MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Galway Eagle on November 11, 2013, 02:00:22 PM

Title: Question about the jerseys
Post by: Galway Eagle on November 11, 2013, 02:00:22 PM
Ok so I've always wondered if anybody else had an opinion on this.  When I was a freshman in 09-10 we had converse making our stuff and the jersies and shorts (at least the ones in the spirit shop) were double layered and actually fairly heavy.  The next year we went to jordan and the clothes were unbelievably lighter, thinner and less stiff.  What happens? we go to the sweet 16 and have had great success since.  Maybe it's just me but I've often wondered if that had any impact on our teams before 10-11.  Maybe I'm just a conspiracy theorist.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: 77ncaachamps on November 11, 2013, 02:08:27 PM
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on November 11, 2013, 02:00:22 PM
Ok so I've always wondered if anybody else had an opinion on this.  When I was a freshman in 09-10 we had converse making our stuff and the jersies and shorts (at least the ones in the spirit shop) were double layered and actually fairly heavy.  The next year we went to jordan and the clothes were unbelievably lighter, thinner and less stiff.  What happens? we go to the sweet 16 and have had great success since.  Maybe it's just me but I've often wondered if that had any impact on our teams before 10-11.  Maybe I'm just a conspiracy theorist.

Nike uses their Dri-Fit technology only with their Nike products.
They own Converse. I don't think they used that technology with Converse product lines.
In fact, I don't think they sponsor any D-1 basketball teams anymore.

MU was the only outfitted team. WKU wore their shoes, but now are Russell Athletic (jerseys) and Nike (shoes).
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: Galway Eagle on November 11, 2013, 02:11:30 PM
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on November 11, 2013, 02:08:27 PM
Nike uses their Dri-Fit technology only with their Nike products.
They own Converse. I don't think they used that technology with Converse product lines.
In fact, I don't think they sponsor any D-1 basketball teams anymore.

MU was the only outfitted team. WKU wore their shoes, but now are Russell Athletic (jerseys) and Nike (shoes).

I know Nike owns Converse and such but just holding the Lazar jersey I have (09-10) vs the DJO jersey I have (11-12) there's no comparison. I'd hate to play in that old converse thing.  Just wondering if anybody else thinks it might've been a hindrance.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: 77ncaachamps on November 11, 2013, 02:31:26 PM
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on November 11, 2013, 02:11:30 PM
I know Nike owns Converse and such but just holding the Lazar jersey I have (09-10) vs the DJO jersey I have (11-12) there's no comparison. I'd hate to play in that old converse thing.  Just wondering if anybody else thinks it might've been a hindrance.

The better comparison is actually holding the authentic jerseys the players wear.

There may be a difference, much like there is in the NFL and the NBA jerseys.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: Windyplayer on November 11, 2013, 02:39:11 PM
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on November 11, 2013, 02:11:30 PM
I know Nike owns Converse and such but just holding the Lazar jersey I have (09-10) vs the DJO jersey I have (11-12) there's no comparison. I'd hate to play in that old converse thing.  Just wondering if anybody else thinks it might've been a hindrance.
Costanza?
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: Galway Eagle on November 11, 2013, 02:41:41 PM
Quote from: 77ncaachamps on November 11, 2013, 02:31:26 PM
The better comparison is actually holding the authentic jerseys the players wear.

There may be a difference, much like there is in the NFL and the NBA jerseys.

True I was hoping someone who's maybe purchased one of those game worn jerseys could fill me in on that info. 
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: 77ncaachamps on November 11, 2013, 02:48:19 PM
I don't have a game-worn or team-issued jersey from the Jordan years, but comparing the Nike to Converse years (since I have one of each)...

Nike: two-layered jersey. thin lining on the inside and stretchy.
Converse: thicker, single-layered. side piping is actually one long piece sewn to the front and back pieces of the jersey.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: GGGG on November 11, 2013, 02:51:33 PM
The switch to a lighter version of a basketball uniform has been occurring at all levels over the past few years.  The NBA made that switch back in 2010-11.  Prior to that, the uniforms were all heavier.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: mileskishnish72 on November 11, 2013, 05:37:02 PM
They make Dri-Fit socks also, but they haven't done jack for my golf game.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: TallTitan34 on November 12, 2013, 07:39:01 AM
Quote from: BagpipingBoxer on November 11, 2013, 02:41:41 PM
True I was hoping someone who's maybe purchased one of those game worn jerseys could fill me in on that info.  

The Nike Elite jerseys were made from a different material than those sold in the spirit shop.  They also had real stitching instead of the tackle twill on the spirit shop jerseys.

As for the current ones, I haven't seen a game worn Jordan jersey.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: MarsupialMadness on November 12, 2013, 11:10:46 AM
They may be slightly lighter now, but I don't think that had any impact on our teams' performance prior to 2010-2011.
Title: Re: Question about the jerseys
Post by: 77ncaachamps on November 12, 2013, 06:03:41 PM
Quote from: TallTitan34 on November 12, 2013, 07:39:01 AM
The Nike Elite jerseys were made from a different material than those sold in the spirit shop.  They also had real stitching instead of the tackle twill on the spirit shop jerseys.

As for the current ones, I haven't seen a game worn Jordan jersey.


I do think the body of the material IS lighter. I did not consider that the emblems and numbers would be of a thicker quality though.

Nevertheless, the jersey excuse in this instance is just that: an excuse.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev