MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: Avenue Commons on December 18, 2012, 12:09:36 PM

Title: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Avenue Commons on December 18, 2012, 12:09:36 PM
Just occurred to me that no one is discussing Holy Cross as an option. Gives the league Boston and with Bill Simmons/ESPNs help could be a player.

Here's the Simmons article from a few years ago:
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/070328&sportCat=ncb
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Dawson Rental on December 18, 2012, 12:13:57 PM
Quote from: Avenue Commons on December 18, 2012, 12:09:36 PM
Just occurred to me that no one is discussing Holy Cross as an option. Gives the league Boston and with Bill Simmons/ESPNs help could be a player.

Holy Cross doesn't want to be big time that's why they went to the Patroit League.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: chapman on December 18, 2012, 12:16:58 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on December 18, 2012, 12:13:57 PM
Holy Cross doesn't want to be big time that's why they went to the Patroit League.

Yep.  All about basketball commitment.  If they want to join, show us that then point out your geography and we can take a look in 2016.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: brewcity77 on December 18, 2012, 12:23:04 PM
You forgot the teal.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: hutchfor3 on December 18, 2012, 12:23:18 PM
Because they are terrible and don't care about basketball.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: warriorchick on December 18, 2012, 12:24:28 PM
Quote from: hutchfor3 on December 18, 2012, 12:23:18 PM
Because they are terrible and don't care about basketball.

And they stole our fight song.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: MUMountin on December 18, 2012, 12:25:18 PM
Too small (less than 3000 students), and Worcester is not Boston.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: 4everwarriors on December 18, 2012, 12:29:14 PM
Man, if the idea is to just find 10-12 basketball schools, that's not too hard. If you wanna try to be elite, with all the fixin's that come with it, well, then I'm glad LW is leadin' this crusade and not fellow bonehead Scoopers.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Dawson Rental on December 18, 2012, 12:33:58 PM
Quote from: warriorchick on December 18, 2012, 12:24:28 PM
And they stole our fight song.

The way my Dad told it, Notre Dame stole Holy Cross' fight song.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Pakuni on December 18, 2012, 12:34:35 PM
Well, for starters, there's the issue with them being Holy Cross.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: GGGG on December 18, 2012, 12:37:32 PM
What about Stetson?  How come nobody brings up that vital link to the Florida market?
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Dawson Rental on December 18, 2012, 12:43:16 PM
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on December 18, 2012, 12:37:32 PM
What about Stetson?  How come nobody brings up that vital link to the Florida market?

LOL.  Would Stetson agree to renaming itself Southeast Cupcake University?
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: warriorchick on December 18, 2012, 12:48:41 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on December 18, 2012, 12:33:58 PM
The way my Dad told it, Notre Dame stole Holy Cross' fight song.


Nope, it's ours.  Listen for yourself -- different arrangement, but same song.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_Lz6-elbsY
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Aughnanure on December 18, 2012, 12:58:22 PM
Would've been nice if Holy Cross had stayed committed to basketball or joined the Big East when it began w/ Providence. They actually run a pretty solid athletic dept with 25 varsity sports though.

Same goes for BU. Would be nice to have a school in that market, would solidify the East Coast contingent. But it's not meant to be.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: slack00 on December 18, 2012, 01:11:22 PM
There are plenty of rea$ons why Holy Cross i$n't included with the re$t of the $chools that are being con$idered.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: frozena pizza on December 18, 2012, 01:15:43 PM
Diener's performance against Holy Cross in the 2003 first round game is still one of my all-time favorites.  That's about all I can say for Holy Cross.  That and Chris Matthews went there in case that makes a difference.

By the way, some people need to put a little more thought into what "brings you a market".  Just because you get a school from a certain metropolitan area into your conference, that does not mean that everyone in that city suddenly becomes a fan of your conference.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: bilsu on December 18, 2012, 01:57:30 PM
Quote from: frozena pizza on December 18, 2012, 01:15:43 PM
Diener's performance against Holy Cross in the 2003 first round game is still one of my all-time favorites.  That's about all I can say for Holy Cross.  That and Chris Matthews went there in case that makes a difference.

By the way, some people need to put a little more thought into what "brings you a market".  Just because you get a school from a certain metropolitan area into your conference, that does not mean that everyone in that city suddenly becomes a fan of your conference.
We came very close to losing that game. I wonder where we would be today, if we had lost that game?
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: ChicosBailBonds on December 18, 2012, 02:00:21 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on December 18, 2012, 12:13:57 PM
Holy Cross doesn't want to be big time that's why they went to the Patroit League.

Patriot League is changing to full scholarships next year I believe.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: MerrittsMustache on December 18, 2012, 02:03:02 PM
Quote from: bilsu on December 18, 2012, 01:57:30 PM
We came very close to losing that game. I wonder where we would be today, if we had lost that game?

We'd be SLU.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: icheights on December 18, 2012, 02:04:25 PM
Quote from: frozena pizza on December 18, 2012, 01:15:43 PM
By the way, some people need to put a little more thought into what "brings you a market".  Just because you get a school from a certain metropolitan area into your conference, that does not mean that everyone in that city suddenly becomes a fan of your conference.

By bring you a market it means television sets with access to your conference's games...not necessarily fans of a conference, so yes having a team in a market does bring you that market.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Benny B on December 18, 2012, 02:08:46 PM
Quote from: bilsu on December 18, 2012, 01:57:30 PM
We came very close to losing that game. I wonder where we would be today, if we had lost that game?

We'd be a bunch of whiners trumpeting how solid and close-knit our middling conference is while secretly hoping that the new Big East lobs us an invite.

In other words, we'd be UDPride.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: 🏀 on December 18, 2012, 02:21:02 PM
Well done, Sultan. Well done.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: The Equalizer on December 18, 2012, 02:25:28 PM
Quote from: hutchfor3 on December 18, 2012, 12:23:18 PM
Because they are terrible and don't care about basketball.

No different than DePaul.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Pakuni on December 18, 2012, 02:35:17 PM
Quote from: The Equalizer on December 18, 2012, 02:25:28 PM
No different than DePaul.

DePaul spent $6.5 million on its basketball program in 2010, seventh most in the Big East. More than Pitt, Villanova, Cincinnati, St. John's and West Virginia, and not far behind UConn. They're paying their coach $1.8 million a year.
They care. They've just made a lot of bad decisions to put them where they are today.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: JD on December 18, 2012, 02:38:59 PM
Why don't we try for the University of Phoenix, or Rassmussen College?

They have a lot of commercials, and probably can add to our conference...

Teal isn't necessary i hope.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Benny B on December 18, 2012, 03:07:24 PM
Quote from: JDuquaine on December 18, 2012, 02:38:59 PM
Teal isn't necessary i hope.

Not for most.  But there's usually at least one horse that can't find his way back to the stable, so it's nice that you left the door open.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: frozena pizza on December 18, 2012, 04:01:11 PM
Quote from: icheights on December 18, 2012, 02:04:25 PM
By bring you a market it means television sets with access to your conference's games...not necessarily fans of a conference, so yes having a team in a market does bring you that market.

First of all, Holy Cross is roughly an hour from Boston.  So is Providence.  There are 52 colleges in Boston and almost none of them would result in us getting a better TV deal even within Boston.  Most games are televised nationally or regionally and the best way to get exposure is to play good teams with fans who will watch.  Playing Gonzaga probably gets us more attention in Boston than Holy Cross. 
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Dish on December 18, 2012, 04:16:53 PM
Since ND is out, we really should focus on getting St. Mary's. We'd still be relevant in South Bend then once ND comes around.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Badgerhater on December 18, 2012, 04:45:28 PM
Once Alverno adds men to their underclass enrollment then it could join the league.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: tower912 on December 18, 2012, 04:47:08 PM
Holy Cross?   As what, the name for the new conference?
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: 🏀 on December 18, 2012, 04:47:25 PM
Call me crazy, but the University of Chicago used to be in the Big Ten.

DePaul can cater to the northsiders and Chicago would be good for the southsiders.

It only makes sense for full-market penetration.

Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Dawson Rental on December 18, 2012, 04:56:42 PM
Quote from: JDuquaine on December 18, 2012, 02:38:59 PM
Why don't we try for the University of Phoenix, or Rassmussen College?

They have a lot of commercials, and probably can add to our conference...

Teal isn't necessary i hope.

University of Phoenix would be okay, except the athletic department would never be sure where to fly to for away games.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: JD on December 18, 2012, 05:01:20 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on December 18, 2012, 04:56:42 PM
University of Phoenix would be okay, except the athletic department would never be sure where to fly to for away games.

+1

You're right, maybe DeVry, or Kaplan is a better choice.  I'm not sure if they stack up academically compared to the University of Phoenix though?

Ok, in all seriousness.  Why in the world would we want Holy Cross?  That's like suggesting we should get Houston, Seatle, Denver, just because of their markets.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: warriorchick on December 18, 2012, 05:09:13 PM
Quote from: LittleMurs on December 18, 2012, 04:56:42 PM
University of Phoenix would be okay, except the athletic department would never be sure where to fly to for away games.
t

Duh - to Phoenix.  That's where their football stadium is.


Wright, Clay baby?
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Dawson Rental on December 18, 2012, 05:17:23 PM
Quote from: warriorchick on December 18, 2012, 05:09:13 PM
t

Duh - to Phoenix.  That's where their football stadium is.


Wright, Clay baby?

I know what jsglow is getting for Christmas!

A night cap that is a replica of a Green Bay Packer helmet.
Title: Re: Why aren't we talking about Holy Cross?
Post by: Avenue Commons on December 18, 2012, 07:30:33 PM
Didn't mean to I mean to imply I thought they are a better option than Creighton, SLU, etc.

To be honest I was only thinking of the Boston angle. Didn't realize Worcester was that far from Boston. Also thought their program was better than it is. Guess I relate it to Bob Cousy and 2003 tourney.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev