MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: GoldenDieners32 on March 08, 2017, 02:35:54 PM

Title: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 08, 2017, 02:35:54 PM
We are a lock in the tourney man it feels good to be back but now we have to worry about where are we seeded. Right now Joe Lunardi has us as a 10 seed playing in Sacramento against South Carolina. CBSsports has us as a 10 seed to except we are playing Iowa State here 
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 08, 2017, 02:48:00 PM
My thoughts:

Between the 5 and 10 line, no one really scares me.  Sure, we could lose to pretty much any of them if we aren't shooting the ball well, but we could also beat any of them without playing our best game.  Avoiding the 8/9 and avoiding Kansas or UNC in the round of 32 would be ideal.  Give me the Zags all day long.  They're a better team than we are, but we beat that team 4/10 times on a neutral court, IMO.  7/10 isn't much better as I don't like how we match up with really any of the potential 2's in Louisville, UCLA, Arizona, Oregon, and Baylor.  But after that, man, things really open up.  There are really only 8-10 really, really good teams this year.

11 seed would be ideal, but I think that ship has sailed, honestly.  I think a 6 is possible if we win the BET.  I wouldn't be shocked if the committee already has us around the 7/8 cut off due to our stack of top 50 wins, and the Nova win.  Another Nova win would certainly push us up.

Current crop of 6-10 from Bracket Matrix:

6: Minnesota, St Marys, Maryland, Iowa State
7: Wisconsin, Creighton, Dayton, OK State
8: So. Carolia, Miami, Witchita, Va TEch
9: Arkansas, Michigan, Northwestern, VCU
10: Marquette, Seton Hall, Michigan State, Providence

Bottom line, I assume we'll either be an 8 or 9 if we beat SHU and lose to Nova, and either a 9 or 10 if we lose to SHU.  So I see it pretty likely we end up in an 8/9 game, and I will be hoping for Gonzaga.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: oldwarrior81 on March 08, 2017, 02:51:12 PM
I think one thing we can agree on is as a 10-seed, we won't being playing games in Milwaukee.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 08, 2017, 02:53:00 PM
Quote from: oldwarrior81 on March 08, 2017, 02:51:12 PM
I think one thing we can agree on is as a 10-seed, we won't being playing games in Milwaukee.
We wouldn't be able to play here anyway because teams aren't allowed to play on their home court
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Bocephys on March 08, 2017, 02:56:59 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 08, 2017, 02:53:00 PM
We wouldn't be able to play here anyway because teams aren't allowed to play on their home court

And because the committee doesn't respect Wojo as a coach.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 08, 2017, 02:58:50 PM
Quote from: Bocephys on March 08, 2017, 02:56:59 PM
And because the committee doesn't respect Wojo as a coach.

If it were Cooley, who the committee has great respect for, and if there were games held at the Dunk, the committee would surely make an exception for PC.  For MU and Wojo, not a chance. 
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: oldwarrior81 on March 08, 2017, 03:02:08 PM
we're in on 131 of 132 brackets at bracketmatrix.com

the one "expert" that doesn't list MU is real time rpi which has Illinois State, Houston, Rhode Island and Georgia as their last 4 in.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 08, 2017, 03:04:10 PM
Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 08, 2017, 02:48:00 PM
My thoughts:

Between the 5 and 10 line, no one really scares me.  Sure, we could lose to pretty much any of them if we aren't shooting the ball well, but we could also beat any of them without playing our best game.  Avoiding the 8/9 and avoiding Kansas or UNC in the round of 32 would be ideal.  Give me the Zags all day long.  They're a better team than we are, but we beat that team 4/10 times on a neutral court, IMO.  7/10 isn't much better as I don't like how we match up with really any of the potential 2's in Louisville, UCLA, Arizona, Oregon, and Baylor.  But after that, man, things really open up.  There are really only 8-10 really, really good teams this year.

11 seed would be ideal, but I think that ship has sailed, honestly.  I think a 6 is possible if we win the BET.  I wouldn't be shocked if the committee already has us around the 7/8 cut off due to our stack of top 50 wins, and the Nova win.  Another Nova win would certainly push us up.

Current crop of 6-10 from Bracket Matrix:

6: Minnesota, St Marys, Maryland, Iowa State
7: Wisconsin, Creighton, Dayton, OK State
8: So. Carolia, Miami, Witchita, Va TEch
9: Arkansas, Michigan, Northwestern, VCU
10: Marquette, Seton Hall, Michigan State, Providence

Bottom line, I assume we'll either be an 8 or 9 if we beat SHU and lose to Nova, and either a 9 or 10 if we lose to SHU.  So I see it pretty likely we end up in an 8/9 game, and I will be hoping for Gonzaga.

Gonzaga as the 1 on the 8/9 line would be a sawweeeeet draw
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: brewcity77 on March 08, 2017, 03:24:02 PM
Quote from: oldwarrior81 on March 08, 2017, 02:51:12 PM
I think one thing we can agree on is as a 10-seed, we won't being playing games in Milwaukee.

That would also be the case as a 1-seed.

No one from the 4-line down scares me, and even most of the top three lines aren't super daunting. They are better overall teams, but with our ability from them there is no one we can't beat. I suppose I'd rather avoid UNC and Kansas the first weekend, but otherwise, bring it on.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 08, 2017, 03:40:56 PM
This Gonzaga scares me more than Gonzaga teams of the past have scared me. Honestly I would give us a 15% chance of beating any of the 1 seeds on a neutral court. Possible but far from probable.

I just want to see us win and the teams in front of us lose. As long as we end up in the tournament, I'll be happy.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 09, 2017, 07:58:08 AM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 08, 2017, 03:40:56 PM
This Gonzaga scares me more than Gonzaga teams of the past have scared me. Honestly I would give us a 15% chance of beating any of the 1 seeds on a neutral court. Possible but far from probable.

I just want to see us win and the teams in front of us lose. As long as we end up in the tournament, I'll be happy.
This year will be the first year a 16 seed wins
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: wadesworld on March 09, 2017, 08:15:00 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 09, 2017, 07:58:08 AM
This year will be the first year a 16 seed wins

Nope.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: BM1090 on March 09, 2017, 09:51:44 AM
It will happen someday. There will be a year where the top is watered down and almost all of the smaller conferences have their best team win the conference tournament. The teams at the top will be weaker. The teams at the bottom will be stronger.

This is definitely not that year.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GWSwarrior on March 09, 2017, 09:57:50 AM
Quote from: oldwarrior81 on March 08, 2017, 02:51:12 PM
I think one thing we can agree on is as a 10-seed, we won't being playing games in Milwaukee.

I just found out Obama wiretapped the Committee and they are going to make a YUGE change to that. Best change ever. You are going to love it. Marquette will be winning so much.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 09, 2017, 10:52:32 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 09, 2017, 07:58:08 AM
This year will be the first year a 16 seed wins

I'm not a betting man, but I would put a hefty amount of money down that this will not end up being true
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Silkk the Shaka on March 09, 2017, 11:22:13 AM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 09, 2017, 10:52:32 AM
I'm not a betting man, but I would put a hefty amount of money down that this will not end up being true

I wouldn't rule it out, but I'd need to see the matchup first

Santa Clara had some athletes and was able to take them down to the last few minutes the other night (minus their best player no less)

St. Mary's has zero athletes and got destroyed
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: PGsHeroes32 on March 09, 2017, 11:31:25 AM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 08, 2017, 03:40:56 PM
This Gonzaga scares me more than Gonzaga teams of the past have scared me. Honestly I would give us a 15% chance of beating any of the 1 seeds on a neutral court. Possible but far from probable.

I just want to see us win and the teams in front of us lose. As long as we end up in the tournament, I'll be happy.

Anyone saying bring on gonzaga hasn't watch 1 second of zags basketball.

They are a worse match up then Kansas is.

Two 7 footers? A 6'9 lanky forward who can defend anyone? An elite PG with a massive size edge on us?

They shoot well and they defend at an elite level with size.

Look what they do to St Mary's a team with a similar make up in having lots of shooters. St Mary's can't get good looks.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on March 09, 2017, 11:40:28 AM
Quote from: PFsHeroes32 on March 09, 2017, 11:31:25 AM
Anyone saying bring on gonzaga hasn't watch 1 second of zags basketball.

They are a worse match up then Kansas is.

Two 7 footers? A 6'9 lanky forward who can defend anyone? An elite PG with a massive size edge on us?

They shoot well and they defend at an elite level with size.

Look what they do to St Mary's a team with a similar make up in having lots of shooters. St Mary's can't get good looks.

If that's a shot at me (appears to be because I am the one that said I will be hoping for the Zags if we're an 8/9).....I have watched a good deal of the Zags this year. They're very good.  You don't go 31-1 if you're not pretty good, I can't care what league you're in. 

That said, the Zags have played 1 game within 10 points since mid December.  They lost that game.  They haven't played a 1 possession game since November 27th.  That is because they are good.  But they also haven't exactly been game tested or played under really any pressure at all outside of the BYU game, in which they turned the ball over multiple times in the final minutes. 

If I am an 8/9, and my options are Gonzaga, Kansas or UNC (a BE team is not going to be opposite Nova), I am taking Gonzaga every single time.  Yah, they'd probably beat us, but I'll take my chances over the other alternatives. 
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: CTWarrior on March 09, 2017, 11:46:43 AM
Quote from: MUeagle1090 on March 09, 2017, 09:51:44 AM
It will happen someday. There will be a year where the top is watered down and almost all of the smaller conferences have their best team win the conference tournament. The teams at the top will be weaker. The teams at the bottom will be stronger.

This is definitely not that year.
As the committees get smarter and smarter on how they seed teams, I think it becomes less and less likely.  I was at the Georgetown-Princeton game in Providence that went to the final buzzer, and I am pretty confident that same Princeton team would not be a 16 seed with the current metrics helping out.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Jay Bee on March 09, 2017, 12:48:37 PM
Texas Southern 2 15-over-2 fame.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 09, 2017, 01:18:30 PM
Quote from: Jay Bee on March 09, 2017, 12:48:37 PM
Texas Southern 2 15-over-2 fame.

But your boy isn't there anymore! Can they win without big Chris NBA?
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Jay Bee on March 09, 2017, 02:05:09 PM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 09, 2017, 01:18:30 PM
But your boy isn't there anymore! Can they win without big Chris NBA?

Yes! My bois Zach Lofton (MN) and Demontrae (Milwaukee) are there!!

That East TN whatever team as well.. with the i4 cast offs.. scary
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: BM1090 on March 09, 2017, 02:13:05 PM
Quote from: Jay Bee on March 09, 2017, 02:05:09 PM
Yes! My bois Zach Lofton (MN) and Demontrae (Milwaukee) are there!!

That East TN whatever team as well.. with the i4 cast offs.. scary

Demontrae is at Texas Southern?? Good for him, didn't realize he was having some success at the D1 level
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Jay Bee on March 09, 2017, 07:37:41 PM
Quote from: MUeagle1090 on March 09, 2017, 02:13:05 PM
Demontrae is at Texas Southern?? Good for him, didn't realize he was having some success at the D1 level

Freshman of the year in the SWAC. He had to wait for end of the first semester to play.. first game was vs. Louisville... and then a bunch of tough non conf games continued.

The Louisville game was hilarious.. 27 points, hit a shot and blew a kiss to the camera.. BUT, 11 flippin turnovers!!

He's found his groove as of late...

Demontrae Jefferson in March: 38.7 mpg, 22.3 ppg, 58.3% eFG%, 81.8% FT%, 4.3 apg, 3.0 rpg, 1.3 to/g, 1.0 spg, 0.7 fc/g
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 09, 2017, 07:40:35 PM
Isn't Jefferson older than a freshman should be?
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Jay Bee on March 09, 2017, 07:49:45 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 09, 2017, 07:40:35 PM
Isn't Jefferson older than a freshman should be?

How old "should" a freshman be? St. John's freshman Marcus LoVett is 21 years old. Our Markus Howard just turned 18.

(But, yes... Trae is older [21])
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: brewcity77 on March 10, 2017, 07:17:04 AM
I always liked Jefferson. Couldn't have ever seen him landing here, though. Too small for Buzz, and doubt he was ever on Wojo's radar.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 10, 2017, 08:15:51 AM
Quote from: brewcity77 on March 10, 2017, 07:17:04 AM
I always liked Jefferson. Couldn't have ever seen him landing here, though. Too small for Buzz, and doubt he was ever on Wojo's radar.

It would depend on why he's a 21 year old freshman. If its a Mayo situation, I don't think he would have been on Wojo's radar.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 10, 2017, 08:47:29 AM
CBS has us as a 11 seed playing virginia in the first round and ESPN still has us as a 10 but playing OKST
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: BM1090 on March 10, 2017, 08:59:05 AM
SI's update has us as a 9 seed.

So after yesterday's "disaster". ESPN didn't move us at all. SI didn't move us at all. Palm moved us down one spot.

And just to illustrate how hard it is to move up the bubble. Kansas State's win over Baylor moved them up ONE spot in his bracket, from first team out to last team in. Even with a win today they won't be head of us, although they will also probably be safely in the field.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 10, 2017, 10:06:03 AM
Playing Virginia would be a good game
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 10, 2017, 10:08:38 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 10, 2017, 10:06:03 AM
Playing Virginia would be a good game

I think that would be a very bad matchup.  Watching their defense in the half court set is amazing.  Personally think you need to be longer and more athletic than we are to beat it. 
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 10, 2017, 10:10:00 AM
But if we were to beat them that would be a great win
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 10, 2017, 10:11:36 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 10, 2017, 10:10:00 AM
But if we were to beat them that would be a great win

At this point any win is a great win.  It's tourney time. 
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 10, 2017, 10:12:18 AM
True i hope we dont play them though
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: brewcity77 on March 10, 2017, 10:36:34 AM
Quote from: Frenns Liquor Depot on March 10, 2017, 10:08:38 AM
I think that would be a very bad matchup.  Watching their defense in the half court set is amazing.  Personally think you need to be longer and more athletic than we are to beat it.

I think it'd be really intriguing. As good as they are on defense, I don't think their offense would punish us too much. They don't get inside enough to get us into foul trouble, and wouldn't likely kill us on the offensive glass (like we saw yesterday). They also like to play very slow, literally dead last in the country. With how much better our passing and patience has become this year, I think we'd be okay.

My guess is that a game with Virginia would be a 1-2 possession game with a score in the 60s. If it's a "first to 70 wins" game, I think we would have a shot. Not saying we would win, but they're not unbeatable. Bennett also doesn't generally fare well against Duke (0-3 the past 3 years), maybe Wojo could get a few tips from Coach K about game prep.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: drewm88 on March 10, 2017, 10:47:11 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 10, 2017, 10:10:00 AM
But if we were to beat them that would be a great win

Just what our resume needs to lock up a bid, eh?
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 10, 2017, 11:30:54 AM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 10, 2017, 08:47:29 AM
ESPN still has us as a 10 but playing OKST

Please let this happen. First team to 125 wins.
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: GoldenDieners32 on March 10, 2017, 12:00:58 PM
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on March 10, 2017, 11:30:54 AM
Please let this happen. First team to 125 wins.
I've watched some of their games and they are not that great offensivley besides Jawuan Evans he is a hell of a player
Title: Re: Seed Watching
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on March 10, 2017, 12:21:49 PM
Quote from: GoldenEagles32 on March 10, 2017, 12:00:58 PM
I've watched some of their games and they are not that great offensivley besides Jawuan Evans he is a hell of a player

....They are the number 1 rated offense in the country.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev