Man, watching the Memphis vs. Tenn. game makes the NBA look like they're playing in slow motion.
unreal number of 3s in the beginning my Memphis - whew. And yeah - this is playing in fast forward lol
LMAO at the Erin Andrews' shudder as the "Sweaty One" tried to bear hug her. Could you be any less obvious Bruce?
As discussed and shown here previously, Pearl has a new girlfriend (circa 1983) who makes EA look like baby poop. But, he's one hell of a coach whose players love his style of ball.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 23, 2008, 09:12:38 PM
As discussed and shown here previously, Pearl has a new girlfriend (circa 1983) who makes EA look like baby poop. But, he's one hell of a coach whose players love his style of ball.
They don't make you take character exams before you start coaching. Lucky for Pearl.
i don't have an exact number, but Tennessee has more turnovers than a bakery in this game. i guess that happens with a fast pace, but its really preventing them from pulling away, just like Memphis' inability to make ft's is doing the same.
I missed most of this game but Memphis has a huge problem with free throw shooting that will be their demise come tourny time.
these so called "character issues" to me and please be specific. Yeah, I know he turned in a cheater back in the day. I don't have a problem with that, do you?
From where I sit, I see a superb coach who took an impossible job where so many others have failed and in his third season sits at #1.
His arena is sold out, can recruit with the big boys, plays a style of ball that today's athlete loves, is a marketing dream come true, and has been a winner everywhere he has coached. That's quite a resume'.
L'Chaim, Bruce. This Bud's for you.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 23, 2008, 10:31:05 PM
these so called "character issues" to me and please be specific. Yeah, I know he turned in a cheater back in the day. I don't have a problem with that, do you?
From where I sit, I see a superb coach who took an impossible job where so many others have failed and in his third season sits at #1.
His arena is sold out, can recruit with the big boys, plays a style of ball that today's athlete loves, is a marketing dream come true, and has been a winner everywhere he has coached. That's quite a resume'.
L'Chaim, Bruce. This Bud's for you.
In my eyes, Bruce Pearl is the best program builder in the country, and looks like he can keep the intensity
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 23, 2008, 10:31:05 PM
these so called "character issues" to me and please be specific. Yeah, I know he turned in a cheater back in the day. I don't have a problem with that, do you?
From where I sit, I see a superb coach who took an impossible job where so many others have failed and in his third season sits at #1.
His arena is sold out, can recruit with the big boys, plays a style of ball that today's athlete loves, is a marketing dream come true, and has been a winner everywhere he has coached. That's quite a resume'.
L'Chaim, Bruce. This Bud's for you.
As mentioned above, Pearl grabbing EA was very classless. How'd ya like to be his daughter watching that.
If you were a highly ranked recruit, how could you not look at going to either of these schools. Wow, what a tempo, up and down and gunning. Louisville sort of the same.
Quote from: Pardner on February 23, 2008, 08:58:12 PM
LMAO at the Erin Andrews' shudder as the "Sweaty One" tried to bear hug her. Could you be any less obvious Bruce?
I thought she looked very violated by this. Not Namath Culver - but pretty bad. I really felt sorry for her.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 23, 2008, 10:31:05 PM
these so called "character issues" to me and please be specific. Yeah, I know he turned in a cheater back in the day. I don't have a problem with that, do you?
From where I sit, I see a superb coach who took an impossible job where so many others have failed and in his third season sits at #1.
His arena is sold out, can recruit with the big boys, plays a style of ball that today's athlete loves, is a marketing dream come true, and has been a winner everywhere he has coached. That's quite a resume'.
L'Chaim, Bruce. This Bud's for you.
It's fine to turn in a cheater. Not so sure it's scrupulous to illegally record a 17 year-old kid and ask him leading questions so you can nail one of your closest rivals. You would have a field day if Crean did this with Jared Swopshire.
Certainly the Erin Andrews grab was a little much for the man on national television but more importantly I like how his wife stuck with him through his days at Southern Indiana and Wisconsin-Milwaukee only to deal with infidelity and finally a divorce process less then 18 months after he arrived in Knoxville. And then have photos of him cavorting with women half his age around town before the divorce is even finalized. To each their own but this discussion is about class and character and both of those take a hit in this matter.
You can throw in his behavior at high school basketball games when he observes recruits only to get tossed out of the gym because he's obnoxious and also toss in his behavior in the early days of the Tyler Smith brouhaha.
Great basketball coach. Not so great character.
the play antics with EA was unnecessary. However, he's a fun loving impulsive guy coaching in the most important game of his life to date against their intrastate rival, so give him some credit. It wasn't like he was hitting on Holly Rowe.
As a point of clarification, don't get me wrong. Divorce is hell, especially for the kids. However, we don't know, and don't need to know, all the significant facts surrounding Bruce and Kim's marriage. Suffice it to say, being married to any highly visible and successful person can be a challenge. BTW, I'll bet you a tall, cool one that they didn't have a pre-nup and Bruce will be paying handsomely to da Mrs.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 11:35:11 AM
the play antics with EA was unnecessary. However, he's a fun loving impulsive guy coaching the in the most important game of his life to date and give him some credit. It wasn't like he was hitting on Holly Rowe.
As a point of clarification, don't get me wrong. Divorce is hell, especially for the kids. However, we don't know, and don't need to know, all the significant facts surrounding Bruce and Kim's marriage. Suffice it to say, being married to any highly visible and successful person can be a challenge. BTW, I'll bet you a tall, cool one that they didn't have a pre-nup and Bruce will be paying handsomely to da Mrs.
This is a nice, level headed post.
I don't want to hijack this thread, but I wanted to point out that I hope some of the critics of our own coach can approach Crean in the same manner that you have approached Pearl when it comes to his professional and personal life.
There is nothing wrong with withholding judgment because we don't know all of the facts and details (on any given subject).
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 11:35:11 AM
the play antics with EA was unnecessary. However, he's a fun loving impulsive guy coaching the in the most important game of his life to date and give him some credit. It wasn't like he was hitting on Holly Rowe.
As a point of clarification, don't get me wrong. Divorce is hell, especially for the kids. However, we don't know, and don't need to know, all the significant facts surrounding Bruce and Kim's marriage. Suffice it to say, being married to any highly visible and successful person can be a challenge. BTW, I'll bet you a tall, cool one that they didn't have a pre-nup and Bruce will be paying handsomely to da Mrs.
It was interesting to see how you got specifics as you asked and paddled it all away with a flip line about how there wasn't a pre-nup.
Truth is not you nor any one else has given me reasons why Bruce is a shady character and you'd be embarassed to have him coach the Warriors. Put him in a line up with Sampson and see if he gets picked out.
Bottom line, while it will never happen, I'd be ecstatic if he was our next coach.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 03:45:57 PM
Truth is not you nor any one else has given me reasons why Bruce is a shady character and you'd be embarassed to have him coach the Warriors. Put him in a line up with Sampson and see if he gets picked out.
Bottom line, while it will never happen, I'd be ecstatic if he was our next coach.
This thread was about his character issues, not about him being shady. That's a convenient insert on your part. Being an obnoxious pretty boy at a high school game doesn't show character. Illegally recording a 17 year-old to punish your rivals doesn't show character. Adultery does not show character. Being photographed with women half your age so your son can see it doesn't show character. Even some Panthers/Badgers fans who were big, big Bruce Pearl fans admit that his type of "recruiting" fits in the SEC.
You asked for it. I supplied it. And yet you still act flip. My guess is you just bring up Pearl because you like it that he needled the coach you don't want at Marquette. That's totally fine. Just be man enough not to beat around the bush.
I wasn't going to post it, but you've forced the issue. I know Bruce personally. While not a close friend at all, I've played golf with him, our sons have golfed together, have many mutual friends, and even shared dinner. He knows my loyalty to MU. I wouldn't kid you, the UWM, MU thing has come up in conversation as has my question of him if the Warriors job ever piqued his interest?
I can say with 100% truthfulness, that I have never heard one negative comment about Tom Crean from Bruce Pearl. On the contrary, Bruce has always been very respectful and positive about the job Tom is doing. You may recall, Crean even acknowledged getting a congratulatory message from Pearl after beating Pitt on the road last season.
Whoa! back up a little..., Coobey's, did you really refer to Bruce Pearl as "pretty"?
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 05:15:06 PM
I wasn't going to post it, but you've forced the issue. I know Bruce personally. While not a close friend at all, I've played golf with him, our sons have golfed together, have many mutual friends, and even shared dinner. He knows my loyalty to MU. I wouldn't kid you, the UWM, MU thing has come up in conversation as has my question of him if the Warriors job ever piqued his interest?
I can say with 100% truthfulness, that I have never heard one negative comment about Tom Crean from Bruce Pearl. On the contrary, Bruce has always been very respectful and positive about the job Tom is doing. You may recall, Crean even acknowledged getting a congratulatory message from Pearl after beating Pitt on the road last season.
Interesting insight, 4ever. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems as though Pearl & Crean have a great deal of mutual respect for one another. Seems as though administrative issues/fan rivalry may have given the impression that the two of them really dislike one another.
I believe you are essentially right. And, while I have never spoken to Crean, I get the impression that their mutual respect is not just a coach's fraternity thing when discussing this topic with Pearl. As an aside, Bruce had a Dreamsickle orange golf bag that he said he found in the athletic office @ UT and was told it had belonged to KO. I told him to get rid of it 'cus it obviously had some bad MU mojo.
wow - 4ever - showing some humanity. Do you think Crean is a good coach?
mviale and this thread wil continue 4ever.
To answer your question, yes I think Crean is a good coach. Not a great coach, but good. I also think he can only take a program so far. Kinda like George Karl of the NBA. If you're happy and content with that, great, then Crean's your guy.
If not, and you aspire to compete yearly at the next level in college basketball, then the program needs someone else. To me, Tom doesn't bring all the pieces to the table. And, yes, I not thrilled just to make the Tournament. Basketball is too great a part of the entire Marquette experience to just settle for the field of 64.
One of the problems on this forum is so many posters endured the Dukiet and Deane eras. Therefore, Crean is looked on as a savior. They haven't experienced true basketball nirvana.
I've always said Crean will be a better coach at his next job. He's been forced to learned on the job here, and has been slow at that.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 06:23:38 PM
To me, Tom doesn't bring all the pieces to the table.
What pieces does he not have? I experienced '77. I also see NCAA hoops as a whole different situation in '08 than in the mid seventies. I won't waste your time by reciting the way the product has changed because I know you know. So what does TC not have that you think he should?
Also as an aside, after watching Pearl's post-game interview with EA last night, I got the impression that he and TC are probably more alike--at least in terms of on-air persona--than those who dislike Pearl are willing to admit.
I'll admit that, in the past, I wasn't the biggest fan of the guy myself, probably because of the MU-UWM situation. I've now turned to more Pearl tolerance than Pearl antagonism.
Yet another aside, I'm a little surprised MUVOL06 hasn't been around lately, especially after last night's (impressive) win :D
I think he's an above average recruiter, but not a great recruiter. Until he goes nose to nose with the elite programs and makes a dent, this can't be argued. His players develop but maybe not to their full extent. Some of the asst. coaching turnover may be part of this problem. Obviously, he has to bring frontcourt players in who can compete in the Big East.
Above all, after 9 seasons I still don't know how to define his coaching philosophy. Given all the resources the University has afforded him, I stll get the impression Tom is searching for a coaching identity.
Bottom line for me is that he talks so much and says nothing that I have a difficult time believing in him.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 06:46:46 PM
I think he's an above average recruiter, but not a great recruiter. Until he goes nose to nose with the elite programs and makes a dent, this can't be argued. His players develop but maybe not to their full extent. Some of the asst. coaching turnover may be part of this problem. Obviously, he has to bring frontcourt players in who can compete in the Big East.
Above all, after 9 seasons I still don't know how to define his coaching philosophy. Given all the resources the University has afforded him, I stll get the impression Tom is searching for a coaching identity.
Bottom line for me is that he talks so much and says nothing that I have a difficult time believing in him.
I can respect your opinion, and your honesty here. Obviously everybody is entitled to a well thought out opinion.
I just want to say that Crean has already clearly defined himself as the second most successful coach in MU history.
I know Hank had some nice years after Al left, but the program was on the downswing once Hank took over. And, all of the KO lovers out there just need to remember that he bailed at the first opportunity (after some limited success) because he clearly didn't think MU was the end destination for him. Had he stayed, he'd have gone through the same program building growing pains that Crean has gone through.
I don't think Crean is Jesus, but he's clearly done a very, very good job and has accomplished a lot in the last 10 years. If he gets the continued support of the university, students, and alumni, imagine what he could do in the next 10!
He's not perfect, but it's hard for me to be too critical of the guy given how far the program has come in 10 years.
4ever - enjoy the ride this year, even though you enjoy some sport school coach like pearl - he could not achieve what crean has done at a small liberal arts school without a football team.
liberal arts school factor into the equation? Neither Crean nor Pearl coach at Williams, Amherst, Colby, Swartmore, Haverford, Carleton, Middlebury, or the like. Please don't confuse Marquette University with any of those.
Come to think of it, UWM hasn't had football since I was a young child and if my memory serves me correctly, Bruce had pretty good success there. BTW, Tennessee has a dynamite recruiting class coming in including Woolridge who is acquintated with Tom.
Quote from: augoman on February 24, 2008, 05:18:24 PM
Whoa! back up a little..., Coobey's, did you really refer to Bruce Pearl as "pretty"?
Our software automatically detects some of the more, um, PG13 words in the English language and replaces them with more family friendly phrases. "Pretty boy" is not likely the word Coobey typed...
Quote from: 4everwarriors on February 24, 2008, 05:15:06 PM
I wasn't going to post it, but you've forced the issue. I know Bruce personally. While not a close friend at all, I've played golf with him, our sons have golfed together, have many mutual friends, and even shared dinner. He knows my loyalty to MU. I wouldn't kid you, the UWM, MU thing has come up in conversation as has my question of him if the Warriors job ever piqued his interest?
I can say with 100% truthfulness, that I have never heard one negative comment about Tom Crean from Bruce Pearl. On the contrary, Bruce has always been very respectful and positive about the job Tom is doing. You may recall, Crean even acknowledged getting a congratulatory message from Pearl after beating Pitt on the road last season.
It was clear you knew Pearl. You dropped his wife's name. It makes your continued naivity childish.
You gloss over nearly everything I wrote about Pearl. Nothing from you about the character issues I brought up: the illegal recordings; being kicked out of high school games; infidelity. In regards to Crean, all I wrote was that Pearl needled him. Were you paying attention at all during the beginning of the UWM/MU fiasco as it played out in the media? Pearl jabbed Crean and MU. I never wrote anything about Pearl disliking Crean personally or saying a demeaning word about him during your friendly golf games.
It's great you know Pearl. It's great you were able to share with him. But when you ask for specifics on character issues and get them don't ignore what I wrote and add a pointless story about knocking your balls around with him.
You checked me on providing specifics. I checked you back with those specifics. To these points, you've remained quiet and rather name dropped to re-focus the conversation.
I actually think Pearl has a little Al McGuire type showmanship in him. I detest what he did to the Illini, but he's got personality, that's for sure.
Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on February 25, 2008, 12:02:21 PM
I actually think Pearl has a little Al McGuire type showmanship in him. I detest what he did to the Illini, but he's got personality, that's for sure.
The question is, would you take him over Crean? And if so why is showmanship different than Crean's? If anything I would argue that Pearl is much more in your face than Crean about the program.
If you think Crean and Pearl have similar personalities then there is something drastically wrong with you.
Pearl would run into academic problems at MU - couldnt survive.
Quote from: PuertoRicanNightmare on February 25, 2008, 04:22:44 PM
If you think Crean and Pearl have similar personalities then there is something drastically wrong with you.
There is something drastically wrong with your reading comprehension if you picked up the word personality in my statement. I asked why you would prefer Pearl's showmanship over Crean's? You seem to hate Crean's selling of the program and if anything Pearl would be more in your face and wouldn't run as ethically tight ship as Crean does. So showmanship....why would you take Pearl over Crean?