MUScoop

MUScoop => Hangin' at the Al => Topic started by: MisterJaylenBrownMU on January 31, 2012, 09:23:39 AM

Title: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: MisterJaylenBrownMU on January 31, 2012, 09:23:39 AM
For those interested in what the Selection Committee looks at when making selections and seeding, they released their exact and current cards for all teams.  Marquette is page 156.

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+01-29+mbb+team+sheets (http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+01-29+mbb+team+sheets)
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: reinko on January 31, 2012, 09:27:17 AM
Quote from: MisterDMU on January 31, 2012, 09:23:39 AM
For those interested in what the Selection Committee looks at when making selections and seeding, they released their exact and current cards for all teams.  Marquette is page 156.

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+01-29+mbb+team+sheets (http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+01-29+mbb+team+sheets)

Keep cheering on Norfolk St (RPI 94) and Nova (RPI 92), 4 of our top 100 RPI wins this year.
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: Bieberhole69 on January 31, 2012, 09:33:38 AM
Quote from: reinko on January 31, 2012, 09:27:17 AM
Keep cheering on Norfolk St (RPI 94) and Nova (RPI 92), 4 of our top 100 RPI wins this year.

Norfolk St moved to 116 after losing to Coppin St last night
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: cj111 on January 31, 2012, 09:36:16 AM
They scored 69 points in the second half; unfortunately, they only scored 13 in the first.
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: reinko on January 31, 2012, 09:52:09 AM
Quote from: Bieberhole69 on January 31, 2012, 09:33:38 AM
Norfolk St moved to 116 after losing to Coppin St last night

(http://jonhoward.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/04/01/doh.jpg)
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: MarquetteDano on January 31, 2012, 10:07:22 AM
Thanks for posting this.  Seeing how the RPI divisions are presented reminds me how flawed it is.  Looking at it, you could have a team that had a bunch of wins at home in the RPI 1-50 column with a lot of teams 30-50.  Then you could have another team with few wins in the 1-50 column but loads of wins against 51-70 and AWAY games at that.

I would be more impressed with the latter team but the way that data gets presented it would be easy to miss it.

A shame as well that none of the other rating systems are used.  Would be more interesting to average RPI, Sagarin, Poweroy kind of how the BCS does it.
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: LON on January 31, 2012, 12:16:56 PM
Transparency Initiative = Here you go Seth Greenberg, quit yer bitchin'.
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: brewcity77 on January 31, 2012, 02:43:42 PM
Quote from: Bieberhole69 on January 31, 2012, 09:33:38 AMNorfolk St moved to 116 after losing to Coppin St last night

If they win out, they should finish top-100. Hopefully Coppin State was just one off game.
Title: Re: NCAA Selection Card (Transparency Initiative)
Post by: Hoopaloop on January 31, 2012, 04:20:42 PM
Quote from: MisterDMU on January 31, 2012, 09:23:39 AM
For those interested in what the Selection Committee looks at when making selections and seeding, they released their exact and current cards for all teams.  Marquette is page 156.

http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+01-29+mbb+team+sheets (http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/pdfs/2012/2012+01-29+mbb+team+sheets)

More than ever, this sure seems to show the importance of the RPI.  The selection committee has said they use other factors, but the RPI is a big one whether we like it or not.  Last year proved that to be the case for a number of bubble teams.
EhPortal 1.39.9 © 2025, WebDev