MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on July 24, 2015, 01:22:32 AM

Title: [Paint Touches] Historically, how weak is Marquette's schedule?
Post by: TAMU, Knower of Ball on July 24, 2015, 01:22:32 AM
http://painttouches.com/2015/07/17/historically-how-weak-is-marquettes-schedule/
Title: Re: [Paint Touches] Historically, how weak is Marquette's schedule?
Post by: keefe on July 24, 2015, 06:56:36 PM
What is amazing is that back in the day we were an independent and our entire schedule had to be constructed from scratch. Given our stature we played some great schools but we did have a lot of Stetsons and St Leos on the card as well.

People are gnashing their teeth but there is a purpose to the schedule built for this team. Let the guys who know their business get the job done.

Title: Re: [Paint Touches] Historically, how weak is Marquette's schedule?
Post by: brandx on July 24, 2015, 09:27:33 PM
Quote from: keefe on July 24, 2015, 06:56:36 PM
What is amazing is that back in the day we were an independent and our entire schedule had to be constructed from scratch. Given our stature we played some great schools but we did have a lot of Stetsons and St Leos on the card as well.


I had the same thought, Crash. Independents had a hard time scheduling conference teams back then. That's why often times MU had a better record than almost all the teams ahead of them in the AP & UPI polls. Writers didn't respect the patsies.
Title: Re: [Paint Touches] Historically, how weak is Marquette's schedule?
Post by: Logi4three on July 24, 2015, 11:58:57 PM
Quote from: brandx on July 24, 2015, 09:27:33 PM
I had the same thought, Crash. Independents had a hard time scheduling conference teams back then. That's why often times MU had a better record than almost all the teams ahead of them in the AP & UPI polls. Writers didn't respect the patsies.

or the process! 
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev