1st Half (MU vs NFSU)
Possessions: 39
Efficiency: 1.03 vs 0.76
eFG%: 50% vs 46%
TO%: 21% vs 37%
OR%: 29% vs 24%
FTR: Irrelevant
2nd Half (MU vs NFSU)
Possessions: 43
Efficiency: 1.39 vs 0.90
eFG%: 70% vs 56%
TO%: 12% vs 26%
OR%: 18% vs 26%
FTR: Irrelevant
Full Game (MU vs NFSU)
Possessions: 81
Efficiency: 1.22 vs 0.84
eFG%: 61% vs 52%
TO%: 16% vs 31%
OR%: 24% vs 25%
FTR: Irrelevant
Overall, a really solid efficiency margin. TO% margin was strong. However, that defensive eFG% is very concerning.
Net points contributions
Crowder +10.5
DJO +9.4
Mayo +5.1
Blue +4.5
Jamil +3.5
Gardner +1.7
DWilson -0.6
Otule -0.8
Cadougan -1.1
Jamail -2.5
Is net points thr plus/minus number when on the court?
Quote from: Lennys Tap on November 15, 2011, 12:57:32 PM
Is net points thr plus/minus number when on the court?
Pretty close to a plus/minus, but it's not the same.
A better way of looking at it is, "MU won by 31 points. How much did each player contribute to that 31 point margin of victory?" I think of it more as, "was this player's impact on the court a net positive or net negative contribution, and by how much?"