(https://i.imgflip.com/46jszr.gif)
Never a doubt
Welcome, Sananda. Good to see Shaka reap the Fru-its of his labor.
Can't believe that Shaka had to settle for his first choice
Terrible news for Willie. Just hope Marquette understands the new NIL rules.
(https://media.tenor.com/v_qPOJw06Q0AAAAM/flexing-flex.gif)
Minutes dried up for our most experienced center. May want to explore other opportunities, aina
Big time get. Thought other schools who missed on their top targets would start sniffing around soon.
Finally. Good news. Would have been really deflating had he gone elsewhere given all the smoke.
Does this mean somebody is going into the portal?
Quote from: BCHoopster on April 15, 2026, 04:31:41 PMDoes this mean somebody is going into the portal?
Doesn't have to, but it could.
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExMGlvanFzYWp0dGVpNGFhN2pqdHR3cG02b2l5Yno0aWkyNnhteW41MyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/f3jZ8moRBbEvNJjOtu/giphy.gif)
Quote from: Uncle Rico on April 15, 2026, 04:08:01 PMTerrible news for Willie. Just hope Marquette understands the new NIL rules.
I just hope Fru understands taxes.
Oh by the way, pretty good for a "poverty program." 🙄🙄🙄
Quote from: BCHoopster on April 15, 2026, 04:31:41 PMDoes this mean somebody is going into the portal?
[/quote
No
Wish we would get someone whose player comp is somebody other than Matt Heldt, but I guess I can live with it, being a poverty program and all.
This is great news on a number of fronts!
This explains our buy game in Ann Arbor. Have to be able to pay for top talent.
Big time
Can't wait for the first time a TV announcer says:
That's not "booo" you're hearing, it's "FRUUUUUUUUU!"
Nice get. Now please reimplement the pick and roll that was utilized with Kur and Oso.
Great pick up. Glad Shaka was able to land Fru.
KAFRUCKINGBOOM!!!!!!!!! 🔨 🔨
LFG!!!!
I believe this is just the beginning Scoopers!!!
Mammoth pick-up for MU!!!!
Quote from: Johnny B on April 15, 2026, 04:31:20 PMFinally. Good news. Would have been really deflating had he gone elsewhere given all the smoke.
Yes. I would have been seeing in-fru-red. :)
Quote from: wadesworld on April 15, 2026, 04:47:09 PMWish we would get someone whose player comp is somebody other than Matt Heldt, but I guess I can live with it, being a poverty program and all.
No no. He's just Heldt's "archetype." 🤪🤪🤪
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 04:39:53 PMI just hope Fru understands taxes.
Okay, that one made me laugh
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 04:40:32 PMOh by the way, pretty good for a "poverty program." 🙄🙄🙄
Ohhhhh, we're going to need another get or two to get out of poverty franchise.
Great to see Shaka and staff land a high priority target at a premium position - and one we needed to upgrade. And thanks to all donors/alums who have contributed to our portal recruiting funds!
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 05:40:29 PMOhhhhh, we're going to need another get or two to get out of poverty franchise.
Attaboy.
(https://gifdb.com/images/high/elmo-meme-i-will-die-on-this-hill-2kg0e9fc1qkujjz9.gif)
https://painttouches.com/2026/04/13/how-does-transfer-sananda-fru-fit-into-marquette/
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 05:40:29 PMOhhhhh, we're going to need another get or two to get out of poverty franchise.
Ahhh...the goalposts, they are a-shiftin'!!!
Quote from: Small Orange Soda on April 15, 2026, 05:03:00 PMNice get. Now please reimplement the pick and roll that was utilized with Kur and Oso.
That's why Fru was the top target
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 05:40:29 PMOhhhhh, we're going to need another get or two to get out of poverty franchise.
LOL
Take it with a grain of salt along with a lot more movement in the portal, but the T Rank rostercast feature puts MU at #20 after this move.
https://barttorvik.com/rostercast.php
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 05:46:00 PMAhhh...the goalposts, they are a-shiftin'!!!
If you think we're going somewhere with 1 signing....
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 06:53:56 PMIf you think we're going somewhere with 1 signing....
This is what you said...
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 08, 2026, 01:44:12 PMEverything done so far in the face of the transfer portal seems to suggest Marquette is a poverty program.
And even though MANY people were saying they would be competitive in the transfer market, you kept insisting otherwise.
And now that Marquette has landed a guy who they apparently targetted early and paid a great deal for, do you admit you were wrong?
Nope. You dishonestly shift the goalposts.
Poverty poster.
If only there was an island of misfit toys for some of our most annoying postets to go to..........sigh......
Quote from: MuMark on April 15, 2026, 07:08:52 PMIf only there was an island of misfit toys for some of our most annoying postets to go to..........sigh......
I thought we were already on that island
Quote from: MuMark on April 15, 2026, 07:08:52 PMIf only there was an island of misfit toys for some of our most annoying postets to go to..........sigh......
https://247sports.com/college/marquette/board/mens-hoops-104085/
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 06:53:56 PMIf you think we're going somewhere with 1 signing....
I think it's quite possible this acquisition raises Marquette's bar considerably. The ability to play with James could be quite dynamic and open things for the rest of the offense they haven't had since Oso graduated.
I'm with Tower. If they add guard depth, they should turn things around quickly. Parham was quite good in Big East play.
I love NJ and AS. I am not so naive as to think they can play 40 minutes every game. Nor do I think that Nash, EJ, or Egbuono are the answer at back up PG. (Admittedly, awesome if they were)
Ergo, next up has to be guards.
Quote from: Uncle Rico on April 15, 2026, 07:17:58 PMI think it's quite possible this acquisition raises Marquette's bar considerably. The ability to play with James could be quite dynamic and open things for the rest of the offense they haven't had since Oso graduated.
I'm with Tower. If they add guard depth, they should turn things around quickly. Parham was quite good in Big East play.
Fru changes everything. And I mean everything. Plus MU will add at least one of the aforementioned perimeter players.
MU is back.
The BEast is also back. Massive gets for the entire conference.
Quote from: tower912 on April 15, 2026, 07:21:49 PMI love NJ and AS. I am not so naive as to think they can play 40 minutes every game. Nor do I think that Nash, EJ, or Egbuono are the answer at back up PG. (Admittedly, awesome if they were)
Ergo, next up has to be guards.
I don't think they get both, but Riley and Minessale are ideal additions. Riley seems like a long shot based on I'd think he'd want to be the primary ball handler and that isn't Marquette.
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 07:05:43 PMThis is what you said...
And even though MANY people were saying they would be competitive in the transfer market, you kept insisting otherwise.
And now that Marquette has landed a guy who they apparently targetted early and paid a great deal for, do you admit you were wrong?
Nope. You dishonestly shift the goalposts.
Poverty poster.
If you actually take a look at EXACTLY what I said....
I very clearly stated it has yet to be seen if marquette had any money to spend or not. Every action they had taken to that point showed they did not.
Today is a STEP in the correct direction. Let's see how much Marquette has in the bank.
But it's totally like you to provide false information on what people actually say.
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 07:31:32 PMBut it's totally like you to provide false information on what people actually say.
I quoted you.
Is it possible for him to play two years for us or do we just have him for one?
Nice get for Shaka and the team! I admit I was skeptical that it would get done but elated we finally have someone respectable in the 5 spot.
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 07:14:11 PMhttps://247sports.com/college/marquette/board/mens-hoops-104085/
Actually I was thinking more like a place with no internet access..........
https://share.google/RsqEEP9xdEDsJNqvE
Fruck yes. Awesome pull Shaka!
Quote from: Superfan on April 15, 2026, 07:46:46 PMIs it possible for him to play two years for us or do we just have him for one?
Only if Shaka adopts him.
Quote from: MuMark on April 15, 2026, 07:08:52 PMIf only there was an island of misfit toys for some of our most annoying postets to go to..........sigh......
This place would be way better if everyone had the same opinion.
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:03:26 PMThis place would be way better if everyone had the same opinion.
yeah....thats what bothers me......that everyone doesn't agree with me......lol
You figured it out!
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:03:26 PMThis place would be way better if everyone had the same opinion.
This place would be way better if everyone held himself or herself accountable.
For example, if Shaka didn't land a highly regarded big in the portal, I'd have admitted I was wrong for having thought he would do so.
Thankfully, at least a few Scoop-tics are admitting they were wrong for believing Shaka couldn't or wouldn't do so.
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 07:32:46 PMI quoted you.
"Everything done so far in the face of the transfer portal seems to suggest Marquette is a poverty program."
Which is completely true. Until STEP 1 was done today. They have a ways to go still.
But you'll ignore actual words and meanings for your stories as you always do =)
Quote from: MU82 on April 15, 2026, 08:12:33 PMThis place would be way better if everyone held himself or herself accountable.
For example, if Shaka didn't land a highly regarded big in the portal, I'd have admitted I was wrong for having thought he would do so.
Thankfully, at least a few Scoop-tics are admitting they were wrong for believing Shaka couldn't or wouldn't do so.
Nobody should expect everyone to be perfect (obviously, Sultan is excluded), but just own it and move on. This guy still owns the fact that I fully supported the Wojo extension. Not my best take.
Quote from: MuMark on April 15, 2026, 08:06:26 PMyeah....thats what bothers me......that everyone doesn't agree with me......lol
You figured it out!
Just because you think some posters are misfits who should go away doesn't mean you're bothered by what they have to say.
Got it.
I also find some posters/opinions annoying. And I think it's great they they're here exchanging their thoughts and ideas about the program that (I think) we all love and support.
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 08:16:42 PM"Everything done so far in the face of the transfer portal seems to suggest Marquette is a poverty program."
Which is completely true. Until STEP 1 was done today.
It absolutely was not true. Marquette was never acting like a "poverty program." First, Marquette resigned their top three returnees. Second, you have no idea what they were doing behind the scenes. Just because you don't know what is going on, doesn't mean nothing is going on.
Seriously, try being less of a clown.
This is great news. It once again proves that Marquette has some very rich, very passionate donors who are willing to step up when the program needs it most. They're the ones who set millions of dollars on fire to get rid of Wojo, I'm assuming they strong-armed Broeker and Shaka into making that portal announcement before the Xavier game back in February, and I think their dollars will help us land some big fish going forward. You love to see it.
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 08:16:42 PM"Everything done so far in the face of the transfer portal seems to suggest Marquette is a poverty program."
Which is completely true. Until STEP 1 was done today. They have a ways to go still.
But you'll ignore actual words and meanings for your stories as you always do =)
Are you and Farley the same person?
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 07:31:32 PMIf you actually take a look at EXACTLY what I said....
I very clearly stated it has yet to be seen if marquette had any money to spend or not. Every action they had taken to that point showed they did not.
Today is a STEP in the correct direction. Let's see how much Marquette has in the bank.
But it's totally like you to provide false information on what people actually say.
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 08:24:18 PMIt absolutely was not true. Marquette was never acting like a "poverty program." First, Marquette resigned their top three returnees. Second, you have no idea what they were doing behind the scenes. Just because you don't know what is going on, doesn't mean nothing is going on.
Seriously, try being less of a clown.
Lol,
A) come off it, you were thinking it too. I bet you were in agony over if Fru would sign or not.
B) There's a single player on the roster that would have received national attention if they went to the portal, lets calm down with the whole signing Nigel back was a massive win. Who knows, he may very well already be on a 3 year contract.
C) a single solitary great signing does not make a 12-20 team close to national contenders. Stop pretending it does.
Quote from: MU82 on April 15, 2026, 08:12:33 PMThis place would be way better if everyone held himself or herself accountable.
For example, if Shaka didn't land a highly regarded big in the portal, I'd have admitted I was wrong for having thought he would do so.
Thankfully, at least a few Scoop-tics are admitting they were wrong for believing Shaka couldn't or wouldn't do so.
Accountable for/to what? It's just a message board where we idiots anonymously share information and various hot takes about a college basketball team. Some of which will be spectacularly wrong.
Why do some people get giddy satisfaction over calling out fellow MU fans' mistaken opinions? We all have bad takes.
Maybe we should form a truth commission where posters will be called upon to account for their grave mistakes. We'll start with those who thought RGV was a good idea.
Quote from: Biggie Clausen on April 15, 2026, 08:26:06 PMThis is great news. It once again proves that Marquette has some very rich, very passionate donors who are willing to step up when the program needs it most. They're the ones who set millions of dollars on fire to get rid of Wojo, I'm assuming they strong-armed Broeker and Shaka into making that portal announcement before the Xavier game back in February, and I think their dollars will help us land some big fish going forward. You love to see it.
We get 1 absolutely stud, or 2 decent players.. I'll agree with ya.
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:30:16 PMAccountable for/to what? It's just a message board where we idiots anonymously share information and various hot takes about a college basketball team. Some of which will be spectacularly wrong.
Why do some people get giddy satisfaction over calling out fellow MU fans' mistaken opinions? We all have bad takes.
Maybe we should form a truth commission where posters will be called upon to account for their grave mistakes. We'll start with those who thought RGV was a good idea.
Literally 1/2 of non scoop conformist posts are done by troll accounts. Scoop is just easy rage bait.
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 08:16:42 PM"Everything done so far in the face of the transfer portal seems to suggest Marquette is a poverty program."
Which is completely true. Until STEP 1 was done today. They have a ways to go still.
But you'll ignore actual words and meanings for your stories as you always do =)
::)
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 08:29:57 PMLol,
A) come off it, you were thinking it too. I bet you were in agony over if Fru would sign or not.
B) There's a single player on the roster that would have received national attention if they went to the portal, lets calm down with the whole signing Nigel back was a massive win. Who knows, he may very well already be on a 3 year contract.
C) a single solitary great signing does not make a 12-20 team close to national contenders. Stop pretending it does.
::)
Quote from: #UnleashThePortal on April 15, 2026, 08:29:57 PMLol,
A) come off it, you were thinking it too. I bet you were in agony over if Fru would sign or not.
B) There's a single player on the roster that would have received national attention if they went to the portal, lets calm down with the whole signing Nigel back was a massive win. Who knows, he may very well already be on a 3 year contract.
C) a single solitary great signing does not make a 12-20 team close to national contenders. Stop pretending it does.
A. Nope. Regardless, if he went elsewhere, it wouldn't be an indication of being a "poverty program."
B. Yes retaining the BE freshman of the year is a big deal.
C. Shifting goalposts continues...
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:22:25 PMJust because you think some posters are misfits who should go away doesn't mean you're bothered by what they have to say.
Got it.
I also find some posters/opinions annoying. And I think it's great they they're here exchanging their thoughts and ideas about the program that (I think) we all love and support.
Just to be clear......
1 it was a joke.......
2 yes I believe the board would be better off without the trolls.......
3 the vast majority of posters add something to the discourse......I do not believe everyone does.
4 You and I have sparred on occasion and I think you are an excellent poster.
What impact do you think Fru will have on Royce on both ends of the floor? I know I'm biased, but I really think RP is primed to have a huge Jr. season.
More importantly, the pick and roll will be back in the offense, which should open up the wings so Adrian and Ross should get more open shots. Plus if Sheek can hit an outside shot, they will have something, called the biggest front line in years, lots of possibilities
Adrian and Royce, bad eyes
Watching some Fru highlights, he moves similar to Oso without the ball. But better hands than Oso. Brown at Louisville played well with Fru on the pick n roll and lobs. Nigel, your running mate is here! Could be a big year
Quote from: MUeng on April 15, 2026, 09:44:22 PMWatching some Fru highlights, he moves similar to Oso without the ball. But better hands than Oso. Brown at Louisville played well with Fru on the pick n roll and lobs. Nigel, your running mate is here! Could be a big year
I love the lob threat and Fru's ability to O-Reb. Look out if MU gets another perimeter scorer.
Quote from: The Sultan on April 15, 2026, 08:56:30 PMA. Nope. Regardless, if he went elsewhere, it wouldn't be an indication of being a "poverty program."
B. Yes retaining the BE freshman of the year is a big deal.
C. Shifting goalposts continues...
Oh I'm glad to see were in the same direction here.
Hopefully Marquette will follow up with another big signing so they'll compete. I'm sure youre hoping for the same.
Weird immature take from ya though.
Quote from: Biggie Clausen on April 15, 2026, 08:26:06 PMI'm assuming they strong-armed Broeker and Shaka into making that portal announcement before the Xavier game back in February,
No lol.
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:30:16 PMAccountable for/to what? It's just a message board where we idiots anonymously share information and various hot takes about a college basketball team. Some of which will be spectacularly wrong.
Why do some people get giddy satisfaction over calling out fellow MU fans' mistaken opinions? We all have bad takes.
Maybe we should form a truth commission where posters will be called upon to account for their grave mistakes. We'll start with those who thought RGV was a good idea.
This seems reasonable.
But if turns out not to have been reasonable, I'll admit I was wrong about it. 8-)
Quote from: Uncle Rico on April 15, 2026, 07:17:58 PMI think it's quite possible this acquisition raises Marquette's bar considerably. The ability to play with James could be quite dynamic and open things for the rest of the offense they haven't had since Oso graduated.
I'm with Tower. If they add guard depth, they should turn things around quickly. Parham was quite good in Big East play.
This. I'm also in agreement with Tower regarding guard depth but getting a center who can play pick and roll is huge. The ceiling for this team has gotten instantly higher. Still need a one or two guards. I trust Shaka will get it done.
A huge get by any standard. Well done to Shaka.
Isn't our priority now a 3 (is that Minnesale - is that an upgrade over DO there?) and then a backup PG? I'd expect Nigel to be near max minutes next year, so backup PG seems less important except as foul insurance. A rotation of Nigel, AS, Minnesale, RP, Fru with DO backing 3/4, Sheek/Josh/Cadin? backing 4/5, MP backing 2/3, Frosh/transfer backing 1/2 seems like it should be in the tournament.
Quote from: 1SE on Today at 12:42:51 AMA huge get by any standard. Well done to Shaka.
Isn't our priority now a 3 (is that Minnesale - is that an upgrade over DO there?) and then a backup PG? I'd expect Nigel to be near max minutes next year, so backup PG seems less important except as foul insurance. A rotation of Nigel, AS, Minnesale, RP, Fru with DO backing 3/4, Sheek/Josh/Cadin? backing 4/5, MP backing 2/3, Frosh/transfer backing 1/2 seems like it should be in the tournament.
You don't really need a 3. You can play three guard lineups to great success. I don't think a backup PG makes much sense. What does make sense is a combo guard who could play next to James or slide over to the 1 when James needs a breather. Riley or Minessale could fill that role.
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on Today at 01:01:02 AMYou don't really need a 3. You can play three guard lineups to great success. I don't think a backup PG makes much sense. What does make sense is a combo guard who could play next to James or slide over to the 1 when James needs a breather. Riley or Minessale could fill that role.
Sorry - who is Riley? Must have missed that chatter.
But basically something like the above? We're still looking for one more starter and then a gaurd backup?
Quote from: 1SE on Today at 01:24:05 AMSorry - who is Riley? Must have missed that chatter.
Tylen Riley from Tulsa is scheduled to visit on Saturday.
Quote from: 1SE on Today at 01:24:05 AMBut basically something like the above? We're still looking for one more starter and then a gaurd backup?
I think that's what most scoopers are hoping for. I'm not sure if we take more than 2 transfers
Quote from: 1SE on Today at 12:42:51 AMA huge get by any standard. Well done to Shaka.
Isn't our priority now a 3 (is that Minnesale - is that an upgrade over DO there?) and then a backup PG? I'd expect Nigel to be near max minutes next year, so backup PG seems less important except as foul insurance. A rotation of Nigel, AS, Minnesale, RP, Fru with DO backing 3/4, Sheek/Josh/Cadin? backing 4/5, MP backing 2/3, Frosh/transfer backing 1/2 seems like it should be in the tournament.
DO, MP, Nash, Ian, EJ, Egbuono. That is six potential 3s already. AS, NJ. That is the guard room. Math.
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:30:16 PMAccountable for/to what? It's just a message board where we idiots anonymously share information and various hot takes about a college basketball team. Some of which will be spectacularly wrong.
Why do some people get giddy satisfaction over calling out fellow MU fans' mistaken opinions? We all have bad takes.
Maybe we should form a truth commission where posters will be called upon to account for their grave mistakes. We'll start with those who thought RGV was a good idea.
We are idiots. And it is a message board. And all opinions get challenged, just as you are challenging other opinions in your post. Because it is mostly anonymous and we have little else to go on, we judge each other every day by every post. We recognize patterns from each other and can frequently guess the poster by content, without checking the name.
It is my personal expectation that if I am willing to post it, I am willing to have it disagreed with. It is supposed to spark and further conversations.
And therefore, I think it is important to challenge takes I view as wrong. Just as mine are challenged.
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:22:25 PMJust because you think some posters are misfits who should go away doesn't mean you're bothered by what they have to say.
Got it.
I also find some posters/opinions annoying. And I think it's great they they're here exchanging their thoughts and ideas about the program that (I think) we all love and support.
Not sure who likes to argue over nothing more, you or Sultan. ;D
Quote from: Hards Alumni on Today at 06:40:16 AMNot sure who likes to argue over nothing more, you or Sultan. ;D
I will point out that I'm sitting this one out...
Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 06:42:32 AMI will point out that I'm sitting this one out...
Ah, so you DO want to argue about this though. :P
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on Today at 01:01:02 AMYou don't really need a 3. You can play three guard lineups to great success. I don't think a backup PG makes much sense. What does make sense is a combo guard who could play next to James or slide over to the 1 when James needs a breather. Riley or Minessale could fill that role.
Either/Both would be very solid additions. What is your anticipated impact of our Frosh class?
I think I would prefer Riley. Shot about 39 percent from 3 and a prominent scorer. I wouldn't mind starting NJ, AS, and Riley along with Royce amd Fru. The Riley could slide in as needed for NJ. Also gives more guard depth than Minnesale would. Riley would be a huge pickup.
Nice pickup in Fru.
Wish he had 2 years eligibility but it is what it is.
The best thing about that pickup is that, besides making the team immediately much better this upcoming season, it'll help a guy like Sheek (or even Josh if he develops) see what that role should look like going forward.
Shaka shouldn't have to go out and get another like Sananda the following year, he should be able to have someone step into the role internally.
As for Riley or Minessale either would be another good get, and both would be great.
If I had my choice on either/or I would pick whoever the better scorer and higher usage guy would be, and I would assume that would be Riley but the data guys can chime in here.
That would give Marquette a lineup of
N James
A Stevens
T Riley
R Parham
S Fru
That's a pretty good lineup that would compete for a top 3 spot in the BE and a roster bid given health.
Bench would be solid with potential guys and you just play whoever pops an grows the most
Damarius, Phillips, Clark/Caedin/Sheek, Ian, Nash, Egbuonu, Ethan Johnston gives Shaka a lot of options to red shirt and grow, find then next man up star, figure out who can shoot and defend well enough to play etc etc.
A lot of athleticism and length there too, and hopefully some good shooting and additional basketball skills.
As an aside to the Riley v Minessale talk, Nolan has an extra year of eligibility so you could argue that bringing him on could be more impactful for the program overall, if he hits.
My last point is that although I would take one of those two over another big, because they should be able to score and play heavy minutes at a 1-3 spot, if it was up to me I would bring in another high caliber big given the ability/funds and move on from one of our other two in house bigs.
The above team is good, but becomes that much better with yet one more starting caliber big.
Don't worry about how you'd play them, Shaka can figure it out
Quote from: Hards Alumni on Today at 06:40:16 AMNot sure who likes to argue over nothing more, you or Sultan. ;D
It's just an honor to be nominated.
I am leaning toward tower's point of view. Two guards, or maybe a guard and a 2/3, because we just don't have the backcourt depth. If it's Riley and Minessale that's fine, but if we decide to go elsewhere, I will trust Shaka to find the right guys. Do we kick the tires again on Odih?
The concern I have with another big is cost. And if Sheek doesn't progress like the staff wants, they can go out and find one next year.
Quote from: Pakuni on Today at 07:46:40 AMIt's just an honor to be nominated.
Well yeah. Because I am the obvious winner of the Arguing about Nothing Award.
Quote from: DoctorV on Today at 07:35:47 AMNice pickup in Fru.
Wish he had 2 years eligibility but it is what it is.
tbh, I'd put the percentage chance he'll be able to play 2 more years if he wants at something quite high. 5 years is coming soon, it's just a ? of implementation plans, especially for a somewhat unique situation that Fru is in. But, my mindset right now is that seniors of today may be back again after the 2026-27 season in men's cbb.
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on April 15, 2026, 05:52:41 PMThat's why Fru was the top target
He absolutely was the #1 target for MU. Not done yet.
Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 07:47:09 AMI am leaning toward tower's point of view. Two guards, or maybe a guard and a 2/3, because we just don't have the backcourt depth. If it's Riley and Minessale that's fine, but if we decide to go elsewhere, I will trust Shaka to find the right guys. Do we kick the tires again on Odih?
The concern I have with another big is cost. And if Sheek doesn't progress like the staff wants, they can go out and find one next year.
I'm all in on Riley. As far as a 2/3 or another big? I think versatility is more valuable but maybe you just go with the most talented option? I mean if we can get a legitimate sniper 2/3? That would pay huge dividends.
Quote from: tower912 on Today at 05:49:36 AMDO, MP, Nash, Ian, EJ, Egbuono. That is six potential 3s already. AS, NJ. That is the guard room. Math.
Yeah. MU has a ton of 3's. Cant figure the emphasis by some for a 3. I have seen some posters slot Militec as a PF. He isnt. He is a 3. And he will likely have a good career. BTW, Egbuono likely projects as a PF.
Quote from: willie warrior on Today at 08:13:10 AMYeah. MU has a ton of 3's. Cant figure the emphasis by some for a 3. I have seen some posters slot Militec as a PF. He isnt. He is a 3. And he will likely have a good career. BTW, Egbuono likely projects as a PF.
A *proven* 3 who can be a high usage guy. Not sure we have that on the roster currently, bub.
Willie, this is a good point. Egbuono reportedly brings an uncommon (for MU) combination of size and skill set. In HS, a broad bodied bruiser with guard skills.
Now, I have to sit down and breathe into a bag.
Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 08:16:19 AMA *proven* 3 who can be a high usage guy. Not sure we have that on the roster currently, bub.
This is one of your mantras that I tend to disagree with. I don't expect young guys to be as high usage early as they are by the time they leave. While you are correct that there are no proven high usage 3s in that group, I worry about that like you worry about team ft %. Most of the time (not every time) it works itself out.
And, with NJ, AS, and Royce projected to dominate the ball. 3, D, facilitator, glue is fine.
My understanding is Riley primarily played the 1 last year but previously played the 2. So he'd be able to start next to NJ and AS and slide over to the 1 to give NJ a break or in case of injury.
That would make much more sense than wasting a roster spot on someone that is strictly a backup 1.
Sounds like a great fit to me. If we add him and Minessale I'd be thrilled.
Quote from: tower912 on Today at 08:23:06 AMThis is one of your mantras that I tend to disagree with. I don't expect young guys to be as high usage early as they are by the time they leave. While you are correct that there are no proven high usage 3s in that group, I worry about that like you worry about team ft %. Most of the time (not every time) it works itself out.
And, with NJ, AS, and Royce projected to dominate the ball. 3, D, facilitator, glue is fine.
Completely disagree. It was a projected issue last season, and eff'd us.
Looking toward next year, I do not see Adrien that way.
Nigel down slightly I think would be ideal.. Royce up modestly ideal.. and both of those are doable. Could we see a jump from Adrien and his 14.4% usage? He's a 3-point guy who doesn't get to the line a lot.. I think this is where we just see it differently, and I'm not even 100% on board that he's a lock for starter next year. Great player, but seeing him well into the 20's for usage next year isn't something I can project at this time.
#NeedUsage
Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 08:16:19 AMA *proven* 3 who can be a high usage guy. Not sure we have that on the roster currently, bub.
Two things Bub. Can we get a "proven" 3? You by your own statement do not have assurance that we dont have some guys on the roster that can handle the 3, bub. Likely we do.
If Riley can start in a 3 guard line-up and assuming Owens keeps progressing, is there room / need for Riley and Minessale?
Quote from: The Lens on Today at 08:52:52 AMIf Riley can start in a 3 guard line-up and assuming Owens keeps progressing, is there room / need for Riley and Minessale?
Guards off the bench. To challenge. To allow others to rest. As an injury hedge.
Quote from: Pakuni on April 15, 2026, 08:22:25 PMJust because you think some posters are misfits who should go away doesn't mean you're bothered by what they have to say.
Got it.
I also find some posters/opinions annoying. And I think it's great they they're here exchanging their thoughts and ideas about the program that (I think) we all love and support.
Leave your sense of humor at home today?
Quote from: MuggsyB on Today at 06:50:42 AMEither/Both would be very solid additions. What is your anticipated impact of our Frosh class?
I'm pretty optimistic. Sheek was a top 50 recruit in the incoming class. Now he's a top 50 recruit with a year in a college strength program and hundreds of practice hours to get used to the speed of the college game. I don't think it's unreasonable to think he will be a big contributor.
Egbuono has the offensive talent to play already and is in a big east ready body. Defense is the concern with him. My comp for him is Justin Lewis. Pair him with quality defenders and I could see (not guarentee) him being an effective 6th man.
I was sorry to hear that Nash got hurt, it tempers my expectations a bit. Supposedly he's our best shooter and there are rumors of elite passing skills. We'll see.
Ian i see having future but my guess is that if he redshirted last season, it's because he was behind Philips. Im not expecting more than a back of rotation spot for him.
Johnston is likely a redshirt candidate.
Don't know very much about Fru other than he was playing at Louisville. But, if he can effectively rebound, defend the rim, and score a little bit, he can certainly help.
Quote from: amgine_MU on Today at 07:02:31 AMI think I would prefer Riley. Shot about 39 percent from 3 and a prominent scorer. I wouldn't mind starting NJ, AS, and Riley along with Royce amd Fru. The Riley could slide in as needed for NJ. Also gives more guard depth than Minnesale would. Riley would be a huge pickup.
Riley's trajectory of improvement has been one of the most stark I recall ever seeing.
Freshman Season Cal Baptist: 78 O-Rating, 19.9% Possessions, 16.7 3pt shooting
Sophomore Seas Cal Baptist: 98 O-Rating, 24% Possessions, 28% 3pt shooting
Junior Season Tulsa: 113 O-Rating, 29% Possessions, 38% 3pt shooting
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on Today at 01:01:02 AMYou don't really need a 3. You can play three guard lineups to great success. I don't think a backup PG makes much sense. What does make sense is a combo guard who could play next to James or slide over to the 1 when James needs a breather. Riley or Minessale could fill that role.
I'd take both of them. Then you have James, Stevens, Owens, Minessale, and Riley. Five guards for a lot of three guard lineups next to Royce, Fru, and Sheek.
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on Today at 09:04:51 AMEgbuono has the offensive talent to play already and is in a big east ready body. Defense is the concern with him. My comp for him is Justin Lewis. Pair him with quality defenders and I could see (not guarentee) him being an effective 6th man.
Not the first time I've seen the Egbuonu-Lewis comparison. Here's hoping, because a freshman-level Lewis would make an outstanding contribution to the team.
Just curious why ESPN has no mention of Fru going to Marquette. Even wikipedia has been updated noting the transfer to Marquette
Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 11:05:41 AMJust curious why ESPN has no mention of Fru going to Marquette. Even wikipedia has been updated noting the transfer to Marquette
I'd assume because they are poor at covering college basketball.
Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 11:05:41 AMJust curious why ESPN has no mention of Fru going to Marquette. Even wikipedia has been updated noting the transfer to Marquette
their strategy involves shunning anything Big East due to media rights is my understanding
Quote from: MUeng on Today at 11:12:25 AMtheir strategy involves shunning anything Big East due to media rights is my understanding
Yep.. They only really cover UConn from the big east. And thats because their employees care about it
Quote from: MUpugnacity on Today at 11:09:13 AMI'd assume because they are poor at covering college basketball.
They actually have a portal update at the top of their page for NCAAM. Big East teams have numerous updates and with a big transfer like Fru surprised at the omission.
Did the Post report it? Wondering if it really happened.
Quote from: tower912 on Today at 11:19:08 AMDid the Post report it? Wondering if it really happened.
I wouldn't know. Men's basketball is behind a paywall and they cover mostly St John's and since ESPN did not report it most people did not know it happened either if they were following ESPN's portal updates.
Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 11:31:17 AMI wouldn't know. Men's basketball is behind a paywall and they cover mostly St John's and since ESPN did not report it most people did not know it happened either if they were following ESPN's portal updates.
Most people don't know it happened because they don't care one bit about Marquette basketball.
With that being the case, who cares if ESPN didn't report it?
Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 11:34:19 AMMost people don't know it happened because they don't care one bit about Marquette basketball.
With that being the case, who cares if ESPN didn't report it?
It's always raining
Quote from: muwarrior69 on Today at 11:05:41 AMJust curious why ESPN has no mention of Fru going to Marquette.
Maybe because of our "one bad year"?
ESPN focuses on teams that have come off a good year and are restocking. The news of Marquette's landing Fru
may show up eventually.
Quote from: Elonsmusk on Today at 09:59:48 AMRiley's trajectory of improvement has been one of the most stark I recall ever seeing.
Freshman Season Cal Baptist: 78 O-Rating, 19.9% Possessions, 16.7 3pt shooting
Sophomore Seas Cal Baptist: 98 O-Rating, 24% Possessions, 28% 3pt shooting
Junior Season Tulsa: 113 O-Rating, 29% Possessions, 38% 3pt shooting
It's absolutely wild. He barely played as a freshman, then it looks like he battled injuries through much of his sophomore year but had a strong finish, then transfered UP and became a 2nd team All-AAC.
Then things I like most about Riley are his PG experience for when Nigel goes to the bench, he has enough size to play SG next Nigel, and he gets to the FT line a lot (over 200 attempts last season, 85%+ at the FT line!).
Not the greatest defender, but a +0.85 DBPR is ok. For comparison, Royce was +0.75 DBPR last year.
I'd gladly take Riley, if Shaka can land him.
Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on Today at 02:39:19 PMIt's absolutely wild. He barely played as a freshman, then it looks like he battled injuries through much of his sophomore year but had a strong finish, then transfered UP and became a 2nd team All-AAC.
Then things I like most about Riley are his PG experience for when Nigel goes to the bench, he has enough size to play SG next Nigel, and he gets to the FT line a lot (over 200 attempts last season, 85%+ at the FT line!).
Not the greatest defender, but a +0.85 DBPR is ok. For comparison, Royce was +0.75 DBPR last year.
I'd gladly take Riley, if Shaka can land him.
I agree...the trajectory is headed the right direction, and another guard able to create his shot would be helpful. 85% FT shooter indicative of him being a good shooter in general, strong Freethrow Rate as you point out - lots to like.
If we get him, we'll be living the life of Riley.
And I do like bringing in upperclassmen with offensive skills, I trust Shaka to teach defense more than offense.
Not saying he'll be a great defender, but I'd bet Shaka can get him up to average. He has the quickness.
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on Today at 09:04:51 AMI'm pretty optimistic. Sheek was a top 50 recruit in the incoming class. Now he's a top 50 recruit with a year in a college strength program and hundreds of practice hours to get used to the speed of the college game. I don't think it's unreasonable to think he will be a big contributor.
Egbuono has the offensive talent to play already and is in a big east ready body. Defense is the concern with him. My comp for him is Justin Lewis. Pair him with quality defenders and I could see (not guarentee) him being an effective 6th man.
I was sorry to hear that Nash got hurt, it tempers my expectations a bit. Supposedly he's our best shooter and there are rumors of elite passing skills. We'll see.
Ian i see having future but my guess is that if he redshirted last season, it's because he was behind Philips. Im not expecting more than a back of rotation spot for him.
Johnston is likely a redshirt candidate.
Ty, TAMU. I think we very easily could have pulled off a coup with Fru, and we may only be one more piece away from a tremendous resurgence in Milwaukee.
Clark and Hamilton will benefit going up against Fru in practice. They will improve significantly.
Quote from: Badgerhater on Today at 04:02:10 PMClark and Hamilton will benefit going up against Fru in practice. They will improve significantly.
Eh. I'm not sure about that...
Quote from: The Sultan on Today at 04:07:12 PMEh. I'm not sure about that...
One wasn't going to learn much guarding Ben Gold.
Quote from: Badgerhater on Today at 04:02:10 PMClark and Hamilton will benefit going up against Fru in practice. They will improve significantly.
Replace Clark & Hamilton with Sheek and I'll agree with you.
Quote from: DoctorV on Today at 07:35:47 AMNice pickup in Fru.
Wish he had 2 years eligibility but it is what it is.
The best thing about that pickup is that, besides making the team immediately much better this upcoming season, it'll help a guy like Sheek (or even Josh if he develops) see what that role should look like going forward.
Shaka shouldn't have to go out and get another like Sananda the following year, he should be able to have someone step into the role internally.
As for Riley or Minessale either would be another good get, and both would be great.
If I had my choice on either/or I would pick whoever the better scorer and higher usage guy would be, and I would assume that would be Riley but the data guys can chime in here.
That would give Marquette a lineup of
N James
A Stevens
T Riley
R Parham
S Fru
That's a pretty good lineup that would compete for a top 3 spot in the BE and a roster bid given health.
Bench would be solid with potential guys and you just play whoever pops an grows the most
Damarius, Phillips, Clark/Caedin/Sheek, Ian, Nash, Egbuonu, Ethan Johnston gives Shaka a lot of options to red shirt and grow, find then next man up star, figure out who can shoot and defend well enough to play etc etc.
A lot of athleticism and length there too, and hopefully some good shooting and additional basketball skills.
As an aside to the Riley v Minessale talk, Nolan has an extra year of eligibility so you could argue that bringing him on could be more impactful for the program overall, if he hits.
My last point is that although I would take one of those two over another big, because they should be able to score and play heavy minutes at a 1-3 spot, if it was up to me I would bring in another high caliber big given the ability/funds and move on from one of our other two in house bigs.
The above team is good, but becomes that much better with yet one more starting caliber big.
Don't worry about how you'd play them, Shaka can figure it out
Riley's like 6"2 not sure u want him starting at the 3?
Quote from: Badgerhater on Today at 04:36:47 PMOne wasn't going to learn much guarding Ben Gold.
I'm questioning "significantly."
Quote from: The Lens on Today at 08:52:52 AMIf Riley can start in a 3 guard line-up and assuming Owens keeps progressing, is there room / need for Riley and Minessale?
My thoughts as well. And then there are Phillips, Ian and Egbuonu who looks physically ready to contribute in year 1. Good depth at the 2&3.
I'm no scout but do you bring in a mid-major top player and play them over a Phillips and Egbuonu? And saying St Thomas MN is a mid-major is a stretch.
Riley clearly makes sense as he is proven against good talent and he fits a need with Sean Jones leaving.
Quote from: The Lens on Today at 08:52:52 AMIf Riley can start in a 3 guard line-up and assuming Owens keeps progressing, is there room / need for Riley and Minessale?
Yes, the rest of our team was not good last year
No other way to put it. With Fru in the fold, guard depth is the paramount concern.
We did a lot of winning with a lineup that included 6-2 Kolek, 6-2 Mitchell and 6-4 Jones ... so I guess it's possible we'd hang in there OK on defense with 6-0 James, 6-1 Riley and 6-4 Stevens.
But Stevie was an extremely tough kid who played taller than his height, willingly mixed it up with much bigger players, and loved playing defense. And Kolek was both sturdy and good at anticipating plays.
A James-Riley-Stevens backcourt could run into trouble defensively similar to the Markus-Rowsey-Sacar backcourt.
I echo others who have said they doubt Riley would come here to play 15-20 mpg off the bench. Obviously, Stevens isn't guaranteed a starting spot, but unless we also add Minessale or another wing, who on the roster would be better than Adrien at the wing? A freshman? A redshirt? D.O. or Phillips? Not seeing it.