MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 08:25:31 AM

Poll
Question: Should ferguson and Taylor Jr get more playing time?
Option 1: No, everythings fine
Option 2: Yes, significantly more
Option 3: Yes, 4-5 per game
Option 4: More Taylor, less Ferguson
Option 5: More Ferguson, less Taylor
Title: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 08:25:31 AM
I think Steve Taylor Jr and Jamal Ferguson should get more playing time. Let me know what you think.   


MU fan in Texas
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: MU B2002 on January 09, 2013, 08:28:14 AM
How many threads or posts do you need to make on the same exact topic?  Your superbar thread is not invisible.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 08:42:38 AM
Just trying to put it in the right forum. Sorry for messing up your day!!!! NO LOVE 4 AMATEURS AT MUSCOOP I SEE. Same as the bball team. Lol
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: brewcity77 on January 09, 2013, 08:47:59 AM
They should only get more time if the goal is to lose more games and sink our NCAA hopes. If Buzz wants to get fired, they should get a lot more time. Both should start and see 20-25 mpg, more if they can take it.

God no. Unquestionably no. They aren't ready on the defensive end. I'm glad Taylor can contribute a few minutes here and there when Juan and Jamil are in foul trouble, but I don't need to see them any more than that. They aren't ready.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: GGGG on January 09, 2013, 08:53:11 AM
Quote from: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 08:42:38 AM
Just trying to put it in the right forum. Sorry for messing up your day!!!! NO LOVE 4 AMATEURS AT MUSCOOP I SEE. Same as the bball team. Lol


You won't get a different answer here than you did in the Superbar.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: TexMex on January 09, 2013, 09:12:35 AM
He will get more exposure.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 09:20:13 AM
You guys are truly over optimistic about the defense we play. If you look at the transition defense and ball rotation d, we're leaving long range shooters open all day. That's why our games are so close. J Wilson can't stop getting his hand caught in the cookie jar (STOP reaching) averaging 4 fouls a game. So be truthful when talking defense. Ferguson is long, moves his feet, and plays the lane. Body size means nothing when you're defending the wing. Wings are not posting!
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: GGGG on January 09, 2013, 09:23:45 AM
Quote from: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 09:20:13 AM
You guys are truly over optimistic about the defense we play. If you look at the transition defense and ball rotation d, we're leaving long range shooters open all day. That's why our games are so close. J Wilson can't stop getting his hand caught in the cookie jar (STOP reaching) averaging 4 fouls a game. So be truthful when talking defense. Ferguson is long, moves his feet, and plays the lane. Body size means nothing when you're defending the wing. Wings are not posting!


You think our perimeter defensive issues are new this year?  This has been a major problem since Buzz has gotten here and is inherent with the scheme they play - teams that rotate the ball quickly are invariably going to get a decent look from deep.  How are Ferguson or Taylor going to change that?
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Dawson Rental on January 09, 2013, 09:29:27 AM
Quote from: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 09:20:13 AM
You guys are truly over optimistic about the defense we play. If you look at the transition defense and ball rotation d, we're leaving long range shooters open all day. That's why our games are so close. J Wilson can't stop getting his hand caught in the cookie jar (STOP reaching) averaging 4 fouls a game. So be truthful when talking defense. Ferguson is long, moves his feet, and plays the lane. Body size means nothing when you're defending the wing. Wings are not posting!

Let's review.
  1. MU's problem is perimeter defense.
  2. Ferguson is long and plays the lane.
  3. Body size (i.e. being long) means nothing when guarding the perimeter.
  4. Therefore, playing Ferguson is the answer to MU's perimeter defense problems.

Does this make sense to you?
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: MarsupialMadness on January 09, 2013, 09:31:45 AM
I think they are at about the right amount of minutes right now... I could maybe see S Taylor getting a couple more ticks.  I agree with what you said (in the other thread I think) that Jake Thomas deserves less time.  He is really bringing nothing to the table right now and overall is just a liability on the court.  I don't see how swapping his minutes with Taylor would be a bad thing.  With Vander, Mayo, Blue, D Wislon, and then Lockett, Jamil, Juan, and Taylor who can all kinda play that in betweener role, I just don't see where Thomas fits in.  Sure, ideally he could spread the defense out with his shot, but it isn't there, and everyone realizes that.  I trust that Buzz is trying to get him into his rythym and get his confidence as a shooter going, but he's not aggressive (which everyone else on our team is, so him not being aggressive slows down everyone) and he's slow on defense.

So yes, I wouldn't be against giving Taylor and Ferguson a couple more minutes, if it means Thomas will be getting a couple less minutes.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: MarsupialMadness on January 09, 2013, 09:34:38 AM
double post
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: GGGG on January 09, 2013, 09:47:02 AM
Thomas' minutes have fallen off the map since Mayo got back.  In the last three games he has gotten 3, 5 and 2.  Should Ferguson get those minutes instead of him?  I don't know...Buzz doesn't seem to think so.  Thomas at least knows where he is supposed to be and what he is supposed to be doing.

Taylor will play more in situations where it is called for.  Against UConn, who had a relatively weak front court, his interior scoring was important...but he still screwed up defensively.  Against Georgetown's length, it was clear that Buzz thought more experienced options like Lockett and Wilson were better - and they both had solid games.

Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 09:49:33 AM
Love the way you think MarsupialMadness. Intelligent minds think alike. To Little Murs, body size has nothing to do with body length. We are all educated her. Your word games don't work. Good try. Lol
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: brewcity77 on January 09, 2013, 09:49:49 AM
Quote from: LittleMurs on January 09, 2013, 09:29:27 AM
Let's review.
  1. MU's problem is perimeter defense.
  2. Ferguson is long and plays the lane.
  3. Body size (i.e. being long) means nothing when guarding the perimeter.
  4. Therefore, playing Ferguson is the answer to MU's perimeter defense problems.

Does this make sense to you?

+1

I'm a fan of passion and all that, but Billybob, give it a rest. That shovel you're using is only digging you deeper. From shallow argument to digging into a manure pile. Not really going well for you here.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: GGGG on January 09, 2013, 09:51:22 AM
Quote from: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 09:49:33 AM
We are all educated her.


Delicious irony keeps me going throughout the day.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: 🏀 on January 09, 2013, 10:07:53 AM
Someone confess, who showed their grandpa how to post on Scoop?
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 10:09:55 AM
Yo momma!! That is funny!!!
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 09, 2013, 10:12:18 AM
You guys are brutal but passionate. Thanks for the convo. Talk to you after the game. GO MU!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: GGGG on January 09, 2013, 10:16:28 AM
In all honesty Billybob, thanks for joining and know that we give all new guys a hard time around here.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: bkooncy on January 09, 2013, 10:49:39 AM
I haven't thought that Juan has brought much to the floor his defense is average at best, he still gets caught in bad positions, and hasn't been able to help on drives as well as he should.  His offense has been well below average missing open jumpers his fg% 381 ft%.526 and 3fg% .250 is horrible.  I think Taylor and Juan should be splitting minutes some what like CO and Gardner do when Wilson is in foul trouble.  However it all depends on the team that we're playing and if we need defense or offense more. 
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: MarsupialMadness on January 09, 2013, 11:26:16 AM
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on January 09, 2013, 09:47:02 AM
Thomas' minutes have fallen off the map since Mayo got back.  In the last three games he has gotten 3, 5 and 2.  Should Ferguson get those minutes instead of him?  I don't know...Buzz doesn't seem to think so.  Thomas at least knows where he is supposed to be and what he is supposed to be doing.



To me, it doesn't seem like Thomas knows where or what he is supposed to be doing.

But you're right, Buzz obviously sees something and that's why he is in there.  The correct answer is that Taylor and Ferguson are Freshman and have A LOT to learn/adapt to.  Their big experience should come on the practice court right now... but I think Taylor has been holding his own for the limited time he's been getting.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Stretchdeltsig on January 09, 2013, 03:15:32 PM
I think Taylor can plug in and help not hurt the team.  Ferguson has a long wingspan and looks like a gifted athlete.  They both should play more. 
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Skatastrophy on January 09, 2013, 03:40:00 PM
They both play like freshmen.  They should be happy getting the minutes the do with the number of lapses they still have.  I'm excited for the upside on both of them, though!
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: 4th and State on January 09, 2013, 04:50:38 PM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on January 09, 2013, 03:40:00 PM
They both play like freshmen.  They should be happy getting the minutes the do with the number of lapses they still have.  I'm excited for the upside on both of them, though!

Me too.  I think Taylor is playing the appropriate amount minutes but Ferguson should've gotten more PT up to this point over Thomas.  He probably won't see much time the rest of the way though.  Unfortunatly, I think he'll probably end up transfering after his Soph season as I believe JaJuan Johnson will pass him on the depth chart next season.  
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 10, 2013, 03:22:23 PM
I've beem reading around and alot of you are ok with MU just making the tournament. One question: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU MEDIOCRE ASS WIPES! Demand more and way may get more. I want Final Four. I want Championship. It's possible.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Bocephys on January 10, 2013, 03:26:50 PM
Quote from: Billybob on January 10, 2013, 03:22:23 PM
I've beem reading around and alot of you are ok with MU just making the tournament. One question: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU MEDIOCRE ASS WIPES! Demand more and way may get more. I want Final Four. I want Championship. It's possible.

Not by playing two mediocre freshman more.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: leever on January 10, 2013, 03:30:21 PM
Quote from: Billybob on January 10, 2013, 03:22:23 PM
I've beem reading around and alot of you are ok with MU just making the tournament. One question: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU MEDIOCRE ASS WIPES! Demand more and way may get more. I want Final Four. I want Championship. It's possible.

Well, "way may" get more, or "way may" not.  I'm guessing you're not getting very much of what you want.
Title: Re: Ferguson and Taylor
Post by: Billybob on January 10, 2013, 04:27:55 PM
You feel the team's mediocre any. Mediocre freshmen should fit in well, right! Loving the excuses.
Quote from: Bocephys on January 10, 2013, 03:26:50 PM
Not by playing two mediocre freshman more.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev