I am going out of character here, but I think this NIT experience has been a good for the future. My feelings on returning talent has not changed, but I believe success builds on itself. I stated last year, but more this year, I hope the guys learn how to win. So far, they are doing it.
My hope is the young guys learn how to win must win games. IMO, Wojo's teams lacked this skill until last couple of games. There is nothing better than winning as a team and everyone, without Rowsey, can build off this next year.
If they can keep it going, I think it is a major head start for next season. Winning is contagious and I hope they get the bug. I remember, I know back in the day, but losing was not acceptable. Who knows, maybe getting a taste of W's carries over to next season.
I agree...but was going to wait to say this until after they punch their NYC ticket. Hope you didn't jinx us
Great post, Goose. I was always in favor of playing in this if it was presented, but felt kind of "meh" on the whole thing. Now that it's here, I'm loving it. The games have been fun and the team seems loose and motivated. Let's get another W and head to MSG!
Frenns
I said tonight before the game because win or lose I think it has been a good experience. Equally as important, there seems to be some juice in the fan base, which I believe has been lacking, aside from the big games. I hope the students carryover excitement to next year, as well,
It has been a net positive. High stress games for a young team. Change in venue seems to have energized fans. Taken lemons, made lemonade.
I think you are correct, and hope we reap the benefits next year.
Well said goose.
Get to NYC without any more serious injuries.
I agree, Goose. Everybody knows a loss ends the season, and I don't think they're ready yet.
Speaking of which, there are only two Big East teams still playing in March.
Quote from: Goose on March 20, 2018, 05:27:01 PM
I am going out of character here, but I think this NIT experience has been a good for the future. My feelings on returning talent has not changed, but I believe success builds on itself. I stated last year, but more this year, I hope the guys learn how to win. So far, they are doing it.
My hope is the young guys learn how to win must win games. IMO, Wojo's teams lacked this skill until last couple of games. There is nothing better than winning as a team and everyone, without Rowsey, can build off this next year.
If they can keep it going, I think it is a major head start for next season. Winning is contagious and I hope they get the bug. I remember, I know back in the day, but losing was not acceptable. Who knows, maybe getting a taste of W's carries over to next season.
What "must win" games did they not win?
Who has said losing was acceptable?
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 20, 2018, 06:00:51 PM
What "must win" games did they not win?
Who has said losing was acceptable?
Depaul...
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on March 20, 2018, 06:09:53 PM
Depaul...
How? That game wouldn't have gotten then in the NCAAs.
The only real "must win" (in regards to the NCAAs) was Nova in the BET.
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 20, 2018, 06:32:16 PM
How? That game wouldn't have gotten then in the NCAAs.
The only real "must win" (in regards to the NCAAs) was Nova in the BET.
Is that a fact? Because assuming all else remains the same that'd mean we're the 3rd place BE team. You think they'd have taken 4-7 over no3?
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on March 20, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
Is that a fact? Because assuming all else remains the same that'd mean we're the 3rd place BE team. You think they'd have taken 4-7 over no3?
That's fair. I wasn't thinking about conference record/standing. I was looking purely at RPI, SOS, etc.
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on March 20, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
Is that a fact? Because assuming all else remains the same that'd mean we're the 3rd place BE team. You think they'd have taken 4-7 over no3?
The committee didn't look at conference standings. Marquette lacked a Top10-15 rpi win. They were way out of the tournament. Not close to being selected. The DePaul win wouldn't have been enough. The committee even said they weren't putting much emphasis on bad conference road losses.
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on March 20, 2018, 06:44:43 PM
Is that a fact? Because assuming all else remains the same that'd mean we're the 3rd place BE team. You think they'd have taken 4-7 over no3?
Wouldnt have mattered.
USC was denied (3rd in PAC12), but ASU (9th in PAC12) went to Dayton.
MU was like 8th team outish. Beating DePaul wouldn't have done much.
Theres next yearss point guard just dribbling it away
Quote from: Eldon on March 20, 2018, 07:06:56 PM
Wouldnt have mattered.
USC was denied (3rd in PAC12), but ASU (9th in PAC12) went to Dayton.
MU was like 8th team outish. Beating DePaul wouldn't have done much.
USC didn't beat a single tournament team all year we beat 5 so it's a bit different. Idk I just don't see it but I guess we'll never know
Quote from: Eldon on March 20, 2018, 07:06:56 PM
Wouldnt have mattered.
USC was denied (3rd in PAC12), but ASU (9th in PAC12) went to Dayton.
MU was like 8th team outish. Beating DePaul wouldn't have done much.
Correction, MU was the 5th to 8th team out. I'm also of the opinion that the difference between the last team in (Syracuse) and a 2 seed in the NIT was very small this season. One win could have been the difference between an NIT 2 seed and being in the tournament. I'm not sure if reversing DePaul or Georgia would have been enough, but finishing off the comeback against X or Nova certainly would have. All the games in between are up for debate.
Well. Another "must win" that we choked away. Young guys will never learn.
As well, seems more accepted losing.
Sad fanbase these days.
Quote from: Goose on March 20, 2018, 05:27:01 PM
I am going out of character here, but I think this NIT experience has been a good for the future. My feelings on returning talent has not changed, but I believe success builds on itself. I stated last year, but more this year, I hope the guys learn how to win. So far, they are doing it.
My hope is the young guys learn how to win must win games. IMO, Wojo's teams lacked this skill until last couple of games. There is nothing better than winning as a team and everyone, without Rowsey, can build off this next year.
If they can keep it going, I think it is a major head start for next season. Winning is contagious and I hope they get the bug. I remember, I know back in the day, but losing was not acceptable. Who knows, maybe getting a taste of W's carries over to next season.
I know some disagreed with me when I said a reasonable run in the NIT would be better than one and done in the NCAA for this team. I expect Sam and Greg to get healthy; expect the frosh to put on some weight and muscle. I hope Harry stays. I hope Murrow can help our defensive woes and Joey, Ike and Brandon can contribute as freshman.
Quote from: peterpan on March 20, 2018, 06:49:10 PM
The committee didn't look at conference standings. Marquette lacked a Top10-15 rpi win. They were way out of the tournament. Not close to being selected. The DePaul win wouldn't have been enough. The committee even said they weren't putting much emphasis on bad conference road losses.
Ok, so the must win was against Providence or Butler or X or V or SJU or it really does not matter the season is over. Let's look forward to a better season next year.
Quote from: brewcity77 on March 20, 2018, 05:30:17 PM
Great post, Goose. I was always in favor of playing in this if it was presented, but felt kind of "meh" on the whole thing. Now that it's here, I'm loving it. The games have been fun and the team seems loose and motivated. Let's get another W and head to MSG!
Agreed. Would have been both ignorant and arrogant to turn down.
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 20, 2018, 08:30:31 PM
Correction, MU was the 5th to 8th team out. I'm also of the opinion that the difference between the last team in (Syracuse) and a 2 seed in the NIT was very small this season. One win could have been the difference between an NIT 2 seed and being in the tournament. I'm not sure if reversing DePaul or Georgia would have been enough, but finishing off the comeback against X or Nova certainly would have. All the games in between are up for debate.
MU was in ND's bracket. ND was the first team out and thus the highest 1-seed in the NIT. Doesn't that make MU the lowest 2-seed?
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 20, 2018, 08:34:47 PM
Well. Another "must win" that we choked away. Young guys will never learn.
As well, seems more accepted losing.
Sad fanbase these days.
We didn't choke it away you fool. We lost a game to a more physical team playing with an additional day's rest when at least two of our critical players, most notably Sam, simply couldn't bring it anymore. Thanks for your non support.
Quote from: Eldon on March 20, 2018, 07:06:56 PM
Wouldnt have mattered.
Beating DePaul wouldn't have done much.
Beating DePaul would have put us in the 10-8 group in the BE. With the tiebreakers we'd have been third. We would have breezed in to the Dance.
Quote from: mileskishnish72 on March 21, 2018, 06:45:44 AM
Beating DePaul would have put us in the 10-8 group in the BE. With the tiebreakers we'd have been third. We would have breezed in to the Dance.
That's a metric that the committee doesn't look at. I think we needed a win against Xavier or Villanova. Maybe beating Georgia and DePaul would have done it. However, I think it was the lack of a top RPI win that did us in.
Quote from: jaygall31 on March 20, 2018, 08:49:28 PM
Agreed. Would have been both ignorant and arrogant to turn down.
Disagree. I did watch at least part of all of the games, but as I said earlier, the season was over when we did not make the NCAA.
My view is we neither reward nor accept mediocrity. These are not teams that would have helped us, had we played them in the regular season, in our quest to be an NCAA team. Like us, most were flawed.
I hope that what other posters said in here were right, that we gain something for next year. But with the injuries and the incoming change in personnel, I think we will have a different look and different set of issues next fall.
Quote from: Eldon on March 21, 2018, 06:30:49 AM
MU was in ND's bracket. ND was the first team out and thus the highest 1-seed in the NIT. Doesn't that make MU the lowest 2-seed?
No. Not how the NIT works. They place teams regionally while still keeping conference teams as separated at possible. That's why our region had a lot of Midwest/Northeast. The other had a lot of southeast. And the other side of the bracket was all west coast. Oregon drew the short straw because there were 5 P12 teams in the NIT
Quote from: jsglow on March 21, 2018, 06:36:08 AM
We didn't choke it away you fool. We lost a game to a more physical team playing with an additional day's rest when at least two of our critical players, most notably Sam, simply couldn't bring it anymore. Thanks for your non support.
Didn't think I needed the teal...
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 21, 2018, 08:07:50 AM
Didn't think I needed the teal...
If you don't track individual posters carefully, it is super easy to assume that it was a serious comment. Scoopers have posted far worse and meant it.
Quote from: dgies9156 on March 21, 2018, 07:42:34 AM
Disagree. I did watch at least part of all of the games, but as I said earlier, the season was over when we did not make the NCAA.
My view is we neither reward nor accept mediocrity. These are not teams that would have helped us, had we played them in the regular season, in our quest to be an NCAA team. Like us, most were flawed.
I hope that what other posters said in here were right, that we gain something for next year. But with the injuries and the incoming change in personnel, I think we will have a different look and different set of issues next fall.
This fails the logic test
Figurin' Mississippi St. woulda cleaned hour clock, hey?
Quote from: jesmu84 on March 21, 2018, 08:07:50 AM
Didn't think I needed the teal...
Sorry. If you meant it as 'teal', I apologize.