I didn't realize Fox Sports 1 surged so far ahead of ESPN 2 in 2016, from down 397-436 in 2015 to 479-354 if I'm reading this chart correctly. Obviously a long way from catching the Worldwide leader, but not bad.
http://awfulannouncing.com/2017/despite-ratings-erosion-espn-continues-to-drive-the-cable-sports-engine.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Yes - and unfortunately Comcast in Chicag had dropped Fox College Sports for 2017. Maybe Fox wanted yoo much since they are surging, but absolutely stinks they are off Comcast. Nat watch any Big East action now. Ugh
Quote from: Daniel on January 03, 2017, 03:24:15 PM
Yes - and unfortunately Comcast in Chicag had dropped Fox College Sports for 2017. Maybe Fox wanted yoo much since they are surging, but absolutely stinks they are off Comcast. Nat watch any Big East action now. Ugh
Always other options....
Quote from: Daniel on January 03, 2017, 03:24:15 PM
Yes - and unfortunately Comcast in Chicag had dropped Fox College Sports for 2017. Maybe Fox wanted yoo much since they are surging, but absolutely stinks they are off Comcast. Nat watch any Big East action now. Ugh
That sucks. Even for the sports package?
Quote from: Daniel on January 03, 2017, 03:24:15 PM
Yes - and unfortunately Comcast in Chicag had dropped Fox College Sports for 2017. Maybe Fox wanted yoo much since they are surging, but absolutely stinks they are off Comcast. Nat watch any Big East action now. Ugh
Huh? FS1 is still on Comcast Chicago. FS2 is not, but that's never been in the Chicago market.
To my knowledge, Big East conference games are only on Fox, FS1, FS2 or CBS Sports Network.
Quote from: RJax55 on January 03, 2017, 04:36:15 PM
Huh? FS1 is still on Comcast Chicago. FS2 is not, but that's never been in the Chicago market.
Indeed. Comcast/Xfinity has FS1 around the country, and FS2 nowhere (they've never signed a deal for FS2).
Quote from: JamilJaeJamailJrJuan on January 03, 2017, 03:32:04 PM
Always other options....
Yup. Lots of streaming options these days that offer both packages.
Quote from: auburnmarquette on January 03, 2017, 02:21:29 PM
I didn't realize Fox Sports 1 surged so far ahead of ESPN 2 in 2016, from down 397-436 in 2015 to 479-354 if I'm reading this chart correctly. Obviously a long way from catching the Worldwide leader, but not bad.
http://awfulannouncing.com/2017/despite-ratings-erosion-espn-continues-to-drive-the-cable-sports-engine.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Shouldn't the title of the thread be "ESPN continues dominance over Fox Sports in Primetime viewing"?
2402 - 510
If not for the Cubs, it would have been even worse.
People in-the -Know know what the Big East is. The problem is that, in actuality, perception is reality. So the B10, ACC, and B12 are perceived generally as the great conferences in basketball. Perception is driven by the powers - and those powers have been Duke, UNC, Kansas, Michigan State, Indian, Wisconsin, etc.
Quote from: brandx on January 03, 2017, 08:28:56 PM
Shouldn't the title of the thread be "ESPN continues dominance over Fox Sports in Primetime viewing"?
2402 - 510
If not for the Cubs, it would have been even worse.
People in-the -Know know what the Big East is. The problem is that, in actuality, perception is reality. So the B10, ACC, and B12 are perceived generally as the great conferences in basketball. Perception is driven by the powers - and those powers have been Duke, UNC, Kansas, Michigan State, Indian, Wisconsin, etc.
Those teams have bigger fanbases. They will draw more eyeballs. That is why the B10 package with Fox is good for the network and the BE.
Cubs, Cubs, Cubs. This wasn't the first year that the MLB Playoffs were on FS1. In 2017, FS1 has the ALCS. So, they are hoping the Yankees are back.
FOX and FS1 will have a major upgrade with the B1G coming in terms of 25 football games and 50 basketball games. Still, with half the football package in the Big 12 and Pac-12 in football.
In February the big two night dog show moves to FS1. That's are 2 to 3 million per night in viewership.
Numbers have been treading up on shows like Undisputed, Herd and Speak for Yourself.
Quote from: RJax55 on January 03, 2017, 04:36:15 PM
Huh? FS1 is still on Comcast Chicago. FS2 is not, but that's never been in the Chicago market.
To my knowledge, Big East conference games are only on Fox, FS1, FS2 or CBS Sports Network.
Comcast has dropped Fox College Sports channels in Chicago. I tried to watch R.E.M. Play of seton hall/MU game that was listed in directory. You get a notice that contract expired for this vendor. Sorry for inconvenience. Same for any othe big east game listed I called to complain. They said ok. Ty.
Quote from: Daniel on January 05, 2017, 12:23:13 AM
Comcast has dropped Fox College Sports channels in Chicago.
OK. I can't debate that. But they still at least have Fox Sports 1, which is
1) what this thread is about
2) Not the same as Fox College Sports
3) Where most Big East games are broadcast live.
From what I can tell, you're talking about the Fox Sports Atlantic/Central/Pacific. Not sure I've ever watched one of those.
Looking it up, FS1 should probably be on channel 237 on Comcast in Chicago. The fox website does confirm though that FS2 and Fox Sports Regional networks are not available.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 05, 2017, 12:45:09 AM
OK. I can't debate that. But they still at least have Fox Sports 1, which is
1) what this thread is about
2) Not the same as Fox College Sports
3) Where most Big East games are broadcast live.
From what I can tell, you're talking about the Fox Sports Atlantic/Central/Pacific. Not sure I've ever watched one of those.
Looking it up, FS1 should probably be on channel 237 on Comcast in Chicago. The fox website does confirm though that FS2 and Fox Sports Regional networks are not available.
I was born at night, but not last night. I may noy know much, but I know that the Big East better broden its demographic, and soon. To hell with Georgetown and Villanova "protecting" their markets.
The Big East is protecting a small market segment.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 02:27:54 AM
I was born at night, but not last night. I may noy know much, but I know that the Big East better broden its demographic, and soon.
I am assuming by "broaden its demographic" you mean add more members. I believe there are six years left on the BE television deal after this one. They should cut the pieces of the pie smaller?
Quote from: Dr. Vinnie Boombatz on January 05, 2017, 08:40:08 AM
I am assuming by "broaden its demographic" you mean add more members. I believe there are six years left on the BE television deal after this one. They should cut the pieces of the pie smaller?
No, get some NON-CATHOLIC schools into the league and EXPAND. Time is a wasting.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 08:42:14 AM
No, get some NON-CATHOLIC schools into the league and EXPAND. Time is a wasting.
What is your obsession with the schools' religious affiliation? In what way does this negatively impact MU?
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 08:42:14 AM
No, get some NON-CATHOLIC schools into the league and EXPAND. Time is a wasting.
The only one who views the Catholic thing as a problem is you.
And expanding has financial consequences because you would have to divide up the television revenue more ways. It makes no sense to expand now. In five or six years? It might.
The Big East has done exceptionally well since the conference re-alignment frenzy. And while expansion is always going to be part of the discussion, to add teams just to say the conference is doing SOMETHING is pure folly. Right now, the Big East isn't broke. It isn't even bent. It continues to be the premiere basketball-only conference. It competes with the ACC and the B-1? on a toe-to-toe basis. The only thing to fear is the entire collegiate athletic model collapsing.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 02:27:54 AM
I was born at night, but not last night. I may noy know much, but I know that the Big East better broden its demographic, and soon. To hell with Georgetown and Villanova "protecting" their markets.
The Big East is protecting a small market segment.
Um. That's a fine opinion. But I don't think it has anything to do with my post that you quoted?
Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 05, 2017, 12:45:09 AM
OK. I can't debate that. But they still at least have Fox Sports 1, which is
1) what this thread is about
2) Not the same as Fox College Sports
3) Where most Big East games are broadcast live.
From what I can tell, you're talking about the Fox Sports Atlantic/Central/Pacific. Not sure I've ever watched one of those.
Looking it up, FS1 should probably be on channel 237 on Comcast in Chicago. The fox website does confirm though that FS2 and Fox Sports Regional networks are not available.
Ty for this. I will check again on my end with 237 and schedule. I just know I tried to watch several big east games and they were not available. Thanks for response. I will che k it out.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 08:42:14 AM
No, get some NON-CATHOLIC schools into the league and EXPAND. Time is a wasting.
What in the world are you talking about?
Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 05, 2017, 12:45:09 AM
OK. I can't debate that. But they still at least have Fox Sports 1, which is
1) what this thread is about
2) Not the same as Fox College Sports
3) Where most Big East games are broadcast live.
From what I can tell, you're talking about the Fox Sports Atlantic/Central/Pacific. Not sure I've ever watched one of those.
Looking it up, FS1 should probably be on channel 237 on Comcast in Chicago. The fox website does confirm though that FS2 and Fox Sports Regional networks are not available.
Color me Impressed......Didn't know this was a full service Site. Thanks for all you do.
Quote from: tower912 on January 05, 2017, 09:07:02 AM
The only thing to fear is the entire collegiate athletic model collapsing.
Indeed. Related thread in Superbar and here: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/special-reports/college-football
Quote from: Loose Cannon on January 05, 2017, 12:04:50 PM
Color me Impressed......Didn't know this was a full service Site. Thanks for all you do.
You want to be impressed? Upgrade to a premium account
Quote from: naginiF on January 05, 2017, 01:21:25 PM
You want to be impressed? Upgrade to a premium account
The cost is 5x your current plan, but you definitely get what you pay for.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 08:42:14 AM
No, get some NON-CATHOLIC schools into the league and EXPAND. Time is a wasting.
So...who should the Big East look to add? Gonna have to be basketball only, and have to be public, and have to be non-P6, so I guess that leaves...umm...VCU? Wichita State? Or maybe some big state school like...uhh...Rhode Island?
Who exactly are these mythical teams we should add?
Quote from: brewcity77 on January 05, 2017, 01:34:10 PM
So...who should the Big East look to add? Gonna have to be basketball only, and have to be public, and have to be non-P6, so I guess that leaves...umm...VCU? Wichita State? Or maybe some big state school like...uhh...Rhode Island?
Who exactly are these mythical teams we should add?
I'm not sure, but I think this would be their mascot
(https://img0.etsystatic.com/000/0/5784534/il_fullxfull.156654686.jpg)
Quote from: Loose Cannon on January 05, 2017, 12:04:50 PM
Color me Impressed......Didn't know this was a full service Site. Thanks for all you do.
Just making sure no MU fan needlessly misses an MU game :)
Quote from: brewcity77 on January 05, 2017, 01:34:10 PM
So...who should the Big East look to add? Gonna have to be basketball only, and have to be public, and have to be non-P6, so I guess that leaves...umm...VCU? Wichita State? Or maybe some big state school like...uhh...Rhode Island?
Who exactly are these mythical teams we should add?
I don't know, but you have a few good ideas right there. BTW, the basketball only canard is a rationalization. Marketing, sell what you have to sell.
We all know that Villanova plays football, I think it is division 2.
Small state schools might be interested, Delaware, U. Con., how about Temple or someone of our old pals at Conference USA. My point is that when time runs out on the TV contract it may be too late to improve the product/brand. I don't think compeditive teams in the NCAA is sufficient for Madison Ave., for recruits possibly, but not for our TV contract.
Have we made any improvements to our league that I may have missed? Time will tell, is Buzz the first or the last coach to move on up from the BE. Coach movement will be telling.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 03:12:41 PM
I don't know, but you have a few good ideas right there. BTW, the basketball only canard is a rationalization. Marketing, sell what you have to sell.
Ah, so your viewpoint is that it is really a religious conspiracy with a basketball façade covering it up? Interesting. Of course, you still haven't answered in what way the religious affiliation of the current BE schools is a negative, or negatively impacts MU basketball.
Quote from: TSmith34 on January 05, 2017, 03:15:52 PM
Ah, so your viewpoint is that it is really a religious conspiracy with a basketball façade covering it up? Interesting. Of course, you still haven't answered in what way the religious affiliation of the current BE schools is a negative, or negatively impacts MU basketball.
Not at all, and there are far too many conspiracies going around anyway.
My viewpoint is that the brand, the BE brand, is catholic centric, it limits potential viewership, and that is aboit the tv contract, which is about $$$$$$, for everyone. Believe it or not but there are some aniti-catholic people in the country.
When Rutgers was in the BE, I went to a game at yhe RAC and a group of people said to me, is Marquette one of those Catholic schools somewhere in the midwest, ignorant, perhaps, but an attitude nontheless.
Maybe I'm just thinking like Al McGuire when he fought vehemently against an all catholic league, and please don't ask me for a reference or a quote. In my day we were an independent, didnt even play ND, because of the money they wanted from our gate, they thought the ND name was a big draw, and when you went to South Bend you got your share of their student tickets, but that's another story.
We are living in a globalized world, lets get with the program.
It's 11PM CET in Italy, thanks for the conversation, good night.
Quote from: Bocephys on January 05, 2017, 01:23:24 PM
The cost is 5x your current plan, but you definitely get what you pay for.
Is there an Installment Plan? Christmas was expensive.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 03:33:31 PM
Not at all, and there are far too many conspiracies going around anyway.
My viewpoint is that the brand, the BE brand, is catholic centric, it limits potential viewership, and that is aboit the tv contract, which is about $$$$$$, for everyone. Believe it or not but there are some aniti-catholic people in the country.
When Rutgers was in the BE, I went to a game at yhe RAC and a group of people said to me, is Marquette one of those Catholic schools somewhere in the midwest, ignorant, perhaps, but an attitude nontheless.
Maybe I'm just thinking like Al McGuire when he fought vehemently against an all catholic league, and please don't ask me for a reference or a quote. In my day we were an independent, didnt even play ND, because of the money they wanted from our gate, they thought the ND name was a big draw, and when you went to South Bend you got your share of their student tickets, but that's another story.
We are living in a globalized world, lets get with the program.
It's 11PM CET in Italy, thanks for the conversation, good night.
I feel fairly confident if you polled 100 casual CBB fans that aren't this guy, catholic would not be one of the top 3 comments out of 98% of them.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LVYIxrSw3L8/maxresdefault.jpg)
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 03:33:31 PM
Not at all, and there are far too many conspiracies going around anyway.
My viewpoint is that the brand, the BE brand, is catholic centric, it limits potential viewership, and that is aboit the tv contract, which is about $$$$$$, for everyone. Believe it or not but there are some aniti-catholic people in the country.
When Rutgers was in the BE, I went to a game at yhe RAC and a group of people said to me, is Marquette one of those Catholic schools somewhere in the midwest, ignorant, perhaps, but an attitude nontheless.
Maybe I'm just thinking like Al McGuire when he fought vehemently against an all catholic league, and please don't ask me for a reference or a quote. In my day we were an independent, didnt even play ND, because of the money they wanted from our gate, they thought the ND name was a big draw, and when you went to South Bend you got your share of their student tickets, but that's another story.
We are living in a globalized world, lets get with the program.
It's 11PM CET in Italy, thanks for the conversation, good night.
Here's the thing...any state school worth having is already in a major conference. The reason no one is chasing schools like Delaware, Rhode Island, Maine, North/South Dakota, Nevada, or wherever else is because they don't bring value. They don't bring a major market, they don't bring significant eyes, and they don't have the quality to significantly enhance the level of play. You're not going to suddenly draw nationwide eyes because Villanova is playing the Delaware Blue Hens.
As far as anti-Catholic, there's anti-everything somewhere in the country. But let's not act like it's still the 1960s. These days, if anyone's drawing a line, it's strictly between Christianity, Islam, Judaism, or atheist. I don't think almost anyone is that bothered by denomination anymore unless they are over the age of 60, and I don't think many television contracts will be impacted by that demographic.
In one regard, you are right. We are living in a globalized world. However the nature of that globalization seems to have left you behind. This globalized world is more concerned with forward thinking than dwelling in 40 year old demographics that no longer pertain to modern media.
Quote from: brewcity77 on January 05, 2017, 05:59:17 PM
Here's the thing...any state school worth having is already in a major conference. The reason no one is chasing schools like Delaware, Rhode Island, Maine, North/South Dakota, Nevada, or wherever else is because they don't bring value. They don't bring a major market, they don't bring significant eyes, and they don't have the quality to significantly enhance the level of play. You're not going to suddenly draw nationwide eyes because Villanova is playing the Delaware Blue Hens.
As far as anti-Catholic, there's anti-everything somewhere in the country. But let's not act like it's still the 1960s. These days, if anyone's drawing a line, it's strictly between Christianity, Islam, Judaism, or atheist. I don't think almost anyone is that bothered by denomination anymore unless they are over the age of 60, and I don't think many television contracts will be impacted by that demographic.
In one regard, you are right. We are living in a globalized world. However the nature of that globalization seems to have left you behind. This globalized world is more concerned with forward thinking than dwelling in 40 year old demographics that no longer pertain to modern media.
BOOM.
Roasted.
I've found the just the team to expand the BE
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/28/ba/9c/28ba9cd761cfe6a0a82559422196f88f.jpg)
Quote from: vogue65 on January 05, 2017, 08:42:14 AM
No, get some NON-CATHOLIC schools into the league and EXPAND. Time is a wasting.
The Big East will expand if it's in the best interest of the conference. No reason to do so until then. It has to be the right school, the right program. And any expansion has to make sense financially.
Quote from: TSmith34 on January 05, 2017, 09:23:56 PM
I've found the just the team to expand the BE
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/28/ba/9c/28ba9cd761cfe6a0a82559422196f88f.jpg)
At least they take the mid-range game seriously instead of parking behind the 3-point line. (Of course they still are living in a century where the 3-point line was just a twinkle in the eye of a basketball fanatic.)
Quote from: brandx on January 05, 2017, 10:33:38 PM
At least they take the mid-range game seriously instead of parking behind the 3-point line. (Of course they still are living in a century where the 3-point line was just a twinkle in the eye of a basketball fanatic.)
A group of traditionals, ai-na?
Quote from: TSmith34 on January 05, 2017, 09:23:56 PM
I've found the just the team to expand the BE
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/28/ba/9c/28ba9cd761cfe6a0a82559422196f88f.jpg)
Love it, sign them up, or are they Villanova practicing outside in their warm up uniforms?
Also, I enjoy the ad hominem attacks.
Interesting how many players come from Europe, Africa, etc..
It is a globalized world and I am enjoying it as I sit here in Bergamo, Italy.
One of my other issues is how Geprgetown and Villanova seem to have veto rights to protect their market. The numbers will tell when the contract is up for renewal, there are only so many graduates of catholic high schools out there. Yes, having top 10 teams helps greatly but that is only one part of the equation and we have that part right, now on to the next part, expand the brand.
Another missing link is rivalry schools, do we have any?
Some fundamental principles don't change, even after 6 centuries. What is 50 years in the overall scheme of things?
Quote from: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 03:38:45 AM
The numbers will tell when the contract is up for renewal, there are only so many graduates of catholic high schools out there.
This fixation is bizarre. Your contention that only graduates of catholic high schools are interested in watching BE basketball is, of course, borne out by some sort of proof?
Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 05, 2017, 02:19:16 PM
Just making sure no MU fan needlessly misses an MU game :)
I think you forgot to include the "Aw Shucks" in the above.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 03:38:45 AMSome fundamental principles don't change, even after 6 centuries. What is 50 years in the overall scheme of things?
In terms of media? Are you completely out of your mind or is your head just buried that far in the sand? 50 years ago the color television transition was still going on. 50 years ago newspapers were still current news. 50 years ago there was no internet, no smartphones, no social media of any sort. 50 years ago the top rated television show was Bonanza and there were only three viable networks. 50 years ago there was no cable television, much less satellite or wireless.
50 years ago Al McGuire had not yet earned his first NCAA Tournament bid. 50 years ago the Big East did not exist. 50 years ago the NCAA Tournament only handed out 25 bids. 50 years ago the Big Ten had 10 teams.
Quite simply, 50 years is an ETERNITY in terms of media. The landscape in terms of sports and media has shifted radically in the 12 years since we joined the Big East. Just because you flew to Europe doesn't mean you understand what the globalization you are trying to talk about means. And frankly, that more you spout off about this, the more obvious it is you have no understanding of media, sports, or the ways the market has shifted.
Quote from: brewcity77 on January 06, 2017, 09:39:39 AM
In terms of media? Are you completely out of your mind or is your head just buried that far in the sand? 50 years ago the color television transition was still going on. 50 years ago newspapers were still current news. 50 years ago there was no internet, no smartphones, no social media of any sort. 50 years ago the top rated television show was Bonanza and there were only three viable networks. 50 years ago there was no cable television, much less satellite or wireless.
50 years ago Al McGuire had not yet earned his first NCAA Tournament bid. 50 years ago the Big East did not exist. 50 years ago the NCAA Tournament only handed out 25 bids. 50 years ago the Big Ten had 10 teams.
Quite simply, 50 years is an ETERNITY in terms of media. The landscape in terms of sports and media has shifted radically in the 12 years since we joined the Big East. Just because you flew to Europe doesn't mean you understand what the globalization you are trying to talk about means. And frankly, that more you spout off about this, the more obvious it is you have no understanding of media, sports, or the ways the market has shifted.
I very much enjoyed when Mr. McGuire turned down an NCAA invitation to play in the NIT.
Yes, even the Not Invited Tournament has come a long way recently.
Furthermore, I live in Italy, retired, part time, and enjoy getting you guys all worked up. I understand your fear and anger, I hear it in many statements. The sweater vests are enjoying the show.
Quote from: TSmith34 on January 06, 2017, 07:25:08 AM
This fixation is bizarre. Your contention that only graduates of catholic high schools are interested in watching BE basketball is, of course, borne out by some sort of proof?
The proof will be at contract negotiation time, for now it is anicdotal.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:03:51 AM
I very much enjoyed when Mr. McGuire turned down an NCAA invitation to play in the NIT.
Yes, even the Not Invited Tournament has come a long way recently.
Furthermore, I live in Italy, retired, part time, and enjoy getting you guys all worked up. I understand your fear and anger, I hear it in many statements. The sweater vests are enjoying the show.
And how'd you get there? Did you swim?
Not sure whay anyone is supposed to be afraid or angry about, but I am amused at how out of touch with modern technology and society you are. Marquette and the Big East is in a great position right now. The only two conferences with comparable security are the SEC and Big 10.
You'd probably do a better job of working us up if you had some viable talking points. Instead you march tired, dated rhetoric that leaves you little more than a bland punching bag from a debate standpoint. But please, enjoy your show. I can only assume it's still Bonanza.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 03:38:45 AM
It is a globalized world and I am enjoying it as I sit here in Bergamo, Italy.
C'mon guys - you jump all over someone bragging about Yale, but not someone being more global than everyone else.
Vogue, I think if you really looked, you'd find many here are just as, if not more "global" than you.
Quote from: vogue65 on January 06, 2017, 10:07:20 AM
The proof will be at contract negotiation time, for now it is anicdotal.
No, not really. If the next contract isn't as rich as the initial one it won't be because people refuse to watch BE basketball because they are anti-Catholic.
Quote from: rocky_warrior on January 06, 2017, 04:27:55 PM
C'mon guys - you jump all over someone bragging about Yale, but not someone being more global than everyone else.
Vogue, I think if you really looked, you'd find many here are just as, if not more "global" than you.
Correct, never said "they" were not, in fact my generation tends to be less global. Ran into MU engineer last year working a motorcycle project in Bergamo, Italy, small world. It is not my residence which makes me aware of globalization, it is my interest. Even had the opportunity to teach a few classes to Italian H.S. students on the subject, they were very interested and concerned.
Would you believe that even my butcher is a big Davante Gardner and M.U. fan?
Take this ESPN!