Cardinals are healthy and look very good.
what was the final score? I can;t find it
It makes sense...West Va doesn't have Mbakwe and I've read that any loss can be attributed his absence.
Quote from: 79Warrior on January 10, 2008, 07:48:11 PM
Cardinals are healthy and look very good.
And West Virginia looked terrible just like they did at Notre Dame. Seems to me people are over-valuating teams simply because they are winning home games against teams that are terrible on the road.
This is the same Louisville team that lost to Cincinnati in Freedom Hall. Yes, the same Cincinnati team that beat Syracuse, which is also the team that has only 6 players and lost to Rhode Island and UMass in the Carrier Dome. And, by the way, the same Cincinnati team that lost to St. John's in Queens who then turned around and got crap smoked by Connecticut in Storrs, who I can virtually gurantee is going to get it handed to them when they visit DC this Saturday.
See a trend? And I'm not talking about Blackledge.
Quote from: Coobeys Oil Depot on January 10, 2008, 10:21:36 PM
Quote from: 79Warrior on January 10, 2008, 07:48:11 PM
Cardinals are healthy and look very good.
And West Virginia looked terrible just like they did at Notre Dame. Seems to me people are over-valuating teams simply because they are winning home games against teams that are terrible on the road.
This is the same Louisville team that lost to Cincinnati in Freedom Hall. Yes, the same Cincinnati team that beat Syracuse, which is also the team that has only 6 players and lost to Rhode Island and UMass in the Carrier Dome. And, by the way, the same Cincinnati team that lost to St. John's in Queens who then turned around and got crap smoked by Connecticut in Storrs, who I can virtually gurantee is going to get it handed to them when they visit DC this Saturday.
See a trend? And I'm not talking about Blackledge.
I agree. Never underestimate the home court.
Sure. The Ville is coasting. WV's Ruff (sp?) isn't shooting 99% (making a genius out of Huggins).