Given that the other McAdams thread was shut down prematurely, here are links to the latest back and forth between Lovell and McAdams in the Wall Street Journal:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/a-jesuit-school-gets-dogmatic-1515362173
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/marquette-responds-to-criticism-about-firing-1515705156
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fired-for-exposing-a-colleagues-misbehavior-1516123459
Quote from: Ellenson Guerrero on January 18, 2018, 09:02:27 AM
Given that the other McAdams thread was shut down prematurely, here are links to the latest back and forth between Lovell and McAdams in the Wall Street Journal:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/a-jesuit-school-gets-dogmatic-1515362173
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/marquette-responds-to-criticism-about-firing-1515705156
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/fired-for-exposing-a-colleagues-misbehavior-1516123459
"Michael Lovell claims I had "shamed" and "harassed" Ms. Abbate. But any journalist who exposes misconduct could be said to have "shamed" or "harassed" the subject of the reporting."
He isn't a reporter. He's a professor and member of a community. (I can't read the rest since I don't have a subscription. Perhaps he clarified this line of "thinking?")
This thread isn't going to end well
In before the lock!
This is why we can't have nice things. Or even mediocre things, like Rocky's 17 year old server.
Yeah, we're done with this topic.
EllensonG, I know you are dying to discuss this, wanting to get in your viewpoint another dozen times.
I prescribe three beef and cheddars for your woes.