MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: mubb34 on November 25, 2014, 07:20:54 PM

Title: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: mubb34 on November 25, 2014, 07:20:54 PM
Sooo....Omaha is up 23-10 On Nebraska early...  ?-(
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: warriorchick on November 25, 2014, 07:47:00 PM
Apparently Nebraska has gone on a 24-6 run since then.
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: brewcity77 on November 25, 2014, 08:44:10 PM
Clearly Nebraska isn't very good. Don't they know Seattle beat this team by 24?
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: chapman on November 25, 2014, 10:20:45 PM
When "not a bad loss" no longer applies, we've moved on to "our bad losses have some not so bad losses".   :D
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: Tums Festival on November 25, 2014, 11:45:51 PM
Nebraska starts four juniors and a senior. Clearly a much more veteran team than MU.
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: jakeec on November 26, 2014, 10:02:35 AM

Nebraska won.  They started off slow and then turned it on. Nebraska outscored UNO by 27 after an awful start.  They lead by 11 or more the last 9 minutes.  Even if UNO isnt bad that doesnt mean Marquette isnt.  In fact, barely beating NJIT is probably worse than getting beat by UNO
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: CTWarrior on November 26, 2014, 10:09:14 AM
Nebraska starts four juniors and a senior. Clearly a much more veteran team than MU.

Well, we start 3 seniors and a junior, so they aren't that much more veteran than we are.  Granted, our other players are the 3 sophs and 2 frosh.
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: brewcity77 on November 26, 2014, 10:52:20 AM
Nebraska won.  They started off slow and then turned it on. Nebraska outscored UNO by 27 after an awful start.  They lead by 11 or more the last 9 minutes.  Even if UNO isnt bad that doesnt mean Marquette isnt.  In fact, barely beating NJIT is probably worse than getting beat by UNO

(http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002181027/1943802283_obvious_troll_xlarge.jpeg)

Badger boards getting a bit boring lately, since Stone decided to push back his commitment date and all the team has to do is roll the ball out and see how much they win by?
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: Tums Festival on November 26, 2014, 01:10:49 PM
Well, we start 3 seniors and a junior, so they aren't that much more veteran than we are.  Granted, our other players are the 3 sophs and 2 frosh.

Of their top 8 players in terms of minutes played, 7 are upperclassmen. And 6 of those 7 upperclassmen were among the leaders in minutes played last year too. That's different from our 4 upperclassmen where one is in his only year in the program and two others played spotty minutes last year.
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: WayOfTheWarrior on November 26, 2014, 01:21:48 PM
Nebraska won.  They started off slow and then turned it on. Nebraska outscored UNO by 27 after an awful start.  They lead by 11 or more the last 9 minutes.  Even if UNO isnt bad that doesnt mean Marquette isnt.  In fact, barely beating NJIT is probably worse than getting beat by UNO

This is where you went wrong. Omaha is a respectable team that came to play against us and got after it, but I'd take any win over any team however narrow, to a loss to a team we should have beat. C'mon man!
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on November 26, 2014, 02:12:27 PM
This is where you went wrong. Omaha is a respectable team that came to play against us and got after it, but I'd take any win over any team however narrow, to a loss to a team we should have beat. C'mon man!

Obviously a win is better than a loss no matter what. But in terms of an indicator, a narrow last minute victory over NJIT probably bodes slightly worse than a 9 point loss to UN-O. Splitting hairs, ultimately.
Title: Re: Omaha vs. Nebraska
Post by: hdog1017 on November 26, 2014, 03:29:06 PM
I would have preferred to beat Omaha instead of losing to them.