MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: brewcity77 on January 29, 2025, 07:26:55 AM

Title: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: brewcity77 on January 29, 2025, 07:26:55 AM
Marquette is in solid position to earn a protected seed, but what about the rest of the Big East? Today we look at the resumes of teams currently in the field and the ones on the outside with a chance to still get in as the league hopes to earn 5 bids come March. All that and a new S-Curve and (very interesting for Marquette) bracket.

And apologies to Georgetown, your time on the bubble was fun while it lasted.

Big East Check-In (http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2025/01/cracketology-big-east-check-in.html)
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Coleman on January 29, 2025, 07:40:01 AM
Good stuff. Would really like to see the conference get 5 bids. I think Xavier has a chance
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 08:59:28 AM
Marquette does not deserve a bid, if they go 2-8.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on January 29, 2025, 09:20:04 AM
Quote from: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 08:59:28 AMMarquette does not deserve a bid, if they go 2-8.

*Sigh*

It's the total body of work.  Even 2-8 would have us well ahead the teams in Dayton and in the 8/9 seed range.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: CountryRoads on January 29, 2025, 09:29:22 AM
That would be nuts if they paired us against UWM.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: brewcity77 on January 29, 2025, 11:22:00 AM
Quote from: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 08:59:28 AMMarquette does not deserve a bid, if they go 2-8.

They absolutely would. Wins over Maryland, Purdue, Wisconsin, and Georgia aren't going anywhere. 20-11 (11-9) would tank our seed, but we'd be safely in.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Badgerhater on January 29, 2025, 11:32:55 AM
Lost me when the article had UCONN and bubble in same sentence.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: SaveOD238 on January 29, 2025, 11:37:17 AM
Quote from: CountryRoads on January 29, 2025, 09:29:22 AMThat would be nuts if they paired us against UWM.

There aren't any bracketing principles that would block it, and with neither of us being able to play at Fiserv it does increase the chances of that being our matchup.

Local media might actually talk about Marquette again though, which would be nice.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: The Sultan on January 29, 2025, 11:37:47 AM
Quote from: Badgerhater on January 29, 2025, 11:32:55 AMLost me when the article had UCONN and bubble in same sentence.

First of all, "UConn" and "bubble" were not ever in the same sentence.

Second, what is inaccurate about this? "Their back loaded schedule gives them the opportunity to move up as high as a 4 or 5 seed, but they are trending closer to the bubble and still have work to do as they could easily miss the field if they lose games they aren't supposed to lose."

Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Galway Eagle on January 29, 2025, 03:21:51 PM
Quote from: CountryRoads on January 29, 2025, 09:29:22 AMThat would be nuts if they paired us against UWM.

This happened to me in the North American hurling finals a few years back. We had to fly out to San Francisco to get paired against... the Naperville/suburban Chicago hurling club.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: PJDunn on January 29, 2025, 03:47:45 PM
You should grow a pair and play Gaelic football.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 03:59:31 PM
Quote from: brewcity77 on January 29, 2025, 11:22:00 AMThey absolutely would. Wins over Maryland, Purdue, Wisconsin, and Georgia aren't going anywhere. 20-11 (11-9) would tank our seed, but we'd be safely in.
I did not say they would not get a bid. I said they would not deserve one.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: BM1090 on January 29, 2025, 04:00:27 PM
Quote from: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 03:59:31 PMI did not say they would not get a bid. I said they would not deserve one.

Do you believe everyone worse than an 8 seed every year doesn't deserve a bid?
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: The Sultan on January 29, 2025, 04:26:26 PM
Quote from: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 03:59:31 PMI did not say they would not get a bid. I said they would not deserve one.

Why not?
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Galway Eagle on January 29, 2025, 10:39:43 PM
Quote from: PJDunn on January 29, 2025, 03:47:45 PMYou should grow a pair and play Gaelic football.

The lesser sport

But also I'm bad at dribbling the ball.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Shaka Shart on January 30, 2025, 12:00:44 AM
Quote from: Galway Eagle on January 29, 2025, 10:39:43 PMThe lesser sport

But also I'm bad at dribbling the ball.

Spending the next three months melting down at Galway's dribbling ability
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: brewcity77 on January 30, 2025, 08:03:52 AM
Quote from: Badgerhater on January 29, 2025, 11:32:55 AMLost me when the article had UCONN and bubble in same sentence.

Look at their resume. Their best wins are Gonzaga, Baylor, and Texas. 4 losses outside the field. Memphis is the best team they played and they lost.

They have five Q1 games left. They'll need to get wins against Marquette, St John's, and Creighton to solidify their case while not slipping up. This isn't the UConn of the past two years and they're a lot further from safety than they've been in the past. No one in their right mind would call them a lock today.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: FairWeatherEagle on January 30, 2025, 11:03:38 AM
Good article. So the math looks like it puts 6 really out of the question. X and NOVA  look mutually exclusive.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: wadesworld on January 30, 2025, 11:16:39 AM
Quote from: brewcity77 on January 30, 2025, 08:03:52 AMLook at their resume. Their best wins are Gonzaga, Baylor, and Texas. 4 losses outside the field. Memphis is the best team they played and they lost.

They have five Q1 games left. They'll need to get wins against Marquette, St John's, and Creighton to solidify their case while not slipping up. This isn't the UConn of the past two years and they're a lot further from safety than they've been in the past. No one in their right mind would call them a lock today.

Played (forget losing to) Dayton.  Not a serious team.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: brewcity77 on January 30, 2025, 11:24:07 AM
Quote from: FairWeatherEagle on January 30, 2025, 11:03:38 AMGood article. So the math looks like it puts 6 really out of the question. X and NOVA  look mutually exclusive.

X at Nova next week feels like an elimination game. Doesn't guarantee a bid for the winner, but hard to see a path for the loser.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: MuMark on January 30, 2025, 12:08:27 PM
Found this interesting

https://blog.evanmiya.com/p/abolish-the-quadrant-system-and-use
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: Its DJOver on January 30, 2025, 12:39:48 PM
Quote from: MuMark on January 30, 2025, 12:08:27 PMFound this interesting

https://blog.evanmiya.com/p/abolish-the-quadrant-system-and-use

Interesting idea. Gets some basic facts wrong though.  Nothing wrong with looking at more numbers and data to help get a clearer picture but at some point the law of diminishing returns has to apply.
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: MU82 on January 30, 2025, 05:15:18 PM
Quote from: bilsu on January 29, 2025, 03:59:31 PMI did not say they would not get a bid. I said they would not deserve one.

Thanks, Eeyore!
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: muwarrior69 on January 30, 2025, 06:43:57 PM
Quote from: SaveOD238 on January 29, 2025, 11:37:17 AMThere aren't any bracketing principles that would block it, and with neither of us being able to play at Fiserv it does increase the chances of that being our matchup.

Local media might actually talk about Marquette again though, which would be nice.

Marquette is not talked about in local media?
Title: Re: [Cracked Sidewalks] Cracketology: Big East Check-In
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on January 30, 2025, 08:55:16 PM
Quote from: muwarrior69 on January 30, 2025, 06:43:57 PMMarquette is not talked about in local media?

He means local sports radio. Which will never happen. The Packers get more air time than the Brewers and BUcks combined,  in May.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev