Down 4 with 6 to go.
Wow Hall missed 6 of Ft's they could have iced game. Now a 3 point shooting foul. Depaul chance to tie 0.6 left
Depaul misses first, makes second, attempet to miss third ft and didn't hit rim. Hall survives. Looking at how these teams are going after rebounds we really need to improve on the boards.
Quote from: News: Ellenson dreams & commits to MU on January 02, 2016, 12:06:17 PM
Depaul misses first, makes second, attempet to miss third ft and didn't hit rim. Hall survives. Looking at how these teams are going after rebounds we really need to improve on the boards.
Yup. Going to have to defensive rebound with all 5.
Think those who rank on DePaul need to reconsider their thoughts.
Quote from: Class71 on January 02, 2016, 12:25:44 PM
Think those who rank on DePaul need to reconsider their thoughts.
It was one game. We've seen that from DePaul before - a decent game or two, then a prompt fall back to the bottom. I'll reconsider when I see DePaul put together a decent season or two.
Quote from: Class71 on January 02, 2016, 12:25:44 PM
Think those who rank on DePaul need to reconsider their thoughts.
Three years ago DePaul started 9 - 3. They beat Auburn, Az State and then Providence.
http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/team/schedule/_/id/305/year/2013/depaul-blue-demons
We burned up this board saying Purnell had finally turned it around they might be a bubble team for the Tourney.
They finished the season 1 - 15 for 11-21 overall.
Patience Grasshopper, this is Depaul. Give them enough rope and they inevitably hang themselves.
Depaul had a career shooting night from 3. SHU had probably their worst shooting night from 3 for the year.
Depaul still lost.
Quote from: forgetful on January 02, 2016, 02:06:40 PM
Depaul had a career shooting night from 3. SHU had probably their worst shooting night from 3 for the year.
Depaul still lost.
Bad teams can stay with good teams when they are hot from three.
Quote from: Class71 on January 02, 2016, 12:25:44 PM
Think those who rank on DePaul need to reconsider their thoughts.
It has been a LONG time since I've heard someone use this phrase.
Quote from: GooooMarquette on January 02, 2016, 12:29:28 PM
It was one game. We've seen that from DePaul before - a decent game or two, then a prompt fall back to the bottom. I'll reconsider when I see DePaul put together a decent season or two.
I think we still look at ourselves as superior based on history. There are no easy outs in the BE. As of right now who are in the bottom half of the BE? Take your choice but is it fair to include 'Nova, Xavier, Providence, Butler or Seton Hall in that group? If not then by default MU is in the bottom five. A little too close to start attacking DePaul given their respectable showing against a solid team. When we have a respectable game against a solid team this season we have reason to think we are a .500 team. Until then we might want to keep the criticism of other teams to a minimum. But, hey what do I know.
Quote from: Eldon on January 02, 2016, 02:17:04 PM
It has been a LONG time since I've heard someone use this phrase.
Apparently not that long ago since you remembered the term.
Quote from: GooooMarquette on January 02, 2016, 12:29:28 PM
It was one game. We've seen that from DePaul before - a decent game or two, then a prompt fall back to the bottom. I'll reconsider when I see DePaul put together a decent season or two.
But they already beat a top 25 team.