Did anyone else see the irony in the last moment or so of regulation yesterday? I think it was a symbol for this season.
D Wilson launches a 65 foot jump shot that goes through the hole. Buzz calls time out a split second before the ball leaves Derrick's hands.
Yikes.
I can only imagine what would have happened if that shot counted. It would have been one of the great shots in Marquette history, up there with Glenn River's half-court buzzer beater against Notre Dame in the early 1980s.
Had Derrick's shot counted, everything this year would have been forgiven. Instead, we have a glass-half-empty win against the worst team in our league. In overtime!
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:14:12 AM
Did anyone else see the irony in the last moment or so of regulation yesterday? I think it was a symbol for this season.
D Wilson launches a 65 foot jump shot that goes through the hole. Buzz calls time out a split second before the ball leaves Derrick's hands.
Yikes.
I can only imagine what would have happened if that shot counted. It would have been one of the great shots in Marquette history, up there with Glenn River's half-court buzzer beater against Notre Dame in the early 1980s.
Had Derrick's shot counted, everything this year would have been forgiven. Instead, we have a glass-half-empty win against the worst team in our league. In overtime!
I agree but not to be nit picky, the TO was called before the ball was inbound. The place was pandemioum so no one heard it. That's what Buzz was standing on the court and the ball sailed over his head. So, it wasn't a split second before.
Quote from: Heisenberg on February 23, 2014, 10:18:34 AM
I agree but not to be nit picky, the TO was called before the ball was inbound. The place was pandemioum so no one heard it. That's what Buzz was standing on the court and the ball sailed over his head. So, it wasn't a split second before.
Buzz standing on the court doesn't mean anything. He's on it so much, someone ought to get him a uniform.
I watched it on television yesterday and it appeared as I saw it. Nonetheless, DePaul was defending us and D Wilson hit a 65 footer. We were over-coaching at that point. 2.6 seconds left in the game, so let the guys do their thing. I would think by now Buzz would have coached them properly.
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:14:12 AM
Did anyone else see the irony in the last moment or so of regulation yesterday? I think it was a symbol for this season.
D Wilson launches a 65 foot jump shot that goes through the hole. Buzz calls time out a split second before the ball leaves Derrick's hands.
Yikes.
I can only imagine what would have happened if that shot counted. It would have been one of the great shots in Marquette history, up there with Glenn River's half-court buzzer beater against Notre Dame in the early 1980s.
Had Derrick's shot counted, everything this year would have been forgiven. Instead, we have a glass-half-empty win against the worst team in our league. In overtime!
I was at the game and it was obvious that a timeout was called well before Wilson shot the ball--as there should have been. Most players were walking off the court and bench players onto the court before Wilson shot the ball. And Wilson making that shot would not have been a panacea.
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:24:01 AM
I watched it on television yesterday and it appeared as I saw it. Nonetheless, DePaul was defending us and D Wilson hit a 65 footer. We were over-coaching at that point. 2.6 seconds left in the game, so let the guys do their thing. I would think by now Buzz would have coached them properly.
I hope you're joking. You wanted Wilson heaving up a 65 footer, rather than Buzz designing a play to get a good look. That inbound play would have worked pretty well if Gardner didn't totally butcher the inbound pass to J Wilson. Your reasoning is completely skewed toward the fact that D Wilson made that prayer.
Homer said it was "about 5 seconds after the timeout was called."
The chances that heave being a better alternative than a play drawn up on the sideline is hilarious. 65' shots go in 1% maybe less.......I think Buzz can draw up a play with better odds than that.
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:24:01 AM
I watched it on television yesterday and it appeared as I saw it. Nonetheless, DePaul was defending us and D Wilson hit a 65 footer. We were over-coaching at that point. 2.6 seconds left in the game, so let the guys do their thing. I would think by now Buzz would have coached them properly.
God help us all.
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:24:01 AM
Buzz standing on the court doesn't mean anything. He's on it so much, someone ought to get him a uniform.
I watched it on television yesterday and it appeared as I saw it. Nonetheless, DePaul was defending us and D Wilson hit a 65 footer. We were over-coaching at that point. 2.6 seconds left in the game, so let the guys do their thing. I would think by now Buzz would have coached them properly.
If MU had missed the potentially game-winning shot, and Buzz still had timeouts to burn, but didn't use them and "Let the guys do their thing" this board would have crucified him.
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:24:01 AM
We were over-coaching at that point. 2.6 seconds left in the game, so let the guys do their thing. I would think by now Buzz would have coached them properly.
I agree with this point. The problem with calling that timeout is that it gives DePaul a chance to set up a defense on the inbounds. With that said, I understand Buzz calling the timeout because I don't think we currently have a player that can make a play on the fly like we needed at that point in time. As it turns out, we didn't do anything after the time out so Derrick's shot looks like a lost opportunity. In reality, it was not the shot we needed when he let it go and he was not the person we needed taking it.
After the TO, Gardner inbounded the ball under at the baseline and ran the floor to do. That means it was an inbound after a made basket. That can only happen if the TO was called before Derrick even touched the ball.
Quote from: Heisenberg on February 23, 2014, 11:34:46 AM
After the TO, Gardner inbounded the ball under at the baseline and ran the floor to do. That means it was an inbound after a made basket. That can only happen if the TO was called before Derrick even touched the ball.
The TO was called immediately after the made basket and before the inbounds. It looked to me that the only reason Derrick even shot the ball (with 2.3 seconds left) was because he knew there was a TO and he was having a little fun. If it had actually been live he would have likely taken at least one more dribble and shot it from around half court.
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:14:12 AM
I can only imagine what would have happened if that shot counted.
Had Derrick's shot counted, everything this year would have been forgiven.
Your imagination is broken.
Quote from: forgetful on February 23, 2014, 11:43:28 AM
The TO was called immediately after the made basket and before the inbounds. It looked to me that the only reason Derrick even shot the ball (with 2.3 seconds left) was because he knew there was a TO and he was having a little fun. If it had actually been live he would have likely taken at least one more dribble and shot it from around half court.
This is how I saw it.
Quote from: We R Final Four on February 23, 2014, 10:40:41 AM
The chances that heave being a better alternative than a play drawn up on the sideline is hilarious. 65' shots go in 1% maybe less.......I think Buzz can draw up a play with better odds than that.
I'm not so certain. Buzz's "special teams" are always "special". There wasn't enough time left for the play to fall apart and someone to make something out of nothing, as with most of our buzzer beaters. For the supposed emphasis, it's always been a weak spot. Perhaps a special teams assistant is in order.
Quote from: mu_hilltopper on February 23, 2014, 11:49:55 AM
Your imagination is broken.
Agree.
That shot, if it counted:
- would have only doubled his point total
- would have been his SECOND made three pointer the whole season (27 games)
- would have been his first 3 pter since 12/17 vs Ball State
His offensive performance for his position is abysmal.
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on February 23, 2014, 12:44:10 PM
Agree.
That shot, if it counted:
- would have only doubled his point total
- would have been his SECOND made three pointer the whole season (27 games)
- would have been his first 3 pter since 12/17 vs Ball State
His offensive performance for his position is abysmal.
+100
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on February 23, 2014, 12:44:10 PM
Agree.
That shot, if it counted:
- would have only doubled his point total
- would have been his SECOND made three pointer the whole season (27 games)
- would have been his first 3 pter since 12/17 vs Ball State
His offensive performance for his position is abysmal.
Summed up best by two notables:
Kevin ONeil: Mu is playing 4 on 5 with their PG out there
MU fan at a game whose Daughter asks: "Daddy, how come nobody is guarding #12?"
Quote from: dgies9156 on February 23, 2014, 10:14:12 AM
Did anyone else see the irony in the last moment or so of regulation yesterday? I think it was a symbol for this season.
D Wilson launches a 65 foot jump shot that goes through the hole. Buzz calls time out a split second before the ball leaves Derrick's hands.
Yikes.
I can only imagine what would have happened if that shot counted. It would have been one of the great shots in Marquette history, up there with Glenn River's half-court buzzer beater against Notre Dame in the early 1980s.
Had Derrick's shot counted, everything this year would have been forgiven. Instead, we have a glass-half-empty win against the worst team in our league. In overtime!
I thought this was the dumbest thing I ever read until I scrolled down to see your next post.
Quote from: mujivitz06 on February 23, 2014, 08:19:01 PM
I thought this was the dumbest thing I ever read until I scrolled down to see your next post.
(http://i.imgur.com/dhMeAzK.gif)