled in native American imagery, would be immense and well deserved.     The narrative would be... Marquette will do anything for money.

While I think such a transition could be handled successfully, that would require an organization with a skill set that MU clearly doesn't possess, so alas I believe you are correct.

It's funny that they would be lambasted for changing back sans imagery because they took money, yet the original change was prompted by a secret exchange of money and assets.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu-rara on August 02, 2016, 09:45:58 AM
While I think such a transition could be handled successfully, that would require an organization with a skill set that MU clearly doesn't possess, so alas I believe you are correct.

It's funny that they would be lambasted for changing back sans imagery because they took money, yet the original change was prompted by a secret exchange of money and assets.
++
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: DienerTime34 on August 02, 2016, 11:13:40 AM
Why do teams need nicknames or mascots at all?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: dgies9156 on August 02, 2016, 11:55:16 AM
Gang, certain things are constants:

1) It's cold in Milwaukee in the wintertime.
2) We're not an independent anymore
3) Al should be up for canonization (at least among us).
4) Crean and the Hillbilly will always be disliked.
5) The Warrior has gone to the big pow wow in the sky.

Face it, the Warrior is NOT coming back. Marquette is not for sale, at least not at a price any of us could ever imagine.

The Warrior decision was a bad one. But the demographics are working against it. There are almost as many living graduates who were graduated from Marquette as the Golden Eagles as there are Warriors.

Not closing Wisconsin Avenue and beheading the Warrior are Father DeUllio's legacies to the university. Thanks Padre! NOT!
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: AccredoJoe on August 02, 2016, 12:21:13 PM
Why not the Warriors. We can use ancient Hittite dress for the mascot. All the Hittites are dead so there will be no blow back
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Herman Cain on August 02, 2016, 12:27:02 PM
Gang, certain things are constants:

1) It's cold in Milwaukee in the wintertime.
2) We're not an independent anymore
3) Al should be up for canonization (at least among us).
4) Crean and the Hillbilly will always be disliked.
5) The Warrior has gone to the big pow wow in the sky.

Face it, the Warrior is NOT coming back. Marquette is not for sale, at least not at a price any of us could ever imagine.

The Warrior decision was a bad one. But the demographics are working against it. There are almost as many living graduates who were graduated from Marquette as the Golden Eagles as there are Warriors.

Not closing Wisconsin Avenue and beheading the Warrior are Father DeUllio's legacies to the university. Thanks Padre! NOT!
Not closing Wisconsin Avenue was one of the 4 great mistakes of Marquette.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GGGG on August 02, 2016, 12:31:27 PM
They tried to close WI Ave. It was the city that nixed the closing. I interviewed for a job at Marquette at the time and even saw the drawings.

Honestly I don't think it was a big deal in the long run.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: 79Warrior on August 02, 2016, 12:33:10 PM
Not closing Wisconsin Avenue was one of the 4 great mistakes of Marquette.

Not sure that is anywhere near as easy (then or now) as you imply.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: avid1010 on August 02, 2016, 12:43:34 PM
been an MU fan my whole life...i'm 33...could not care less what their mascot is....have always referred to them as marquette.  the generation that cares is aging (sorry, dad). 
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on August 02, 2016, 12:45:00 PM
Not closing Wisconsin Avenue was one of the 4 great mistakes of Marquette.

What are the other three?  We can bring them to the Fan Advisory Council...I hear that is where we get to air our grievances.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: brewcity77 on August 02, 2016, 12:46:02 PM
Why do teams need nicknames or mascots at all?

+1

Just be Marquette and call it a day.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu03eng on August 02, 2016, 12:54:00 PM
What are the other three?  We can bring them to the Fan Advisory Council...I hear that is where we get to air our grievances.

Shouldn't that been done here?

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/517k4oO7zcL._SL1024_.jpg)
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Herman Cain on August 02, 2016, 01:09:41 PM
What are the other three?  We can bring them to the Fan Advisory Council...I hear that is where we get to air our grievances.
1. Giving Up Football Program
2. Giving Up Medical School
3. Not Closing Wisconsin Avenue
4. Giving up Warrior Name
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: warriorchick on August 02, 2016, 01:15:18 PM
Closing Wisconsin Avenue would have been terrible.  Worrying that a cop car or a witness could drive by at any time is a great deterrent to crime.  I honestly don't see any advantage to doing it other than aesthetics.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GGGG on August 02, 2016, 01:17:49 PM
Not to mention that MU's idea was to relocate Wisconsin down to Clybourn by using basically the entire block bordered by Wisconsin, 17th and 18th. That wouldn't have been very feasible.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on August 02, 2016, 01:26:00 PM
1. Giving Up Football Program
2. Giving Up Medical School
3. Not Closing Wisconsin Avenue
4. Giving up Warrior Name

1. Couldn't disagree more
2. Couldn't agree more
3. Not MUs fault
4. Agreed with the caveat that all native imagery be dropped, fans be discouraged from using native imagery, and an apology was given for Willie Wampum and other past transgressions.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TallTitan34 on August 02, 2016, 01:47:25 PM
Very soon there will be more Golden Eagle alumni than Warrior alumni. 
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 02, 2016, 01:47:53 PM
We are all Warrior alum.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: real chili 83 on August 02, 2016, 02:01:18 PM
We are all Warrior alum.

Here, here.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: jsglow on August 02, 2016, 02:09:36 PM
Not to mention that MU's idea was to relocate Wisconsin down to Clybourn by using basically the entire block bordered by Wisconsin, 17th and 18th. That wouldn't have been very feasible.

Correct.

Let's rather look at Marquette's outstanding contribution to the 11th Street bypass (it was actually our idea) that created 'the wiggle' and the 11th street ped mall.  BTW, same thing will be happening on 18th between WI and Wells pursuant to new res hall development.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: MU82 on August 02, 2016, 02:11:26 PM
Um, that's not what he said.

(http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/1m.gif)

chickadee, I thought he updated it in a later movie ... and he did ... but a quick look on the Googles reveals he upped it to 100 billion.

So either way, I'm wrong. Again.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Lennys Tap on August 02, 2016, 02:29:43 PM
What are the other three?  We can bring them to the Fan Advisory Council...I hear that is where we get to air our grievances.

1. Axing the Warriors
2. Hiring Bob Dukiet
3. Messin' with happy
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: real chili 83 on August 02, 2016, 02:34:40 PM
1. Axing the Warriors
2. Hiring Bob Dukiet
3. Messin' with happy


1. Ending grill concerts
2. Ending block party
3. Disco on campus
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: cheebs09 on August 02, 2016, 02:39:17 PM
I don't understand why there isn't a pedestrian bridge going over Wisconsin Ave by the library and on 16th, kind of like in Las Vegas. I figured that would help with students crossing the street and let traffic flow a little better. You can even put "Marquette University" on them.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Benny B on August 02, 2016, 02:39:53 PM
How much is Valley Fields worth?

Why the teal?

I don't think title of Valley Field would necessarily revert to Pottawatomie, but there would be some sort of compensation and/or liquidated damages involved... I have no clue what that might even be.  That could be Dr. Evil territory, perhaps.

Nevertheless, whatever cost would be necessary to make Pottawatomie whole while retaining Valley Fields is probably a rounding error compared to what it would take to capture MU's attention.  The only way you'd prevent a revolt from the faculty/administration would be to endow enough scholarships directed towards Native Americans to bring their demos up to well over-represented levels (according to Wikipedia, MU is currently 0.3% compared to the US population of 0.9%, so that's a couple hundred scholarships right there).  In addition, you'd probably have to fully endow the athletic department (another 20-30 schollies), and probably a curriculum on Native American history (3-4 professors).  And that's just the minimum to get to the bargaining table.

Given MU's current "fully endowed" benchmarks of $600k for students and $1M for professors, my guess is we're talking an entry fee of upwards of $150M, which would probably end up around $200-250M at the end of the day.

Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Henry Sugar on August 02, 2016, 03:29:02 PM
Very soon there will be more Golden Eagle alumni than Warrior alumni.

I like the old TallTitan34 avatar. Titan, would you mind re-posting that?

I would go for "Marquette Warriors" using the Golden Eagle mascot. You honor both parts of the tradition, and immediately replace the Indian imagery. Everybody's happy. Or put another way, everybody's a little unhappy.

Never give up hope.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GGGG on August 02, 2016, 03:31:47 PM
I don't understand why there isn't a pedestrian bridge going over Wisconsin Ave by the library and on 16th, kind of like in Las Vegas. I figured that would help with students crossing the street and let traffic flow a little better. You can even put "Marquette University" on them.


Because no one would use it.  Wisconsin Avenue isn't *that* busy.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: 🏀 on August 02, 2016, 04:10:31 PM

Because no one would use it.  Wisconsin Avenue isn't *that* busy.

Would be the world's worst bridge.

Now if you connected Raynor to another library esque building across Wisconsin, that would get used. Especially during winter.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: warriorchick on August 02, 2016, 04:11:24 PM
chickadee, I thought he updated it in a later movie ... and he did ... but a quick look on the Googles reveals he upped it to 100 billion.

So either way, I'm wrong. Again.

Couldn't find a decent GIF for the 100 Billion quote, so I posted the other one instead.  But here is a video clip:

https://www.youtube.com/v/cf7uJDhVZIE
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: warriorchick on August 02, 2016, 04:19:28 PM
I don't understand why there isn't a pedestrian bridge going over Wisconsin Ave by the library and on 16th, kind of like in Las Vegas. I figured that would help with students crossing the street and let traffic flow a little better. You can even put "Marquette University" on them.

Believe it or not, a couple of years ago some parents called for a pedestrian bridge across Wisconsin because they didn't want their precious babies to get hit by cars when they were crossing it. It will never happen, for several reasons:

1. It would visually bisect the campus, which would not be flattering, aesthetics-wise.
2. You would have to make it wheelchair accessible, which means either installing a very expensive elevator on each end which would require constant maintenance, or having each end of the bridge start hundreds of feet back from the curb in order to make the slope gentle enough
3.  Any student who doesn't have the common sense to look both ways before crossing Wisconsin Avenue is not going to go a half-block out of his way to use a pedestrian bridge.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 02, 2016, 04:22:11 PM
Believe it or not, a couple of years ago some parents called for a pedestrian bridge across Wisconsin because they didn't want their precious babies to get hit by cars when they were crossing it. It will never happen, for several reasons:

1. It would visually bisect the campus, which would not be flattering, aesthetics-wise.
2. You would have to make it wheelchair accessible, which means either installing a very expensive elevator on each end which would require constant maintenance, or having each end of the bridge start hundreds of feet back from the curb in order to make the slope gentle enough
3.  Any student who doesn't have the common sense to look both ways before crossing Wisconsin Avenue is not going to go a half-block out of his way to use a pedestrian bridge.

Not always the pedestrian's fault.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: WarriorPride68 on August 02, 2016, 04:56:56 PM
I hope we keep Golden Eagles
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: dgies9156 on August 02, 2016, 04:57:47 PM
Marquette Fan In NY
1. Giving Up Football Program
    Unless we were in the BIG, there was no sense in keeping football. Vanderbilt and Northwestern can have crappy football teams because they get BIG or SEC revenue and they lend an air of class to both conferences. Same for Stanford, except they win in the Pac10. We were independent and it was doubtful from the gitgo that we would have been ever accepted into the BIG. We would have ended up in the Mid-America  or Missouri Valley conferences.
2. Giving Up Medical School
I believe the reason they gave up the medical school at the time was the concern that Marquette's teaching of its religious values might have prevented the medical school from receiving large federal research grants.It was a different time in the 1960s.
3. Not Closing Wisconsin Avenue
Closing Wisconsin Avenue was a public relations problem. It was less about traffic flow (which dropped off drramatically after Interstate 94 was constructed) and more about the perception that Wisconsin Avenue was Milwaukee's main street -- and that Marquette was taking that away. The reality was and is that Wells and Clybourn Streets could have more than effectively handled the  spillover.
4. Giving up Warrior Name
It may have been a HUGE mistake at the time but in the PC world that is the NCAA today, how far would we have been willing to go to keep it. Heck, the University of Illinois had to get rid of any reference to Chief Illiniwick. For us, Warriors referred to the Native Americans of the Northwoods and their aide and comfort to Father Marquette. You could do something PC to get past that problem but you not eliminate it, hence the reason for no longer being Warriors. For what it is worth, getting rid of the Warrior name stunk, but eventually we were going to have to, or make an Al-like stand against the NCAA.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: dgies9156 on August 02, 2016, 05:01:44 PM
1. Axing the Warriors
2. Hiring Bob Dukiet
3. Messin' with happy

Based on what I read in here, I'd add these:
1) Going cheap in the 1980s and not hiring Denny Crum when they allegedly had the chance in 1977.
2) Dukiet is absolutely right -- may be the biggest single mistake they ever made.
3) He was going to find a way to be a victim no matter what! We aren't UNLV and if he had stayed, we would have been! Maybe we should call him Hillbilly Tarkanian.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: warriorchick on August 02, 2016, 05:51:49 PM
Not always the pedestrian's fault.
A pedestrian who crosses when and  where he is supposed to and verifies that conditions are safe before proceeding almost never gets hit by a vehicle.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: muwarrior69 on August 02, 2016, 06:15:33 PM
Golden Avalanche 200 million; Warriors, priceless.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Dawson Rental on August 02, 2016, 07:25:13 PM
1. Giving Up Football Program
2. Giving Up Medical School
3. Not Closing Wisconsin Avenue
4. Giving up Warrior Name

Mistakes?
1. Was bankrupting the Athletic Department.
2. Would have bankrupted the University.
3. Would have bankrupted the University.
4. Didn't have to happen, if MU committed to a an alternate to Native American imagry.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: MUDPT on August 02, 2016, 07:43:49 PM
Correct.

Let's rather look at Marquette's outstanding contribution to the 11th Street bypass (it was actually our idea) that created 'the wiggle' and the 11th street ped mall.  BTW, same thing will be happening on 18th between WI and Wells pursuant to new res hall development.

Wasn't the original interchange plan to knock tower down?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: We R Final Four on August 02, 2016, 07:46:27 PM
Not always the pedestrian's fault.
No crap--can't tell you how many times I've seen drivers not stop, not sure what to do, one driver stops one doesn't, or slamming of the brakes.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Herman Cain on August 02, 2016, 08:48:04 PM
Mistakes?
1. Was bankrupting the Athletic Department.
2. Would have bankrupted the University.
3. Would have bankrupted the University.
4. Didn't have to happen, if MU committed to a an alternate to Native American imagry.
1. Disagree with this analysis
2. Disagree with this analysis
3. Disagree with this analysis
3. I agree with this analysis.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: tower912 on August 02, 2016, 08:59:29 PM
Wasn't the original interchange plan to knock tower down?

You can knock me down, but I will just get back up. 
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TallTitan34 on August 03, 2016, 10:23:15 AM
I like the old TallTitan34 avatar. Titan, would you mind re-posting that?

I would go for "Marquette Warriors" using the Golden Eagle mascot. You honor both parts of the tradition, and immediately replace the Indian imagery. Everybody's happy. Or put another way, everybody's a little unhappy.

Never give up hope.

This is what I would like them to do as well.  Warrior name, eagle mascot.

Here is the logo for you Henry:
(http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj229/marquettetitan34/0ca7fc7015e231afd028aa3a9c72c01a_media_900x900.jpg) (http://s273.photobucket.com/user/marquettetitan34/media/0ca7fc7015e231afd028aa3a9c72c01a_media_900x900.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: MUEng92 on August 03, 2016, 12:11:49 PM
Last night TWC's WI sports channel replayed the 1994 MU-Kentucky game.  I was relishing in the fact that they were referring to the Warriors the whole game, while beating KU as well.

Then, during the last minute, Vern Lundquist kicked me in the gut when he said, something about "the Warriors...which, by the way, they won't be called after this season".  Ripped open the scab.

Side note, Jim Burr reffed the game and had at least one point where he pulled aside another ref and had a 20 second conversation, then when back to his position with no explanation to anyone.  I didn't realize that was always his thing, even when he had darker hair.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on August 03, 2016, 12:28:49 PM
I don't understand why people just didn't vote for Hilltoppers back when they called for a vote. I actually really like that nickname.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 03, 2016, 12:34:33 PM
I don't understand why people just didn't vote for Hilltoppers back when they called for a vote. I actually really like that nickname.

People found it insulting that they would take a vote on a name change and not include the Warriors.  But I agree, Hilltoppers is a good name.  It's not the Warriors, but it's certainly better than the Gold/Golden Eagles.  As is the Jumping Jesuits.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on August 03, 2016, 12:42:20 PM
I don't understand why people just didn't vote for Hilltoppers back when they called for a vote. I actually really like that nickname.

I don't think it was ever a real vote. The conspiracy theorist in me thinks they picked the name that finished last in voting so people would beg just to get the Golden Eagles back.

I actually didn't mind Gold as a name. Its unique. Would have preferred Hilltoppers or Jumping Jesuits though. I like Golden Eagles but I just wish it was more unique. Way too many schools that use our mascot.

Of course, wish we could have gone back to the Warriors. Loved the idea someone had about using Joan of Arc as the mascot. Lot of history and campus connections in that idea. But I understand why the University felt like they couldn't.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu03eng on August 03, 2016, 01:28:54 PM
I don't understand why people just didn't vote for Hilltoppers back when they called for a vote. I actually really like that nickname.

Vote split 3 ways....lot of alums wrote in Warriors even though it explicitly said it wouldn't be counted leaving (probably mostly the "young") alumni to vote for no change and the rest to vote Hilltoppers with a few scattered "others".

If MU had been smart(no one has ever accused them of that) they would have run the vote in such a way that alumni could protest for Warriors but still get a secondary choice...in that scenario I have little doubt that Hilltoppers win. By doing that, it would have blunted a ton of future angst because while warriors wouldn't come back there would be a path to move forward together. Oh well.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: jsglow on August 03, 2016, 02:38:13 PM
Wasn't the original interchange plan to knock tower down?

I don't believe so.  The original plan had huge traffic counts going down the old 11th Street.  Recall that there had been no on ramp to I-94 (either direction) as part of the old interchange.  When that was appropriately included in the proposed layout, it was clear that local traffic counts would skyrocket at 11th & WI.

Dr. Peters served directly on the Marquette Interchange commission.  I don't know who exactly came up with the cantilevered configuration that was ultimately developed (note that 11th now 'hangs' in the air over the highway below) but Marquette was absolutely insistent that it be created once the engineering proved that it was feasible.  Other than cost, I don't think anyone on the commission disagreed.  It's actually an excellent design.

Plans for 18th are similar in terms of the creation of a dedicated driveway with retractable pillars to be lowered for vehicle access in an emergency and at move in/out.   I have been told 12th is NEVER a candidate for reconfiguration as it serves as a primary route to the Mt. Sinai emergency room.  I believe, but am not certain, that 13th is squarely in the maybe someday camp and they still need something better for Shamu now that the new Jes Res is complete.   
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: rocky_warrior on August 03, 2016, 02:47:17 PM
I don't think it was ever a real vote. The conspiracy theorist in me thinks they picked the name that finished last in voting so people would beg just to get the Golden Eagles back.

I actually didn't mind Gold as a name. Its unique. Would have preferred Hilltoppers or Jumping Jesuits though. I like Golden Eagles but I just wish it was more unique. Way too many schools that use our mascot.

I think you're confusing two events.  Gold came about from the BOT after $2MM "Warriors" offer, and a subsequent survey which indicated alumni didn't like GE's.  The vote came about after Gold flopped, and the BOT still needed a name.

But yes, after the BOT said Warriors wasn't an option, I don't think the vote really mattered much.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: jsglow on August 03, 2016, 02:52:17 PM
I think you're confusing two events. Gold came about from the BOT after $2MM "Warriors" offer, and a subsequent survey which indicated alumni didn't like GE's.  The vote came about after Gold flopped, and the BOT still needed a name.

But yes, after the BOT said Warriors wasn't an option, I don't think the vote really mattered much.

Correct.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on August 03, 2016, 03:56:48 PM
But yes, after the BOT said Warriors wasn't an option, I don't think the vote really mattered much.

I seem to remember there was a 2-stage process to get all the back to where we started...to me the result said that people didn't care what we were called if we couldn't be the Warriors.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GGGG on August 03, 2016, 04:03:02 PM
I seem to remember there was a 2-stage process to get all the back to where we started...to me the result said that people didn't care what we were called if we couldn't be the Warriors.


It was a two stage process.  Golden Eagles and Hilltoppers were the final two.

Here is a summary.

http://www.espn.com/college-sports/news/story?id=2097051
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on August 03, 2016, 04:16:41 PM
I think you're confusing two events.  Gold came about from the BOT after $2MM "Warriors" offer, and a subsequent survey which indicated alumni didn't like GE's.  The vote came about after Gold flopped, and the BOT still needed a name.

But yes, after the BOT said Warriors wasn't an option, I don't think the vote really mattered much.

Huh, my mistake. Vote happened before my time at Marquette. Also thought Gold was the poll result.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on August 03, 2016, 04:32:27 PM

It was a two stage process.  Golden Eagles and Hilltoppers were the final two.

Here is a summary.

http://www.espn.com/college-sports/news/story?id=2097051

My favorite quote

The school rejected the trustees' offer and this spring announced a switch from Golden Eagles to Gold, which was strongly opposed by students and alumni because they weren't consulted.

I think a more accurate description would be "...because they thought it was stupid"
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: DoggyDaddy on August 04, 2016, 07:47:56 AM
Money, the root of evil, what the Jesuits inspire us to be wary of, what to some of the oldest Americans was  wampum. I remember Willie somewhat fondly but I come from newer American stock. Let's keep him in the more remote corners of Marquette history.
The Golden Eagle has landed and so it will stay.   
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu03eng on August 04, 2016, 08:10:25 AM
Money, the root of evil, what the Jesuits inspire us to be wary of, what to some of the oldest Americans was  wampum. I remember Willie somewhat fondly but I come from newer American stock. Let's keep him in the more remote corners of Marquette history.
The Golden Eagle has landed and so it will stay.   

Multiple things here:
-Except for maybe a few fringe nobody is advocating bring Warriors back with any Native American imagery let alone with Willie
-The Jesuits took money in the first place to change away from Warriors
-New American stock? what does this even mean in this context?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: jsglow on August 04, 2016, 08:16:14 AM
My favorite quote

The school rejected the trustees' offer and this spring announced a switch from Golden Eagles to Gold, which was strongly opposed by students and alumni because they weren't consulted.

I think a more accurate description would be "...because they thought it was stupid"

Ya'll all know that there was one person on the BOT (who shall remain nameless) that pushed for Gold.  The rest were mind numbed sheep.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Eye on August 04, 2016, 08:33:33 AM
Based on what I read in here, I'd add these:
1) Going cheap in the 1980s and not hiring Denny Crum when they allegedly had the chance in 1977.

1st I've ever heard of this; anybody got more info on if this is actually true?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on August 04, 2016, 08:34:57 AM
Ya'll all know that there was one person on the BOT (who shall remain nameless) that pushed for Gold.  The rest were mind numbed sheep.

(http://s.quickmeme.com/img/ee/ee16d4c7a19e8e9073fcb29c21e534dba3729ba4d36a60c0ffe7f0fbb451ae93.jpg)
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Brewtown Andy on August 04, 2016, 08:38:04 AM
Plans for 18th are similar in terms of the creation of a dedicated driveway with retractable pillars to be lowered for vehicle access in an emergency and at move in/out.   

Given that they just removed the retractable pillars by Carpenter and Cobeen last week, I suspect that these will not be installed on 18th Street.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu03eng on August 04, 2016, 08:55:19 AM
1st I've ever heard of this; anybody got more info on if this is actually true?

100% true....and they are a marketing genius...just ask them.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on August 04, 2016, 10:34:30 AM
100% true....and they are a marketing genius...just ask them.

I think eye was talking about hiring Denny Crum in 1977.

Curious what people didn't like about Gold. Was it that bad or was it that any name that wasn't Warriors going to be booed down? I personally didn't think it was good enough to warrant a mascot change, but I think it's a better mascot than Golden Eagles. We're what? One of 47 universities that have Golden Eagles as their mascot? Gold is at least unique.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GGGG on August 04, 2016, 10:38:40 AM
I think eye was talking about hiring Denny Crum in 1977.

Curious what people didn't like about Gold. Was it that bad or was it that any name that wasn't Warriors going to be booed down? I personally didn't think it was good enough to warrant a mascot change, but I think it's a better mascot than Golden Eagles. We're what? One of 47 universities that have Golden Eagles as their mascot? Gold is at least unique.


I think it just came out of nowhere and sounded really dumb.  I still am not really a fan.  I would have taken Golden Avalanche though.  (I think I actually voted for that in the initial round.)
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: jsglow on August 04, 2016, 10:39:33 AM
Given that they just removed the retractable pillars by Carpenter and Cobeen last week, I suspect that these will not be installed on 18th Street.

Huh, news to me.  Seems odd.  I wonder if a different, more modern system might be going in.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Eye on August 04, 2016, 11:41:38 AM
I think eye was talking about hiring Denny Crum in 1977.

Yes, I was wondering about Crum in 1977. I got quite a reaction when I stomped on a bag of Rold Gold pretzels into oblivion the day of that announcement. Scared the heck out of some girl 'til she understood what I was doing; at the same time three of my bodies were on the ground laughing.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 04, 2016, 12:11:57 PM
Yes, I was wondering about Crum in 1977. I got quite a reaction when I stomped on a bag of Rold Gold pretzels into oblivion the day of that announcement. Scared the heck out of some girl 'til she understood what I was doing; at the same time three of my bodies were on the ground laughing.

You have four+ bodies?!
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Eye on August 04, 2016, 12:14:33 PM
Bodies/buddies, tomato/tomahto.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: mu03eng on August 04, 2016, 12:25:18 PM
I think eye was talking about hiring Denny Crum in 1977.

Curious what people didn't like about Gold. Was it that bad or was it that any name that wasn't Warriors going to be booed down? I personally didn't think it was good enough to warrant a mascot change, but I think it's a better mascot than Golden Eagles. We're what? One of 47 universities that have Golden Eagles as their mascot? Gold is at least unique.

I think it was a combination of factors...passion for warriors, angst over not being consulted the first time and then turning around and doing the same thing all over again (pissed off both warrior and golden eagle fans), wasn't that original(Stanford, I think Syracuse changed right before us, might be one or two others) and it came from no where.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: wadesworld on August 04, 2016, 12:52:40 PM
I think it was a combination of factors...passion for warriors, angst over not being consulted the first time and then turning around and doing the same thing all over again (pissed off both warrior and golden eagle fans), wasn't that original(Stanford, I think Syracuse changed right before us, might be one or two others) and it came from no where.

And, most importantly, Dwyane Wade said no way in hell.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: MU Fan in Connecticut on August 04, 2016, 01:37:28 PM

It was a two stage process.  Golden Eagles and Hilltoppers were the final two.

Here is a summary.

http://www.espn.com/college-sports/news/story?id=2097051

Wasn't one of the choice Lightning?  Maybe that was one of the first round choices?
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: GGGG on August 04, 2016, 01:43:52 PM
Wasn't one of the choice Lightning?  Maybe that was one of the first round choices?


No that was when they changed from Warriors.  The final vote was Lightning and Golden Eagles.

Really the entire nickname episode over the last 20 years has been one f*ck up after another.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Litehouse on August 04, 2016, 02:13:07 PM

No that was when they changed from Warriors.  The final vote was Lightning and Golden Eagles.

Really the entire nickname episode over the last 20 years has been one f*ck up after another.
Yep.  If they would have just gone back to Hilltoppers in 1994 this issue would be over.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: rocky_warrior on August 04, 2016, 03:35:43 PM
Wasn't one of the choice Lightning?  Maybe that was one of the first round choices?

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=WqsxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CBMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5259%2C7978499
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Herman Cain on August 04, 2016, 03:40:19 PM
https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=WqsxAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CBMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=5259%2C7978499
Some mention of closing off  Wisconsin avenue in the article as well.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: Benny B on August 08, 2016, 10:01:59 AM
You have four+ bodies?!

Eye may speak with a very think Russian accent.
Title: Re: Poll: What Price To Bring Back Warrior Name
Post by: MU82 on August 08, 2016, 10:19:35 AM
Yep.  If they would have just gone back to Hilltoppers in 1994 this issue would be over.

This.

It was so obvious and they screwed it up royally.

Oh well. All it is now is something for all of us oldsters to talk and/or whine about.