MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: JD on January 06, 2013, 02:25:42 PM

Title: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: JD on January 06, 2013, 02:25:42 PM
1. No offense to Buzz Williams, but when I looked at Marquette's Big East schedule, I wouldn't have pegged the Golden Eagles to be 2-0 in league play with wins over Connecticut and Georgetown. But that's the scenario following Marquette's overtime victory against the Huskies on New Year's Day and Saturday's 49-48 squeaker against the Hoyas. Marquette lost its top two players (Jae Crowder and Darius Johnson-Odom) from last season's team and didn't really replace them with much. Before last week, its best win was against a mediocre Wisconsin squad. And who could forget that 33-point loss to Florida? As always, though, the Golden Eagles are playing great defense under Williams. Georgetown's 48 points were 18 below its season average of 66.

Just a small tidbit from Espn.

http://espn.go.com/ncb/notebook/_/page/notebookweeklywatch130106/pick-n-roll
Title: Re: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: Pakuni on January 06, 2013, 02:44:59 PM
Quote from: JDuquaine on January 06, 2013, 02:25:42 PM
1. No offense to Buzz Williams, but when I looked at Marquette's Big East schedule, I wouldn't have pegged the Golden Eagles to be 2-0 in league play with wins over Connecticut and Georgetown. But that's the scenario following Marquette's overtime victory against the Huskies on New Year's Day and Saturday's 49-48 squeaker against the Hoyas. Marquette lost its top two players (Jae Crowder and Darius Johnson-Odom) from last season's team and didn't really replace them with much. Before last week, its best win was against a mediocre Wisconsin squad. And who could forget that 33-point loss to Florida? As always, though, the Golden Eagles are playing great defense under Williams. Georgetown's 48 points were 18 below its season average of 66.

Just a small tidbit from Espn.

http://espn.go.com/ncb/notebook/_/page/notebookweeklywatch130106/pick-n-roll

Huh??
Title: Re: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: JD on January 06, 2013, 02:46:45 PM
Review the right side of the article....

"just a SMALL tidbit from Espn"
Title: Re: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: LloydMooresLegs on January 06, 2013, 04:35:09 PM
And this, quoted before the OP quote at the top of the linked page:


Marquette: The Golden Eagles had struggled to win key games outside of their rivalry home game against Wisconsin. That's why if Marquette had a chance to be a player in the Big East, it had to win its first two league games of the season. And it did, beating UConn in overtime and Georgetown -- both at home. Neither was a good-looking game, but Marquette made the right plays.
Title: Re: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: We R Final Four on January 06, 2013, 05:34:16 PM
Quote from: JDuquaine on January 06, 2013, 02:25:42 PM

And who could forget that 33-point loss to Florida?

Not Mike Hunt, that is for certain.
Title: Re: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: RubyWiscy on January 06, 2013, 06:37:14 PM
Don't quite get the "No offense to Buzz..." part of the statement. Is this what you call a backhanded insult, the opposite of a backhanded complement?
Title: Re: No offense to Buzz...
Post by: classof2k on January 06, 2013, 08:20:17 PM
I think the "no offense" comment was referring to the first sentence - i.e. that there was not an expectation that Buzz's team was capable of starting BE play 2-0.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev