MUScoop

Since tomorrow (Sunday) is the Pro-Bowl ... I'm curious as to how you view all-star games.

I took the last option ...I don't plan to watch them and often don't watch them even when I'm in front of the TV and they are on.

So yo, obviously no one gives a chit ether 'bout da games or dis thread, hey?

Quote from: 4everwarriors on January 28, 2017, 08:45:32 PM
So yo, obviously no one gives a chit ether 'bout da games or dis thread, hey?

I agree ... since few want to even open this thread and answer the question might show how little they care about games like the pro-bowl.

Let me try this ...

The reason no one cares is they don't matter and no one actually tries.  At least in pre-season football their are rookies and free agents trying to make the team.

What I will actually watch is skills competitions like the home run derby and slam dunk competition.  At least they try at them.

Now that the dunk contest is good again, I try to watch if I remember too.  I don't watch any other part of the NBA AS game.

I also try to watch the MLB AS game if I remember to. 

I haven't watched the Pro-Bowl since I was 12.  I don't know anyone who watches the Pro-Bowl.  Nobody.  Contrast that with friends of mine who go out of the way to watch the MLB AS game, and a smaller group who will want to watch the NBA AS game.

MLB, NBA, and NHL all star games at least resemble a real game. The probowl should just end...

All Star games used to be watched because you could see players that you normally didn't get much of a chance to see.  Now you can see anyone play whenever you want.  No longer special. 

While NFL is my favorite pro sport, the other sports' skills contests are way better to watch. Dunk contest, 3 pt contest, home run derby, etc.

Maybe silly, but I like watching the MLB All Star game because the game actually means something. Determines home field advantage in the World Series. I feel like the players take it more seriously.

The NBA all star game is fun just because of how mind blowingly athletic some of the plays are. But it does get old by the end of the game.

I don't watch hockey.

The Pro Bowl is a joke and always has been.

Don't ever plan on a ny of them, but I'll watch a bit of the NHL to see how the wacky format is going.  I have never watched a minute of the pro bowl; used to watch the dunk contest 20 years ago, never the game; baseball I watched the HR contest during peak roid era, but don't watch the game (maybe I'll be able to watch the HR contest again if that gasbag really retires).

Before inter league play and free agency the baseball All Star game was fun to watch. Not so much any more. Wasn't the first one kind of a lark as it was sort of an extra attraction during the Chicago Worlds Fair.

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 29, 2017, 01:57:16 PM
Maybe silly, but I like watching the MLB All Star game because the game actually means something. Determines home field advantage in the World Series.

Nope. Not anymore, thankfully.

Any y'all watchin' Miss Universe and wanna handicap da field? I'm goin' wit France, hey?

The Baseball All Star game in the 60s and early 70s was fun back in the pre cable pre internet era. It provided the opportunity to see many of the stars whose teams were not featured in the game of the week. Some great pitcher batter match ups.

The NBA weekend is the best of the modern all star games .

NBA has the best overall weekend.

The skills challenges/home run derby are usually better than the game for all sports, but I need to DVR and watch later because it all goes way too slow. The NFL introduced a skills contest this year, but I heard it was mediocre.

I'll watch most of the NBA/NHL/MLB games. I didn't generally watch the old NHL format.

How my teams are doing and represented plays a role in how much I want to watch.

I haven't watched any of the Pro Bowl in probably 15 years.

Quote from: MU82 on January 29, 2017, 06:13:11 PM
Nope. Not anymore, thankfully.

Really? Shows how much I pay attention. Welp, looks like I can go back to watching Netflix that night!

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 30, 2017, 10:31:23 AM
Really? Shows how much I pay attention. Welp, looks like I can go back to watching Netflix that night!

I absolutely hated the All-Star Game/World Series home-field advantage connection.

So, some Twins pitcher throws a meatball to some Padres infielder, whose hard grounder is booted by some Tigers infielder (perhaps a replacement for a real All-Star who was injured), letting the winning run score in an exhibition game ... that determines who gets home-field advantage for the single most important game of the entire season?

You actually liked that rule, TAMU? I'm surprised about that!

I watched a rerun of Moonshiners last night instead of the Pro Bowl.  Think that answers the question.

I only watch the MLB All-Star game because that is the only one where the players on the field/court are going full out to win.  The managers may be more concerned with getting everyone in, but the players are going full-throttle on both offense and defense.

I've heard people say the NBA All-Star game is a like a pickup game, but that is an insult to pick-up games.

Quote from: CTWarrior on January 30, 2017, 12:16:26 PM
I only watch the MLB All-Star game because that is the only one where the players on the field/court are going full out to win.  The managers may be more concerned with getting everyone in, but the players are going full-throttle on both offense and defense.

I've heard people say the NBA All-Star game is a like a pickup game, but that is an insult to pick-up games.

NBA is still entertaining, even if they aren't going their hardest. They put on a show.

Quote from: drewm88 on January 30, 2017, 12:25:12 PM
NBA is still entertaining, even if they aren't going their hardest. They put on a show.

I don't disagree, but that type of show is not something I enjoy.  To each his own.

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 29, 2017, 01:57:16 PM
Maybe silly, but I like watching the MLB All Star game because the game actually means something. Determines home field advantage in the World Series. I feel like the players take it more seriously.

Not anymore  ;D ;D

Austin Karp
‏@AustinKarp

For some perspective, ESPN's 7.45 million viewers for Pro Bowl was 4 million viewers more than ANY program on all of cable TV on Sunday

To put those numbers in context, the MLB ASG had about 8.7 million viewers and the NBA had about 6.6.

When the Brewers have been competitive, I've set aside time to watch MLB game; which means I've actually planned to watch the game three times in the past 20+ years.

The rest I wouldn't plan; however, if I was flipping through channels:

NHL -- I would certainly watch if it was a close game in the third period.  While I don't make plans to watch any games, I absolutely love watching competitive hockey in the waning minutes of the game no matter the match-up/circumstances.  Hell, if I happened to flip to a high school JV game in North Dakota being broadcast in 240i that was tied 2-2 with a minute to go, I'd watch that minute and probably even stick around for OT.  However, the number of hockey games I've watched on TV from start to finish over the past 30 years could probably be counted on one hand, and that hand could even belong to a shop teacher.

NBA -- I'd watch the dunk and 3-point contests (do they even have those still?), but I wouldn't stick around for the actual game.

NFL -- I simply wouldn't watch at all.  I'd turn on reruns of Star Trek before I'd watch the NFL Pro Bowl, and I've never seen Star Trek outside JJ Abrams.

The last baseball all star game I watched was 1983.    The last NBA all-star game I watched was the one where Chuck Daly actually tried to have his team play defense.    I have never watched a Pro Bowl or NHL all-star game. 

Quote from: MU82 on January 30, 2017, 10:36:56 AM
I absolutely hated the All-Star Game/World Series home-field advantage connection.

So, some Twins pitcher throws a meatball to some Padres infielder, whose hard grounder is booted by some Tigers infielder (perhaps a replacement for a real All-Star who was injured), letting the winning run score in an exhibition game ... that determines who gets home-field advantage for the single most important game of the entire season?

You actually liked that rule, TAMU? I'm surprised about that!

I felt like the teams and managers actually cared about the outcome. If we're going to get all the greats together, I actually want to see them compete. Most times it seems like all star games are just about goofing off.

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 31, 2017, 03:55:52 PM
I felt like the teams and managers actually cared about the outcome. If we're going to get all the greats together, I actually want to see them compete. Most times it seems like all star games are just about goofing off.

I honestly don't think it materially affected anything.

Players are proud so they want to do their best when they're out there, but the managers hardly play anybody more than one or two innings. Pitchers are run in and out of games in a blink. Managers mostly try to get almost everybody into the game.

That's the way it was before "this time it counts," and that's the way it was the last several years even though "it counted."

The days of Pete Rose crashing into Ray Fosse are long gone, and that's a good thing. These guys make $20 million a year, and the last thing baseball needs is one of them suffering a career-ending injury in an exhibition game. Can you imagine the stink if the Red Sox manager ran a Yankees pitcher out for a third inning "because I felt that was the best way for us to win" only to see the pitcher blow out his arm? Come on, TAMU!

I find games more interesting when there is something on the line. Others don't. This change means that the mlb allstar game has lost me as a viewer. I'm sure they are heartbroken and will be changing it back shortly as a result.

No more watching meaningless bowl games then, right TAMU?

Quote from: tower912 on February 01, 2017, 05:33:10 PM
No more watching meaningless bowl games then, right TAMU?

Can't stand bowl games. Who cares?

Quote from: TAMU Eagle on February 01, 2017, 03:43:36 PM
I find games more interesting when there is something on the line. Others don't. This change means that the mlb allstar game has lost me as a viewer.

Fair enough.

Each of us must have a reason to watch any event, show, movie, etc. You've drawn your line, and I respect that. (Which I'm sure must be a relief to you!)

Quote from: MU82 on February 01, 2017, 10:09:19 PM
Fair enough.

Each of us must have a reason to watch any event, show, movie, etc. You've drawn your line, and I respect that. (Which I'm sure must be a relief to you!)

I was waiting with bated breath  8-)