What's up with this line? Computers have it MU +10 or 11, is there a Creighton injury I don't know about? I've definitely been slacking on my college hoops this year, this season is too depressing sorry if it's been discussed and nauseum in previews already.
Quote from: Silkk the Shaka on Today at 01:54:16 PMWhat's up with this line? Computers have it MU +10 or 11, is there a Creighton injury I don't know about? I've definitely been slacking on my college hoops this year, this season is too depressing sorry if it's been discussed and nauseum in previews already.
Vegas predicting the Caedin breakout game.
A couple of our guys had "that look" in their eyes this morning. We should easily cover.
Lowery high fived everyone at the airport.
Just saw Creighton -7 on the site I use....weird line. KenPom has Creighton by 10 and usually Vegas sets line at his predicted delta. Seeing a 3 point variance is odd. Not to mention the trend of the two teams seems to be going in opposite directions.
Quote from: Elonsmusk on Today at 02:20:03 PMJust saw Creighton -7 on the site I use....weird line. KenPom has Creighton by 10 and usually Vegas sets line at his predicted delta. Seeing a 3 point variance is odd. Not to mention the trend of the two teams seems to be going in opposite directions.
What kind of bootleg book do you use giving out an even numbered line lol
Quote from: Jay Bee on Today at 02:07:12 PMA couple of our guys had "that look" in their eyes this morning. We should easily cover.
Hamilton at tip off:
lebron.png
Quote from: panda on Today at 02:39:07 PMWhat kind of bootleg book do you use giving out an even numbered line lol
Lol. Sportsbook.ag
Quote from: Elonsmusk on Today at 02:20:03 PMJust saw Creighton -7 on the site I use....weird line. KenPom has Creighton by 10 and usually Vegas sets line at his predicted delta. Seeing a 3 point variance is odd. Not to mention the trend of the two teams seems to be going in opposite directions.
Exactly that's the entire premise of this thread, what's the deal here what am I missing? is there a fix in or something if no Creighton injuries?
Until MU shows it can play, betting against MU is a lock, I see at least a 20 point loss, hard place to play
Quote from: BCHoopster on Today at 03:42:24 PMUntil MU shows it can play, betting against MU is a lock, I see at least a 20 point loss, hard place to play
Agreed been cleaning up lately 🤣😭
Extremely rare that I bet "against" MU. Got in on Creighton +7.5 though. Seems way low.
I'll be happy with an MU win nonetheless, but kinda pissed if we lose by 7 or less.
Clarity of Thought >> Making the Shot. #muMbb
Quote from: Elonsmusk on Today at 02:20:03 PMNot to mention the trend of the two teams seems to be going in opposite directions.
We're obviously trending worse than anybody, but Creighton's "positive trend" is one consecutive victory (over a terrible Xavier team) after losing four of their previous six.
That 2-4 stretch included a home loss to a mediocre K-State team (one that lost to Bowling Green and Seton Hall) and a humiliating blowout defeat at Nebraska, while one of their two wins was against mighty Nicholls. Creighton's two highest-quality wins are against Oregon and Xavier, neither of which is expected to sniff the NCAAT.
In other words, Creighton is not very good. All that being said, -7 or -7.5 at home against us does seem inexplicably low.
They looked really good at X!
Only had to give 6.5
Quote from: BCHoopster on Today at 04:56:51 PMThey looked really good at X!
Yes, that's one consecutive victory over a team that will be battling to stay out of 11th place in the Big East. Very impressive.
X stinks as bad as MU, but getting blown out at home is somewhat surprising.
Not really.