MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: mug644 on November 13, 2015, 11:08:59 PM

Title: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: mug644 on November 13, 2015, 11:08:59 PM
Curious what people think about the minutes distribution tonight.

H Ellenson 36
Fischer 30
JJJ 29
Sandy 28
Duane 27
Haanif 26
Traci 14
Anim 10

I only heard the game on the radio, but am a surprised by:
--no Wally
--low minutes by Anim, and high minutes by Fischer and Henry
--both Sandy and Haanif at basically same as Duane
--low minutes by Traci
--doesn't seem like foul trouble was a factor for anyone

No judgment here, just observations and curiosity about others' thoughts.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: GooooMarquette on November 13, 2015, 11:10:43 PM
Would have liked to see more of Sacar.  We played well when he was on the court.  Otherwise, no major gripes about minute distribution.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: Warrior of Law on November 13, 2015, 11:20:25 PM
The 0 minutes for Wally and Heldt were surprising.  I figured they'd be in the rotation.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: tower912 on November 13, 2015, 11:21:51 PM
I thought MU played better when they weren't using the twin towers.    One big and 4 quicks turned the momentum. 
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: Babybluejeans on November 14, 2015, 06:09:59 AM
The team played best with Anim on the floor. Seemed like he was out there a lot toward the end and I'd bet he played his way into more minutes in the future. Carter played the amount he should have--he's good but his being a freshman is sometimes obvious.

Surprised Heldt didn't see any time but I'm sure wojo has his reasons. Wally, not so surprised. 

As a side note, which may not be apparent from only listening to the game, we've got LOADS of talent on this team. Tough loss but gonna be a fun year.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: tower912 on November 14, 2015, 07:02:48 AM
Wally not playing surprised me more than Heldt not playing.   Belmont was not big and spread the floor with shooters.   Henry and Luke struggled to defend on the perimeter and on the high pick and rolls.   I cannot imagine that Heldt would have been better.   
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: GGGG on November 14, 2015, 09:39:22 AM
Quote from: Babybluejeans on November 14, 2015, 06:09:59 AM
The team played best with Anim on the floor.


I agree with this.  He hustled and played tough. 
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: Brewtown Andy on November 14, 2015, 09:44:15 AM
Quote from: mug644 on November 13, 2015, 11:08:59 PM
Curious what people think about the minutes distribution tonight.

H Ellenson 36
Fischer 30
JJJ 29
Sandy 28
Duane 27
Haanif 26
Traci 14
Anim 10

I only heard the game on the radio, but am a surprised by:
--no Wally
--low minutes by Anim, and high minutes by Fischer and Henry
--both Sandy and Haanif at basically same as Duane
--low minutes by Traci
--doesn't seem like foul trouble was a factor for anyone

No judgment here, just observations and curiosity about others' thoughts.

Fischer averaged 29.3 minutes last season.  Henry's the most physically gifted player on the team.  I don't know why their minutes surprise you.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: Herman Cain on November 14, 2015, 10:17:46 AM
Good distribution, would prefer more of Duane and less Carter.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: GGGG on November 14, 2015, 10:40:34 AM
I would have rather seen more Carter and less Cheatham.  I think Carter is a better defender and handles the break better.
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: brewcity77 on November 15, 2015, 07:54:52 AM
Title: Re: minutes vs. Belmont
Post by: We R Final Four on November 15, 2015, 08:35:13 AM
Playing a slower Heldt where he who have had to defend a shooter on the perimeter while Luke was not in foul trouble was not necessary and therefore not utilized.

I suspect Heldt will get limited minutes when Luke gets in foul trouble or a defensive post presence is needed. Amin seems to be the first option off the bench at the four.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev