MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: 1SE on November 15, 2026, 03:49:32 PM

Title: That was a bad loss.
Post by: 1SE on November 15, 2026, 03:49:32 PM
Not seeing anything yet to make me think last year was an aberration. Or that $13 million was worth it.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: Farley36 on November 15, 2026, 03:51:51 PM
VBMG emotional outburst incoming in 3...2...1
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: StillWarriors on November 15, 2026, 03:52:55 PM
Horrendous. Stupid basketball. Parham a shell of what he was last year and James slightly better today but still plenty of huge mental mistakes and zero confidence in his shot. Not good.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: goldeneagle91114 on November 15, 2026, 03:53:55 PM
Quote from: StillWarriors on <strong>Today</strong> at 03:52:55 PMHorrendous. Stupid basketball. Parham a shell of what he was last year and James slightly better today but still plenty of huge mental mistakes and zero confidence in his shot. Not good.

James with more TO's than baskets made. that does not equal a winning combo from the best Player on the team.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: MuggsyB on November 15, 2026, 03:57:33 PM
Thas was a terrible loss.  Absolutely putrid. 
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: StillWarriors on November 15, 2026, 03:57:56 PM
Quote from: goldeneagle91114 on <strong>Today</strong> at 03:53:55 PMJames with more TO's than baskets made. that does not equal a winning combo from the best Player on the team.

His gamble for a steal that led to Fru's 4th foul showed zero discipline and was very costly. Have to be smarter than that. Especially with a lead.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: 1SE on November 15, 2026, 03:58:44 PM
Why is Shaka so bad at end of game situations (not that we should have been in one in the first place). Not getting a shot off is a Scoop trope now.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on November 15, 2026, 03:59:40 PM
There's a realistic scenario where we lose to DePaul twice this year
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: Tha Hound on November 15, 2026, 04:00:21 PM
No sugar coating, losing that game to a team missing one of their best players is a very bad sign. I thought a year of development and new signings would have a major impact. I appear to have been wrong.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: MuggsyB on November 15, 2026, 04:00:36 PM
Quote from: goldeneagle91114 on <strong>Today</strong> at 03:53:55 PMJames with more TO's than baskets made. that does not equal a winning combo from the best Player on the team.

Don't gloss over what our 2nd best player has done vs Mich & Mizzou. 
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: goldeneagle91114 on November 15, 2026, 04:03:57 PM
Quote from: MuggsyB on <strong>Today</strong> at 04:00:36 PMDon't gloss over what our 2nd best player has done vs Mich & Mizzou.

look at James, Royce and Fru a a whole over that period. Those were the 3 that were suppose to save us from what took place last year.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on November 15, 2026, 04:05:13 PM
I don't even know if I blame Nigel, if you know nobody else can score what else is he supposed to do?

I wish he fixed his shot in the offseason but he has zero help out there with Parham missing 0 footers.
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: wisblue on November 15, 2026, 04:08:07 PM
Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on <strong>Today</strong> at 03:59:40 PMThere's a realistic scenario where we lose to DePaul twice this year

Is there a realistic scenario in which Marquette would beat de Paul once?
Title: Re: That was a bad loss.
Post by: MuggsyB on November 15, 2026, 04:11:08 PM
Quote from: goldeneagle91114 on <strong>Today</strong> at 04:03:57 PMlook at James, Royce and Fru a a whole over that period. Those were the 3 that were suppose to save us from what took place last year.


Ya....it's been pretty much a disaster for that trio. 
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2026, WebDev