At center, skill sets being equal, would you rather have 7' and 230, or 6'9 and a muscular 250?
At PF, skill sets being equal, would you rather have 6'9 , 225 or 6'7 240?
If their skill sets are equal, what does it matter?
Quote from: tower912 on June 02, 2017, 10:13:32 AM
At center, skill sets being equal, would you rather have 7' and 230, or 6'9 and a muscular 250?
At PF, skill sets being equal, would you rather have 6'9 , 225 or 6'7 240?
Two 6'9" guys. One would be a banger, and the other a stretch player.
Honestly, depends entirely upon our guards ability to slash and/or shoot from range. Don't want any of it if at least the PF can't shoot from range.
Big men these days are primarily rim protectors, screeners, and as a stretch player(shoot consistently from range).
Whoever gets the easy rebounds....
Big man's game and it depends on neck girth, ai na?
Ox and Hank would have been quite the 4/5 combo.
Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on June 02, 2017, 11:39:34 AM
Ox and Hank would have been quite the 4/5 combo.
You mean in that they would have given up every point defensively that they would have scored on the other end?
Quote from: tower912 on June 02, 2017, 10:13:32 AM
At center, skill sets being equal, would you rather have 7' and 230, or 6'9 and a muscular 250?
At PF, skill sets being equal, would you rather have 6'9 , 225 or 6'7 240?
IMHO, I would like the 7' 230lb center and at PF a 6'7" 250lb beast.
Give me the reincarnation of Lloyd Moore!!!!!!
Most dangerous elbows in all of college basketball.
Quote from: 4everwarriors on June 02, 2017, 11:29:40 AM
Big man's game and it depends on neck girth, ai na?
I agree with this analysis.
Depends on the relative neck circumference.
Give me a tall and lean center and a wide and muscular PF. One protects the rim, the other cleans up the boards.
Quit body shaming.