7 rbs, 3 assts, 4 stls, 2 blks, 10-12 fg, 1-1 3pt, 12-12 ft. 33 points on 12 shot attempts. Has there been a more efficient performance in modern NBA history? Wow.
That's a 100% free throw rate, correct?
Quote from: Marcus92 on October 20, 2018, 12:32:58 AM
That's a 100% free throw rate, correct?
Correct. FTA = FTA/FGA
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on October 20, 2018, 01:24:17 AM
Correct. FTA = FTA/FGA
I don't get into stats at all, but that doesn't seem mathematically correct. Except if there was 1 FGA. 😬
FTs no matta right?
Quote from: MUEng92 on October 20, 2018, 08:16:21 AM
I don't get into stats at all, but that doesn't seem mathematically correct. Except if there was 1 FGA. 😬
Free Throw Rate is the ratio of foul shots to field goal attempts, expressed as FTA/FGA. Kind of like a batting average in baseball.
In 2015, for example, the NCAA D1 FTR was .373, meaning that for every 100 shots from the field, college teams took, on average, 37 free throws.
Quote from: barfolomew on October 20, 2018, 08:44:46 AM
Free Throw Rate is the ratio of foul shots to field goal attempts, expressed as FTA/FGA. Kind of like a batting average in baseball.
In 2015, for example, the NCAA D1 FTR was .373, meaning that for every 100 shots from the field, college teams took, on average, 37 free throws.
I know that. I was ribbing him about the typo. FTA=FTA/FGA? Shouldn't that be FTR=FTA/FGA
Quote from: MUEng92 on October 20, 2018, 08:16:21 AM
I don't get into stats at all, but that doesn't seem mathematically correct. Except if there was 1 FGA. 😬
(http://i1.wp.com/gifrific.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Chris-Farley-Oh-God-Theyre-Gonna-Know-Im-Dumb-Conan-Interview.gif?ssl=1)