MUScoop

MUScoop => The Superbar => Topic started by: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:12:31 PM

Title: Jamie Dixon Staying At Pitt
Post by: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:12:31 PM
Resigned with the school through 2023. So much for the move to LA, Chico!
Title: Jamie Dixon Staying At Pitt
Post by: T.V. Diener 34 on March 23, 2013, 04:12:32 PM
Just announced... signed new deal through 2022-2023 season lol
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 23, 2013, 04:20:53 PM
Quote from: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:12:31 PM
Resigned with the school through 2023. So much for the move to LA, Chico!

Yup.

I said it was a rumor. Enough that was making the rounds in reputable news outlets.  

http://m.washingtonpost.com/sports/colleges/pittsburgh-coach-jamie-dixon-signs-extension-to-keep-him-with-panthers-through-2022-23/2013/03/23/1de5200c-93fe-11e2-8e33-9cc6c739d012_story.html

Howland is the one I'm pretty serious goes.

Did Gonzaga join the Big East yet?  Haven't seen that in anything reputable yet, Keefe!
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: The Process on March 23, 2013, 04:30:40 PM
Misleading subject.

Shouldn't it be "Jamie Dixon Re-Signs WITH Pitt?"

Here I was expecting to see some sort of drama about Jamie Dixon storming off from Pitt. ;)
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: netty24 on March 23, 2013, 04:31:27 PM
That is a slightly misleading title.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:31:53 PM
Quote from: ChicosBailBonds on March 23, 2013, 04:20:53 PM
Yup.

I said it was a rumor.  Howland is the one I'm pretty serious goes.

Did Gonzaga join the Big East yet?

I'm waiting to see the G5 flight from Gainesville to SMO.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:33:35 PM
Quote from: netty24 on March 23, 2013, 04:31:27 PM
That is a slightly misleading title.

I was effing with Chicos.

Reminds me of the reinterpretation of Augustine. It was believed that Augustine wrote sex was for re-creation but further analysis confirms he meant sex is for recreation!
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: netty24 on March 23, 2013, 04:34:51 PM
Quote from: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:33:35 PM
I was effing with Chicos.

Reminds me of the reinterpretation of Augustine. It was believed that Augustine wrote sex was for re-creation but further analysis confirms he meant sex is for recreation!

Ahh, i see.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: 4everwarriors on March 23, 2013, 04:36:04 PM
Quote from: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:31:53 PM
I'm waiting to see the G5 flight from Gainesville to SMO.


Can a 787 land in Santa Monica?
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: The Process on March 23, 2013, 04:40:31 PM
Quote from: 4everwarriors on March 23, 2013, 04:36:04 PM

Can a 787 land in Santa Monica?

Seeing as they're still grounded other than test flights, that'd be quite the feat to get one to even take off.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: Avenue Commons on March 23, 2013, 04:47:31 PM
Quote from: netty24 on March 23, 2013, 04:31:27 PM
That is a slightly misleading title.

Slightly misleading? It says Dixon is leaving (FROM) Pitt.

In reality he RE-signed WITH Pitt.

I expect MQ grads to be better with their prepositional phrases.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: real chili 83 on March 23, 2013, 04:48:30 PM
Superbar?   ;)
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: Avenue Commons on March 23, 2013, 04:49:14 PM
Quote from: Avenue Commons on March 23, 2013, 04:47:31 PM
Slightly misleading? It says Dixon is leaving (FROM) Pitt.

In reality he RE-signed WITH Pitt.

I expect MQ grads to be better with their prepositional phrases.

Sorry, missed that it was a joke.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on March 23, 2013, 04:53:42 PM
Quote from: 4everwarriors on March 23, 2013, 04:36:04 PM

Can a 787 land in Santa Monica?

Can a 787 fly without an issue, let alone a landing?
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Resigns From Pitt!
Post by: keefe on March 23, 2013, 04:55:36 PM
Quote from: 4everwarriors on March 23, 2013, 04:36:04 PM

Can a 787 land in Santa Monica?

I would have to look at a Jepsen but I referenced a G5 which easily slides in there.

I just looked at the Op Reps for SMO and a 78 could land there but all traffic for the past two years has been Class D VFR with Itinerant Traffic mixed in. The problem a 78 would have is not runway length but noise restrictions. I doubt they get below the 95 dBA SENEL. This is especially critical in recovery on short field which requires heavy reverse thrust. Looking at their noise limits you'd get written up pretty easily which means some heavy fines. F#cking California. People buy a home near an airfield that's been there forever then bitch about the noise. Go figure.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Staying At Pitt
Post by: chapman on March 23, 2013, 04:56:06 PM
Guess they're still confident even after another tournament crap-out.  Guessing JTIII and Brey will be asking for extensions as well after crapping out even harder.
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Staying At Pitt
Post by: keefe on March 23, 2013, 05:00:02 PM
Quote from: chapman on March 23, 2013, 04:56:06 PM
Guess they're still confident even after another tournament crap-out.  Guessing JTIII and Brey will be asking for extensions as well after crapping out even harder.

That's funny. Barkley had a great comment after the other guy read the announcement. He remarked, "Just think what sort of an extension he would have gotten if he hadn't lost in the first round!"
Title: Re: Jamie Dixon Staying At Pitt
Post by: Jay Bee on March 24, 2013, 01:52:22 AM
Oh, Dixon is signed through 2023? That's cool.

We signed a dude through 2017.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev