http://www.tmz.com/2013/11/14/jameis-winston-sexual-assault-investigation-florida-state-university-cover-up/
yes, i realize it's tmz. but this stuff pisses me off.
At least he didn't crack someone's coconut with a bottle of Dom.
Quote from: jesmu84 on November 14, 2013, 08:39:21 PM
http://www.tmz.com/2013/11/14/jameis-winston-sexual-assault-investigation-florida-state-university-cover-up/
yes, i realize it's tmz. but this stuff pisses me off.
May or may not be a story - but one thing I can guarantee is that I will never stoop to reading or listening to TMZ
Left out of the TMZ article (and many media reports) is that the person accused of committing the actual assault is not Winston. The police report describes the offender as being between 5'9" and 5'11" with straight hair. That most certainly does not describe Winston. Obviously, that doesn't mean that he wasn't involved in some capacity but it also does not appear as though Winston is under investigation for committing sexual assault despite what the media would like us to believe.
Also left out is that the alleged victim initially hemmed and hawed about moving forward.
Quote from: brandx on November 14, 2013, 11:52:00 PM
May or may not be a story - but one thing I can guarantee is that I will never stoop to reading or listening to TMZ
You guys might want to join us in the Internet age...it's the TMZs of the world that tend to be first in on breaking stories these days.
Quote from: NavinRJohnson on November 15, 2013, 09:14:44 AM
You guys might want to join us in the Internet age...it's the TMZs of the world that tend to be first in on breaking stories these days.
I work in the IT industry so I guess I'd have to say I have joined.
But if you think TMZ is interested in news stories, you might need to join reality :o
Quote from: brandx on November 15, 2013, 01:17:33 PM
I work in the IT industry so I guess I'd have to say I have joined.
But if you think TMZ is interested in news stories, you might need to join reality :o
Ah, you mean the google industry.
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on November 15, 2013, 07:58:16 AM
Left out of the TMZ article (and many media reports) is that the person accused of committing the actual assault is not Winston. The police report describes the offender as being between 5'9" and 5'11" with straight hair. That most certainly does not describe Winston. Obviously, that doesn't mean that he wasn't involved in some capacity but it also does not appear as though Winston is under investigation for committing sexual assault despite what the media would like us to believe.
What's that now?
http://m.espn.go.com/ncf/story?storyId=10009077
Quote from: jesmu84 on November 21, 2013, 12:30:54 AM
What's that now?
http://m.espn.go.com/ncf/story?storyId=10009077
It's a bizarre story. That's for sure. Either the accuser changed her story (which seems likely given the DNA test) or there was some very faulty reporting.
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on November 27, 2013, 07:05:22 AM
It's a bizarre story. That's for sure. Either the accuser changed her story (which seems likely given the DNA test) or there was some very faulty reporting.
This is heading down the same predictable path that these things always go down. Ugly.
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on November 27, 2013, 07:05:22 AM
It's a bizarre story. That's for sure. Either the accuser changed her story (which seems likely given the DNA test) or there was some very faulty reporting.
One of the very firs things I read on this indicated in some fashion (I don't really recall exactly), that the height/weight thing was believed to be inaccurate. Where the inaccuracy came from (witness or reporting) I don't know, but all indications were that Winston was their guy, despite what the reported description did or did not say. I find that easy to believe, as I would guess that most witness physical description estimates are highly inaccurate.
Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on November 27, 2013, 07:50:02 AM
This is heading down the same predictable path that these things always go down. Ugly.
The guy is absolutely innocent until proven guilty, and legitimate questions about the accusation can be asked, but it is extremely hard not to be cynical when investigators come out and say that nothing will be known for at least two weeks...after ACC Championship game, Heisman voting, etc.
Quote from: NavinRJohnson on November 27, 2013, 08:05:52 AM
The guy is absolutely innocent until proven guilty, and legitimate questions about the accusation can be asked, but it is extremely hard not to be cynical when investigators come out and say that nothing will be known for at least two weeks...after ACC Championship game, Heisman voting, etc.
Well, the state attorneys office did just find out about this two weeks ago.
It could get even uglier if they arrest and charge Winston...and then allow him to play in the BCSCG under their exceptions clause. That would actually require me to root for Alabama two years in a row.
Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on November 27, 2013, 08:15:56 AM
Well, the state attorneys office did just find out about this two weeks ago.
It could get even uglier if they arrest and charge Winston...and then allow him to play in the BCSCG under their exceptions clause. That would actually require me to root for Alabama two years in a row.
I have a weird feeling Auburn is taking Bama down this week
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on November 27, 2013, 08:32:32 AM
I have a weird feeling Auburn is taking Bama down this week
Rematch: Florida State vs. Northern Illinois! This time for all the marbles!
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on November 27, 2013, 08:32:32 AM
I have a weird feeling Auburn is taking Bama down this week
I don't think so. Auburn's defense is porous, and Alabama eats offenses like Auburn's for lunch.
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on November 27, 2013, 07:05:22 AM
It's a bizarre story. That's for sure. Either the accuser changed her story (which seems likely given the DNA test) or there was some very faulty reporting.
there is also that nasty 'lil detail about some peoples connected to florida st. program that gave her an offer she couldn't/shouldn't refuse ;D ;D
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on November 27, 2013, 07:05:22 AM
It's a bizarre story. That's for sure. Either the accuser changed her story (which seems likely given the DNA test) or there was some very faulty reporting.
Boy, I see way more possibilities than those two.
Like, say, a police department that's extremely friendly to the local football team (i.e. notified the team's attorney and campus police, but not the state's attorney; didn't even bother questioning the suspect; waited months to start collecting evidence) discouraged a victim then buried the investigation.
I'm not saying that happened. I have no idea. But it seems at least as plausible as your version.
Uh-oh.
Tallahassee detective who initially investigated the rape accusation against Winston sought employment with FSU booster group and has numerous ties to FSU.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf--detective-in-jameis-winston-case-requested-work-with-florida-state-booster-group-182713080.html
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on November 27, 2013, 08:32:32 AM
I have a weird feeling Auburn is taking Bama down this week
:P
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on November 30, 2013, 06:27:45 PM
:P
chico!!! did ya lay any bones on it? auburn getting 10 with a money line of 355!! nice call!!
Quote from: rocket surgeon on December 01, 2013, 07:03:12 AM
chico!!! did ya lay any bones on it? auburn getting 10 with a money line of 355!! nice call!!
No bones. I'll do fun wagering from time to time with friends, but not with bookies. For some reason I've always been really good at college football picks...wish it translated to the NFL.
I'm sure someone here knows more about this than me, but I'm curious. Considering there's going to be an announcement this afternoon, doesn't that seem to indicate that Winston won't be charged? I mean, if they were going to arrest him, wouldn't they get the warrant and go arrest him as opposed to calling a press conference?
Quote from: MerrittsMustache on December 05, 2013, 07:14:50 AM
I'm sure someone here knows more about this than me, but I'm curious. Considering there's going to be an announcement this afternoon, doesn't that seem to indicate that Winston won't be charged? I mean, if they were going to arrest him, wouldn't they get the warrant and go arrest him as opposed to calling a press conference?
If there's charges, safe to say that by the time the press conference is held, they will have been filed, and he will already be in custody. One report I saw last night suggested they would already have been in touch with his lawyers to provide him an opportunity to come in voluntarily under the dark of night. I don't really know, but I assume the timing of announcement is related in some way to when his court appearance (if any) would be, etc.
If I had to guess, there will be no charges, and the announcement will largely be not enough evidence, conflicting evidence, etc., coupled with some sort of admonishment of those who handled (or didnt) the initial investigation.
I have no idea on most of the details about the case. Having said that, like every other instance before this one, it seems a bit shady all around.
Quote from: jesmu84 on December 05, 2013, 01:52:13 PM
I have no idea on most of the details about the case. Having said that, like every other instance before this one, it seems a bit shady all around.
The prosecutor said this: "We have a duty as prosecutors to only file charges if we have a reasonable likelihood of a conviction.... We did not feel we could meet that burden."
That IMO is pretty darn near a "I think something illegal went on....but I can't prove it" type of implication.
So is it shady, as in did he get preferential treatment from the DA? I don't think so.
Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on December 05, 2013, 01:58:28 PM
The prosecutor said this: "We have a duty as prosecutors to only file charges if we have a reasonable likelihood of a conviction.... We did not feel we could meet that burden."
That IMO is pretty darn near a "I think something illegal went on....but I can't prove it" type of implication.
So is it shady, as in did he get preferential treatment from the DA? I don't think so.
It is a very odd case, particularly in the way that it played out almost a year after the incident took place. On top of that, you have the officer telling the accuser that she needs to think long and hard about pressing charges because FSU fans could make her life hell. Was that a threat because he was biased toward FSU football or was he sincerely warning her of what would likely happen if she moved forward?
Also, I'm no lawyer, but if this had gone to trial, I'd have to think that the defense would be able to portray her as a liar right off the bat. She claims to have been basically blackout drunk that night (which also hurts her case) but the toxicology report showed her with a BAC of .04. Tough for the prosectutor to come back from that, I'd think.
Having said all that, the cynic in me can't help but think that there were some shady actions from the TPD.
Oh I agree that things look shady, or at the least very in appropriate, from the Police Department. I just think the DA's hand are tied here.
Quote from: The Sultan of Syncopation on December 05, 2013, 02:18:26 PM
Oh I agree that things look shady, or at the least very in appropriate, from the Police Department. I just think the DA's hand are tied here.
Agreed.
Does anyone expect anything to come of this from the university? When MU had some front-page issues, we lost an AD and such.
Quote from: jesmu84 on December 05, 2013, 02:21:01 PM
Agreed.
Does anyone expect anything to come of this from the university? When MU had some front-page issues, we lost an AD and such.
Doubtful. The MU case was a breakdown in protocol between Public Safety and the MPD. I don't believe the university was directly involved in the Winston case.
nm