MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 09:38:34 AM

Title: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 09:38:34 AM
This is the second year in a row that MU has not had a post defender or a good rebounder that can play. Until Shaka brings someone in that can do these two things MU will not be successful. Sheek is a good player but he will be a freshman next season and is very thin. Shaka needs to bring in a one year player to fill this role.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 09:51:55 AM
Ben Gold was the best defender on the team last season. Shut down multiple high profile bigs.

As to last night, the team defense in the second half was abysmal all around.   Inability to slow down Gunn became the domino that broke down everything else.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: panda on January 17, 2026, 09:54:20 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 09:51:55 AMBen Gold was the best defender on the team last season. Shut down multiple high profile bigs.


It's a big problem when Ben gold is your best/only perimeter defender
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:01:12 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 09:51:55 AMBen Gold was the best defender on the team last season. Shut down multiple high profile bigs.

As to last night, the team defense in the second half was abysmal all around.   Inability to slow down Gunn became the domino that broke down everything else.
that is the problem. If Gold is  your best post defender and rebounder you have a problem. Benson was 8-9 last night. Ejifor was 8-11. They made Payne from Seton Hall look like an All American. He had 14 points and 22 rebounds.Brennan from Villanova was I think 6-7 from the floor. If you can't see the problem you don't know ball and I can't help you.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:05:07 AM
Ben Gold has been more nicked up by injuries the last two seasons than anybody I can remember.  Shin splits, broken finger, rib injury, sprained ankle.  Before he started getting beat up last season he had really good defensive games against Wisconsin, Georgetown, Maryland, Creighton.  And, according to the coaches, he held the guy he was guarding to the lowest shooting percentage of anybody on the team.  His defensive improvement really started midway through his sophomore season when he started understanding help and traps.
  This season, often he has been so busy trying to cover other mistakes that he has looked like a one armed wallpaper hanger, leading to him being out of position.
  The overall team defense has been a constant source of frustration.  Ben trying to cover for other horrible switches, help, angles has led to him being equally bad.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:09:59 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:01:12 AMthat is the problem. If Gold is  your best post defender and rebounder you have a problem. Benson was 8-9 last night. Ejifor was 8-11. They made Payne from Seton Hall look like an All American. He had 14 points and 22 rebounds.Brennan from Villanova was I think 6-7 from the floor. If you can't see the problem you don't know ball and I can't help you.
And Ben barely played last night or against Villanova.  He didn't play against SJU.  And yet you blame him. 

Parham is playing a lot of small ball 5, which is a bad fit.  Yes, Hamilton and Clark have ample room for improvement.  Who is arguing anything  different?   But the only way out is through.  The only way to improve is to play.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:18:42 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:09:59 AMAnd Ben barely played last night or against Villanova.  He didn't play against SJU.  And yet you blame him. 

Parham is playing a lot of small ball 5, which is a bad fit.  Yes, Hamilton and Clark have ample room for improvement.  Who is arguing anything  different?   But the only way out is through.  The only way to improve is to play.
Did Ben play against Georgetown, Purdue,Oklahoma and Wisconsin? Look it up and look at the opponents big man results. MU got destroyed. Ben should not be guarding a 5 man in the post.He gets punished.against the good teams.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: mileskishnish72 on January 17, 2026, 10:21:32 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:09:59 AM.  The only way to improve is to play.

Hopefully somewhere else.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:32:43 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:18:42 AMDid Ben play against Georgetown, Purdue,Oklahoma and Wisconsin? Look it up and look at the opponents big man results. MU got destroyed. Ben should not be guarding a 5 man in the post.He gets punished.against the good teams.
Like he got destroyed by Ejiofor late last season.  The problem isn't Ben.  Look at the lack of containment on the perimeter.   Royce is no Joplin on the defensive end either.  Ben can't 'do his work early' defending the post because there is yet another guard driving in a straight line to the basket.  Or another blown switch leading to an alley oop.

For me, the team defense is the most puzzling part of this season.  Ben is part of that, but he is a deck chair on the Titanic of the defensive issues.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:38:39 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:32:43 AMLike he got destroyed by Ejiofor late last season.  The problem isn't Ben.  Look at the lack of containment on the perimeter.   Royce is no Joplin on the defensive end either.  Ben can't 'do his work early' defending the post because there is yet another guard driving in a straight line to the basket.  Or another blown switch leading to an alley oop.

For me, the team defense is the most puzzling part of this season.  Ben is part of that, but he is a deck chair on the Titanic of the defensive issues.
Thanks for proving my point. MU has no rim protector or rebounding big. The point is if Gold is the best person you have in that capacity you have a big problem against high major teams. I feel bad for Ben that he is put in that situation. It is totally unfair to him. MU is not a good team this year. Has a lot of youth but if this team had a big that could rebound they probably would have 4 more wins.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 10:41:41 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:38:39 AMThanks for proving my point.

Ehhh, I think he's saying the defense is so broken that it would be difficult for any 'rim protector' to do a good job.  Things are breaking down so badly far away from the basket that we're f**k at that point.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: 79Warrior on January 17, 2026, 10:45:43 AM
Quote from: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 10:41:41 AMEhhh, I think he's saying the defense is so broken that it would be difficult for any 'rim protector' to do a good job.  Things are breaking down so badly far away from the basket that we're f**k at that point.

Exactly. Tower is correct in his analysis.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:47:11 AM
Quote from: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 10:41:41 AMEhhh, I think he's saying the defense is so broken that it would be difficult for any 'rim protector' to do a good job.  Things are breaking down so badly far away from the basket that we're f**k at that point.
of course the defense is bad, but there is no one to protect the rim like MU had when McIlvaine was here. MU gave up 15 offensive rebounds which let to how many 2nd chance points? And still only lost by 5. I can't believe people are denying the fact that MU doesn't have a big problem at the 5 spot. One scholarship left as of now and they want a combo guard. Seriously?
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:49:11 AM
Quote from: 79Warrior on January 17, 2026, 10:45:43 AMExactly. Tower is correct in his analysis.
DePaul had 15 offensive rebounds. MU can't rebound. It has been a problem for two years. What was the excuse last year. Our perimeter was pretty good.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:55:45 AM
I saw an offense bog down  in the second half last night.  I saw a PG frustrated and sometimes out of control forcing things.

So, NJ has growing to do.  Right now, his back ups are Sean and Tre.

Caedin, Josh, and Sheek clearly have improving to do, also. 

If there is only one portal transfer, give me an experienced guard.  Guard play is more important, IMO.

And MU has had rebounding problems throughout Shaka's tenure.  The team goes as guard play goes
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: MuggsyB on January 17, 2026, 11:00:56 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:09:59 AMAnd Ben barely played last night or against Villanova.  He didn't play against SJU.  And yet you blame him. 

Parham is playing a lot of small ball 5, which is a bad fit.  Yes, Hamilton and Clark have ample room for improvement.  Who is arguing anything  different?   But the only way out is through.  The only way to improve is to play.

Of course they have ample room for improvement.  Right now they're not really playable.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 11:11:41 AM
Quote from: MuggsyB on January 17, 2026, 11:00:56 AMOf course they have ample room for improvement.  Right now they're not really playable.
But it is also not possible to only play 6 guys.  And if the season is written off, then it is irresponsible to not play them and let them learn through doing.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 11:22:48 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:49:11 AMDePaul had 15 offensive rebounds. MU can't rebound. It has been a problem for two years. What was the excuse last year. Our perimeter was pretty good.

Two years? No. Always.

Look at Shaka's career. If you want good defensive rebounding, you've got the wrong coach. NEVER happens.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 11:31:07 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 10:49:11 AMDePaul had 15 offensive rebounds. MU can't rebound. It has been a problem for two years. What was the excuse last year. Our perimeter was pretty good.
Last season's downward spiral began when Stevie got banged up (surgery), Chase injured his thumb (surgery), and Ben's injuries (shin splints, broken finger) stacked up.   

For fun, name all of the MU teams over the years that have been successful with average guard play but really good post play. 

MU, like all teams, needs good guard play and enough versatile players up front.  It is possible to win a lot with merely adequate play up front if the guards are good enough.   It is nearly impossible to win with average guard play.   

So, if there are no more departures and therefore only room for one player to come in, I want a guard with size and experience playing point.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 11:31:17 AM
Quote from: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 11:22:48 AMTwo years? No. Always.

Look at Shaka's career. If you want good defensive rebounding, you've got the wrong coach. NEVER happens.
I am not going to tell you who said this to me.I said to this person last week the team is playing better.The person said we need two bigs to really compete.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 11:46:04 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 11:31:17 AMI am not going to tell you who said this to me.I said to this person last week the team is playing better.The person said we need two bigs to really compete.

Oh. Well, that settles it! lol, wtf??

Bruh, Shaka's BEST def reb team ever — many moons ago - was ranked #147.

Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: connie on January 17, 2026, 11:53:55 AM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 10:32:43 AMFor me, the team defense is the most puzzling part of this season.  Ben is part of that, but he is a deck chair on the Titanic of the defensive issues.
I think the explanation is that this team doesn't have the talent needed to defend as the scheme demands. When your justification is that "Ben is the best defender on the team" that should require some examination of the "team."  I think it faint praise.  Again, this was something that was obviously coming--although I think the scale of the defensive collapse is even more surprising than the offensive.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 12:02:21 PM
Quote from: connie on January 17, 2026, 11:53:55 AMI think the explanation is that this team doesn't have the talent needed to defend as the scheme demands. When your justification is that "Ben is the best defender on the team" that should require some examination of the "team."  I think it faint praise.  Again, this was something that was obviously coming--although I think the scale of the defensive collapse is even more surprising than the offensive.
good post Connie. 10 of the 14 scholarship players are freshman and sophomore's. Difficult to win with that mix especially when your upperclassman aren't producing
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 12:08:33 PM
Quote from: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 11:46:04 AMOh. Well, that settles it! lol, wtf??

Bruh, Shaka's BEST def reb team ever — many moons ago - was ranked #147.


well good luck going forward then in the Big East. Going to get there brains beat in with the front court they have now.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: MuggsyB on January 17, 2026, 12:36:15 PM
We also don't have guys that attack the offensive glass.  When was the last time we scored off an offensive rebound?  I'm watching a UCONN team that would be losing big to G-Town if they're weren't pursuing the rock off the glass. 
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Viper on January 17, 2026, 01:16:57 PM
Clark DNP last night. At this point of a lost season, get him some minutes. He's 1.5 yrs with the program. Is he not capable of even 10-12 mins of D and boards?
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: BM1090 on January 17, 2026, 01:20:56 PM
Quote from: Viper on January 17, 2026, 01:16:57 PMClark DNP last night. At this point of a lost season, get him some minutes. He's 1.5 yrs with the program. Is he not capable of even 10-12 mins of D and boards?

Yeah that made no sense to me. With Caedin being Caedin, Ben injured, and us getting bullied inside, seemed like a good chance to get him out there for ten minutes.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: panda on January 17, 2026, 01:33:36 PM
Quote from: tower912 on January 17, 2026, 11:31:07 AMLast season's downward spiral began when Stevie got banged up (surgery), Chase injured his thumb (surgery), and Ben's injuries (shin splints, broken finger) stacked up. 

For fun, name all of the MU teams over the years that have been successful with average guard play but really good post play. 

MU, like all teams, needs good guard play and enough versatile players up front.  It is possible to win a lot with merely adequate play up front if the guards are good enough.  It is nearly impossible to win with average guard play. 

So, if there are no more departures and therefore only room for one player to come in, I want a guard with size and experience playing point.

It actually started with horrible roster construction exasperating the issues above
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Mu8891 on January 17, 2026, 01:35:43 PM
Good questions ^

Why the heck would Clark not play ?
More bungling from Shaka.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: WhiteTrash on January 17, 2026, 01:37:21 PM
Quote from: Mu8891 on January 17, 2026, 01:35:43 PMGood questions ^

Why the heck would Clark not play ?
More bungling from Shaka.
Maybe he's told Shaka that he is leaving?
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Jay Bee on January 17, 2026, 02:47:36 PM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 12:08:33 PMGoing to get there brains beat in

Hopefully not so bad such that they'd be unable to figure out there/their/they're usage.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: MU82 on January 18, 2026, 04:41:27 PM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 12:08:33 PMwell good luck going forward then in the Big East. Going to get there brains beat in with the front court they have now.

We won the Big East regular-season and tournament titles just 3 years ago with a mediocre-at-best rebounding team. And no real rim protector, either.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Newsdreams on January 18, 2026, 07:03:09 PM
Quote from: MU82 on January 18, 2026, 04:41:27 PMWe won the Big East regular-season and tournament titles just 3 years ago with a mediocre-at-best rebounding team. And no real rim protector, either.
Facts no matta
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Big Papi on January 19, 2026, 08:22:45 AM
The number 1 issue right now is not having adequate bigs.  A shot blocker, a rebounder, a scorer down low.  Gold banging down low at the 5 is an adequate defender but his body is not meant to bang down low consistently with bigger guys.  That's why he has these nagging injuries.

Our defending is awful because we don't have a legit 5 shot blocking defender to mask our perimeter defending mistakes. 

Our offense stagnated against Depaul because we couldn't stop Depaul from scoring so no transition offense and our half-court offense this year is abysmal.  We made our run late in the game when we made stops.  The first half scoring spree by both teams was due to bad defending by all. 

This is a circle of bad starts with not having legit 5s.  That is the number 1 issue.

Clark has shown an ability to block shots down low and his height does cause some problems.  He should be consistently getting 15-20 minutes a game from here on out.  The best of the bad.  Shaka needs to solve this problem next year otherwise it will be as bad or worse next year.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: muwarrior69 on January 19, 2026, 08:45:15 AM
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 17, 2026, 12:02:21 PMgood post Connie. 10 of the 14 scholarship players are freshman and sophomore's. Difficult to win with that mix especially when your upperclassman aren't producing
Actually it is 9 of 14 scholarship players are underclassmen and two of them are redshirts and one upperclassmen is no longer on the team. It is not just difficult it is what you would expect.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: WellsstreetWanderer on January 19, 2026, 11:53:30 AM
Quote from: MU82 on January 18, 2026, 04:41:27 PMWe won the Big East regular-season and tournament titles just 3 years ago with a mediocre-at-best rebounding team. And no real rim protector, either.
[/]
Wasn't it that Mississippi guy who owned the rim that burst our bubble? He owned the paint as I recall. With good guard play we still need someone who can own territory under the rim
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: drbob on January 19, 2026, 12:36:36 PM
I don't understand why people refuse to acknowledge the obvious. The lack of a proficient front court has been our achilles heel for the last 3 years. Kolek was right if he told Shaka we needed to get a big man in the portal. Oso would have made a better 4 . With a solid big who could score and rebound inside and rim protect that team would
 have been final 4 material. Look at the past UConn teams, also Creighton. I for one get tired of seeing us manhandled inside while also not having any post scoring.  Like playing 4 on 5 . Aircraftcarrier is correct.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: milwaukee expat on January 19, 2026, 01:52:40 PM
Quote from: Viper on January 17, 2026, 01:16:57 PMClark DNP last night. At this point of a lost season, get him some minutes. He's 1.5 yrs with the program. Is he not capable of even 10-12 mins of D and boards?

In the few minutes he plays he gets rebounds, shows up on the stat sheet - in the very limited minutes he is on the floor.  Vs St Johns I though when he was on the floor St Johns was very aware of him - he altered their play a bit. He is a legit rim protector.  Play him.  Personally I would love for Shaka to do a four out with Clark guarding the rim - over time could see a tough defensive identity take hold with that. 
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 19, 2026, 02:01:44 PM
As Clark gets stronger, especially with Sheek coming along next season, having the 5 play more drop coverage is certainly an option.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: burger on January 19, 2026, 05:58:06 PM
So how do we get Hamilton to portal out?????
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Jay Bee on January 19, 2026, 06:08:17 PM
Providence with a 57.1% OR% in the first half. Big whoop. Up 10.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Newsdreams on January 20, 2026, 12:05:40 AM
Quote from: drbob on January 19, 2026, 12:36:36 PMI don't understand why people refuse to acknowledge the obvious. The lack of a proficient front court has been our achilles heel for the last 3 years. Kolek was right if he told Shaka we needed to get a big man in the portal. Oso would have made a better 4 . With a solid big who could score and rebound inside and rim protect that team would
 have been final 4 material. Look at the past UConn teams, also Creighton. I for one get tired of seeing us manhandled inside while also not having any post scoring.  Like playing 4 on 5 . Aircraftcarrier is correct.
Oso a 4???
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: Stretchdeltsig on January 20, 2026, 11:33:12 AM
Shakas 's bigs need to be bigger, thicker, tougher, more dominant.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: tower912 on January 20, 2026, 11:50:20 AM
Strangely icky.
Title: Re: Post defense and rebounding
Post by: MU82 on January 20, 2026, 12:21:39 PM
Quote from: Newsdreams on January 20, 2026, 12:05:40 AMOso a 4???

Yup - ridiculous. If Oso is a 4 and you pair him with an "aircraft carrier," you have two non-shooters on the floor. Unless your 5 was Jokic, who probably had eligibility left. Can't believe Shaka missed out on Jokic!
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2026, WebDev