As of now MU has two more to use.Who do you want?Many players in the mix.Stone,Heldt,Schwartz and Watson.There are others.I did not include Ellenson because he is going to Wisconsin.Hope I am wrong on that,but by accounts it looks like Wisconsin.
I would take Stone and Schwartz.Schwartz is a stretch 4 like Ellenson.He is 6'8"and can knock down the 3pt.shot.I really like Heldt and if another scholarship opens I would take him in a minute.
What leads you to be so sure of Ellenson? Not disagreeing, I just haven't seen anything so definitive out there yet.
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 10, 2014, 09:54:06 AM
As of now MU has two more to use.Who do you want?Many players in the mix.Stone,Heldt,Schwartz and Watson.There are others.I did not include Ellenson because he is going to Wisconsin.Hope I am wrong on that,but by accounts it looks like Wisconsin.
I would take Stone and Schwartz.Schwartz is a stretch 4 like Ellenson.He is 6'8"and can knock down the 3pt.shot.I really like Heldt and if another scholarship opens I would take him in a minute.
Stone, Charles Matthews, Watson, in that order.
Murray, that there Kool-Aid in your avatar is the Jonestown flavor, a'ina?
Guards, guards, guards and more guards, as long as they can pass, dribble and shoot.
Quote from: Aircraftcarrier on January 10, 2014, 09:54:06 AM
As of now MU has two more to use.Who do you want?Many players in the mix.Stone,Heldt,Schwartz and Watson.There are others.I did not include Ellenson because he is going to Wisconsin.Hope I am wrong on that,but by accounts it looks like Wisconsin.
I would take Stone and Schwartz.Schwartz is a stretch 4 like Ellenson.He is 6'8"and can knock down the 3pt.shot.I really like Heldt and if another scholarship opens I would take him in a minute.
The way Wisky is playing right now--maybe Bo will snap up all of them.
Do not see Schwartz going to UW if they land Ellenson.If UW lands Sharma they will not get Stone and/or Heldt.
Quote from: UticaBusBarn on January 10, 2014, 02:03:58 PM
Guards, guards, guards and more guards, as long as they can pass, dribble and shoot.
Oh how the times have changed from as little as two years ago...
Charles Matthews and Diamond Stone, no question
Quote from: TAMU Eagle on January 10, 2014, 06:10:15 PM
Charles Matthews and Diamond Stone, no question
So how about 2 we have a shot to get?
Scwartz and Watson. Can't afford Stone or Mathews.
Think Stone and Watson seems reasonable.
Quote from: wadesworld on January 10, 2014, 06:15:53 PM
So how about 2 we have a shot to get?
This is a wish list. Not my actual predictions.
I still have a great feeling about Stone, especially after Jerry Meyer gave us the nod as the leader for Stone.
Matthews is a tougher sell, but last I heard (which was admittedly 2 or 3 months ago) Buzz and Co. were still optimistic about their chances.