No swearing, no name calling, just a request to the moderators to please end unnecessary embarrassment to MU Avenue's children by banning him. Please. Thank you.
I mean if the ignore button was considered inadequate to deal with Chicos...
...this guy is far worse, IMO.
Chicos at least brought information to the table, even if it tended to be considered "negative" news/opinions from around the internet by many.
Quote from: LittleMurs on March 01, 2012, 01:21:24 PM
No swearing, no name calling, just a request to the moderators to please end unnecessary embarrassment to MU Avenue's children by banning him. Please. Thank you.
I mean if the ignore button was considered inadequate to deal with Chicos...
...this guy is far worse, IMO.
LAME.
And, I don't even like to read Mu Avenue's schtick.
Quote from: MUCam on March 01, 2012, 01:25:57 PM
LAME.
And, I don't even like to read Mu Avenue's schtick.
In all honesty, how?
Calling out a poster in the title of a thread is lame. Just ignore him. Not difficult.
Quote from: The Sultan of South Wayne on March 01, 2012, 01:28:46 PM
Calling out a poster in the title of a thread is lame. Just ignore him. Not difficult.
Point taken. He does get to me a little
too much.
Quote from: LittleMurs on March 01, 2012, 01:33:24 PMPoint taken. He does get to me a little too much.
+1
He only posts when he has something negative to say. He creates sky is falling threads either to torture himself or wind up the board. He is the epitome if a troll. Honestly, Wisconsin fans couldn't troll this site as well as he does. If CBB had to go, someone who brought positive value to the board even in antagonism, then why allow someone like MU Ave, who brings nothing but negativity? There is no redeeming value to him as a member that I can see, so why allow members like that?
Ban hammer.
Completely disagree. MUAvenue is a debby downer, but to my knowledge he has never said anything objectionable. Banning someone just because his perspective is annoying is the absolute wrong thing to do. I may jab at him, but banning him is just plain wrong.
Bans come when posters break the posted rules after 2,3,4...12 warnings. We're pretty tolerant. With that said, this thread has no where left to go, so lets move on.