MUScoop

MUScoop => The Superbar => Topic started by: RushmoreAcademy on January 30, 2015, 12:09:35 PM

Title: Superbowl
Post by: RushmoreAcademy on January 30, 2015, 12:09:35 PM
What say you, Scoop?
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on January 31, 2015, 09:56:39 AM
Super Bowl
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MU B2002 on January 31, 2015, 10:07:09 AM
Sea +1
Under.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: Groin_pull on January 31, 2015, 11:05:54 PM
Not interested. Can end in a 0-0 tie. Won't be watching. Hate both teams. Going to a movie instead.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: mu_hilltopper on February 01, 2015, 08:20:16 AM
I am introducing my boys to cheese wiz and pizza rolls during the game.  So we got that going for us.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: 4everwarriors on February 01, 2015, 09:35:23 AM
I don't give no chit. Hopin' for a Katy Perry wardrobe malfunction at halftime, aina?
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on February 01, 2015, 11:54:27 AM
Won't be there in person this year, but not shedding a tear.  Good times up in Portland....flying back during part of the game.  Plenty of funny Crean and Deane stories were told. 

Could not care any less for the outcome of this game. 
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MUsoxfan on February 01, 2015, 01:47:45 PM
Not interested. Can end in a 0-0 tie. Won't be watching. Hate both teams. Going to a movie instead.

Agreed. I'm thankful to be snowed in and completely isolated from the game
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: 77ncaachamps on February 01, 2015, 03:59:44 PM
Who cares.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: muwarrior69 on February 01, 2015, 07:20:23 PM
Who cares.

Pretty much the general feeling especially when your team is not in it.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: wadesworld on February 01, 2015, 09:12:39 PM
Seahawks are a bunch of classless punks.

Guessing God wanted Russell to throw that pick.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: 4everwarriors on February 01, 2015, 09:13:44 PM
Karma's a bitch, aina?
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on February 01, 2015, 09:15:01 PM
Watching Badger Darrell Bevill call the worst play in NFL history and watching Badger Russell Wilson throw that pick to have Pete Carroll go down....well that was kind of fun.  Even though I didn't care who won the game, having that epic of a screwup was great.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: GGGG on February 01, 2015, 09:16:43 PM
Watching Badger Darrell Bevill call the worst play in NFL history and watching Badger Russell Wilson throw that pick to have Pete Carroll go down....well that was kind of fun.  Even though I didn't care who won the game, having that epic of a screwup was great.


What could have been one of the most remarkable catches in the history of the Super Bowl will go down as a mere footnote.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: NersEllenson on February 01, 2015, 09:25:30 PM
Questionable coaching decisions by guys paid millions:

1) Why did Belicheck not call a timeout after the first Lynch run that concluded in a 2nd and goal on the 1 yard line with 1:00 left and two timeouts?  In the event Seattle doesn't completely implode and make a similar idiotic coaching decision - such as not running Lynch - you get Brady back the football after kickoff with probably 18 seconds left.  

2) Seahawks, inexplicably with 1 time out left, choose NOT to run Lynch - snap ball at 22 seconds left in game.  You run Lynch, he doesn't get it - timeout.  3rd&goal with roughly 18 seconds.  Run 3rd down play...don't get it - kick field goal and go to OT.

Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: nyg on February 01, 2015, 09:31:40 PM
Carroll will be able to appease the media about the call, but not to his players.  The players must be absolutely sick and this may effect them for some time.  Lynch had at least two more shots to get one yard. 

Ners, Seattle was down four, no field goal......
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: keefe on February 01, 2015, 09:32:45 PM
Well, sh1t
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: Texas Western on February 01, 2015, 09:34:31 PM
I Was at the game sitting in Seahawks dominated section. People were stunned at the last play.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: brandx on February 01, 2015, 09:40:09 PM
Carroll will be able to appease the media about the call, but not to his players.  The players must be absolutely sick and this may effect them for some time.  Lynch had at least two more shots to get one yard. 

Ners, Seattle was down four, no field goal......

 ;D

And Ners wonders why we all think he's an idiot. But as a guy who actually probably played some football, he knows that a real coach would know how to run a four point field goal.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: JWags85 on February 01, 2015, 09:59:04 PM
I just can't stomach the Pats gloating that will be coming.  Seahawks fans may be ridiculed for being bandwagon, but Boston fans are insufferable.  Not the least of which is my good friend who was born and raised in Chicago but roots for the Pats cause he "never liked the Bears" and won a $10 bet on them in their first Brady Super Bowl win and talks about them like he grew up in Southie.  Until Seattle starts saying things like "Greatriots" "Patriots East" "Patriot Way" etc...  they are infinitely less obnoxious.  I'm honestly more upset about this game outcome than any Super Bowl since the Bears collapse in 2003.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: ChuckyChip on February 01, 2015, 10:06:42 PM
The key was that Seattle wasted two timeouts on the drive and only had one left. They didn't think they could run the ball three times with only one timeout and 22 seconds remaining.  So the plan was throw on second down and either score or get an incompletion, then run on third down and use the timeout if you don't score to setup the fourth down play.

Kind of makes sense, but horribly risky to throw a ball in traffic like that.  They should have done a fade to the corner.

I also agree about NE not taking a timeout...that was very surprising.  If Seattle had scored there would have been no time left.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: buckchuckler on February 01, 2015, 10:09:30 PM
;D

And Ners wonders why we all think he's an idiot. But as a guy who actually probably played some football, he knows that a real coach would know how to run a four point field goal.

Yeah.  Clearly never played hs football.  Why even bother to comment on a sport which you are obviously so ignorant. 
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: wadesworld on February 01, 2015, 10:19:32 PM
Grandma is from Boston and always liked the Patriots (and Red Sox and Celtics).  Wouldn't necessarily call myself a fan of theirs or even really root for them, but certainly wanted them to win this one with the Seahawks as their opponent.  The 2nd last play of the game confirmed everything I believed about the Seahawks and Pete Carroll.  Nothing but a punk, and everyone on his team follows suit.  The way they lost that game slightly helps the healing process for what happened 2 weeks ago.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: jesmu84 on February 01, 2015, 10:20:34 PM
1. No concussion protocol for Edelman but there was for Avril?

2. Only one person tossed during the scuffle at the end? Gronk, among a couple others, absolutely threw a punch.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: wadesworld on February 01, 2015, 10:28:37 PM
1. No concussion protocol for Edelman but there was for Avril?

2. Only one person tossed during the scuffle at the end? Gronk, among a couple others, absolutely threw a punch.

Gronk had about 6 guys jumping on him at once.  Seattle loses so they have to start a fight right before it ends.  Complete joke.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: JWags85 on February 01, 2015, 10:30:44 PM
Gronk had about 6 guys jumping on him at once.  Seattle loses so they have to start a fight right before it ends.  Complete joke.

He smacked a dude in the helmet before that.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: jesmu84 on February 01, 2015, 10:39:07 PM
Gronk had about 6 guys jumping on him at once.  Seattle loses so they have to start a fight right before it ends.  Complete joke.

Oh. Absolutely. But my question still stands as any punch thrown in a game is supposed to result in an immediate dismissal.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: keefe on February 01, 2015, 11:59:55 PM
Oh. Absolutely. But my question still stands as any punch thrown in a game is supposed to result in an immediate dismissal.

It's like the skipper of the Titanic asking after the bump in the night about the next day's menu...
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MU B2002 on February 02, 2015, 06:54:20 AM
1. No concussion protocol for Edelman but there was for Avril?

2. Only one person tossed during the scuffle at the end? Gronk, among a couple others, absolutely threw a punch.


That was baffling.  After that helmet shot at mid field he was clearly stumbling for several plays in a row.  I think Al & Chris mentioned something about his hip, but it seemed pretty clear he was trying to shake the cobwebs out.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MerrittsMustache on February 02, 2015, 07:57:05 AM

That was baffling.  After that helmet shot at mid field he was clearly stumbling for several plays in a row.  I think Al & Chris mentioned something about his hip, but it seemed pretty clear he was trying to shake the cobwebs out.

It's the Super Bowl! Valuable players don't get concussed in important regular season games let alone the Super Bowl.

Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MU B2002 on February 02, 2015, 08:00:16 AM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/1507707_10101881177362535_4980927025490718664_n.jpg?oh=71afa19e2b501f12ca66a57526e96e69&oe=555AC188&__gda__=1431433399_d1a433a13b758259a1eaabcad34ffc98)
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: Chicago_inferiority_complexes on February 02, 2015, 08:22:56 AM
Awful lot of people on here with no interest in the game appeared to have seen it ...
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MU B2002 on February 02, 2015, 08:25:43 AM
Not a comment made by me.

It's the Super Bowl, I will always be interested.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: RushmoreAcademy on February 02, 2015, 08:29:05 AM
Exciting game, which when I don't have a dog in the fight, is all I really want.
More importantly, scoop correctly predicted the outcome.    It's time we start making some money on this.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: GGGG on February 02, 2015, 08:35:41 AM
Oh. Absolutely. But my question still stands as any punch thrown in a game is supposed to result in an immediate dismissal.


There was 30 seconds left in the game.  I am sure the refs just wanted it over by that point.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: jesmu84 on February 02, 2015, 08:59:17 AM

There was 30 seconds left in the game.  I am sure the refs just wanted it over by that point.

Then why toss the Seahawks player? Just throw a few personal fouls and call it a day.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: MU B2002 on February 02, 2015, 09:05:08 AM
Then why toss the Seahawks player? Just throw a few personal fouls and call it a day.


(http://imgick.mlive.com/home/adv-media/width620/img/nfl_2013_national_desk/photo/15819501-mmmain.jpg)
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: Lennys Tap on February 02, 2015, 09:15:31 AM
Then why toss the Seahawks player? Just throw a few personal fouls and call it a day.

Because he was and idiot and started a ridiculous, unnecessary melee. Because with the game over he showed extremely bad sportsmanship. Because he was a total tool. It was a great game that the Seahawks tried to ruin by starting a fight in the last 30 seconds. The least the refs could do was to publicly embarrass the instigator, call him out for the jerk he was and toss him so he gets a hefty fine. Rule or no rule, to equally penalize New England players for defending themselves would have made a mockery of the situation.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: GGGG on February 02, 2015, 09:17:22 AM
Then why toss the Seahawks player? Just throw a few personal fouls and call it a day.


Because he was and idiot and started a ridiculous, unnecessary melee. Because with the game over he showed extremely bad sportsmanship. Because he was a total tool. It was a great game that the Seahawks tried to ruin by starting a fight in the last 30 seconds. The least the refs could do was to publicly embarrass the instigator, call him out for the jerk he was and toss him so he gets a hefty fine. Rule or no rule, to equally penalize New England players for defending themselves would have made a mockery of the situation.


Exactly.

Let's try not to overthink this.
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: keefe on February 02, 2015, 11:32:29 AM
Because he was and idiot and started a ridiculous, unnecessary melee. Because with the game over he showed extremely bad sportsmanship. Because he was a total tool. It was a great game that the Seahawks tried to ruin by starting a fight in the last 30 seconds. The least the refs could do was to publicly embarrass the instigator, call him out for the jerk he was and toss him so he gets a hefty fine. Rule or no rule, to equally penalize New England players for defending themselves would have made a mockery of the situation.

I think it had something  to do with deflated gonads
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: BrewCity83 on February 02, 2015, 11:43:41 AM
Super Bowl

Superb Owl
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on February 02, 2015, 08:52:05 PM
Poopgate?

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/02/02/seahawks-wr-doug-baldwin-appears-to-mimic-pooping-during-super-bowl-touchdown-celebration/
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on February 02, 2015, 10:45:50 PM
(https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/s720x720/10013024_949121478433773_7851441227704614421_n.jpg?oh=0ed70b79364eee5f744fc2c23c79d8a5&oe=555748A5&__gda__=1432553752_c562d2aa6c529a1dfe27875c5e0bc69f)
Title: Re: Superbowl
Post by: wadesworld on February 02, 2015, 11:47:54 PM
Poopgate?

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/02/02/seahawks-wr-doug-baldwin-appears-to-mimic-pooping-during-super-bowl-touchdown-celebration/

Not surprising.