1st Half (MU vs Winthrop)
Possessions: 36
Efficiency: 1.20 vs 1.05
eFG%: 67% v 53%
TO%: 16% vs 20%
OR%: 19% vs 22%
FTR: Irrelevant
2nd Half (MU vs Winthrop)
Possessions: 39
Efficiency: 1.27 vs 0.92
eFG%: 67% vs 42%
TO%: 18% vs 15%
OR%: 33% vs 33%
FTR: Irrelevant
Full Game (MU vs Winthrop)
Possessions: 76
Efficiency: 1.24 vs 0.98
eFG%: 67% vs 48%
TO%: 17% vs 17%
OR%: 24% vs 27%
FTR: Irrelevant
Offense continues to roll along. MU is again looking strong at protecting the ball, and that offensive eFG% is sick. 1H defensive eFG% was crap, but it got much better in the 2H.
Net Points Contributions
Positive
Vander +9.0
DJO +7.9 (close on pts, more rbs, less to's)
Otule +3.8
Mayo +1.8
Jamail +0.9
Negative
Junior -0.5
Jae -1.0
TFON -1.6
JWilson -2.4
DWilson -4.8
I was a little surprised that DJO was so close to Vander. Would have thought the spacing would be larger. Nice performance by Otule. Jae surprised me a bit. He gets dinged a bit for the two TO's and not taking many FTs.
TFON=Davante?
TFON= The Freak Of Nature?
Henry, are there goals or baselines for eFG%? What is the number where we say That was great, or good, or lousy defense? Can one look at certain stats and predict the score? What are some glaring exceptions>
Yeah, TFON is a name that Tim and I are putting on Gardner. It's an abbreviation for The Force of Nature. As in... Gardner is an Unstoppable Force of Nature.
Here are the ranges from last year on eFG%.
#1 - 42%
#50 - 46%
#100 - 47.5%
#150 - 49%
#200 - 49.6
#214 - 49.5% (MARQUETTE last year)
#250 - 51%