MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: brewcity77 on February 20, 2025, 07:43:31 AM

Title: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Non-Con Check-in
Post by: brewcity77 on February 20, 2025, 07:43:31 AM
Today we look back at Marquette's non-conference opponents and where they stand as we move toward March.

Non-Con Check In (https://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2025/02/cracketology-non-con-check-in.html?m=1)
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Non-Con Check-in
Post by: We R Final Four on February 20, 2025, 05:21:51 PM
Quote from: brewcity77 on February 20, 2025, 07:43:31 AMToday we look back at Marquette's non-conference opponents and where they stand as we move toward March.

Non-Con Check In (https://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2025/02/cracketology-non-con-check-in.html?m=1)
What is the significance, if any, of a Stonehill team exceeding expectations?
294 Net, Quad 4 win........compared to the expected 325? Net, Quad 4?
We beat them by 35.......and covered.
Is that more significant?

George Mason turned out to be a great team to schedule this year.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Non-Con Check-in
Post by: Uncle Rico on February 20, 2025, 05:29:10 PM
Quote from: We R Final Four on February 20, 2025, 05:21:51 PMWhat is the significance, if any, of a Stonehill team exceeding expectations?
294 Net, Quad 4 win........compared to the expected 325? Net, Quad 4?
We beat them by 35.......and covered.
Is that more significant?

George Mason turned out to be a great team to schedule this year.

Too bad we lost to George Mason
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Non-Con Check-in
Post by: taylor999 on February 20, 2025, 06:01:36 PM
Yeah, beating George Mason would've been huge. As for Stonehill, it's nice to see them exceed expectations, but a 35-point win still says a lot.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Non-Con Check-in
Post by: PointWarrior on February 20, 2025, 08:05:56 PM
F' Dayton
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev