MUScoop

Crowder wins Big East POY; side-by-side comparison with the great Kevin Jones

Written by: noreply@blogger.com (bamamarquettefan1)


table.tableizer-table {border: 1px solid #CCC; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;} .tableizer-table td {padding: 4px; margin: 3px; border: 1px solid #ccc;}
.tableizer-table th {background-color: #104E8B; color: #FFF; font-weight: bold;}

Conference PlayJae CrowderKevin JonesAdvantage [/tr]

Shots Taken	219	285	KJ took 66 more shots…
Points on field goals	256	297	… to score just 41 more pts
Points per shot	1.17	1.04	or 58.4 eFG% to 52.1%, ADV JC
2-pt FG%	63.4%	53.5%	ADV JC
3-pt FG%	34.1%	31.9%	ADV JC
FT%	77.3%	80.5%	KJ 70 pts to 68 pts on FT
Rebounds	149	203	ADV KJ
Assists	39	15	ADV JC
Steals	53	8	ADV JC
Blocks	22	19	ADV JC
Head-to-Head Pts.	26	12	ADV JC

In congratulating Jae Crowder for winning Big East Player of the Year today, I want to start by first congratulating Kevin Jones.  Putting on my stat cruncher hat instead of my MU hat for a moment, I thought that finishing non-conference play with a 28 point, 17 rebound game against Baylor on December 23, Kevin Jones was the second best player in the country behind Anthony Davis.  That followed up a 30/12 performance against K-State.

Jae Crowder was playing like an All-American in non-conference play as well, but Jones looked like he had a shot at National Player of the Year.

I say all this to point out that Jae just won a Super Bowl in beating out Kevin Jones for Conference Player of the Year.  However, in a side-by-side Crowder was better in every aspect except for rebounding.

The argument that Jones also averaged more points (19.0 ppg to 18.0 ppg in conference play) doesn't hold up once you realize Jones took 66 more shots than Jae to score 41 more points on field goals (43 more points when you add free throws).  So when you realize that Jae was actually a better scorer, shot blocker, had well over twice as many assists and more than six times as many steals, and shut down Jones in their head-to-head, it really was a clear choice.

For overall play all season Value Add ranks Crowder as the No. 2 move valuable player in the country and Jones as the No. 4 â€" so that’s a coin toss.  However, in conference play Jae had a pretty clear advantage in a Super Bowl of candidates.

http://www.crackedsidewalks.com/2012/03/crowder-wins-big-east-poy-side-by-side.html

Thanks for putting together a cogent fact-based argument for Crowder's excellence this Big East season.  I still can't believe Jae actually got the award, I was convinced people voting would look at nothing but raw points and rebounds, which is exactly what the WVU fan base is doing. Both players were deserving, but Crowder's dominance in other stats tips the scales.  Someone should post the CS link on the WVU board!

Thx! I've posted it on a couple of wv newspaper sites in a very respectful manner. It is a shame either of them had to come in 2nd, but it would have been a greater injustice if jae didn't get it.

Just putting the steals next to each other pretty much justifies everything for me.  Rebounding is great, but Jae's defense and steals have been so key to a lot of points this year.  Agreed with the others-thanks for setting up the chart!