MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: HowardsWorld on March 12, 2023, 05:40:17 PM

Title: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: HowardsWorld on March 12, 2023, 05:40:17 PM
Lets jump into this right away. What do we know about them? Strengths, weaknesses, etc

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/_/id/261/vermont-catamounts

Currently on a 15 game win streak including winning the last 4 by double digits.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 05:42:19 PM
This is the game we need to focus on. Nothing will be easy. Vermont has nothing to lose. Win this and go from there.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: 🏀 on March 12, 2023, 05:44:18 PM
They shoot the three well and limit turnovers. Can't rebound.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: The Sultan on March 12, 2023, 05:45:26 PM
Cracked Sidewalks called Vermont a dream match up.

"The Catamounts are always an upset darling, but they haven't played a top-100 kenpom team since December and went 0-5 against such opposition, losing by an average of 18 points. They are terrible on the offensive glass and the worst defensive team in the mix for a 14-seed. Vermont has stayed close to NCAA opponents in recent years, but John Becker is 0-4 in Thursday/Friday NCAA games and this doesn't look like the year he breaks that streak."
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: CountryRoads on March 12, 2023, 05:45:44 PM
What the hell was going on with Vermont early in the year? Started the year 1-5.

26 point loss to St Mary's
21 point loss to Iona
29 point loss to Yale

No good wins.

They'll be tough but there's no excuse here.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Uncle Rico on March 12, 2023, 05:48:21 PM
Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on March 12, 2023, 05:45:26 PM
Cracked Sidewalks called Vermont a dream match up.

"The Catamounts are always an upset darling, but they haven't played a top-100 kenpom team since December and went 0-5 against such opposition, losing by an average of 18 points. They are terrible on the offensive glass and the worst defensive team in the mix for a 14-seed. Vermont has stayed close to NCAA opponents in recent years, but John Becker is 0-4 in Thursday/Friday NCAA games and this doesn't look like the year he breaks that streak."

Weakest Vermont team to make the dance in awhile.  Can probably muck things up, make some dumb shots but Marquette wins by 20+
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Dish on March 12, 2023, 05:50:10 PM
MU opens -13.5.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Skatastrophy on March 12, 2023, 05:50:46 PM
This is a trap game
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: PointWarrior on March 12, 2023, 05:51:04 PM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 05:42:19 PM
This is the game we need to focus on. Nothing will be easy. Vermont has nothing to lose. Win this and go from there.

Can we get all the "focus on the first game" and "don't look ahead" stupid posts out of the way today?

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Norm on March 12, 2023, 05:51:34 PM
One thing to know is they will hustle their butts off, If they get hot from 3 it could get uncomfortable. Need to play with the energy we brought against XU last night.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: panda on March 12, 2023, 05:52:28 PM
Zero athleticism, no size and limited depth. Buy your Sunday tickets now
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: nyg on March 12, 2023, 05:54:02 PM
Quote from: 🏀 on March 12, 2023, 05:44:18 PM
They shoot the three well and limit turnovers. Can't rebound.

Exactly. Watched them yesterday, almost losing to UMass Lowell in like a high school gym. Maybe you can find game on YouTube or something to actually see them as opposed to speculation stuff.

One big guy, Verato (sp) like 6 ft7. No one else even close to that height. No one
Play four guards, one guy named Penn, pretty good. 
Shot lots of threes.

MU going to destroy them on boards, for once.  Vermont will not know what hit them after first ten minutes.
Whatever the spread is, going MU all in in this game
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: 1SE on March 12, 2023, 05:55:25 PM
Quote from: DegenerateDish on March 12, 2023, 05:50:10 PM
MU opens -13.5.

It's a high quality buy game.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 05:56:26 PM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 12, 2023, 05:51:04 PM
Can we get all the "focus on the first game" and "don't look ahead" stupid posts out of the way today?
Would you like to bypass our first game entirely and then look like a blithering nincompoop when we, against all odds, get upset by a 15 seed? Or would you rather just watch and talk about the actual game on the schedule? Your choice.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: BM1090 on March 12, 2023, 06:00:17 PM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 05:56:26 PM
Would you like to bypass our first game entirely and then look like a blithering nincompoop when we, against all odds, get upset by a 15 seed? Or would you rather just watch and talk about the actual game on the schedule? Your choice.

The team should focus on Vermont.

We can talk about whatever the hell we want.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Dickthedribbler on March 12, 2023, 06:03:08 PM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 05:42:19 PM
This is the game we need to focus on. Nothing will be easy. Vermont has nothing to lose. Win this and go from there.

The players and the coaches need to focus on this game ( and I'm certain they will).

But why is this the game WE need to focus on. Never understood that in a million years.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: RushmoreAcademy on March 12, 2023, 06:04:37 PM
Quote from: BM1090 on March 12, 2023, 06:00:17 PM
The team should focus on Vermont.

We can talk about whatever the hell we want.

This. One game at a time is important for the coaches and players. Since we have zero play into the outcome and this is the NCAA tournament where the entire country plays games of looking ahead, we are free to do so.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: PointWarrior on March 12, 2023, 06:04:43 PM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 05:56:26 PM
Would you like to bypass our first game entirely and then look like a blithering nincompoop when we, against all odds, get upset by a 15 seed? Or would you rather just watch and talk about the actual game on the schedule? Your choice.


I will take my chances on being a blithering nincompoop.

A+ word choice for your rebuttal.  Please laser lock focus on Vermont so I don't have to.


Hell, I am more worried about Purdue losing and not making it to a rematch with us
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: wisblue on March 12, 2023, 06:08:15 PM
Vermont does seem to be one of those teams loaded with veteran players. Those teams always seem to be disciplined if not overly blessed with raw talent.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 06:08:54 PM
Vermont start 2-7 this year.

They are currently on a 15 game winning streak to end the season.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Skatastrophy on March 12, 2023, 06:09:44 PM
Anyway, the Final 4 game against Alabama is going to be great. They aren't going to win over any neutral fans after their off-court bs this year.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 12, 2023, 06:10:25 PM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 12, 2023, 06:04:43 PM

I will take my chances on being a blithering nincompoop.
Love the enthusiasm.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: goldeneagle91114 on March 12, 2023, 06:10:35 PM
Feel like the BEAST tournament was a great dry run. Dealt with adversity, played close games blew a team out.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: panda on March 12, 2023, 06:12:02 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 06:08:54 PM
Vermont start 2-7 this year.

They are currently on a 15 game winning streak to end the season.

Their conference is worse than the big 10
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: nyg on March 12, 2023, 06:15:08 PM
Quote from: wisblue on March 12, 2023, 06:08:15 PM
Vermont does seem to be one of those teams loaded with veteran players. Those teams always seem to be disciplined if not overly blessed with raw talent.

When I was watching Vermont in their conference title game yesterday, I actually said to myself, MU or any BE team would demolish either of these teams in the tournament.

Maybe find the game online and watch.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: RushmoreAcademy on March 12, 2023, 06:28:53 PM
Quote from: panda on March 12, 2023, 06:12:02 PM
Their conference is worse than the big 10

Don't say things you can't take back.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Daniel on March 12, 2023, 06:44:37 PM
It's a much better draw than UNC last year,  or Murray State, or South Carolina like we had in the past!   I will take the Catamounts. 

I think we played them at the Bradley Center a long time ago!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: HowardsWorld on March 12, 2023, 06:46:49 PM
Game time set for 1:45 PM CT which probably means 2 PM CT
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: mugrad_89 on March 12, 2023, 06:48:40 PM
Quote from: panda on March 12, 2023, 06:12:02 PM
Their conference is worse than the big 10

That's a low bar.  😊
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 06:53:04 PM
https://youtu.be/HgXtffDcCsE

Every basket from their Conference Title game for anyone that wants to see them before Friday.

They are small and they don't turn the ball over.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MUfan12 on March 12, 2023, 06:55:15 PM
We'll see how they handle our guys flying around.

They could get hot but I feel like MU is well equipped to guard a team that plays five out.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: tower912 on March 12, 2023, 06:56:48 PM
MU fans in Columbus, make sure the MU is prominently displayed and that you aren't just walking around in Blue and Gold.


"Is Marquette in Michigan?" might be a life or death question.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: MU Fan in Connecticut on March 12, 2023, 06:57:08 PM
Quote from: Uncle Rico on March 12, 2023, 05:48:21 PM
Weakest Vermont team to make the dance in awhile.  Can probably muck things up, make some dumb shots but Marquette wins by 20+

Second game in a row that Marquette plays one of my daughter's schools.
Seen a few times this year.  Exactly as Rico said, this is not a typical UVM team.  They rolled everyone in conference but had a tough time out of conference.  They usually play better out of conference but not this season.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Scoop Snoop on March 12, 2023, 07:17:16 PM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 12, 2023, 05:51:04 PM
Can we get all the "focus on the first game" and "don't look ahead" stupid posts out of the way today?

Not a chance!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: MUEng92 on March 12, 2023, 07:24:40 PM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on March 12, 2023, 06:09:44 PM
Anyway, the Final 4 game against Alabama is going to be great. They aren't going to win over any neutral fans after their off-court bs this year.
Anyone else think it was "cringy" when he mentioned the whole murder situation in the same breath as he said they were the number 1 seed.  Gave then about 8 seconds to enjoy it.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Scoop Snoop on March 12, 2023, 07:27:52 PM
Quote from: MUEng92 on March 12, 2023, 07:24:40 PM
Anyone else think it was "cringy" when he mentioned the whole murder situation in the same breath as he said they were the number 1 seed.  Gave then about 8 seconds to enjoy it.

I did. They would have been better off saying nothing rather than the way they (mis)handled it so badly.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: HowardsWorld on March 12, 2023, 07:28:22 PM
Quote from: MUEng92 on March 12, 2023, 07:24:40 PM
Anyone else think it was "cringy" when he mentioned the whole murder situation in the same breath as he said they were the number 1 seed.  Gave then about 8 seconds to enjoy it.

deservedly so, f*ck Alabama. Whether he was involved or not they dropped the ball and showed that winning games was more important that a woman's life. No matter what happens there season will always be tarnished.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: tower912 on March 12, 2023, 07:30:38 PM
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/team/stats/_/id/261


That is a whole bunch of 6'3-6'5 guys.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ATL MU Warrior on March 12, 2023, 07:31:19 PM
We'll have every physical advantage it's possible to have in a basketball game.  I trust Shaka and the team to be prepared mentally. We should roll. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Norm on March 12, 2023, 07:49:15 PM
Vermont plays mostly seniors and have been in the NCAAs 3 out of the last 4 years, so the players have been there before.

I'll be nervous since MU hasn't won a NCAA game since 2013 and Shaka's teams have lost 7 NCAA games in a row. Lots of monkeys to get off our backs.

But if MU plays with the energy and focus they did Saturday night at MSG they will be hard to beat.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Herman Cain on March 12, 2023, 07:50:13 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 06:53:04 PM
https://youtu.be/HgXtffDcCsE

Every basket from their Conference Title game for anyone that wants to see them before Friday.

They are small and they don't turn the ball over.
Thanks for posting . We have to make sure Catamounts  don't get clean looks cause they can make them. These kind of teams can hang around and make 3s. So our defense of last 3 games needs to continue.

It would help our cause to get some early separation , build on it and let our freshman get some tournament minutes .
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Strokin 3s on March 12, 2023, 07:51:56 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 12, 2023, 07:49:15 PM
Vermont plays mostly seniors and have been in the NCAAs 3 out of the last 4 years, so the players have been there before.

I'll be nervous since MU hasn't won a NCAA game since 2003 and Shaka's teams have lost 7 NCAA games in a row. Lots of monkeys to get off our backs.

But if MU plays with the energy and focus they did Saturday night at MSG they will be hard to beat.

Huh?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: TVDirector on March 12, 2023, 07:57:52 PM
Quote from: Daniel on March 12, 2023, 06:44:37 PM
It's a much better draw than UNC last year,  or Murray State, or South Carolina like we had in the past!   I will take the Catamounts. 

I think we played them at the Bradley Center a long time ago!
The benefit of being a 2 seed and not anything higher....
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: nyg on March 12, 2023, 08:02:16 PM
Quote from: Herman Cain on March 12, 2023, 07:50:13 PM
Thanks for posting . We have to make sure Catamounts  don't get clean looks cause they can make them. These kind of teams can hang around and make 3s. So our defense of last 3 games meds to continue.

It would help our cause to get some early separation , build on it and let our freshman get some tournament minutes .

MU will destroy them.  They will not know what hit them and if they get in any foul trouble, it only multiplies. Georgetown would beat this team easily.

If MU happens to lose (not), it would be worse loss in MU history in tournament and definitely Shaka's career.

Chill out on the cause stuff, demolition crews are enroute to Columbus. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Scoop Snoop on March 12, 2023, 08:02:51 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 12, 2023, 07:49:15 PM
Vermont plays mostly seniors and have been in the NCAAs 3 out of the last 4 years, so the players have been there before.

I'll be nervous since MU hasn't won a NCAA game since 2003 and Shaka's teams have lost 7 NCAA games in a row. Lots of monkeys to get off our backs.

But if MU plays with the energy and focus they did Saturday night at MSG they will be hard to beat.

And I thought we had ALL you COLES on the run. Somebody sic a dobie on this guy.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 12, 2023, 08:03:00 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 12, 2023, 07:49:15 PM
Lots of monkeys to get off our backs.

Catamounts are cats, not monkeys. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Norm on March 12, 2023, 08:14:39 PM
Quote from: Strokin 3s on March 12, 2023, 07:51:56 PM
Huh?

Meant to say 2013, not 2003. Corrected it.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: pbiflyer on March 12, 2023, 08:30:25 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 06:53:04 PM
https://youtu.be/HgXtffDcCsE

Every basket from their Conference Title game for anyone that wants to see them before Friday.

They are small and they don't turn the ball over.

Watching that, I already don't like them.  Maybe their leading score, but the rest? Don't like 'em one bit.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MUeng on March 12, 2023, 08:32:02 PM
Quote from: MUfan12 on March 12, 2023, 06:55:15 PM
We'll see how they handle our guys flying around.

They could get hot but I feel like MU is well equipped to guard a team that plays five out.
my basic bball knowledge says 3 2 zone? No way can they deal with our length and speed on the arc. If we bring the energy and hunger, it'll be over at half
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 08:32:49 PM
Quote from: pbiflyer on March 12, 2023, 08:30:25 PM
Watching that, I already don't like them.  Maybe their leading score, but the rest? Don't like 'em one bit.

As in you don't like the matchup for Marquette? Don't like them to have a chance to win?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: muwarrior69 on March 12, 2023, 08:41:32 PM
Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 12, 2023, 08:03:00 PM
Catamounts are cats, not monkeys.

Season 3 Episode 24: To Serve Man

Respectfully submitted for your perusal — a Kanamit Catamount. Height: a little over nine feet. Weight: in the neighborhood of three hundred and fifty pounds. Origin: unknown. Motives? Therein hangs the tale, for in just a moment, we're going to ask you to shake hands, figuratively, with a Christopher Columbus from another galaxy and another time. This is the Twilight Zone.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: pbiflyer on March 12, 2023, 08:42:30 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 08:32:49 PM
As in you don't like the matchup for Marquette? Don't like them to have a chance to win?

No, I think we handle them just fine. They seem just unlikeable.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: NickelDimer on March 12, 2023, 08:48:54 PM
Quote from: MUeng on March 12, 2023, 08:32:02 PM
my basic bball knowledge says 3 2 zone? No way can they deal with our length and speed on the arc. If we bring the energy and hunger, it'll be over at half
Zone would play to their strengths. Unless we're concerned they'll penetrate the lane off the bounce, which I don't see why we would be we'll man up and pressure the hell out of them I reckon
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ATL MU Warrior on March 12, 2023, 08:50:53 PM
Quote from: NickelDimer on March 12, 2023, 08:48:54 PM
Zone would play to their strengths. Unless we're concerned they'll penetrate the lane off the bounce, which I don't see why we would be we'll man up and pressure the hell out of them I reckon
Yeah, I think we pressure the ever lovin' crap out of them and see if they can deal with it.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 12, 2023, 11:24:22 PM
1:02:50 mark the coach of Vermont is interviewed

https://www.youtube.com/live/om1GEiC_4GY?feature=share

Q: "What's the 1st thought when you hear Marquette is your matchup?"

A: "Uh oh"

Coach said he knows Tyler Kolek well but doesn't seem as though he knows too much of Marquette's personnel quite yet.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 12, 2023, 11:31:47 PM
I don't think I've ever seen this before. Vermont's starting "center", Matt Veretto, played his freshman year at Delaware where he put up moderate numbers for a freshman. He then stopped playing basketball, transferred to UConn as a non-athlete student, finished his his undergraduate degree over the next three years, then went to Vermont for his graduate degree and decided to play another year of basketball.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Goatherder on March 13, 2023, 01:26:52 AM
Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 12, 2023, 08:03:00 PM
Catamounts are cats, not monkeys.

Also known as mountain lions, pumas, or cougars.  Lots of Cougars among college teams.  Surprisingly no Mountain Lions or Pumas.I guess Mountain Lions is a little long, but why no Pumas?  Strange.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Tums Festival on March 13, 2023, 05:33:09 AM
I remember happily watching Vermont, lead by Taylor Coppenrath, bounce Syracuse out in the 1st round back in 2005.

This Vermont team has no near as talented as Taylor Coppenrath on their roster.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: i71_dawg on March 13, 2023, 05:39:00 AM
Quote from: Goatherder on March 13, 2023, 01:26:52 AM
Also known as mountain lions, pumas, or cougars.  Lots of Cougars among college teams.  Surprisingly no Mountain Lions or Pumas.I guess Mountain Lions is a little long, but why no Pumas?  Strange.

Penn St Nittany Lions are close....their mascot is a mountain lion named after nearby Mount Nittany. 

The nickname was originally coined by a Penn State baseball player who used the full longer name of "Nittany Mountain Lions."
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: cheebs09 on March 13, 2023, 05:47:34 AM
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 12, 2023, 11:31:47 PM
I don't think I've ever seen this before. Vermont's starting "center", Matt Veretto, played his freshman year at Delaware where he put up moderate numbers for a freshman. He then stopped playing basketball, transferred to UConn as a non-athlete student, finished his his undergraduate degree over the next three years, then went to Vermont for his graduate degree and decided to play another year of basketball.

Ian Markolf lost the will to play for UW and then resurfaced elsewhere.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: avid1010 on March 13, 2023, 06:53:41 AM
Quote from: Daniel on March 12, 2023, 06:44:37 PM
It's a much better draw than UNC last year,  or Murray State, or South Carolina like we had in the past!   I will take the Catamounts. 

I think we played them at the Bradley Center a long time ago!
Yup...long time ago...had to be 6+ years as I was childless.  My wife and I went down to MKE for the wknd to see the Christmas Carol and a MU game.  We were checking into the Hilton as thy were, and I said something to her like "they must be a D3 team in town to play MSOE or Concordia."  Then I saw some Vermont gear...

If I remember correctly, they had a win or two many years ago with a really solid coach.  Brennan, Brennehan, or something. 

MU only an 11 point favorite.  Pressure the hell out of them, and funnel everything to Oso?  If I'm Vermont...I'm running 5 out...with 5 shooters...and hoping to hit a ton of 3s. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 07:31:57 AM
Quote from: Goatherder on March 13, 2023, 01:26:52 AM
Also known as mountain lions, pumas, or cougars.  Lots of Cougars among college teams.  Surprisingly no Mountain Lions or Pumas.I guess Mountain Lions is a little long, but why no Pumas?  Strange.
St Joseph's College in Rennselaer Indiana , which is no longer around, were the Pumas.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MU82 on March 13, 2023, 08:39:46 AM
The reason Vermont started so poorly and then turned it on later in the season is that they weren't any competition for the P6 teams they faced ... and then they got to compete in a terrible conference, where they were the best of the mediocre (and the bad).

It's a great draw for Marquette, and it will be a nice way for our guys to get the tourney nervousness out of the way early en route to the Final Four and more.

Sorry ... I didn't mean to mention aiming for the Final Four. We fans have to concentrate only on the mighty, mighty Catamounts because if we so much as think of any possible future opponent, we will have doomed our Warrior Eagles to certain first-round defeat.

Everyone knows every single Kansas fan was laser-focused on Texas Southern in the days leading up to their first-round matchup last season, never once thought of the possible second-round matchup with Creighton or of winning the title. And because every single Kansas fan thought only about Texas Southern, the team was able to eventually win the championship. I mean, that's just science.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 09:31:23 AM
Marquette matches up well with Vermont because we can defend 5 out. 

1. Ball pressure: make them start their offense far away from the basket.

2. Deny the pass: force Vermont to catch the ball running away from the hoop and get some timely steals.

3. Switch when necessary: Vermont doesn't have the personnel to create a lot of one on one matchup advantages.  Switch out to shooters to deny open threes.

4. Mobile 4/5s:  O-Max and Oso have the speed to defend on the perimeter.  Joplin is less consistent on D but has played well at times. Chase Ross could even get some run in a 4 guard lineup.  I don't expect to see Gold very much, except in garbage time.

This is one of the things I love about Shaka's roster construction.  I know a lot of people want a big bruiser that can go toe to toe with Sanago, Kalkbrenner, Nunge, Soriano, etc.  But sometimes you have to play a tournament game versus mid majors that play 5 out small ball.  Marquette has the matchup flexibility to win against all styles.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 13, 2023, 09:33:36 AM
Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 09:31:23 AM
Marquette matches up well with Vermont because we can defend 5 out. 

1. Ball pressure: make them start their offense far away from the basket.

2. Deny the pass: force Vermont to catch the ball running away from the hoop and get some timely steals.

3. Switch when necessary: Vermont doesn't have the personnel to create a lot of one on one matchup advantages.  Switch out to shooters to deny open threes.

4. Mobile 4/5s:  O-Max and Oso have the speed to defend on the perimeter.  Joplin is less consistent on D but has played well at times. Chase Ross could even get some run in a 4 guard lineup.  I don't expect to see Gold very much, except in garbage time.

This is one of the things I love about Shaka's roster construction.  I know a lot of people want a big bruiser that can go toe to toe with Sanago, Kalkbrenner, Nunge, Soriano, etc.  But sometimes you have to play a tournament game versus mid majors that play 5 out small ball.  Marquette has the matchup flexibility to win against all styles.


Yep, yep, yep and yep.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: tower912 on March 13, 2023, 09:40:34 AM
Pull Ellis's red-shirt and really mess these guys up.


What a terrible idea.  MU will be fine.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 13, 2023, 09:47:40 AM
Just run them off the 3 point line like they did the past few games in New York, they'll be fine.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Dr. Blackheart on March 13, 2023, 10:13:06 AM
Vermont is a sloooow tempo, good trey shooting, low turnover team. Grinders. The type of team MU underperforms against (according to Vegas). Jfp61 and I had this argument earlier in the season...let's hope I am wrong and MU blows them out early.

As was said, pressure them and run them off the line. The next game is the most important.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: NickelDimer on March 13, 2023, 10:17:25 AM
More than being active on defense, defensive discipline will be very important. Have to communicate on switches, can't overhelp (which we've been prone to do), can't lose cutters, etc. They look to run a very structured offense and patiently wait for the defense to make a mistake
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 13, 2023, 10:18:30 AM
Super slow tempo and don't turn it over.  Half court offense is going to have to be good.  MU wins, would be nice to have it going away.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Jay Bee on March 13, 2023, 10:21:07 AM
+50% 3fg% from them is the wildcard that could make things interesting if they are in fire/lucky.  #pray
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 13, 2023, 10:48:41 AM
Watching some replays of their games, they have two guys who initiate the offense. Dylan Penn and Robin Duncan.

Penn will have the ball in hands more often than not. He's quick and strong enough to take (America East level) defenders off the bounce. If he can beat his man he is pretty craft around the hoop. If he can't, he goes into a post up and tries to back down his defender. He's skilled enough in the post that he can score on guards with his back to the basket. However, he is really doing that so he can see his four teammates on the perimeter and is looking for an open man to begin a series of quick perimeter passes which forces the defense to rotate and leads to open shots.

Duncan is a taller guard (6'5") and is the more creative passer of the two. He is good at skip passes and dump offs and is usually the guy who finds the open shooter. He himself can't shoot and his scoring is pretty limited. He is a smart player though and knows when and where to cut.

I think we will see OMax on Penn. His size and length should be more than enough to contain Penn and will neutralize his post up ability, meaning we won't need to help on him and can play him as a passer.  Duncan has some creative passing ability but I don't think his skip passes will work well against our guys, there will be plenty of interception opportunities. I'd put Kolek or Kam on Duncan and have them sag to dare him to shoot and take away his passing ability.

Other key to the game will be limiting Matt Vertto. He's their starting "center" who during their current winning streak is shooting 45% from three. He has the potential to go nuclear and hit a bunch of treys. I think Oso should be more than a match for him. Tell Oso to run him off the line. He has some ability to put it on the floor but not against our level of defense. If Oso stays home, Veretto shouldn't be able to get shots off.

Vermont also has the conference player of the year on their team in  Finn Sullivan. His numbers are very muted for a conference POY and he doesn't seem all that potent on offense. Stick Stevie "Off Night" Mitchell on him and I think he'll be out of the picture.

Their defense struggled to stop America East opponents at times. We should eviscerate them on that end.

Game may have a smaller margin of victory than we expect just because of how SLOW Vermont is, but I expect us to be comfortably in control for 40 minutes.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: JakeBarnes on March 13, 2023, 10:57:56 AM
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 13, 2023, 10:48:41 AM
Watching some replays of their games, they have two guys who initiate the offense. Dylan Penn and Robin Duncan.

Penn will have the ball in hands more often than not. He's quick and strong enough to take (America East level) defenders off the bounce. If he can beat his man he is pretty craft around the hoop. If he can't, he goes into a post up and tries to back down his defender. He's skilled enough in the post that he can score on guards with his back to the basket. However, he is really doing that so he can see his four teammates on the perimeter and is looking for an open man to begin a series of quick perimeter passes which forces the defense to rotate and leads to open shots.

Duncan is a taller guard (6'5") and is the more creative passer of the two. He is good at skip passes and dump offs and is usually the guy who finds the open shooter. He himself can't shoot and his scoring is pretty limited. He is a smart player though and knows when and where to cut.

I think we will see OMax on Penn. His size and length should be more than enough to contain Penn and will neutralize his post up ability, meaning we won't need to help on him and can play him as a passer.  Duncan has some creative passing ability but I don't think his skip passes will work well against our guys, there will be plenty of interception opportunities. I'd put Kolek or Kam on Duncan and have them sag to dare him to shoot and take away his passing ability.

Other key to the game will be limiting Matt Vertto. He's their starting "center" who during their current winning streak is shooting 45% from three. He has the potential to go nuclear and hit a bunch of treys. I think Oso should be more than a match for him. Tell Oso to run him off the line. He has some ability to put it on the floor but not against our level of defense. If Oso stays home, Veretto shouldn't be able to get shots off.

Vermont also has the conference player of the year on their team in  Finn Sullivan. His numbers are very muted for a conference POY and he doesn't seem all that potent on offense. Stick Stevie "Off Night" Mitchell on him and I think he'll be out of the picture.

Their defense struggled to stop America East opponents at times. We should eviscerate them on that end.

Game may have a smaller margin of victory than we expect just because of how SLOW Vermont is, but I expect us to be comfortably in control for 40 minutes.

Great write up. I think there is a good chance we can impose our pace on them with how active (and deep) our defense is. The key will be imposing our pace there to force them into "uncharacteristic" turnovers. Establish a good lead early and we can really force them into that sort of pace and get out of sorts.

Also just happy that "Off Nite" is catching on.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: warriorchick on March 13, 2023, 11:17:30 AM
Quote from: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 07:31:57 AM
St Joseph's College in Rennselaer Indiana , which is no longer around, were the Pumas.

Yep.  I went there my freshman year.  Being the only Pumas was one of our few claims to fame.

Based on the state of affairs at the school when I was there, I was surprised it actually survived another 35 years after I left.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 13, 2023, 11:21:45 AM
St Joseph's is still around. They are offering a bunch of unaccredited two year and certificate programs. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: warriorchick on March 13, 2023, 11:32:27 AM
Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on March 13, 2023, 11:21:45 AM
St Joseph's is still around. They are offering a bunch of unaccredited two year and certificate programs.

Is their campus still completely shut down?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 13, 2023, 11:33:39 AM
Quote from: warriorchick on March 13, 2023, 11:32:27 AM
Is their campus still completely shut down?

I don't believe so.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 13, 2023, 11:40:28 AM
Quote from: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 13, 2023, 10:48:41 AM
Watching some replays of their games, they have two guys who initiate the offense. Dylan Penn and Robin Duncan.

Penn will have the ball in hands more often than not. He's quick and strong enough to take (America East level) defenders off the bounce. If he can beat his man he is pretty craft around the hoop. If he can't, he goes into a post up and tries to back down his defender. He's skilled enough in the post that he can score on guards with his back to the basket. However, he is really doing that so he can see his four teammates on the perimeter and is looking for an open man to begin a series of quick perimeter passes which forces the defense to rotate and leads to open shots.

Duncan is a taller guard (6'5") and is the more creative passer of the two. He is good at skip passes and dump offs and is usually the guy who finds the open shooter. He himself can't shoot and his scoring is pretty limited. He is a smart player though and knows when and where to cut.

I think we will see OMax on Penn. His size and length should be more than enough to contain Penn and will neutralize his post up ability, meaning we won't need to help on him and can play him as a passer.  Duncan has some creative passing ability but I don't think his skip passes will work well against our guys, there will be plenty of interception opportunities. I'd put Kolek or Kam on Duncan and have them sag to dare him to shoot and take away his passing ability.

Other key to the game will be limiting Matt Vertto. He's their starting "center" who during their current winning streak is shooting 45% from three. He has the potential to go nuclear and hit a bunch of treys. I think Oso should be more than a match for him. Tell Oso to run him off the line. He has some ability to put it on the floor but not against our level of defense. If Oso stays home, Veretto shouldn't be able to get shots off.

Vermont also has the conference player of the year on their team in  Finn Sullivan. His numbers are very muted for a conference POY and he doesn't seem all that potent on offense. Stick Stevie "Off Night" Mitchell on him and I think he'll be out of the picture.

Their defense struggled to stop America East opponents at times. We should eviscerate them on that end.

Game may have a smaller margin of victory than we expect just because of how SLOW Vermont is, but I expect us to be comfortably in control for 40 minutes.

Having not seen them at all, How do they utilize Vertto?  Is he running of screens around the perimeter?  If so, is there someone else we can stick Oso on while we have OMax chase him around the perimeter like he did with Hawkins?  And then we use Stevie on Penn to stay in front and just don't budge on the back downs.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 11:47:35 AM
Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on March 13, 2023, 11:21:45 AM
St Joseph's is still around. They are offering a bunch of unaccredited two year and certificate programs.
It wasn't for a few years. Looks like it reopened as a juco?

Their most famous alums I think are Gol Hodges and Ed Vrdolyak.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: pbiflyer on March 13, 2023, 11:58:28 AM
I think this game is somewhat similar to our home game against Butler. We will basically drive to the basket and score whenever we really need to.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MU82 on March 13, 2023, 12:24:43 PM
Thanks for the scouting report, TAMU. If your current gig ever stops working for you, you have a future in scouting.

Looking forward to Friday's resounding victory, a nice start to our big tourney run.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Norm on March 13, 2023, 12:37:30 PM
Vermont roster by points per game:

Dylan Penn - 13.5 ppg - 54% FG, 33% 3P, 84% FT - Senior/3 years exp
Finn Sullivan 11.9 ppg - 43% FG, 33% 3P, 73% FT - Senior/5 years exp
Aaron Deloney - 11.6 ppg - 45% FG, 41% 3P, 72% FT - Senior/4 years exp
Matt Veretto - 8.8ppg - 51% FG, 42% 3P, 76% FT - Senior/2 years exp (3 year gap playing bball)
Robin Duncan - 7.8 ppg - 53% FG, 21% 3P, 47% FT - Senior/5 years exp
Kameron Gibson - 7.9 ppg - 45% FG, 37% 3P, 72% FT - Senior/5 years exp
TJ Hurley - 5.3 ppg - 40% FG, 44% #P, 100% FT - Freshman/1 year exp
Nick Fioillo - 4.5 ppg - 41% FG, 17% 3P, 56% FT - Junior/3 years exp
Ileri Ayo-Faleye - 3.1 ppg - 38% FG, 50% 3P, 72% FT - Sophomore/2 year exp
Sam Alamutu - 2.4 ppg - 60% FG, 100% 3P, 25% FT - Freshman/1 year exp
Perry Smith Jr. - 2.0 ppg - 43% FG, 0% #P, 30% FT - Freshman/1 year exp

During the season all the players listed above averaged 10+ minutes per game, but the bottom four only averaged about 2-3 minutes per game in their conference tournament.

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: barfolomew on March 13, 2023, 12:39:26 PM
Watching them on YouTube, I am not overly concerned about the Catamounts.

On defense, I see Kam and Tyler getting to the rack at will without fear of a shot blocker.
If there is an NCAA tourney record for scoop shots, we may break it.

On offense, they seem to rely on capitalizing on slow/bad switches, which is NOT us.
They average just 9.3 turnovers a game, but I'd put the over at 16 on Friday.

This will not be close.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: nyg on March 13, 2023, 12:49:21 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 13, 2023, 12:37:30 PM
Vermont roster by points per game:

Dylan Penn - 13.5 ppg - 54% FG, 33% 3P, 84% FT - Senior/3 years exp
Finn Sullivan 11.9 ppg - 43% FG, 33% 3P, 73% FT - Senior/5 years exp
Aaron Deloney - 11.6 ppg - 45% FG, 41% 3P, 72% FT - Senior/4 years exp
Matt Veretto - 8.8ppg - 51% FG, 42% 3P, 76% FT - Senior/2 years exp (3 year gap playing bball)
Robin Duncan - 7.8 ppg - 53% FG, 21% 3P, 47% FT - Senior/5 years exp
Kameron Gibson - 7.9 ppg - 45% FG, 37% 3P, 72% FT - Senior/5 years exp
TJ Hurley - 5.3 ppg - 40% FG, 44% #P, 100% FT - Freshman/1 year exp
Nick Fioillo - 4.5 ppg - 41% FG, 17% 3P, 56% FT - Junior/3 years exp
Ileri Ayo-Faleye - 3.1 ppg - 38% FG, 50% 3P, 72% FT - Sophomore/2 year exp
Sam Alamutu - 2.4 ppg - 60% FG, 100% 3P, 25% FT - Freshman/1 year exp
Perry Smith Jr. - 2.0 ppg - 43% FG, 0% #P, 30% FT - Freshman/1 year exp

During the season all the players listed above averaged 10+ minutes per game, but the bottom four only averaged about 2-3 minutes per game in their conference tournament.

Yes, those are statistics against the likes of Albany, NJIT, Bryant, Binghamton, UMBC, not UCONN, Xavier, Creighton, Nova. Never the less not playing in a big arena as opposed to very small venues.

The only comp on the schedule is St.Marys, who pummeled them.  In that game, they did play numerous players, the bottom of their roster wouldn't be walk-ons on MU.
Boxscore:

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore/_/gameId/401489013

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: panda on March 13, 2023, 12:52:40 PM
Quote from: nyg on March 13, 2023, 12:49:21 PM
Yes, those are statistics against the likes of Albany, NJIT, Bryant, Binghamton, UMBC, not UCONN, Xavier, Creighton, Nova. Never the less not playing in a big arena as opposed to very small venues.

The only comp on the schedule is St.Marys, who pummeled them.  In that game, they did play numerous players, the bottom of their roster wouldn't be walk-ons on MU.
Boxscore:

https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/boxscore/_/gameId/401489013

Iona is a much better comp to us than st Mary's. Vermont lost on a neutral floor to them by like 25
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 12:54:16 PM
Quote from: barfolomew on March 13, 2023, 12:39:26 PM
Watching them on YouTube, I am not overly concerned about the Catamounts.

Do they have any highlight reels/mix tapes ala Dexter Akanno?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: nyg on March 13, 2023, 12:58:11 PM
Quote from: panda on March 13, 2023, 12:52:40 PM
Iona is a much better comp to us than st Mary's. Vermont lost on a neutral floor to them by like 25

St. Marys ranked 19 and believe a 6 seed, Iona who knows....

But you at least get the point, especially the neutral court.  Stats on this team are not relevant because the level of competition is so far below the BE.  I get that they are best in their conference and won a bunch in a row, but this team might win one game in the BE if they shoot 85% from three and the field.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: pbiflyer on March 13, 2023, 01:02:55 PM
Pick and roll all day long. And this may be Ben's big break out game.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: CountryRoads on March 13, 2023, 01:06:26 PM
Quote from: nyg on March 13, 2023, 12:58:11 PM
St. Marys ranked 19 and believe a 6 seed, Iona who knows....

But you at least get the point, especially the neutral court.  Stats on this team are not relevant because the level of competition is so far below the BE.  I get that they are best in their conference and won a bunch in a row, but this team might win one game in the BE if they shoot 85% from three and the field.

Without watching every game, it's hard to tell how much better they've gotten over the course of the year but yeah...pretty much anybody that's decent has blown them out of the water.

I remember we played them in 2017-2018 and I was pretty jacked to go to that game since I knew they were supposed to be good that year. They gave us a good game and hit a bunch of threes. We won by 10. Hoping that worse case scenario it ends up like that game.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: nyg on March 13, 2023, 01:12:50 PM
Quote from: CountryRoads on March 13, 2023, 01:06:26 PM
Without watching every game, it's hard to tell how much better they've gotten over the course of the year but yeah...pretty much anybody that's decent has blown them out of the water.

I remember we played them in 2017-2018 and I was pretty jacked to go to that game since I knew they were supposed to be good that year. They gave us a good game and hit a bunch of threes. We won by 10. Hoping that worse case scenario it ends up like that game.

I know...Watch, MU will win by 10 and I'll have to eat crow after all the barking I have done on this topic.  But after watching their conference final game and comparing them to MU and BE, I still think MU pulverizers them. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 13, 2023, 01:14:03 PM
Quote from: barfolomew on March 13, 2023, 12:39:26 PM
Watching them on YouTube, I am not overly concerned about the Catamounts.

On defense, I see Kam and Tyler getting to the rack at will without fear of a shot blocker.
If there is an NCAA tourney record for scoop shots, we may break it.

On offense, they seem to rely on capitalizing on slow/bad switches, which is NOT us.
They average just 9.3 turnovers a game, but I'd put the over at 16 on Friday.

This will not be close.

The pick and roll for Kam/Tyler and Oso should be lethal.  Kam and Tyler are good at getting to the bucket off a screen but if they are stopped by a body then Oso at the rim should be all day.  They have no one go prevent buckets at the basket.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: JakeBarnes on March 13, 2023, 01:18:41 PM
Sort of weird that USC played Vermont earlier this year. Only won by 2. So theoretical matchup there that could happen.

I am going to hope it doesn't, but definitely a quirk in the scheduling.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: panda on March 13, 2023, 01:19:59 PM
Quote from: nyg on March 13, 2023, 12:58:11 PM
St. Marys ranked 19 and believe a 6 seed, Iona who knows....

But you at least get the point, especially the neutral court.  Stats on this team are not relevant because the level of competition is so far below the BE.  I get that they are best in their conference and won a bunch in a row, but this team might win one game in the BE if they shoot 85% from three and the field.

To clarify - we're stylistically much more similar to Iona than St. Mary's.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 01:25:20 PM
My only concern is Vermont plays zone and we play really dumb against it.  Their only hope is to muck it up, get hot from 3, and hope to pull out a close one.

If Marquette plays like the first BET game, it'll be close.  If they play with the same poise, confidence, and intensity we saw in the other two BET games, it'll be a comfortable victory.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: nyg on March 13, 2023, 01:26:28 PM
Quote from: panda on March 13, 2023, 01:19:59 PM
To clarify - we're stylistically much more similar to Iona than St. Mary's.

Here is the last thing I'll mention/attach and it could happen.  But MU on a roll and Shaka will be teeing the team up, the matchup is well in MU's favor.

At least its a good read prior to Friday and gives some context 

https://www.ncaa.com/news/basketball-men/article/2022-03-17/history-2-seeds-vs-15-seeds-march-madness

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MU82 on March 13, 2023, 01:36:13 PM
Trying to decide who will score most in this one -- Kam, TK, O-Max or Oso.

I think I'll go with Oso getting a season-high 20 points (or maybe even besting his career high, 22). Kolek will get double-digit assists, largely because nobody will be able to stop Oso's dunks, layups and short hooks.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Skatastrophy on March 13, 2023, 01:41:53 PM
Quote from: MU82 on March 13, 2023, 01:36:13 PM
Trying to decide who will score most in this one -- Kam, TK, O-Max or Oso.

I think I'll go with Oso getting a season-high 20 points (or maybe even besting his career high, 22). Kolek will get double-digit assists, largely because nobody will be able to stop Oso's dunks, layups and short hooks.

Sean Jones could eat them alive with his speed. Same with Stevie.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: willie warrior on March 13, 2023, 01:43:23 PM
Quote from: pbiflyer on March 13, 2023, 01:02:55 PM
Pick and roll all day long. And this may be Ben's big break out game.
He sure needs one. Hasn't done squat in quite a while
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: RJax55 on March 13, 2023, 02:01:24 PM
Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 01:25:20 PM
My only concern is Vermont plays zone and we play really dumb against it.  Their only hope is to muck it up, get hot from 3, and hope to pull out a close one.

MU is difficult to zone because Oso and Kolek are such good passers and the rest of our teams moves well without the ball. When teams have gone zone against us, Kolek has been going right to the middle. Now, he's at the top of the key with a variety of options. And, Vermont doesn't have the size to keep the ball out of the middle. Please Vermont, go zone.

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: RJax55 on March 13, 2023, 02:04:32 PM
Quote from: pbiflyer on March 13, 2023, 01:02:55 PM
Pick and roll all day long. And this may be Ben's big break out game.

I don't see Ben playing a lot of minutes in this game. I would expect MU to go small if Oso were to get in foul trouble.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 13, 2023, 02:05:30 PM
Quote from: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 01:25:20 PM
My only concern is Vermont plays zone and we play really dumb against it.  Their only hope is to muck it up, get hot from 3, and hope to pull out a close one.

If Marquette plays like the first BET game, it'll be close.  If they play with the same poise, confidence, and intensity we saw in the other two BET games, it'll be a comfortable victory.

I think they would struggle to play a zone against us for a few reasons

1) Marquette is good at forcing turnovers (even against teams that don't turn it over) and getting buckets in transition.

2) They are small and not athletic.  Marquette countered the zone at MSG by putting Kolek at the free throw line to catch and attack or lob.  The Big East teams can prevent the lob but Vermont has no one to do that against Oso or even OMax and Kolek won't be bothered by a shot blocker.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Miss Katie’s on March 13, 2023, 02:06:52 PM
View from the opposing fans if anyone has interest...

http://thenamesvermont.blogspot.com/2023/03/marquette-vs-vermont-rapid-react.html?m=1
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 13, 2023, 02:26:12 PM
I predict a big time pick and roll game. When they inevitably have to start doubling the roll man, Joplin, Kam, Stevie, Chase will bury them with 3s.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: mreezybreezy on March 13, 2023, 02:36:39 PM
Pretty clear at this point Marquette has given up losing for Lent, and Easter falls well after the championship game this year!!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion
Post by: Goatherder on March 13, 2023, 02:37:37 PM
Quote from: avid1010 on March 13, 2023, 06:53:41 AM
Yup...long time ago...had to be 6+ years as I was childless.  My wife and I went down to MKE for the wknd to see the Christmas Carol and a MU game.  We were checking into the Hilton as thy were, and I said something to her like "they must be a D3 team in town to play MSOE or Concordia."  Then I saw some Vermont gear...

If I remember correctly, they had a win or two many years ago with a really solid coach.  Brennan, Brennehan, or something. 

MU only an 11 point favorite.  Pressure the hell out of them, and funnel everything to Oso?  If I'm Vermont...I'm running 5 out...with 5 shooters...and hoping to hit a ton of 3s.

We played them once long ago at the Mecca because the BC was not available.  They were also noted for having one of the toughest trips to their game ever.  They played at Dayton, then had to fly out west somewhere, but the flight got cancelled because of the weather.  They ended up hopping to a string of different cities before arriving late the night before the game.  Ah, the struggles of a low major.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Norm on March 13, 2023, 02:39:07 PM
Quote from: Miss Katie's on March 13, 2023, 02:06:52 PM
View from the opposing fans if anyone has interest...

http://thenamesvermont.blogspot.com/2023/03/marquette-vs-vermont-rapid-react.html?m=1

They seem to like their chances against MU. Focusing on MU's lack of traditional big man and not so great rebounding. They also claim their defense drives the team so that will help against MU.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 13, 2023, 02:48:07 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 13, 2023, 02:39:07 PM
They seem to like their chances against MU. Focusing on MU's lack of traditional big man and not so great rebounding. They also claim their defense drives the team so that will help against MU.

Vermont
99th KenPom Offense
153rd KenPom Defense

If Vermont makes this a game it will likely be because of their pace and offense, not defense.

Marquette
8th KenPom Offense
47th KenPom Defense
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PointWarrior on March 13, 2023, 02:50:18 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 13, 2023, 02:39:07 PM
They seem to like their chances against MU. Focusing on MU's lack of traditional big man and not so great rebounding. They also claim their defense drives the team so that will help against MU.


it's very cute they think they have a chance...
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MarquetteDano on March 13, 2023, 02:53:18 PM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 13, 2023, 02:50:18 PM

it's very cute they think they have a chance...

They have a chance.. if you gave me 25-1 odds on Vermont winning I would take Vermont.

But 150+ defense on KenPom is no bueno. That is Wojo level defense!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 03:11:48 PM
I agree with all the points about how Marquette should attack the zone.  I'm a big believer that the key to beating a zone is passing and movement.  Kolek and Oso give us two great hubs vs zone.

Their only hope would be the zone disrupts us mentally.  Poor shot selection against a set defense and they clean the defensive glass, then we could have a real grinder.

If Marquette stays poised, runs their zone offense correctly, and takes good shots then MU should come out on top.

Plus, I'm still confident our defense can disrupt them on offense more than they can disrupt us.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 13, 2023, 03:20:00 PM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 13, 2023, 02:50:18 PM

it's very cute they think they have a chance...

They certainly have a chance, remember texas to albiene Christian had a certain coach?

Or any of these all of whom the 2 seed went in very cocky:

1991   Richmond def. Syracuse   73-69

1993   Santa Clara def. Arizona   64-61

1997   Coppin State def. South Carolina   78-65

2001   Hampton def. Iowa State   58-57

2012   Lehigh def. Duke   75-70

2012   Norfolk State def. Missouri   86-84

2013   Florida Gulf Coast def. Georgetown   78-68

2016   Middle Tennessee def. Michigan State   90-81

2021   Oral Roberts def. Ohio State   75-72

2022   Saint Peter's def. Kentucky 85-79

Not saying I don't think we win, but 15 seeds have certainly gotten better and less prone to rolling over as of late.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MU82 on March 13, 2023, 03:22:04 PM
What's really impressive about that list is the number of 15 seeds who defeated 2 seeds twice in the same tournament!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: NCMUFan on March 13, 2023, 03:22:58 PM
Awesome it is on CBS.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 13, 2023, 03:24:30 PM
Quote from: MU82 on March 13, 2023, 03:22:04 PM
What's really impressive about that list is the number of 15 seeds who defeated 2 seeds twice in the same tournament!

;D
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Juan Anderson's Mixtape on March 13, 2023, 03:38:10 PM
Two of those 15 seed winners also had future NBA players.  Steve Nash at Santa Clara and CJ McCollum at Lehigh.  McCollum in particular was key to that upset.  IIRC, he hung 30 on Duke.

Vermont doesn't have anyone of that caliber.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Its DJOver on March 13, 2023, 03:44:10 PM
Kyle O'Quinn was on that Norfolk State team too.  Certainly not to the level of Nash or McCollum, but a future NBA player nonetheless.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MarquetteDano on March 13, 2023, 03:56:50 PM
I don't like that Vermont doesn't turn it over.  That is one of the keys of our defense.

I do like that they are a very poor offensive rebounding team.  They only get 20% of their misses, which is awful.  That really hides one of big defensive issues.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 13, 2023, 03:57:57 PM
So 12 didnt have an NBA guy to go nuts, again I'm not saying I think we lose but I'm definitely not going to go in thinking "bring on Michigan St or USC!"
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: panda on March 13, 2023, 04:12:46 PM
Quote from: MarquetteDano on March 13, 2023, 03:56:50 PM
I don't like that Vermont doesn't turn it over.  That is one of the keys of our defense.

I do like that they are a very poor offensive rebounding team.  They only get 20% of their misses, which is awful.  That really hides one of big defensive issues.

Iona turns up the pressure in the half and full court like we do and they turned it over a ton that game.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 13, 2023, 04:21:27 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 13, 2023, 12:37:30 PM
Vermont roster by points per game:

Dylan Penn
Finn Sullivan 30 minutes, 2/7 from the field, 1/5 from 3, 6 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists, 1 turnover
Aaron Deloney 19 minutes, 2/8 from the field, 0/3 from 3, 2 rebounds, 1 turnover
Matt Veretto
Robin Duncan 19 minutes, 2/3 from the field, 1/1 from 3, 2 assists
Kameron Gibson
TJ Hurley
Nick Fioillo 7 minutes, 0/1 from the field, 0/1 from 3, 1 assist, 1 steal
Ileri Ayo-Faleye
Sam Alamutu
Perry Smith Jr.

Stats from the players who played in last year's 4 point loss to Arkansas in the NCAA Tournament as a 13 seed.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: willie warrior on March 13, 2023, 04:34:57 PM
Quote from: Miss Katie's on March 13, 2023, 02:06:52 PM
View from the opposing fans if anyone has interest...

http://thenamesvermont.blogspot.com/2023/03/marquette-vs-vermont-rapid-react.html?m=1
Yep. They seem pretty confident. F#$k em.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: brewcity77 on March 13, 2023, 04:36:41 PM
Vermont looks like a tourney darling on paper, but I think they are more of a paper tiger in that regard (as much as a 15 can be).

Sorting T-Rank, I compared them to Marquette against quadrants:

Q1+2 - Marquette #7 / Vermont #211
Q3+4 - Marquette #29 / Vermont #85

They are a team that was terrible when matched up against high-level opponents and high-major talent. The positives in their analytic rankings are all based on pounding a weak America East (#25 ranked conference per kenpom). Admittedly, Marquette had some "play with their food" tendency against weaker opposition like Vermont, but I don't think focus will be an issue in the NCAA Tournament.

They will slow the pace, don't turn it over, and are a decent shooting team, but I just don't see the defense to slow our offense. If they had a lights-out offense, maybe they would have a chance, but this isn't a team that will be able to score with us considering their defensive deficiencies.

There will also be a lot of talk about their age. While they do have plenty of D1 experience in terms of years, this isn't last year's Vermont team that played Arkansas close. Four of the five starters from that team are gone. Most of what's left are guys that were good enough to win the America East, but not good enough to play on last year's team.

Nothing is guaranteed. If they can slow it enough and have a hot shooting night, anything's possible. But while they shot 36.2% as a team on the season, that number was just 29.2% against Q1+2 opponents like Marquette. Their offense is #99 overall, but #232 against Q1+2. I think this is a team we beat relatively comfortably, somewhere in the 8-13 range, and if we play like we have in Big East play, it won't be that close.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: HowardsWorld on March 13, 2023, 04:52:39 PM
Quote from: Norm on March 13, 2023, 02:39:07 PM
They seem to like their chances against MU. Focusing on MU's lack of traditional big man and not so great rebounding. They also claim their defense drives the team so that will help against MU.

What are they supposed to say, that their team is going to get taken to the woodshed?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 13, 2023, 04:55:09 PM
Scoop is basically saying the same thing as they are.  Slow it down, don't turn it over, get hot, and see if you can steal one in a close game down the stretch.  That's what they'll try to do.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wisblue on March 13, 2023, 05:37:52 PM
March Madness NCAA Bracket Busters: Cinderella teams in position to pull off an upset
https://sports.yahoo.com/march-madness-ncaa-bracket-busters-cinderella-teams-in-position-to-pull-off-an-upset-175221299.html

This guy sees Vermont as a "pesky draw".
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 05:42:47 PM
Quote from: HowardsWorld on March 13, 2023, 04:52:39 PM
What are they supposed to say, that their team is going to get taken to the woodshed?
Didn't check their site, anyone named NoLongerCatamounts there? If so, they would say it.

Side note on how they became the Catamounts:

On February 6, 1926, the UVM Cynic (the student newspaper) asked undergraduates whether they wanted a mascot and offered a ballot with lynx, wildcat, or other as options. They received a limited response. So, they tried again with a vote later in the year. Only male students were allowed to vote and the ballot this time included tomcat, camel, cow, or catamount. Catamount won by a vote of 138-126.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: forgetful on March 13, 2023, 07:17:53 PM
Quote from: wadesworld on March 13, 2023, 04:55:09 PM
Scoop is basically saying the same thing as they are.  Slow it down, don't turn it over, get hot, and see if you can steal one in a close game down the stretch.  That's what they'll try to do.

+1

And if you are them, and you know you struggle against big teams that offensive rebound well, you are also looking at MU compared to the other 2's and thinking...well at least they aren't big, strong offensive rebounding behemoths.

They seemed pretty rationale. They probably do match up the best against us compared to the other 2's when you compare their weaknesses to the strengths of the 2 seeds.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: TSmith34, Inc. on March 13, 2023, 07:48:52 PM
Quote from: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 05:42:47 PM
Didn't check their site, anyone named NoLongerCatamounts there? If so, they would say it.

Side note on how they became the Catamounts:

On February 6, 1926, the UVM Cynic (the student newspaper) asked undergraduates whether they wanted a mascot and offered a ballot with lynx, wildcat, or other as options. They received a limited response. So, they tried again with a vote later in the year. Only male students were allowed to vote and the ballot this time included tomcat, camel, cow, or catamount. Catamount won by a vote of 138-126.
When I think of Vermont, the first thing that comes to mind is a camel.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: tower912 on March 13, 2023, 08:03:34 PM
You can vote for a new name, but no votes for Warriors will be accepted.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 13, 2023, 08:20:43 PM
Quote from: lawdog77 on March 13, 2023, 05:42:47 PM
the ballot this time included tomcat, camel, cow, or catamount. Catamount won by a vote of 138-126.

138-126 against the field?  Or they nearly became the cow's?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: BLWarrior91 on March 14, 2023, 07:37:05 AM
Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 13, 2023, 08:20:43 PM
138-126 against the field?  Or they nearly became the cow's?

Camel instantly comes to mind when you think of Vermont.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Daniel on March 14, 2023, 03:13:04 PM
Someone said Vermont is ranked 200 in defense.... Is that true??
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Uncle Rico on March 14, 2023, 03:14:32 PM
Quote from: Daniel on March 14, 2023, 03:13:04 PM
Someone said Vermont is ranked 200 in defense.... Is that true??

153rd in KenPom overall.  191st in effective fg% defense
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MDMU04 on March 14, 2023, 03:52:31 PM
Seems like the mismatch of the game, if i'm being honest
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 14, 2023, 04:05:53 PM
Kam and O Max should be able to get to the rim whenever they want. And without a shot blocker, at 6'4" and 6'8" they should have no problem finishing.

Just don't settle for jumpers and Marquette will me more than fine.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wisblue on March 14, 2023, 05:41:53 PM
March Madness: 5 squads in danger of busting brackets with early NCAA tournament exits
https://sports.yahoo.com/march-madness-5-squads-in-danger-of-busting-brackets-with-early-ncaa-tournament-exits-221802715.html

This guy has Marquette on Upset Alert.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 14, 2023, 06:00:26 PM
I'll wait to see where the sharps lay their money. Public just looking for the next St. Peter's

Fade the public, especially in the NCAA tourney
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 08:20:40 AM
Some random cinderella dork on Titus show has Vermont as his upset pick.

Says that Marquette is better than St Johns but just like them in that we cant defend unless a team turns it over.

That was it, that was the analysis.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 08:26:06 AM
Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 08:20:40 AM
Some random cinderella dork on Titus show has Vermont as his upset pick.
Titus might be the least knowledgeable college basketball head out there. His national champion has been knocked out in the first weekend like 4 years running. He's trying to be a comedian not an analyst.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 09:20:45 AM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 08:26:06 AM
Titus might be the least knowledgeable college basketball head out there. His national champion has been knocked out in the first weekend like 4 years running. He's trying to be a comedian not an analyst.

Well, Titus has MU going to the Final Four so I guess we're screwed.

The good thing is you're not really right, but that's okay and pretty expected.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 09:37:07 AM
Quote from: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 09:20:45 AM
Well, Titus has MU going to the Final Four so I guess we're screwed.

The good thing is you're not really right, but that's okay and pretty expected.
From his own twitter account:

My last four national champ picks:

2018 – Virginia loses in 1st round
2019 – UVA wins national title
2021 – Ohio State withdraws due to COVID
2022 – Kentucky loses in 1st round

No sugar coating it: This is a legacy year. Biggest bracket of my life on tomorrow's show.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 15, 2023, 09:41:56 AM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 09:37:07 AM
From his own twitter account:

My last four national champ picks:

2018 – Virginia loses in 1st round
2019 – UVA wins national title
2021 – Ohio State withdraws due to COVID
2022 – Kentucky loses in 1st round

No sugar coating it: This is a legacy year. Biggest bracket of my life on tomorrow's show.


Ohio State didn't "withdraw due to COVID" in 2021. They lost to Oral Roberts in the first round.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 09:43:47 AM
Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on March 15, 2023, 09:41:56 AM

Ohio State didn't "withdraw due to COVID" in 2021. They lost to Oral Roberts in the first round.
That's his joke. That's why I said he's an unserious analyst and more of a comedian. Thanks.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 15, 2023, 09:48:07 AM
Quote from: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 09:20:45 AM
Well, Titus has MU going to the Final Four so I guess we're screwed.

The good thing is you're not really right, but that's okay and pretty expected.

Nah it's only if he had us as champs that we'd be screwed
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 15, 2023, 09:55:29 AM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 09:43:47 AM
That's his joke. That's why I said he's an unserious analyst and more of a comedian. Thanks.

Gotcha. I guess I expect jokes to be funny, but alas...
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 09:57:45 AM
Quote from: Galway Eagle on March 15, 2023, 09:48:07 AM
Nah it's only if he had us as champs that we'd be screwed

Yeah I was more saying that if Titus is the least knowledgeable analyst out there and his bracket is always hot garbage (because that's definitely a great method to determine who "knows ball"), then we're in trouble because he thinks we'll be advancing pretty deep.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 09:59:35 AM
Quote from: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 09:57:45 AM
Yeah I was more saying that if Titus is the least knowledgeable analyst out there and his bracket is always hot garbage (because that's definitely a great method to determine who "knows ball"), then we're in trouble because he thinks we'll be advancing pretty deep.
I think champ out in the first weekend (first round really for him) is definitely a sign that dude doesn't know ball.

If a team is so flawed they are getting upset in Rd 1 and you picked them to win the whole thing you don't know what you're talking about.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 10:25:31 AM
Quote from: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 09:59:35 AM
I think champ out in the first weekend (first round really for him) is definitely a sign that dude doesn't know ball.

If a team is so flawed they are getting upset in Rd 1 and you picked them to win the whole thing you don't know what you're talking about.

He picked two one seeds (one of which won it all) and two two seeds.  Let me guess.  You've picked Kansas, Baylor, covid, Virginia, Nova, UNC, Nova, Duke, UCONN, Louisville (and predicted it'd be vacated later), Kentucky, UCONN, Duke since 2010, in order from most recent to 2010?  And you filled them out ahead of the seasons, so when there wasn't even covid19 you knew ahead of time.

What we really need is college basketball podcasts led by the people who don't follow the sport but win their office pools by picking teams based on uniform colors or mascots.  Those people definitely know ball.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lake on March 15, 2023, 10:30:09 AM
Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 08:20:40 AM
Some random cinderella dork on Titus show has Vermont as his upset pick.

Says that Marquette is better than St Johns but just like them in that we cant defend unless a team turns it over.

That was it, that was the analysis.

Jake Marsh is a Vermont homer, of course he's going to pick UVM.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 10:31:06 AM
Quote from: lake on March 15, 2023, 10:30:09 AM
Jake Marsh is a Vermont homer, of course he's going to pick UVM.

Yeah, I think he was their radio play by play or something for a bit.  Traveled with the team and everything.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2023, 10:55:05 AM
I know some of us are probably to the point where we are starting to get jitters.

Marquette needs to get over that tournament hump and the wait is just agonizing. Factor in Vermont being on a 15 game win streak with the line seemingly dropping each day and that doesn't help the nerves.

Here's the thing. Marquette is simply put, the better team by a wide margin.  That doesn't guarantee anything, but Marquette is 19-2 since Christmas (in the Big Freakin' East). I'll still be anxious up until the final buzzer but I fully trust this team to come out and bring it from the tip.  Can't wait!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PointWarrior on March 15, 2023, 10:59:47 AM
Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 08:20:40 AM
Some random cinderella dork on Titus show has Vermont as his upset pick.

Says that Marquette is better than St Johns but just like them in that we cant defend unless a team turns it over.

That was it, that was the analysis.

Ask UConn or Xavier if Marquette can defend.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PointWarrior on March 15, 2023, 11:00:59 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2023, 10:55:05 AM
I know some of us are probably to the point where we are starting to get jitters.

Marquette needs to get over that tournament hump and the wait is just agonizing. Factor in Vermont being on a 15 game win streak with the line seemingly dropping each day and that doesn't help the nerves.

Here's the thing. Marquette is simply put, the better team by a wide margin.  That doesn't guarantee anything, but Marquette is 19-2 since Christmas (in the Big Freakin' East). I'll still be anxious up until the final buzzer but I fully trust this team to come out and bring it from the tip.  Can't wait!


If Marquette played vermonts's schedule, they would be undefeated. 

Vermont lost to Yale by 29.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: LloydsLegs on March 15, 2023, 11:07:57 AM
Quote from: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 10:31:06 AM
Yeah, I think he was their radio play by play or something for a bit.  Traveled with the team and everything.

Yes- and he said that is the only reason he picked them- and picks them every year.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 11:08:54 AM
Quote from: lake on March 15, 2023, 10:30:09 AM
Jake Marsh is a Vermont homer, of course he's going to pick UVM.

It wasnt Marsh

Its some guy who only attends mid major games making him "a mid major" expert. Which kinda collapses since he isnt watching the big dogs play.

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: StillAWarrior on March 15, 2023, 11:13:17 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles03 on March 15, 2023, 10:55:05 AM
I know some of us are probably to the point where we are starting to get jitters.

Marquette needs to get over that tournament hump and the wait is just agonizing.

I'm sure the wait is agonizing for the team too. This is one of the reasons I am astounded that there were/are fans out there who say, "I'd rather lose in the first round of the Big East tournament so our guys will have time to rest up for the NCAA tournament." Honestly, it's one of of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard a fan say. I really think that our guys will be fine with five full days of rest. I'm pretty they'd have been OK even if we had been slotted into one of the Thursday locations. To lose early in the BET and have 7+ days off? No thank you.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 15, 2023, 11:28:45 AM
If we didn't get our doors blown off our last three tourney appearances, as a collective I think there would be much less worry.

I just want that first one out of the way, after that it's golden.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: mugrack on March 15, 2023, 11:40:19 AM
Keep the disrespect coming. The team feeds off of it.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Jay Bee on March 15, 2023, 11:55:01 AM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 15, 2023, 10:59:47 AM
Ask UConn or Xavier if Marquette can defend.

Not on a sustained basis aina
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: StillWarriors on March 15, 2023, 11:57:27 AM
Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 11:08:54 AM
It wasnt Marsh

Its some guy who only attends mid major games making him "a mid major" expert. Which kinda collapses since he isnt watching the big dogs play.

He also has been horrendous on his betting recommendations on games. I credit his hustle and coming up with a different angle of "finding Cinderella," but an expert he is not.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 94Warrior on March 15, 2023, 01:05:32 PM
Quote from: tower912 on March 13, 2023, 09:40:34 AM
Pull Ellis's red-shirt and really mess these guys up.


What a terrible idea.  MU will be fine.

Ellis hasn't worn him warmups in weeks.  He sits on the bench, in uniform, as if he just came out of the game for a quick blow.

If we got into foul/injury trouble, and are in a close game, where playing Ellis could be the difference between going home, or advancing- you absolutely pull his shirt off.  Luckily, he isn't wearing a warmup with nothing under it.  He's in uniform, and ready to go!

I'm not going to worry about 4 years from now, if we have a chance at a Final 4.  I doubt Emarion or Shaka would worry about the future either.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 15, 2023, 01:09:04 PM
I don't think EE plays in any circumstances.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lawdog77 on March 15, 2023, 01:10:45 PM
Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on March 15, 2023, 01:09:04 PM
I don't think EE plays in any circumstances.
I think if there is a brawl an 7 MU players were ejected, EE plays
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 94Warrior on March 15, 2023, 02:09:24 PM
Of course, nobody is predicting he's going to play.  But, if Shaka NEEDS him, he'll play him.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: lake on March 15, 2023, 02:19:30 PM
Quote from: PGsHeroes32 on March 15, 2023, 11:08:54 AM
It wasnt Marsh

Its some guy who only attends mid major games making him "a mid major" expert. Which kinda collapses since he isnt watching the big dogs play.

Yeah I just caught up on today's ep, him liking three 15 seeds is absurd. That guy has a tweet saying one of the reasons UVM will win is because they rebound well, so not sure where he gets his info.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Miss Katie’s on March 15, 2023, 02:49:49 PM
Quote from: lake on March 15, 2023, 02:19:30 PM
Yeah I just caught up on today's ep, him liking three 15 seeds is absurd. That guy has a tweet saying one of the reasons UVM will win is because they rebound well, so not sure where he gets his info.

They say that in their game preview as well...

http://thenamesvermont.blogspot.com/2023/03/ncaa-tournament-preview-15-vermont-vs-2.html?m=1
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: FairWeatherEagle on March 15, 2023, 03:02:31 PM
After watching a few Youtube highlights on Vermont:
1. Teams always look a bit pedestrian when you see them playing in an oversized high-school gym. Its deceptive, looked like Hoosiers regular season.
2. #15 is good....probably on the level of a decent shooting forward in the Big East. POY in their league. But no Wally Szczerbiak....he can't just win it for them.
3. their Point with the dreads is decent. But we've played against better.

How do we possibly lose:
"lid on the basket" + "crazy awkward turnovers" + "they shoot lights out"+"foul trouble"
BUT even if every one of those things happens in the first half....we would get it together and make it right. Losing to Vermont is almost another universe.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: MarquetteDano on March 15, 2023, 04:01:55 PM
Quote from: lake on March 15, 2023, 02:19:30 PM
Yeah I just caught up on today's ep, him liking three 15 seeds is absurd. That guy has a tweet saying one of the reasons UVM will win is because they rebound well, so not sure where he gets his info.

They are very good DEFENSIVE rebounding team.  But a poor OFFENSIVE rebounding team.  Like really, really poor.  The latter are the teams that gives us fits on defense.  So, if they hold form, will limit our offensive rebounds.

We shoot well enough and take care of the basketball so that our offensive rebounding does not seem to matter too much.   I would be more concerned about a really good offensive rebounding team... which Vermont certainly is not.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: wadesworld on March 15, 2023, 04:10:11 PM
He becomes a "mid major expert" by picking a bunch of upsets.  If they don't hit it's a, "Well, I took a shot, we all know there will be upset, I just picked the wrong one."  When a 15 happens to win and he's the guy that made the pick (even if he picked 2 others incorrectly) it's a crazy good pick.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PointWarrior on March 15, 2023, 05:25:20 PM
but they are coming in on a 15 game win streak, they beat the murder's row of the lowly AE conference (with Kenpom ranking)

15 wins against:

UMBC            235
Maine      (2x)      282
New Hampshire      287
Bryant         210
Albany  (2x)      347
NJIT (3x)              331
Binghamton  (3x)   311
UMass Lowell (2x)    138


Vermont is the king of a crap conference.  Their cling to hope is they almost beat USC in one game.  Yale beat them by 29.

Marquette is the king of a top conference in basketball.  This will not be close without absurd abnormalities.

Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: tower912 on March 15, 2023, 06:16:59 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJL4cOp29-0

Coach Becker previews the game.   
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 5DollarPitcher on March 15, 2023, 07:30:40 PM
Quote from: PointWarrior on March 15, 2023, 05:25:20 PM
without absurd abnormalities.
Uh oh
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 15, 2023, 11:14:08 PM
It just kinda interesting to compare the confidence levels of this tourney run compared to say 2012.

I don't think there's much argument that this is Marquettes best team since the 2012 one (even though 2013 went further)

Maybe it was me being a naive and less cynical freshman, I had zero doubt that Marquette was gonna roll through BYU and Murray State, in Kentucky.

But even with a higher seed, better record, probably better all around team, I'm still so apprehensive about the first weekend.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: The Sultan on March 16, 2023, 03:30:52 AM
People were apprehensive about BYU here. It was similar, nervous apprehension to what we are reading about Vermont.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: 1SE on March 16, 2023, 03:36:05 AM
Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 15, 2023, 11:14:08 PM
It just kinda interesting to compare the confidence levels of this tourney run compared to say 2012.

I don't think there's much argument that this is Marquettes best team since the 2012 one (even though 2013 went further)

Maybe it was me being a naive and less cynical freshman, I had zero doubt that Marquette was gonna roll through BYU and Murray State, in Kentucky.

But even with a higher seed, better record, probably better all around team, I'm still so apprehensive about the first weekend.

Take two High Lifes and watch this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YjbukzAJvk&list=PLzqRtxGmacTdwekhBMqX6gnvg0QRxnDfQ&index=6

The cure for COLEitis. Trust me, I'm a doctor.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Galway Eagle on March 16, 2023, 07:37:05 AM
Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 15, 2023, 11:14:08 PM
It just kinda interesting to compare the confidence levels of this tourney run compared to say 2012.

I don't think there's much argument that this is Marquettes best team since the 2012 one (even though 2013 went further)

Maybe it was me being a naive and less cynical freshman, I had zero doubt that Marquette was gonna roll through BYU and Murray State, in Kentucky.

But even with a higher seed, better record, probably better all around team, I'm still so apprehensive about the first weekend.

I was terrified of that Murray St team. 30+ wins don't come east in any conference and they had a ton of experience.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 17, 2023, 09:14:53 AM
I know we've dabbled with chat rooms before .. this game might break MUScoop with the number of people watching from work, posting.

Test out this chat room:

https://y99.in/r/975199

password = Warriors
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: cheebs09 on March 17, 2023, 09:18:22 AM
Quote from: Galway Eagle on March 16, 2023, 07:37:05 AM
I was terrified of that Murray St team. 30+ wins don't come east in any conference and they had a ton of experience.

I also remember people being upset that we didn't know who our opponent was until Tues/Wed and they had a game under their belts already, with regards to BYU.

I think it's normal to be anxious, especially with our lack of success in March. This on paper seems like a good matchup for us and the team sounds ready. Now we just have to execute.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 17, 2023, 09:36:47 AM
Quote from: The Sultan of Semantics on March 16, 2023, 03:30:52 AM
People were apprehensive about BYU here. It was similar, nervous apprehension to what we are reading about Vermont.

Yeah that BYU team had a lot of people thinking we could lose. Probably due to their religion making a 14 seed a play in for the only time ever. But yeah we were a pretty trendy upset pick outside of scoop as well.

Manhandled them
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: SaveOD238 on March 17, 2023, 10:01:55 AM
Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 15, 2023, 11:14:08 PM
It just kinda interesting to compare the confidence levels of this tourney run compared to say 2012.

I don't think there's much argument that this is Marquettes best team since the 2012 one (even though 2013 went further)

Maybe it was me being a naive and less cynical freshman, I had zero doubt that Marquette was gonna roll through BYU and Murray State, in Kentucky.

But even with a higher seed, better record, probably better all around team, I'm still so apprehensive about the first weekend.

Recency bias is a helluva drug.  In 2012 we were coming off a great run to the Sweet 16 in 2011 where we took care of business against superior opponents (X and Cuse).  Under Buzz we rarely lost to teams that we were supposed to beat.  Of course we weren't worried about BYU and Murray St.

Since then, we've rolled into the NCAAs against a meh South Carolina team with a good defense and got steamrolled.  Then got steamrolled by a mid major.  Then got steam rolled against a meh UNC team that got hot at the right time.

This year's team is way better than either of those squads, and the opponent is not as strong.  But yeah, I've got the jitters too.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Lighthouse 84 on March 17, 2023, 10:31:18 AM
I can't even imagine what retired Warrior fans are going through.  I'm at my office and have a lot going on to keep me busy, but this is the longest morning I can remember, in a looooong time! 1:45 seems like such a long time from now!
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: SaveOD238 on March 17, 2023, 10:45:38 AM
Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on March 17, 2023, 10:31:18 AM
I can't even imagine what retired Warrior fans are going through.  I'm at my office and have a lot going on to keep me busy, but this is the longest morning I can remember, in a looooong time! 1:45 seems like such a long time from now!

Watch the women on ESPN2 to pass the time
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: rocky_warrior on March 17, 2023, 10:52:18 AM
Quote from: mu_hilltopper on March 17, 2023, 09:14:53 AM
might break MUScoop with the number of people watching from work, posting.

Whoa, you didn't just tell your boss that your OTHER job required you to to be absent yesterday & today?

Seriously though, I think I've taken these 2 days off of work for the past 20 years.  Why pretend to work?
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: FairWeatherEagle on March 17, 2023, 10:53:12 AM
Quote from: Lighthouse 84 on March 17, 2023, 10:31:18 AM
I can't even imagine what retired Warrior fans are going through.  I'm at my office and have a lot going on to keep me busy, but this is the longest morning I can remember, in a looooong time! 1:45 seems like such a long time from now!

Yeah, feel it too.  obviously MSUvUSC is a good watch at 11:15 to see who's who. In general I'm looking to see if one or the other wins big, plays confident and has good stats. that would concern me...otherwise we should beat either 4 out of 5 times.
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: mu_hilltopper on March 17, 2023, 11:07:40 AM
Quote from: rocky_warrior on March 17, 2023, 10:52:18 AM
Whoa, you didn't just tell your boss that your OTHER job required you to to be absent yesterday & today?

Seriously though, I think I've taken these 2 days off of work for the past 20 years.  Why pretend to work?

I forgot the air-quotes.

Working from home is always "working."
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: FairWeatherEagle on March 17, 2023, 12:54:18 PM
Less than an hour now.
GO MARQUETTE!!
(https://media.tenor.com/89S_LxnL5KwAAAAj/eagle-flying-eagle.gif)
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on March 17, 2023, 01:05:19 PM
Ugh my stomach is turning
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: Vander Blue Man Group on March 17, 2023, 01:13:41 PM
I'm irrationally nervous so hopefully we get off to a great start.

Really enjoying the benefits of "working" remotely today. 
Title: Re: Vermont Discussion Game Time 1:45 CT
Post by: GoldenEagles03 on March 17, 2023, 02:17:04 PM
https://twitter.com/claywsyx6/status/1636417359740301313?t=xD5ME1XlQhAim9rhf0Q1Aw&s=19

I'll have to look for it later but there was multiple videos I saw Kolek clutching his hand yesterday. You can briefly see it here just after the 15 second mark.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev