MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: lessthannick11 on May 29, 2012, 09:16:07 PM

Title: semi exciting?
Post by: lessthannick11 on May 29, 2012, 09:16:07 PM
DJO's tweet about Tony Parker was just on the Spurs game halftime show as they show off "NBA" players talking about the game. Has to be a good sign right?
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Blackhat on May 29, 2012, 10:42:37 PM
they gotta take him now.   tweets are binding.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Hards Alumni on May 30, 2012, 06:38:09 AM
I don't want to be captain bummer Stone Cold, but really, do you need 2 huge gifs in your signature?  They take up my whole screen.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Skatastrophy on May 30, 2012, 07:48:23 AM
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on May 30, 2012, 06:38:09 AM
I don't want to be captain bummer Stone Cold, but really, do you need 2 huge gifs in your signature?  They take up my whole screen.

+1

Permaban Stone Cold.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: wadesworld on May 30, 2012, 08:18:11 AM
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on May 30, 2012, 06:38:09 AM
I don't want to be captain bummer Stone Cold, but really, do you need 2 huge gifs in your signature?  They take up my whole screen.

And they slow the site down big time when you're on the iPhone...
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: GGGG on May 30, 2012, 08:39:27 AM
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on May 30, 2012, 06:38:09 AM
I don't want to be captain bummer Stone Cold, but really, do you need 2 huge gifs in your signature?  They take up my whole screen.


You can hide signatures, but yeah...it is a little much.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: brewcity77 on May 30, 2012, 08:57:29 AM
Am I the only one that thinks something completely different when they see the thread title? More along the "this is so excited I get a semi just thinking about it"? Or am I just the odd pervy guy? ;D
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: dwaderoy2004 on May 30, 2012, 09:23:37 AM
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on May 30, 2012, 06:38:09 AM
I don't want to be captain bummer Stone Cold, but really, do you need 2 huge gifs in your signature?  They take up my whole screen.

Just go to your profile and check the hide signatures box.  poof, problem solved.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Skatastrophy on May 30, 2012, 09:41:10 AM
Quote from: dwaderoy2004 on May 30, 2012, 09:23:37 AM
Just go to your profile and check the hide signatures box.  poof, problem solved.

We don't want to see no signatures, we just don't want to scroll down a whole page every time a frequent contributor happens to post :)
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: brewcity77 on May 30, 2012, 09:44:39 AM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on May 30, 2012, 09:41:10 AM
We don't want to see no signatures, we just don't want to scroll down a whole page every time a frequent contributor happens to post :)

Big fan of not allowing pics in signatures. While tasteful, small pics can work well, it's far easier just to not allow them because invariably someone goes overboard.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Hards Alumni on May 30, 2012, 09:47:32 AM
Quote from: Skatastrophy on May 30, 2012, 09:41:10 AM
We don't want to see no signatures, we just don't want to scroll down a whole page every time a frequent contributor happens to post :)

exactly, I like some of them... but two pictures is a bit much.

And I guess I could just go overboard with mine to prove a point...
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: SoCalwarrior on May 30, 2012, 02:37:10 PM
Go to your Profile settings, then click look and layout link. You can check don't show user's signatures.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: brewcity77 on May 30, 2012, 02:44:46 PM
Quote from: SoCalwarrior on May 30, 2012, 02:37:10 PM
Go to your Profile settings, then click look and layout link. You can check don't show user's signatures.

But I think many of us don't want to ignore all the signatures. I rather enjoy most people's signatures. I just don't want the insanely huge pictures and gifs that take up way more space than a "signature" is intended to or slows down my phone so the site becomes near unreadable when I'm using that to access the Internet.

Just my 2ยข, but it seems like signatures should be a tag line, a humorous quote, an enjoyable (short) post, or a link to something of value. Massive gifs of tin foil hats, Novak's championship belt animation, or flying elephants (for a few examples) don't really have a "signature" feel.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: MU B2002 on May 30, 2012, 03:42:02 PM
Quote from: brewcity77 on May 30, 2012, 08:57:29 AM
Am I the only one that thinks something completely different when they see the thread title?


I thought we were finally going to talk about tractor trailers.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Skatastrophy on May 30, 2012, 03:45:33 PM
Welp, ignoring Stone Cold was easier than anything else.  Sorry SC :)
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Blackhat on May 30, 2012, 05:27:01 PM
this should be more satisfying to the collective scoop palate.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Dawson Rental on May 30, 2012, 09:10:34 PM
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on May 30, 2012, 09:47:32 AM
exactly, I like some of them... but two pictures is a bit much.

And I guess I could just go overboard with mine to prove a point...

Be sure to include a diss on a moderator's wife, and you'll have it all.
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Hards Alumni on May 31, 2012, 07:28:11 AM
Quote from: Stone Cold on May 30, 2012, 05:27:01 PM
this should be more satisfying to the collective scoop palate.

Thank you!
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Skatastrophy on May 31, 2012, 08:11:20 AM
Quote from: Hards_Alumni on May 31, 2012, 07:28:11 AM
Thank you!

+1

Unban Stone Cold! :)
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: Tugg Speedman on May 31, 2012, 08:49:59 AM
Will this thread ever get back to DJO or is it permanently gone?
Title: Re: semi exciting?
Post by: leever on May 31, 2012, 08:58:57 AM
Quote from: AnotherMU84 on May 31, 2012, 08:49:59 AM
Will this thread ever get back to DJO or is it permanently gone?

Enlund hasn't reported anything about DJO.  What's to discuss?
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev