MUScoop

MUScoop => The Superbar => Topic started by: State Street Warrior on September 29, 2015, 08:56:10 AM

Title: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: State Street Warrior on September 29, 2015, 08:56:10 AM
ESPN (Goodman) is reporting SMU will have a post season ban, lose 9 scholarships over the next 3 years and Larry Brown will be suspended for 30% of the games for lack of institutional control.

I'm just shocked, shocked I tell you...

Wonder if SMU17 new this was coming too.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: GoldenWarrior11 on September 29, 2015, 09:05:13 AM
SMU got what they paid for - literally.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: GoldenWarrior11 on September 29, 2015, 09:10:38 AM
It's always worth repeating at least one more time, but, boy, did Marquette and the C7 make the wisest and most responsible basketball decision in their programs history by separating from schools like SMU, Houston, Tulane, East Carolina, UCF, USF, and Tulsa.  Continuing to play Cincinnati and UConn, while also playing Temple and Memphis, would have been just fine - but not at the expense of those other programs.

The above listed schools tried for years to shake the stigma that they were marginalized as Conference USA-lifers, that they belonged in the power conferences and that they could compete in basketball and football.  So, what do they do?  They form a new conference called the American Conference with the same group of schools from Conference USA...   ::)
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on September 29, 2015, 09:16:59 AM
SMU tried to get someone else first.....
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: GGGG on September 29, 2015, 10:01:49 AM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on September 29, 2015, 09:16:59 AM
SMU tried to get someone else first.....


Who turned them down.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: tower912 on September 29, 2015, 10:36:58 AM
Proof that Buzz has too many scruples to get dragged into that cesspool. 
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: 4everwarriors on September 29, 2015, 11:40:53 AM
Nah, probably wouldn't meet his number, hey? He tried to get the Auburn gig, but lost out to Bruce.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: brandx on September 29, 2015, 11:44:23 AM
One word

Craig James!!
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: wadesworld on September 29, 2015, 12:25:55 PM
I just hope nobody in the history of every single place Chicos has ever worked has ever done something bad.  Not sure where he is currently working (I'm sure he'd be happy to let me know what awesome and very high up position he is in very loudly and publicly), but let's just say he's at Time Warner Cable, who has someone high up who has a very public divorce with his wife because he is cheating with his young secretary.  According to Chicos logic, that means we can all scream loudly that Chicos sleeps with his young secretary (despite the fact that he will not even look at a single Tweet by her because it's creepy for someone to even consider looking at a social media post by a just-out-of-college female).
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: jesmu84 on September 29, 2015, 02:50:36 PM
SMU punished. UNC is not - so far.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: ChitownSpaceForRent on September 29, 2015, 03:00:45 PM
SMU must have the record for most sanctions for a school, or at least the most severe.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: GGGG on September 29, 2015, 03:31:56 PM
Quote from: 4everwarriors on September 29, 2015, 11:40:53 AM
Nah, probably wouldn't meet his number, hey? He tried to get the Auburn gig, but lost out to Bruce.


They paid Larry Brown $2.8M.  Buzz is making $2.3M.  I don't think meeting Buzz's salary requirements was why he wasn't interested.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: Spotcheck Billy on September 29, 2015, 03:50:11 PM
Quote from: ChitownSpaceForRent on September 29, 2015, 03:00:45 PM
SMU must have the record for most sanctions for a school, or at least the most severe.

I believe they do have a record of being sanctioned 10 times
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: 4everwarriors on September 29, 2015, 04:09:34 PM
Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on September 29, 2015, 03:31:56 PM

They paid Larry Brown $2.8M.  Buzz is making $2.3M.  I don't think meeting Buzz's salary requirements was why he wasn't interested.


Maybe he was a bigger fool than we thought? Shoulda gone then, ai na?
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: brandx on September 29, 2015, 05:29:23 PM
Brown is a perfect 3-for-3, having worked as a head coach at just 3 NCAA Division I schools (UCLA, Kansas and SMU), yet managing to lead all 3 into a post-season ban.

Any school that hires Brown should be blamed just as much as Brown. Everyone knows what he is, but they hire him anyway.
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: GGGG on September 29, 2015, 05:34:49 PM
Quote from: 4everwarriors on September 29, 2015, 04:09:34 PM

Maybe he was a bigger fool than we thought? Shoulda gone then, ai na?


He didn't really want to leave in 2012.  He wanted to leave in 2013.  What happened in between?
Title: Re: SMU Post Season Ban
Post by: wadesworld on September 29, 2015, 06:01:10 PM
Quote from: The Sultan of Sunshine on September 29, 2015, 05:34:49 PM

He didn't really want to leave in 2012.  He wanted to leave in 2013.  What happened in between?

Only Chicos knows.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev