MUScoop
MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Stronghold on March 27, 2013, 12:14:32 PM
-
http://insider.espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/blog/_/name/ncbexperts/id/9099369/matchup-nightmares-sweet-16-games-college-basketball
-
My hard-earned money...all for you:
East Region
Indiana Hoosiers: Victor Oladipo
You could almost always make a case for Oladipo being a matchup nightmare, but it's especially true for this game. Against the Syracuse zone, Oladipo's ability to get to the offensive glass, get into seams off the drive, and catch in the middle of the zone to either shoot or get the ball to open teammates will be critical. He's a tough one for the Orange to account for. On defense, Oladipo likely will have the responsibility of defending Brandon Triche, which is important because when Triche plays well, Syracuse plays well.
Syracuse Orange: C.J. Fair
Fair isn't a guy who can break you down off the dribble, but his cumulative effect on the game could give Indiana trouble. He runs the floor hard; he is difficult to keep off the offensive glass; and his length on defense creates turnovers, which could be Syracuse's best offense against IU. And even though he doesn't have a lot of plays run for him, Fair can score.
Miami Hurricanes: Shane Larkin
I've written about Larkin a lot this season, but I have to pick him for this one, too. He is the one who makes everything go for Miami -- his ability to see all five defenders, make the correct read on ball screens, and either score himself or distribute to his teammates is really hard to defend. He's a menace defensively, as well, as he has great hands, feet and anticipation.
I think Marquette will put Junior Cadougan on Larkin and do its best to push up on him and get over the Canes' ball screens, trying to extend the defense and making Larkin work in the full court.
Marquette Golden Eagles: Vander Blue
Blue is playing at an elite level right now. He is fearless taking it to the basket, and that, along with his ability to make shots in recent games, makes him very tough to defend. He wants the ball in late-game situations, and he is playing with the swagger of a player who knows this is his team right now.
I expect Miami to put Durand Scott on Blue, and this should be one of the best individual matchups in the tournament. Scott is strong enough and determined enough to defend Blue, and he's a guy who might feel a little underappreciated after having some tough breaks throughout his college career. He knows that this is his stage to shine on by shutting down his opponent's best player.
-
That's a pretty weak analysis of how we'll defend Larkin. "Eh, maybe they'll let the other PG guard him." No mention of D.Wilson.
-
Thanks Lens
-
That's a pretty weak analysis of how we'll defend Larkin. "Eh, maybe they'll let the other PG guard him." No mention of D.Wilson.
or Todd Mayo. He is so athletic and can be a defensive beast. I think Todd will make his season a success tomorrow night. We are rooting for you Todd. I want mayo all over that Larkin sandwich.
-
or Todd Mayo. He is so athletic and can be a defensive beast. I think Todd will make his season a success tomorrow night. We are rooting for you Todd. I want mayo all over that Larkin sandwich.
What has Todd Mayo done in the last 15 games to make anyone think that's a good idea?
-
What has Todd Mayo done in the last 15 games to make anyone think that's a good idea?
I completely agree with you, Bocephys.....not much. I just feel that we will struggle with Larkin's athleticism, and Vander can't do it all for the entire game. Todd has the athletic ability, and I believe Buzz is the kind of coach that can make him click when it really counts. Almost like the Jake Thomas 4 point play.
-
Cadougan can't guard Larkin one on one. Jr. will be left in his wake.
-
What has Todd Mayo done in the last 15 games to make anyone think that's a good idea?
See Dame, Notre.
-
I think they run Vander or even Lockett at Larkin. Miami doesn't assist a lot anyway(10 per game) and half of them come from Larkin(5 per game). If you cut off Larkin's distribution and scoring, you severely weaken their offense. Plus Vander is long enough to recover off screens without giving up the pick and rolls.
-
Put Junior on Larkin and have them clunk heads. It worked against Tra Woodall and Pitt.
-
Not sure how this is really up for question. Larkin is 6'2, 6'3. Derrick is 6'1. Derrick is our best defensive weapon. Larkin pg, Derrick pg. Case closed to me.
-
Not sure how this is really up for question. Larkin is 6'2, 6'3. Derrick is 6'1. Derrick is our best defensive weapon. Larkin pg, Derrick pg. Case closed to me.
Larkin is listed 5'11, 176 by Miami.
-
Larkin is listed 5'11, 176 by Miami.
Reallly? Wow, even better! I thought i read an ESPN article that had him listed as 6'2, 6'3
-
Not sure how this is really up for question. Larkin is 6'2, 6'3. Derrick is 6'1. Derrick is our best defensive weapon. Larkin pg, Derrick pg. Case closed to me.
Larkin is not 6'2" If he's really 5'10" I'd be surprised.
-
Larkin is not 6'2" If he's really 5'10" I'd be surprised.
All the more reasoning i'm perplexed that people are trying to figure out who's going to smother him.
-
Put Junior on Larkin and have them clunk heads. It worked against Tra Woodall and Pitt.
Seconded, but that was Derrick Wilson.
-
Larkin is not 6'2" If he's really 5'10" I'd be surprised.
Good catch. Espn lists at 5'11, so he's probably more like 5'10.
-
Good catch. Espn lists at 5'11, so he's probably more like 5'10.
Tim Doyle said he's no taller than 5'9" on The Score this morning.
-
Tim Doyle said he's no taller than 5'9" on The Score this morning.
Bring back Junior Mints for a "little people" fight.
-
I think they run Vander or even Lockett at Larkin. Miami doesn't assist a lot anyway(10 per game) and half of them come from Larkin(5 per game). If you cut off Larkin's distribution and scoring, you severely weaken their offense. Plus Vander is long enough to recover off screens without giving up the pick and rolls.
I like Trent alot, but no way should he cover Larkin. Way too slow.
-
That's a pretty weak analysis of how we'll defend Larkin. "Eh, maybe they'll let the other PG guard him." No mention of D.Wilson.
It's shallow, but may be accurate. Let Junior guard Larkin and let our better defenders clog the passing lanes. Force Larkin to only beat us one-on-one. Junior may struggle to stay with him, but if we take away his playmaking ability he becomes a lot more mortal.
-
It's shallow, but may be accurate. Let Junior guard Larkin and let our better defenders clog the passing lanes. Force Larkin to only beat us one-on-one. Junior may struggle to stay with him, but if we take away his playmaking ability he becomes a lot more mortal.
Letting him go at it 1-on-1 will ALLOW Larkin to make a play: Larkin beats his man off the dribble, 2nd level defender helps, Larkin kicks out for a shot.
I'm curious how a zone might take them out of the penetration game, especially with no 6'10" underneath.
-
Letting him go at it 1-on-1 will ALLOW Larkin to make a play: Larkin beats his man off the dribble, 2nd level defender helps, Larkin kicks out for a shot.
I'm curious how a zone might take them out of the penetration game, especially with no 6'10" underneath.
Clemson did it twice. They hedged the lanes and Larkin had subpar games both times they played him. Granted, Miami won both games, but we are a much better team than Clemson in nearly every facet of the game.