MUScoop

Stated this poll four days before the draft.

I say no, and hope I'm wrong.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/212512231.html

Vander Blue remains confident entering draft

St. Francis - Vander Blue is almost finished with a grueling workout schedule that has taken him from NBA city to NBA city.

The former Marquette guard made his stop in Milwaukee on Friday to work out with the Bucks, his home state team. And he will move on to Memphis on Monday for his final workout before settling back in Madison on Thursday night to watch the draft at home with his mom.

Blue is confident he will be chosen among the 60 players in the two-round draft after showing his skills for the last month.

"Nobody knows, especially this year's draft," Blue said. "It's pretty wide open. I've gotten a lot of interesting feedback from a lot of teams. Right now I'm not sure about where I would land, but at this point it's just about me getting my foot in the door.

"I'm not really concerned about where I get in, about what pick, it's about what team."

Blue took part in a six-player workout that also featured Serbian guard Nemanja Nedovic, Washington State senior forward Brock Motum, Arizona freshman forward Grant Jerrett, Butler senior center Andrew Smith and Serbian center Dejan Musli.

Blue worked out in Dallas on Thursday where he was able to spend some time with former MU teammate Jae Crowder, now playing for the Mavericks. He also said he had good workouts in Atlanta, Philadelphia, Houston, San Antonio and Detroit.

"This is No. 10 or No. 11, I'm not sure," Blue said of the Bucks workout. "I think I've been able to show my versatility, being able to play the 1 (point guard) and 2 (shooting guard). Showing people I can shoot the ball.

"Teams put me in different situations and see what I can do. More here they had me with the ball. Other teams had me off the ball. Some teams had me particularly (at) the 1."

The 6-foot-5 Blue was not used in a point guard role in his three years at Marquette.

"I didn't have the chance at Marquette to bring the ball up as much because we had a great point guard in Junior (Cadougan)," Blue said. "Just being able to show teams I can play the point has really helped me. It's more now being a combo guard."

Bucks coach Larry Drew did not attend Friday's session while he worked on making the move from his Atlanta home, and assistants Bob Bender and Nick Van Exel directed Friday's session.

Bucks director of scouting Billy McKinney said he thinks Blue could go early in the second round or in the middle of the round.

"I think there are going to be some surprises," McKinney said. "Some guys could go up. Lucas Nogueira (a Brazilian center), who had a really good camp in Treviso, could move up. Steven Adams (a 19-year-old Pittsburgh center), a lot of people are moving up based on their draft workouts."

Blue said he would not be devastated if his name is not called on draft night.

"I've seen guys not get drafted, Wesley (Matthews) for instance," Blue said. "I'm pretty sure I can get on a summer league team, play summer league and work my way on a roster. Work from there.

"But I'm feeling good going into the draft. Nobody knows where but I think I'll hear my name called. And if not, I'll still be ready.

"Hope for the best but expect the worst, that's how I live," Blue said. "It wouldn't be devastating at all. It just means I have a little more work to do. I want to have a long career in the NBA. I just don't want to get there and say I'm in the NBA.

"I want to get there and establish myself."

Anyone going to the draft?

Vander is going to get to pick from among several offers to play for summer teams because he's not going to get drafted.

You know what really could have shown teams he can handle the 1? Staying his senior season and doing it over a full season versus 11 three-hour workouts.

Vander will be the beneficiary of a Buzz Williams lineage.  My predicition is a late 2nd round pick.

Quote from: Niv Berkowitz on June 23, 2013, 04:11:40 PM
You know what really could have shown teams he can handle the 1? Staying his senior season and doing it over a full season versus 11 three-hour workouts.

Why do you think Buzz would have had him play point?

Blue is not NBA PG material. Hope he makes it, but it will not be at the point.

Honestly, its probably in his best interest to not be drafted and go the Wes route. From MU's perspective, I'll still be rooting for him to find a way in.

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 23, 2013, 04:44:27 PM

Why do you think Buzz would have had him play point?

Exactly. Buzz is interested in winning games, not experiment with positions to showcase players for the next level.

I still think Vander gets drafted though.

Quote from: AWegrzyn17 on June 23, 2013, 07:24:39 PM
Honestly, its probably in his best interest to not be drafted and go the Wes route.

Wes is by far the exception to the rule.  A second round pick shows some sort of investment. 

I voted yes, as I think he'll be one of the last couple picks of the draft. Still a dumb decision, but hope it all works out for Vander.

Quote from: MUSF on June 23, 2013, 07:43:17 PM
Exactly. Buzz is interested in winning games, not experiment with positions to showcase players for the next level.

I still think Vander gets drafted though.

If memory serves, Buzz played him some at PG when Vander was a freshman. Maybe even a little as a soph. No?

When Dee Brown was at Illinois, he was Deron Williams' 2-guard. But he had absolutely no chance to be a 2 in the NBA. Meanwhile, after Williams left, Illinois didn't have a proven PG for the following season. So Bruce Webber moved Brown to PG, Illinois had a good season and Brown did get drafted as a PG. It was a win-win.

We'll never know if Buzz would have played Vander some or a lot at PG, but I don't think it's way out there to think he might have.

Oh, and I voted no on Vander getting drafted.

Sorry to say no. Haven't seen one recent article mentioning a team interested in Blue. Phoenix at 57th is his best chance cause of their strong need for shooting guards. 

I think he'll get picked. The relative success of Matthews, Butler, and to a lesser extent Crowder and Novak's resurgence has MU guys a bit more popular than they were when the Amigos came out. I agree that he won't end up a PG, but I do think he can be a decent 6th-7th man in the league. He may have been better served by coming back, but based on Blue's own comments it seems like this was always going to be inevitable.

I voted yes, but it will be late like DJO. I believe you are better off going undrafted than being picked 57th like DJO.

Quote from: AnotherMU84 on June 23, 2013, 11:51:55 AM
Blue took part in a six-player workout that also featured Serbian guard Nemanja Nedovic, Washington State senior forward Brock Motum, Arizona freshman forward Grant Jerrett, Butler senior center Andrew Smith and Serbian center Dejan Musli.

If those were the names on the Bucks draft board right now, I'd feel pretty darn confident if I were Vander.  I'd also feel pretty darn upset if I was a Bucks fan.

Quote from: bilsu on June 24, 2013, 08:27:50 AM
I voted yes, but it will be late like DJO. I believe you are better off going undrafted than being picked 57th like DJO.

Seriously...why do people say this?  I can't figure it out for the life of me. 

A second round draft choice isn't a high-priced asset, but it *is* an asset.  For a team to draft you in the second round shows some sort of investment in the player.  A free agent signing shows *none.*

The reason Wes was successful is because the entire NBA simply f*cked up and didn't draft him.  He wasn't successful because he could pick and choose where to start his career.

Anything is possible, but I vote no.

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 24, 2013, 11:57:38 AM

Seriously...why do people say this?  I can't figure it out for the life of me. 

A second round draft choice isn't a high-priced asset, but it *is* an asset.  For a team to draft you in the second round shows some sort of investment in the player.  A free agent signing shows *none.*

The reason Wes was successful is because the entire NBA simply f*cked up and didn't draft him.  He wasn't successful because he could pick and choose where to start his career.

When you are drafted 57th, you are stuck with the team that drafted you. I rather not get drafted and look at who is on the roster and sign with the team that I have the best chance to make.

Quote from: bilsu on June 24, 2013, 12:50:20 PM
When you are drafted 57th, you are stuck with the team that drafted you. I rather not get drafted and look at who is on the roster and sign with the team that I have the best chance to make.

As a 2nd rounder, you have a non-guaranteed contract with a team that thinks enough of your abilities to draft your rights. The other option is to go to a team that didn't think you were worth a draft pick and hope to latch on. NBA teams don't exactly beat down the doors of undrafted FAs either. It's not like Vander will go undrafted and then start a bidding war between Pat Riley and R.C. Buford for his services. He'll play for whatever team(s) offer him a spot on their summer league roster. IIRC, Wes played for a couple of different teams in the summer, as did Jerel.

This past season, only 4 rookie, undrafted college players saw action in NBA games.

PG Scott Machado (11 games, 2.5min/gm)
SG Kent Bazemore (61 games, 4.4 min/gm)
SF DeQuan Jones (63 games, 12.7 min/gm)
SF Kevin Jones (32 games, 10.4 min/gm)

From the 2011 Draft, there were 0.
From the 2010 Draft, there were 2 (Jeremy Lin, Courtney Fortson).

The odds aren't exactly in favor of an undrafted free agent.

Quote from: bilsu on June 24, 2013, 12:50:20 PM
When you are drafted 57th, you are stuck with the team that drafted you. I rather not get drafted and look at who is on the roster and sign with the team that I have the best chance to make.

That sometimes works in the NFL...but rarely works in the NBA for the reasons that Merritts lays out.  Furthermore he is going to play in the summer league for whatever team drafts him, and if they don't have space for him in the long-run, he'll be cut.  And if he performed well enough, he will be picked up elsewhere.

The problem with DJO wasn't that he was drafted...it's just that he didn't quite have the talent.  And again, Wes succeeded because he did have the talent...not because he wasn't drafted.

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 24, 2013, 01:08:12 PM

That sometimes works in the NFL...but rarely works in the NBA for the reasons that Merritts lays out.  Furthermore he is going to play in the summer league for whatever team drafts him, and if they don't have space for him in the long-run, he'll be cut.  And if he performed well enough, he will be picked up elsewhere.

The problem with DJO wasn't that he was drafted...it's just that he didn't quite have the talent.  And again, Wes succeeded because he did have the talent...not because he wasn't drafted.

And great 2 guard size

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on June 24, 2013, 12:55:06 PM
As a 2nd rounder, you have a non-guaranteed contract with a team that thinks enough of your abilities to draft your rights. The other option is to go to a team that didn't think you were worth a draft pick and hope to latch on. NBA teams don't exactly beat down the doors of undrafted FAs either. It's not like Vander will go undrafted and then start a bidding war between Pat Riley and R.C. Buford for his services. He'll play for whatever team(s) offer him a spot on their summer league roster. IIRC, Wes played for a couple of different teams in the summer, as did Jerel.

This past season, only 4 rookie, undrafted college players saw action in NBA games.

PG Scott Machado (11 games, 2.5min/gm)
SG Kent Bazemore (61 games, 4.4 min/gm)
SF DeQuan Jones (63 games, 12.7 min/gm)
SF Kevin Jones (32 games, 10.4 min/gm)

From the 2011 Draft, there were 0.
From the 2010 Draft, there were 2 (Jeremy Lin, Courtney Fortson).

The odds aren't exactly in favor of an undrafted free agent.

That is incredible.  Wow.  That should tell you what sort of exception Matthews was...and what a big screw up the NBA made.

FWIW, a scout's brief take on Vander (via SI.com)...

Vander Blue, 6-5 guard, Marquette: "He's a really good athlete, but I'm not sure what position he is. He's a little on the small side to be a two-guard. But he's a really good defender, and he's a tough kid, which most Marquette kids are."

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on June 24, 2013, 01:22:22 PM
FWIW, a scout's brief take on Vander (via SI.com)...

Vander Blue, 6-5 guard, Marquette: "He's a really good athlete, but I'm not sure what position he is. He's a little on the small side to be a two-guard. But he's a really good defender, and he's a tough kid, which most Marquette kids are."


Wow! Sounds a bit like someone who left MU 10 years ago

Quote from: mu-rara on June 24, 2013, 01:20:01 PM
And great 2 guard size

Exactly. Honestly, I think DJO was more talented than Wes coming out of Marquette. And that's not a knock on Wesley at all.

If DJO was Wesley's size, he would have been a lottery pick.

Quote from: MUfan12 on June 24, 2013, 01:31:04 PM
Honestly, I think DJO was more talented than Wes coming out of Marquette.

Ehhh....I don't know about that. 

Wes scored more, rebounded more and shot better his senior year.  Plus he was always a better defender than DJO. 

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 24, 2013, 01:37:52 PM

Ehhh....I don't know about that. 

Wes scored more, rebounded more and shot better his senior year.  Plus he was always a better defender than DJO. 

The numbers were close, except for rebounding. Wes got to the line a ton more. Interesting to look at, regardless.

http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=23-wesley-matthews&i=1&p1=darius-johnson-odom

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on June 24, 2013, 12:55:06 PM
As a 2nd rounder, you have a non-guaranteed contract with a team that thinks enough of your abilities to draft your rights. The other option is to go to a team that didn't think you were worth a draft pick and hope to latch on.

That isn't always completely true. Some teams traded away one or both of their draft picks and therefore have to go the free-agent route with rookies. For example, the Bobcats have the No. 4 pick in this year's draft and then that's it. No second-rounder. So they might LOVE Vander and would have drafted him 35th overall if they could have ... and they would be thrilled if no other team drafted him. That happens fairly often, as NBA teams throw second-round picks around in trades like crazy.

Quote from: MU82 on June 24, 2013, 01:55:52 PM
That isn't always completely true. Some teams traded away one or both of their draft picks and therefore have to go the free-agent route with rookies. For example, the Bobcats have the No. 4 pick in this year's draft and then that's it. No second-rounder. So they might LOVE Vander and would have drafted him 35th overall if they could have ... and they would be thrilled if no other team drafted him. That happens fairly often, as NBA teams throw second-round picks around in trades like crazy.

If they LOVED Vander, they'd trade a future 2nd Round pick for a 2013 2nd Round pick and draft him.

I think if he makes it to 48 the Lakers will take him.

Quote from: MerrittsMustache on June 24, 2013, 01:57:37 PM
If they LOVED Vander, they'd trade a future 2nd Round pick for a 2013 2nd Round pick and draft him.

You're probably right about that.

All I was saying is that just because a guy wasn't drafted in the second round it doesn't mean he was trash that nobody wanted. That's all.

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 23, 2013, 04:44:27 PM

Why do you think Buzz would have had him play point?

Quote from: MUfan12 on June 24, 2013, 01:31:04 PM
Exactly. Honestly, I think DJO was more talented than Wes coming out of Marquette. And that's not a knock on Wesley at all.

You guys think if Blue asked Buzz if he could be the starting point if he returned that Buzz would turn down the offer? At that point, Buzz isn't going screw over a senior and completely destroy chemistry. He knows Blue out of position on next year's team is waaaaaaay better than no Blue and Derrick Wilson as your starter.


Also, that whole not getting drafted root is silly. How many GMs are going to cut a guy they just drafted a few months earlier for a street FA? Even if Blue is better they don't like making themselves look bad.

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on June 24, 2013, 11:54:58 PM
You guys think if Blue asked Buzz if he could be the starting point if he returned that Buzz would turn down the offer? 

Yes.

Quote from: MUfan12 on June 24, 2013, 01:31:04 PM
Exactly. Honestly, I think DJO was more talented than Wes coming out of Marquette. And that's not a knock on Wesley at all.

If DJO was Wesley's size, he would have been a lottery pick.

No he wasn't. Give me a break here! He was a streaky shooter and had a good mid-range game but tunnel vision as far as court vision and cannot set up another guy to save his life which is why he is not in the league nor has a true position now. 

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 24, 2013, 11:57:38 AM

Seriously...why do people say this?  I can't figure it out for the life of me. 

A second round draft choice isn't a high-priced asset, but it *is* an asset.  For a team to draft you in the second round shows some sort of investment in the player.  A free agent signing shows *none.*

The reason Wes was successful is because the entire NBA simply f*cked up and didn't draft him.  He wasn't successful because he could pick and choose where to start his career.

Ah, YES HE WAS!

He was successful because he could pick and choose where and who to start his career with. Are you kidding me. That is exactly what happened. Utah liked him and he fit with what Utah needed. It worked perfectly for him.

In fact, the best thing for Vander would be to actually not be drafted and take a look at any team looking for guard help regardless to position like say the Milwaukee Bucks for instance...and take his chances there.

Wesley happened to be a 6'5 guard with size who did not mind to work and defend and has a high bball IQ that appealed to the Jazz. I am sure his agent knew that.

If you have a smart, savvy, and experienced agent who has some connections and knows the process and the league, it might be very advantageous to not be drafted.

It depends on your representation and if you have a position. Vander does not have a set position or a jump shot so I say no. If he is drafted it will strictly be on MU's past reputation and the draft cred they have had in the past 10 years...plain and simple.

He will be drafted mainly on familiarity or the rep that MU players have garnered over the past 7 years more then the merit of his own play until an MU player totally flops on his face scouts will keep coming back to any of them.

Like I said Vander is the only cat who did not stay all 4 years besides Dwyane Wade. All other players who left him and sniffed the NBA played 4 years. Not that it did them much good but it did for some.

Wesley, Jerel, Dominc, Jae, JB, DJO, Novak, Diener, Lazar, etc none of them left and played for a time on an NBA roster playing under 4 years...he is the only one. It will be a milestone if he is drafted and makes an NBA team Opening Night. 

Quote from: Sunbelt15 on June 23, 2013, 09:21:40 PM
Sorry to say no. Haven't seen one recent article mentioning a team interested in Blue. Phoenix at 57th is his best chance cause of their strong need for shooting guards. 

He is not a shooting guard, that's the problem. If Lazar did not go off the roller coaster he would be and option there. I do not think Jeff Hornacek would draft a guy like Vander. I say they go for Wolters who is a bit Jeff Horny there...

Vander Blue is popping up on mock drafts in the second round and SI.Com lists him as one of the top 50 prospects for the draft on Thursday....just relaying he is on radar screens of some so-called experts.  I say he gets drafted in the second round by a team that is looking for the potential of a lock-down defender who is athletic, works hard and has upside potential.   Marquette is developing a nice reputation for developing that toughness and it translates into the NBA game.   Butler's rising status, Crowder's first year as an undersized but hardworking rookie and Wes' success give a bit of a halo to a guy like Blue.   This may sound ludicrous, but a team like the Heat who do not need any scoring punch but could have used some fresh, quicker legs than Ray Allen to guard the perimeter and stop the open 3s against the Spurs could reach for a player like Blue to provide some minutes off the bench and let him develop around some great talent.

So, not that outlandish that he gets drafted or at least gets a long look in some camps as a FA.   I voted he sees his dream come true for at least one night and hears his name near the end of round 2.

Quote from: MUHoopsFan2 on June 25, 2013, 04:12:12 AM
No he wasn't. Give me a break here! He was a streaky shooter and had a good mid-range game but tunnel vision as far as court vision and cannot set up another guy to save his life which is why he is not in the league nor has a true position now. 

Look at the numbers I posted, they were very close as seniors.

DJO is an undersized 2. Just like Jerel. If both were Wesley's size, they would have stuck in the league.

I voted "yes" because I think his athleticism will impress somebody enough to take a flier in the second round.  I still don't seem him on an NBA roster in 2013-14.  He's a poor shooter, and I don't see how he translates as a PG.  He'll be a solid defender, but he wasn't a lockdown defender at Marquette (it wasn't like you could put him on a good scorer and say "that guy's done scoring"), so I'm not so sure why we should project him as one in the NBA.  Two things about him, though, are that he is undeniably tough and he is still very young.  He may help someone down the road if they are willing to keep him on the end of the bench or in the D-League for a few years while he develops his game. 

Quote from: CTWarrior on June 25, 2013, 08:03:31 AM
I voted "yes" because I think his athleticism will impress somebody enough to take a flier in the second round.  I still don't seem him on an NBA roster in 2013-14.  He's a poor shooter, and I don't see how he translates as a PG.  He'll be a solid defender, but he wasn't a lockdown defender at Marquette (it wasn't like you could put him on a good scorer and say "that guy's done scoring"), so I'm not so sure why we should project him as one in the NBA.  Two things about him, though, are that he is undeniably tough and he is still very young.  He may help someone down the road if they are willing to keep him on the end of the bench or in the D-League for a few years while he develops his game. 

+1

Someone is going to take Vander in the second round.

Quote from: MUHoopsFan2 on June 25, 2013, 04:28:30 AM
Ah, YES HE WAS!

He was successful because he could pick and choose where and who to start his career with. Are you kidding me. That is exactly what happened. Utah liked him and he fit with what Utah needed. It worked perfectly for him.

After he played on another summer league team previously.  Look, it worked out well for him.  It didn't work out because he wasn't drafted.  If he wouldn't have stuck with the Jazz, he would have stuck somewhere else.

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on June 24, 2013, 11:54:58 PM
You guys think if Blue asked Buzz if he could be the starting point if he returned that Buzz would turn down the offer?

Buzz is going to play him where he thinks it is best for the team.  My guess is that he wouldn't take his starting 2-guard, and best player on the team, and move him to point guard to help develop Vander's NBA resume.  Vander will have to work to develop that in the NBA, Europe or NBDL.

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 25, 2013, 08:35:42 AM

Buzz is going to play him where he thinks it is best for the team.  My guess is that he wouldn't take his starting 2-guard, and best player on the team, and move him to point guard to help develop Vander's NBA resume.  Vander will have to work to develop that in the NBA, Europe or NBDL.

+1

Why would Buzz sit Derrick Wilson, Duane Wilson and John Dawson to make room for Vander to play out of position?

Buycks had to play PG out of necessity ... and DJO never play PG that year (meaning not every 2G is also a PG).  Next year's team will not be short PGs.

With friends like these, Van's right in knowing he doesn't need enemies.

Quote from: murobrob on June 25, 2013, 07:32:39 AM
Vander Blue is popping up on mock drafts in the second round and SI.Com lists him as one of the top 50 prospects for the draft on Thursday....just relaying he is on radar screens of some so-called experts.  I say he gets drafted in the second round by a team that is looking for the potential of a lock-down defender who is athletic, works hard and has upside potential.   Marquette is developing a nice reputation for developing that toughness and it translates into the NBA game.   Butler's rising status, Crowder's first year as an undersized but hardworking rookie and Wes' success give a bit of a halo to a guy like Blue.   This may sound ludicrous, but a team like the Heat who do not need any scoring punch but could have used some fresh, quicker legs than Ray Allen to guard the perimeter and stop the open 3s against the Spurs could reach for a player like Blue to provide some minutes off the bench and let him develop around some great talent.

I don't know if it's "ludicrous," but it simply wouldn't have happened.

Ray Allen was out there because the Heat needed somebody to spread the floor and create space for LeBron and/or Wade. If Spoelstra wanted to put an offensive liability on the floor to improve the team's perimeter D, he could have gone with Norris Cole. But he didn't because he wanted the 3-point threat on the floor. And one thing we know for certain that Vander isn't is a 3-point threat. Somehow, even without Vander Blue, when the Heat committed to stop giving Green open 3s, he stopped getting them. They are a great defensive team, and Spoelstra is a very underrated coach.

Quote from: Golden Avalanche on June 25, 2013, 10:45:07 AM
With friends like these, Van's right in knowing he doesn't need enemies.

I don't see anything unfair in this thread.

If the poll was "Do you hope Vander gets drafted?" the response would be overwhelmingly positive.

Quote from: AnotherMU84 on June 25, 2013, 09:35:27 AM
+1

Why would Buzz sit Derrick Wilson, Duane Wilson and John Dawson to make room for Vander to play out of position?

Buycks had to play PG out of necessity ... and DJO never play PG that year (meaning not every 2G is also a PG).  Next year's team will not be short PGs.

Blue at PG>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Derrick and Dawson at PG. You seriously wondering why Buzz would Blue over the two?
It's not like there is ton of experience at the PG spot. You have 2 freshmen and a guy that has limited experience. Blue has some experience himself and I thought he did a better job than Wilson.

And it wouldn't have to be the whole game. Just give Blue the keys to start the game and to be officially listed as their PG and bring in the Wilsons off the bench for a combined 20+ minutes a game at PG. It wouldn't even be hard to justify in playing Blue, Mayo, Wilson, McKay, and Otule together going big with a lot of offense. A ton of height and ability to run the floor. I actually like that lineup (or other combinations with Blue at PG) over giving the keys to a guy that has zero scoring.

Quote from: martyconlonontherun on June 25, 2013, 11:59:25 AM
Blue at PG>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Derrick and Dawson at PG. You seriously wondering why Buzz would Blue over the two?
It's not like there is ton of experience at the PG spot. You have 2 freshmen and a guy that has limited experience. Blue has some experience himself and I thought he did a better job than Wilson.

What I said was that Buzz is going to do what is best for the team.  And I am sure that if Buzz had an idea that moving him over to point might be best for the team, that he told Vander that before he decided to enter the draft.  And it didn't convince him to stay.

And if Buzz thought it wasn't best for the team, then he would have flat out told Vander that.

So my point is that there really isn't all that much to think about here.

Quote from: Terror Skink on June 25, 2013, 12:09:16 PM

What I said was that Buzz is going to do what is best for the team.  And I am sure that if Buzz had an idea that moving him over to point might be best for the team, that he told Vander that before he decided to enter the draft.  And it didn't convince him to stay.

And if Buzz thought it wasn't best for the team, then he would have flat out told Vander that.

So my point is that there really isn't all that much to think about here.

Fair enough. It started by someone saying he should have came back for a year and played PG. Someone said Buzz wouldn't do that. I think Blue had no desire to come back and agree it wasn't plausible. I just find it funny that people think Buzz wouldn't accommodate a player of Blue's quality to convince him to come back as a leader of the team and help him reach the next level. Buzz wants to win and is smart enough to realize Blue at PG is better than no Blue.